James Madison believed that U.S. forces should support local revolts in Florida, which had been ceded to the United States from Spain in 1819.
What is local revolt?Local revolt is a term used to describe the uprising of a local population against a ruling authority or a set of laws. Revolts can take many forms, from peaceful protests to violent insurrections. Local revolts often occur when people feel their rights and freedoms are being infringed upon or when there is a lack of representation or accountability from the ruling authority. The motivations for local revolt can vary greatly, but they are usually rooted in a sense of injustice or oppression. Local revolts often represent a challenge to the legitimacy of the ruling authority and can be seen as a form of resistance or protest against a system of governance.
Madison appointed former Georgia governor, General George Mathews, to lead a contingent of U.S. military forces into Florida to help support the local revolts. Madison argued that the revolts were legitimate and that the U.S. had a responsibility to assist those who were pushing for freedom and democracy. This effort ultimately failed, but it demonstrated Madison's commitment to supporting freedom and democracy abroad.
To learn more about violent insurrections
https://brainly.com/question/22588346
#SPJ9
Which of the following is an ideology by John Locke
a) The poor should have property
The occultation of smallpox
c) Christianity should be spread through emotions
d) The idea of life, liberty, and property
Answer:
I'm sure it's
d) The idea of life, liberty, and property.
Let me know if it's right. :)
Hope it helped! :)
Answer:
d
Explanation:
I'm pretty sure so yea bye
What happened to the price of goods that the colonists exported? What action(s) did the colonists take in response to mercantilism?
How did Nixon's law and order platform collide
with the Warren Court?
1. Nixon's law and order platform collided with the Warren Court primarily because the Warren Court was known for expanding the rights of criminal defendants and promoting social justice, whereas Nixon's platform focused on law enforcement and stricter punishment for offenders.
2. The Warren Court made several landmark decisions that aimed to protect the rights of criminal defendants, such as Miranda v. Arizona, which established the Miranda warning that police officers must give to suspects in custody, and Gideon v. Wainwright, which ensured that indigent defendants have the right to an attorney.
3. These decisions were viewed by Nixon and his supporters as being too lenient on criminals and hindering law enforcement efforts.
4. Nixon ran his presidential campaign on a platform of "law and order," emphasizing the need for tougher crime laws and increased police presence.
5. He also appointed conservative judges to the Supreme Court who were more aligned with his views on law enforcement and criminal justice.
6. The clash between Nixon's law and order platform and the Warren Court's focus on expanding rights for criminal defendants resulted in tension between the executive and judicial branches of government.
7. This tension was evident in Nixon's attempts to push for stricter crime laws and his criticism of the Warren Court's decisions, which he believed were too liberal and undermined law and order.
Learn more about Earl Warren, here:
brainly.com/question/12541536
If you need anything in the interim, please contact my assistant"
A block of wood has a density of 0. 6 g/cm3 and a volume of 1. 2 cm3. What is the mass of the block of wood?
AYUDA RAPIDO TENGO 1 HORA PARA RESPONDER ESTO NESESITO DE AYUDA
The mass of the block of wood is 0.72 g in the given case
The formula to calculate the mass of an object is:
Mass is a measure of the amount of matter in an object. It is a scalar quantity and its unit is measured in kilograms (kg) in the SI system. Mass is different from weight, which is a measure of the force exerted on an object by gravity and is dependent on the object's mass and the acceleration due to gravity at a particular location.
mass = density x volume
In this case, the density of the block of wood is 0.6 g/cm3 and the volume is 1.2 cm3. Plugging in these values, we get:
mass = 0.6 g/cm3 x 1.2 cm3
mass = 0.72 g
Therefore, the mass of the block of wood is 0.72 g.
To know more about assistant HERE
https://brainly.com/question/25964907
#SPJ4
HELP ME ITS URGENT
Why did Athens thrive while Sparta died out?
on what basis does douglass demand the end of slavery? how do his arguments relate to the ideology of the american revolution?
25 This map shows a trade system that emerged in the 1500s and
reached its height in the 1700s.
Transatlantic Slave Trade
on Line ape
IN
-E
A Labor demands of the factory system
B Invention of the steamboat
C Labor demands of the plantation system
D Invention of the mechanical loom
Recons
construct
Which factor was a reason for the trade system illustrated on this
map?
Answer:
A B and
Explanation:
i think it'sone of the.
What does Chapman mean when he writes, "I am sure you
agree that this is not just a problem for Jewish people to work out alone, but one of urgent
concern for America and all the United Nations"?
Chapman could be making a statement about the need for cooperation and collaboration among different groups to tackle societal issues that affect us all.
What major problems faced by the Jews that concerned America and the rest of the world?Amongst major problems that have faced the Jews which have concerned America and the rest of the world included:
1. Anti-Semitism: Anti-Semitism has been a major problem that has affected Jews around the world, including in Europe, the Middle East, and America.
2. Holocaust: During World War II, the Nazi regime led by Adolf Hitler systematically murdered six million Jews in what is known as the Holocaust.
3. Israeli-Palestinian conflict: The Israeli-Palestinian conflict has been an ongoing issue for decades, and it has had a significant impact on the Jewish community and the rest of the world.
These are some of the major problems that have faced the Jews and have concerned America and the rest of the world.
learn more about Chapman: https://brainly.com/question/30016202
#SPJ1
How the impact of power endured or change over time during the Mongol empire ?
Answer:
The impact of power during the Mongol Empire changed over time in several ways.
Expansion and Conquest: At the height of its power, the Mongol Empire, under the leadership of Genghis Khan and his successors, rapidly expanded its territories through conquest. The Mongols established one of the largest empires in history, stretching from Asia to Europe, and their military conquests brought significant changes in political power, economic systems, and social structures in the regions they conquered.
Centralization and Consolidation: The Mongols established a centralized system of government in their empire, where power was concentrated in the hands of the Great Khan and his family. The Mongols implemented policies to consolidate their rule, including the establishment of a hierarchical administrative structure, adoption of a census system, and imposition of Mongol laws and customs in the territories they conquered.
Cultural Exchange and Influence: The Mongols were known for their tolerance of different cultures and religions, which resulted in cultural exchange and influence between the Mongols and the conquered peoples. This led to the adoption of Mongol customs, language, and practices by some of the conquered populations, and also influenced the Mongols themselves, leading to changes in their way of life and governance.
Decline and Fragmentation: Over time, the Mongol Empire faced challenges such as internal conflicts, succession struggles, and external pressures from other powers. As a result, the empire started to decline and eventually fragmented into different Khanates, each with its own rulers and power centers. This led to a loss of central authority and a weakening of Mongol power over time.
Legacy and Impact: Despite the eventual decline of the Mongol Empire, its impact on the regions it conquered and its legacy endured. The Mongols left lasting influences on the political, economic, social, and cultural systems of the regions they ruled. Their conquests and rule had long-term effects on trade routes, diplomatic relations, cultural exchange, and governance structures in Eurasia, shaping the history of those regions for centuries to come.
In summary, the impact of power during the Mongol Empire changed over time due to expansion, centralization, cultural exchange, decline, and fragmentation. The legacy of the Mongol Empire continued to endure in the regions it conquered, shaping the history and development of those regions in various ways.
Your welcome!
As a result of Senator McCarthy's crusade against communist subversion in America
a) the FBI was shown to have had several spies working as communist agents.
b) the United States Army was forced to give dishonorable discharges to more than one hundred officers.
c) the State Department lost a number of Asian specialists who might have counseled a wiser course in Vietnam.
d) Eisenhower nearly lost the Republican presidential nomination in 1956.
e) the United States achieved a stronger settlement in Korea.
Senator McCarthy's crusade against communist subversion in America resulted in several negative consequences, including damage to the credibility of the FBI, dishonorable discharges of over one hundred officers, and the loss of Asian specialists in the State Department.
As a result of Senator McCarthy's crusade against communist subversion in America, several negative consequences occurred. Firstly, it was discovered that the FBI had several spies working as communist agents, which was a major blow to the agency's credibility. Additionally, the United States Army was forced to give dishonorable discharges to over one hundred officers, which damaged morale and undermined trust in the military. The State Department also suffered losses as a number of Asian specialists who might have counseled a wiser course in Vietnam were let go. Finally, Eisenhower nearly lost the Republican presidential nomination in 1956 due to the controversy surrounding McCarthy's tactics. While the United States achieved a stronger settlement in Korea, the cost of McCarthy's crusade was high and had long-lasting negative consequences.
Know more about communist subversion in America here:
https://brainly.com/question/9789401
#SPJ11
The United States gained a virtual right of intervention in Cuba in the a. insular cases. b. Platt Amendment. c. Teller Amendment. d. Foraker Act.
Select the correct answer.
Which of the following statements describes the command economy of the Soviet Union?
OA. The government allowed private businesses to produce goods and services demanded by the market
O B.
The government decided what goods and services would be produced and supplied to the market.
O C.
The government allowed workers to own the means of production.
OD. The government ensured high wages for workers.
Answer:
O B.
Explanation:
The answer is B, since the Soviet Union tightly controlled what would be allowed in the market.
Under the Great Compromise, representation in the Senate was:
Under the Great Compromise, representation in the Senate was evenfor all states
How the Great Compromise affect the senateThe Great Compromise, better referred to as the Connecticut Compromise, was devised in order to allot equivalent Senate representation towards each state of the union, regardless of their population size.
Every single state received two Senators as part and parcel of this arrangement; thereby assuring that smaller states would partake in an identical role as large and populous states within this legislative unit. This compromise sought to satisfy both large and small states concerning the formation of a new nation's legislative body during the inceptive United States Constitution drafting process of 1787.
Learn more about great compromise at
https://brainly.com/question/5172111
#SPJ1
Your assignment, you need to look at what was happening in Germany under Hindenburg (the leader prior to Hitler). What did he do that set in motion the rise of the Nazis? What economic factors were at play in Germany that Hindenburg couldn’t control? Leadership matters, and how did his impact the era?
AND…how did Hitler and the Nazis step into the vacuum? In other words, how did they rise to power? Do you think it was inevitable that they would have seized power…or do you think Hitler’s rise could have been averted? Really the question is about, “how did Hitler come to power”...but I really want you to look at the process, the leadership styles etc.
During the Weimar Republic in Germany, Hindenburg served as president from 1925 until his death in 1934. His presidency was marked by political and economic instability in Germany, which paved the way for the rise of the Nazis.
What actions triggered the rise of the Nazis?One of Hindenburg's main actions that sparked the rise of the Nazis was his decision to appoint Hitler as Chancellor of Germany in January 1933. Hindenburg believed that he could control Hitler and that the Nazis would help stabilize the country.
Therefore, this decision proved to be a grave mistake, as Hitler and the Nazis quickly seized power and established a dictatorship, which led to the horrors of the Holocaust and World War II.
Find out more about Nazis at:
https://brainly.com/question/11331942
#SPJ1
Can somebody please help me with this essay?? I'd greatly appreciate it!!
(I'll raise the points & mark brainlest) Do not copy & paste someone else's please
Using at least 4 sources (an encyclopedia, the Internet, or other resources), discuss your chosen topic in a detailed report of at least 750-800 words. Make sure you use proper grammar, punctuation, and spelling. At the end of the report, include a bibliography listing all your sources.
Korean War:
Division after World War II
Invasion and Pusan Perimeter
Landing at Inchon
Stalemate on the battlefield and negotiating table
Truce, no treaty, remained divided
The Korean War was a significant conflict that took place on the Korean Peninsula from 1950 to 1953. It was a result of the division of Korea after World War II, where the Soviet Union occupied the northern half, and the United States occupied the southern half. The North was led by Kim Il-sung, a communist dictator, while the South was led by Syngman Rhee, a pro-Western authoritarian.
Division after World War II:
The division of Korea occurred in 1945 after the end of World War II. The Soviet Union occupied the northern half of the peninsula, while the United States occupied the southern half. The division was supposed to be temporary until a unified Korean government could be established. However, the two superpowers had different ideas on how to achieve this goal.
The Soviet Union supported the establishment of a communist government in North Korea, while the United States supported the establishment of a pro-Western government in South Korea. As a result, both Koreas developed very different political and economic systems.
Invasion and Pusan Perimeter:
On June 25, 1950, North Korea invaded South Korea, hoping to reunify the peninsula under communist rule. The North Korean army quickly advanced, taking control of most of South Korea in a matter of weeks. The United Nations Security Council, led by the United States, intervened and authorized a military coalition to support South Korea.
The coalition's initial strategy was to establish a defensive line along the southern coast of South Korea, known as the Pusan Perimeter, while reinforcements arrived from other countries. The Pusan Perimeter held off the North Korean advance for several months, but the situation was becoming increasingly dire.
Landing at Inchon:
General Douglas MacArthur, the commander of the United Nations forces, devised a daring plan to turn the tide of the war. He proposed an amphibious landing at the port of Inchon, which was behind North Korean lines. The landing would cut off the North Korean supply lines and force them to retreat.
The landing took place on September 15, 1950, and was a stunning success. The North Korean army was caught off guard, and their supply lines were cut off. The UN forces quickly advanced and liberated the South Korean capital of Seoul.
Stalemate on the battlefield and negotiating table:
After the landing at Inchon, the UN forces pushed into North Korea and came close to the Chinese border. China, fearing a UN invasion, intervened and sent hundreds of thousands of troops to support the North Koreans.
The war quickly became a stalemate, with both sides fighting over the same ground for months. The UN forces tried several times to break through the North Korean lines, but they were met with fierce resistance. The Chinese troops proved to be a formidable opponent, and the war became a bloody and costly stalemate.
Negotiations to end the war began in 1951, but progress was slow. Both sides were unwilling to compromise, and the fighting continued for two more years. In 1953, an armistice was signed, ending the fighting, but no treaty was ever signed.
Truce, no treaty, remained divided:
The armistice established a demilitarized zone (DMZ) along the 38th parallel, which was supposed to be a buffer zone between North and South Korea. However, tensions remained high, and occasional skirmishes continued to occur.
Today, North Korea remains a communist dictatorship, while South Korea is a democratic republic. The two countries are still technically at war, and the DMZ remains one of the most heavily fortified borders in the world.
In conclusion, the Korean War was a significant conflict that had a lasting impact on the Korean Peninsula and the world. It was a result of the division of Korea after World War II
[tex]\huge{\colorbox{black}{\textcolor{lime}{\textsf{\textbf{I\:hope\:this\:helps\:!}}}}}[/tex]
[tex]\begin{align}\colorbox{black}{\textcolor{white}{\underline{\underline{\sf{Please\: mark\: as\: brillinest !}}}}}\end{align}[/tex]
[tex]\textcolor{blue}{\small\texttt{If you have any further questions,}}[/tex] [tex]\textcolor{blue}{\small{\texttt{feel free to ask!}}}[/tex]
♥️ [tex]{\underline{\underline{\texttt{\large{\color{hotpink}{Sumit\:\:Roy\:\:(:\:\:}}}}}}\\[/tex]
was the allied dual-thrust strategy the best one to use in the pacific war? why or why not?
Answer: The Allied dual-thrust strategy, which involved simultaneous advances towards Japan through the Pacific Islands and the Asian mainland, was a controversial strategy in the Pacific War.
On one hand, the strategy allowed the Allies to engage Japanese forces on multiple fronts, spreading their resources thin and making it more difficult for them to mount a cohesive defense. It also allowed the Allies to maintain pressure on Japan and prevent them from consolidating their forces in any one area.
On the other hand, the strategy required significant resources and stretched Allied supply lines, making it difficult to maintain momentum and supply troops effectively. The terrain and climate of the Pacific Islands also posed significant logistical challenges for the Allies, making it difficult to maintain troop morale and momentum.
Ultimately, the effectiveness of the dual-thrust strategy is difficult to evaluate definitively. Some argue that it was the best strategy given the circumstances of the war, while others argue that a more focused strategy on either the Pacific Islands or the Asian mainland would have been more effective. However, it is worth noting that the strategy did ultimately lead to Allied victory in the Pacific War.
Explanation:
You learned that the author's message in "The Battle of Greasy Grass" is that the battle "was a watershed moment in the history of Indigenous-U.S. relations." You also learned that the message in "The Little Horn Massacre" is that the battle was a disaster for the United States. Since the two accounts have the same general purpose, explain how the perspective of the accounts helps communicate the different messages.
By exposing the divergent perspectives of Indigenous peoples as well as the United States, the stories points of view aid in the communication of the various messages.
"The Little Horn Massacre" message:In addition to highlighting Indigenous peoples , "The Battle at Greasy Grass" under scores the battle's significance in influencing Indigenous U.S. relations.
Yet, "Some Little Horn " presents the conflict as a dreadful American defeat, showing the American military officials.
Both narratives aim to inform readers about the war, but they approach the task from various perspectives, shedding light on the complexity and subtleties of historical occurrences.
Readers are prompted to reflect critically on the events and draw their own judgements about the meaning and influence of the through the presentation of several viewpoints.
To know more about Indigenous peoples visit:
https://brainly.com/question/27960189
#SPJ1
Answer:
Explanation:
"The Battle of Greasy Grass" focuses on the struggle of Native Americans in the United States, emphasizing the effects of the battle on the community. "The Little Horn Massacre" focuses on the failure of the United States and the poor performance of the US military. Both have the same reason for looking at the war, but the diversity of points of view highlights particular angles of events and leads to different conclusions.
HIS THE IPACT OF PSEUDOSCIENTIFIC IDEAS OF RACE ON THE JEWISHNATION DURING THE PERIOD 1933 To 1946
Answer:
From 1933 to 1945, Nazi Germany carried out a campaign to “cleanse” the German society of individuals viewed as biological threats to the nation’s “health.” Enlisting the help of physicians and medically trained geneticists, psychiatrists, and anthropologists, the Nazis developed racial health policies that began with the mass sterilization of “genetically diseased” persons and ended with the near annihilation of European Jewry. With the patina of legitimacy provided by “racial” science experts, the Nazi regime carried out a program of approximately 400,000 forced sterilizations and over 275,000 euthanasia deaths that found its most radical manifestation in the death of millions of “racial” enemies in the Holocaust.
How would the US be different if the 1st Amendment didnt exist? you can put personal thoughts to :D
Answer:
Since the first amendment protects our freedom of expression, without it, we would be living in a world where the government controls us to a greater degree (no rallies/protests, the government can force one religion on everyone...etc)
Which factors(identify 3) were the most influential in the establishment and administration of residentials schools in Canada?
Evaluate the extent to which religion was the primary factor leading to conflict in
the period 1450–1750.
Answer:
The Incas, Mughals, and the Ottomans were examples of the empires that did practice religious tolerance, unlike many other states.
Explanation:
Write a letter pretending you are an American soldier in the Vietnam war to your mother. Use the words: Vietminh, Gulf of Tonklin Incident, Gulf of Tonklin Resolution, Battle of Ia Drang Valley
Answer:
Dear Mom,
I hope this letter finds you well. Life here in Vietnam is tough, but I'm doing my best to stay strong. I know you must be worried about me, but I want you to know that I'm doing everything I can to stay safe.
We've been fighting against the Vietminh for what seems like forever now. It's a difficult and dangerous war, but we're all dedicated to the cause. You may have heard about the Gulf of Tonkin Incident in the news. It was a scary time for us, but we knew we had to keep fighting. The Gulf of Tonkin Resolution was passed shortly after, which gave us more support and resources to continue the fight.
Recently, we were involved in the Battle of Ia Drang Valley. It was a long and grueling battle, but we managed to hold our ground and come out victorious. It's moments like these that make me proud to be a soldier, knowing that we're making a difference in this war.
I miss you and the rest of the family terribly, but I know that I need to be here fighting for what's right. Please take care of yourself and know that I love you.
Your son,
[Your Name]
What world-wide event, recently discovered by scientists, is used by some historians to describe the two hundred years near the end of the 3rd Millennium to explain civil unrest in many of the ancient river valley civilizations?
Whilst there has been no global phenomenon discovered by scientists that historians can solely attribute to the occurrence of civil unrest.
Why is this so.?This is because, within many ancient river valley civilizations during the final two centuries of the 3rd millennium, several factors have been identified as contributing significantly towards their eventual collapse.
Among these decisive influences are environmental deterioration, aggression from external parties, internal disputes and conflicts, as well as a failure in effective centralized political and economic structures.
Read more about civil unrest here:
https://brainly.com/question/242118
#SPJ1
Think about the news article excerpt you just read, and highlight the sentences that reveal the reporter's point of view.
The utterances of the speakers were still of a most inflammatory character, however, and the hearers who still remained grew riotous in demeanor. The police concluded to put an end to the disturbance, and advancing, ordered the crowd to disperse. At first the socialists fell back slowly, one of the speakers still urging them to stand firm. Suddenly the bombs were thrown. The police retorted instantly with a volley from their revolvers. The rioters answered with theirs, which shots showed they were provided with pistols. The mob appeared crazed with a frantic desire for blood and holding its ground, poured volley after volley into the midst of the officers.
But, the speakers' comments remained in being highly explosive, and the remaining audience members began behaving violently.
It was clear from their shooting that the rioters were armed as they fired back with their own weapons. The seemingly insane crowd held its position by firing volley after volley of shots at the police.
What is the main idea of the news story?News articles are written with the intention of informing and educating readers about current events and concerns. They are employed to inform readers on the topics they need or want to learn about.
What does the theory of crowd behavior entail?In a nutshell, the contagion theory holds that groups of individuals have an infectious effect that leads to irrational collective behavior. The contagion theory contends that individuals in a group exhibit emotional and impulsive behavior as a result of being influenced by the group's moods.
Learn more about contagion theory: https://brainly.com/question/12488533
#SPJ1
What were the three reasons the industrial revolution began in england
Tibetans who claim to have journeyed to the afterlife are known as:
a. Calisorts
b. Delogs c. Bon Priests d. Jadu
Answer: B
Tibetans who claim to have journeyed to the afterlife are known as Delogs.
In the 1928 presidential election, Herbert Hoover:
A. only won the popular vote.
B. only won with the support of labor unions.
C. won by a small margin.
D. won the election by a landslide.
Option (d), Herbert Hoover won the 1928 presidential election with a resounding victory.
Who was chosen to serve as president in 1928, just as the American financial crisis began?Hoover beat Democratic nominee Al Smith in a landslide after winning the Republican nomination for president in 1928. Hoover became president in 1929 at a time of general economic stability.
Why did Hoover achieve victory in 1928?Hoover became the party's front-runner once President Calvin Coolidge decided against running for reelection. Due to the inability of Hoover's rivals in his party to agree on a nominee, Hoover won a landslide majority of the vote at the Republican National Convention in 1928.
Learn more about Herbert Hoover: https://brainly.com/question/12255447
#SPJ1
Answer:
D
Explanation:
true or false: between 1000-1800, the worship of islam in africa was primarily concentrated to egypt and other regions adjacent to the arabian peninsula.
Answer:
true
Explanation:
What were the causes of the rise of the ‘New Right’ and how did that movement dramatically shift the nature of American politics?
Plans for talks between the United States and China stalled when:
A. The United States said it would reduce its military presence in
Asia.
B. The United States sent troops into Cambodia.
C. The United States asked permission to send an official to China.
D. The United States said it would consider agreements with China
over Taiwan.
Answer:
its BExplanation:
The United States sent troops into Cambodia in 1970 to disrupt and destroy North Vietnamese supply lines along the H o Chi Minh trail, which ran through Cambodia. President Nixon argued that this was necessary to protect American troops in Vietnam and to encourage the Vietnamese to negotiate a peace agreement. However, the invasion was highly controversial and led to widespread protests domestically and internationally. It also increased tensions with the Cambodian government and fueled the growth of the Khmer Rouge, which eventually took power and committed genocide in Cambodia.
Plans for talks between the United States and China stalled when the United States sent troops into Cambodia. Thus, option B is correct.
What was the US China conflict?Since January 2018, when American President Donald Trump started imposing tariffs and other trade restrictions on China in an effort to pressure it to stop what the U.S. claims are longstanding unfair trade practices and intellectual property theft, there has been a growing economic rift between the two countries.
According to the Trump administration, these practices can add to the trade imbalance between the United States and China, and the Chinese government demands that American technology be transferred to China. China's government retaliated against US trade sanctions by accusing the Trump administration of acting in a nationalist and protectionist manner. A tough phase one deal between the two parties was achieved in January 2020 after the trade war intensified through 2019; it ended with China in December 2021.
Learn more about U.S China conflict here:
https://brainly.com/question/12023017
#SPJ5