Please answer this question with a decent explanation - thank you.

Answer:

7,000 pounds

Step-by-step explanation:

One ton = 2,000 lbs

2,000 x 3.5 = 7,000

Answer: 7000 pounds I tried my best

Step-by-step explanation:

The given statement, "The sampling distribution of a single proportion is approximately normal if the number of successes or the number of failures is greater than or equal to 10" is True.

The sampling distribution of a single proportion is approximately normal if the sample size is large enough and the number of successes or the number of failures is greater than or equal to 10. This is known as the normal approximation of the binomial distribution.

The normal approximation to the binomial distribution is based on the central limit theorem, which states that as the sample size increases, the sampling distribution of the sample means approaches a normal distribution, regardless of the shape of the population distribution. In the case of the binomial distribution, the sample mean is the proportion of successes, and as the sample size increases, the sampling distribution of the sample proportion approaches a normal distribution.

When the number of successes or the number of failures is less than 10, the normal approximation to the binomial distribution may not be valid, and alternative methods, such as the exact binomial distribution or the Poisson approximation, may need to be used.

To learn more about sampling distribution, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/15201212

#SPJ11

The value of surface area of the pyramid is 1/8yd² (option a).

To find the surface area of a square pyramid, we need to add up the area of all its faces.

In this case, we can see from the net that the two equal sides of each triangular face are each 1/2 yard long, and the height of the pyramid is also 1/2 yard. Therefore, the length of the hypotenuse of each triangular face is given by the square root of (1/2)² + (1/2)² = √(2)/2 yards.

The area of each triangular face can be found by multiplying the length of the base (which is also 1/2 yard) by the height (which is 1/2 yard) and then dividing by 2, since the area of a triangle is given by 1/2 times the base times the height.

Therefore, the area of each triangular face is (1/2 x 1/2)/2 = 1/8 square yards.

Since the pyramid has four triangular faces, the total area of all the triangular faces is 4 times 1/8 square yards.

Hence the correct option is (a).

To know more about surface area here

https://brainly.com/question/27784309

#SPJ1

The Mean of the data is 87 secs. The Median is 99 secs.

The Range is 56 secs.

Given the data set for the number of secs that Braden ran in the 200-meter dash as: 56 sec, 99 sec, 112 sec, 56 sec, and 112 sec, first, order the data from lowest to highest.

56, 56, 99, 112, 112

Mean = sum of all data / number of data set = 435/5 = 87 secs.

Median = the middle data value which is 99 secs.

Mode = most appeared data value, thus, there is none that appeared the most. It means there is no mode.

Range = highest data value - lowest data value

= 56 secs.

Learn more about the mean, median and mode on:

https://brainly.com/question/30934274

#SPJ1

(a) The closest z-value to 0.2119 is -0.81, so c = -0.81.

(b) The closest z-value to 0.9515 is 1.43, so c = 1.43 or -1.43.

(c) The closest z-value to 0.9948 is 2.62, so c = 2.62.

(d) The closest z-value to 0.2546 is -0.53, so c = 0.53 or -0.53.

(a) For a standard normal distribution, we can find the value of c such that P(z < c) = 0.2119 using a standard normal distribution table or calculator. From the table, we can see that the closest probability value to 0.2119 is 0.2119 = 0.5893 - 0.3771.

This corresponds to z = -0.81 (the closest z-value to 0.2119 is -0.81), so c = -0.81.

(b) For a standard normal distribution, we can find the value of c such that P(-c < z < c) = 0.9030 using symmetry.

Since the distribution is symmetric about the mean, P(-c < z < c) = 2P(z < c) - 1 = 0.9030. Solving for P(z < c), we get P(z < c) = (1 + 0.9030)/2 = 0.9515.

From the standard normal distribution table or calculator, we find that the closest probability value to 0.9515 is 0.9515 = 0.3450 + 0.6064.

This corresponds to z = 1.43 (the closest z-value to 0.9515 is 1.43), so c = 1.43 or -1.43.

(c) Similarly, for P(z < c) = 0.9948, we find the closest probability value in the standard normal distribution table or calculator to be 0.9948 = 0.4999 + 0.4948.

This corresponds to z = 2.62 (the closest z-value to 0.9948 is 2.62), so c = 2.62.

(d) For P(z > c) = 0.6915, we can use symmetry to find the value of c. Since the distribution is symmetric about the mean, P(z > c) = P(z < -c) = 0.6915.

From the standard normal distribution table or calculator, we find that the closest probability value to 0.6915 is 0.6915 = 0.2546 + 0.4364.

This corresponds to z = -0.53 (the closest z-value to 0.2546 is -0.53), so c = 0.53 or -0.53.

Learn more about standard normal distribution

brainly.com/question/29509087

#SPJ11

The marginal PDF of x is a function of x^2, and the conditional PDF of y given x=a is a function of y^2.

To find the marginal and conditional PDFs, we need to first determine the value of the constant c.

Since this is a joint PDF, it must satisfy the condition that the integral of the PDF over the entire domain equals 1. Therefore, we have:

integral from -inf to +inf of (integral from -inf to +inf of cx^2 * xy^2 dy)dx = 1

Simplifying this expression, we get:

integral from -inf to +inf of (c/3)x^5 dx = 1

Solving for c, we get:

c = 3/[(2/3)*(pi^2)]

Therefore, the joint PDF is:

f(x,y) = (3/[(2/3)*(pi^2)]) * x^2 * y^2

Now, we can find the marginal PDF of x by integrating f(x,y) over y from negative infinity to positive infinity:

f_x(x) = integral from -inf to +inf of f(x,y) dy = integral from -inf to +inf of (3/[(2/3)*(pi^2)]) * x^2 * y^2 dy

Simplifying this expression, we get:

f_x(x) = (3/[(2/3)*(pi^2)]) * x^2 * integral from -inf to +inf of y^2 dy

The integral of y^2 over the entire domain is equal to infinity, but we can still normalize the marginal PDF by dividing it by its integral over the entire domain. Therefore, we have:

f_x(x) = (3/(pi^2)) * x^2, for -inf < x < +inf

Next, we can find the conditional PDF of y given x = a by dividing the joint PDF by the marginal PDF of x evaluated at x = a:

f(y|x=a) = f(x,y) / f_x(a)

f(y|x=a) = [(2/3)(pi^2)] / (3a^2) * y^2, for 0 < y < +inf

Therefore, the marginal PDF of x is a function of x^2, and the conditional PDF of y given x=a is a function of y^2.

Learn more about PDFs

brainly.com/question/31064509

#SPJ11

The two nonparallel vectors and the coordinates of a point in the plane with parametric equations is a = <2, 1, -1> = 2i + j -k and

b = <3, -5, 2> = 3i -5j + 2k.

Geometrical objects with magnitude and direction are called vectors. A line with an arrow pointing in its direction can be used to represent a vector, and the length of the line corresponds to the vector's magnitude. As a result, vectors are shown as arrows and have starting and ending points. It took 200 years for the idea of vectors to develop. Physical quantities like displacement, velocity, acceleration, etc. are represented by vectors.

Additionally, the development of the field of electromagnetic induction in the late 19th century marked the beginning of the use of vectors. For a better understanding, we will explore the concept of vectors in this section along with their characteristics, formulae, and operations while utilising solved examples.

r(s, t) = < x, y, z> = < 2s+3t, s-5t, -s+2t >

r(s, t) = < x, y, z> = < 0+2s+3t, 0+s-5t, 0-s+2t >

r(s, t) = < x, y, z> = < 0+0+0, s(2, 1, -1), t(3, -5, 2) >

In parametric form for following:

a = <2, 1, -1> = 2i + j -k

b = <3, -5, 2> = 3i -5j + 2k

and point P([tex]x_0,y_0,z_0[/tex]) = P(0, 0, 0)

Learn more about Vectors:

https://brainly.com/question/28028700

#SPJ4

The sequence converges, and the limit is 11/9, which is not among the given options (a, b, c, d, or e).

Based on the given sequence, we can see that the numerator (11n-1) and denominator (9n+2) both approach infinity as n approaches infinity. Thus, we can use L'Hopital's Rule to evaluate the limit:
lim (n→∞) [(11n-1)/(9n+2)]
= lim (n→∞) [(11/(9))]  (by applying L'Hopital's Rule)
= 11/9
Therefore, the sequence converges to 11/9 as n approaches infinity. Thus, the answer is b) converges to 11/9.
It seems like you are asking about the convergence of the sequence an = (11n - 1)/(9n + 2). To determine if it converges as n → ∞, we can analyze the terms in the sequence.
As n grows large, the dominant terms are 11n in the numerator and 9n in the denominator. Therefore, we can rewrite the sequence as an = (11n)/(9n), which simplifies to an = (11/9)n.
Now, we can easily see that as n → ∞, the sequence converges to a constant value. To find the limit, we can take the ratio of the coefficients:
Limit (an) = 11/9.
Therefore, the sequence converges, and the limit is 11/9, which is not among the given options (a, b, c, d, or e).

To learn more about sequence converges, click here:

brainly.com/question/21961097

#SPJ11

The area under the standard normal curve between z=-2.95 and z=2.61 is approximately 0.9942.

What is curve?

A curve is a geometrical object that is made up of points that are continuous and connected to form a line or a path. It can be defined mathematically by an equation or parametrically by a set of equations that describe the x and y coordinates of points on the curve as a function of a parameter such as time or distance along the curve.

Using a standard normal distribution table, we can find the area under the curve between z=-2.95 and z=2.61 as follows:

Area = Phi(2.61) - Phi(-2.95)

Where Phi(z) represents the cumulative distribution function of the standard normal distribution.

From the standard normal distribution table, we find:

Phi(2.61) = 0.9959

Phi(-2.95) = 0.0017

Therefore, the area under the curve between z=-2.95 and z=2.61 is:

Area = 0.9959 - 0.0017 = 0.9942

Rounding to four decimal places, we get:

Area ≈ 0.9942

Therefore, the area under the standard normal curve between z=-2.95 and z=2.61 is approximately 0.9942.

To learn more about curve visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31012623

#SPJ1

Answer:

  dw/dt = -cos(t)(2sin(t) +1)

Step-by-step explanation:

You want dw/dt for w = x² -y and x = cos(t), y = sin(t).

  w' = 2xx' -y' . . . . . . derivative with respect to t

  w' = 2cos(t)(-sin(t)) -cos(t) . . . . . substitute given relations

  dw/dt = -cos(t)(2sin(t) +1)

Answer:

[tex](-8, 15)[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

First, solve this system. Since [tex]y=y[/tex],

[tex]2x-1 = 2(x-1)+1\\2x-1=2x-2+1\\2x-1=2x-1[/tex]

Thus, they are the same equation.

Now, plug in to find:

[tex]-1 = 2(0)-1 (correct)\\3 = 2(2) -1 (correct)\\-5 = 2(-2) - 1 (correct)\\15 \neq 2(-8) - 1 (incorrect)\\15 = 2(8) - 1 (correct)[/tex]

Thus [tex](-8, 15)[/tex] is the ordered pair that doesn't work.

Answer:

2(2.5) + 2(4.5) + 2(1.75) + 3.25

= 5 + 9 + 3.5 + 3.25 = 14 + 6.75 = 20.75

= 20 3/4 feet

The length of the wall is 20 3/4 feet.

The work done in dragging the air compressor up the incline is 4,168.24 J.

To solve this problem, we need to determine the work done in dragging the air compressor up the incline.

First, we need to determine the change in height of the compressor:

Δy = y2 - y1

Δy = 4.4 m - 1.3 m

Δy = 3.1 m

Next, we need to determine the work done against gravity in lifting the compressor:

W_gravity = mgh

W_gravity = (25 kg)(9.81 m/s^2)(3.1 m)

W_gravity = 765.98 J

Finally, we need to determine the work done against friction in dragging the compressor:

W_friction = μmgd

where μ is the coefficient of kinetic friction, g is the acceleration due to gravity, and d is the distance moved.

We can assume that the compressor is moved at a constant speed, so the work done against friction is equal to the work done by the applied force.

To find the applied force, we can use the fact that the net force in the x-direction is zero:

F_applied,x = F_friction,x

F_applied,x = μmgcosθ

where θ is the angle of the incline (measured from the horizontal) and cosθ = (r2 - r1)/d.

d = |r2 - r1| = √[(8.3 m - 1.3 m)² + (4.4 m - 1.3 m)²]

d = 8.24 m

cosθ = (r2 - r1)/d

cosθ = [(8.3 m - 1.3 m)/8.24 m]

cosθ = 0.888

μ = F_friction,x / (mgcosθ)

μ = F_applied,x / (mgcosθ)

μ = (F_net,x - F_gravity,x) / (mgcosθ)

μ = (0 - mg(sinθ)) / (mgcosθ)

μ = -tanθ

where sinθ = (Δy / d) = (3.1 m / 8.24 m) = 0.376.

μ = -tanθ = -(-0.376) = 0.376

F_applied = F_net = F_gravity + F_friction

F_applied = F_gravity + μmg

F_applied = mg(sinθ + μcosθ)

F_applied = (25 kg)(9.81 m/s^2)(0.376 + 0.376(0.888))

F_applied = 412.58 N

W_friction = F_appliedd

W_friction = (412.58 N)(8.24 m)

W_friction = 3,402.26 J

Therefore, the total work done in dragging the compressor up the incline is:

W_total = W_gravity + W_friction

W_total = 765.98 J + 3,402.26 J

W_total = 4,168.24 J

So the work done in dragging the air compressor up the incline is 4,168.24 J.

Learn more about work done.

brainly.com/question/13662169

#SPJ11

Answer:

x = -2.

Zoe used the Addition and Division Properties

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]3x - 4 = - 10\\3x -4 + 4= -10 + 4 (Addition Property)\\3x = -6\\3x/3 = -6/3 (Division Property)\\x = -2[/tex]

The derivative of y = (x + 3)(11√x+5) using the product rule is f'(x) = u(x).v'(x) + v(x).u'(x) = (x + 3).11/2 x^-1/2 + (11√x+5).1.

To use the product rule, we must first identify the two functions being multiplied together, which in this case are (x + 3) and (11√x+5).

Next, we must find the derivative of each function. The derivative of (x + 3) is simply 1, and the derivative of (11√x+5) is (11/2)x^(-1/2).

Using the product rule, we then multiply the first function by the derivative of the second function and add that to the second function multiplied by the derivative of the first function. This gives us the derivative of the entire function, which is (x + 3)(11/2)x^(-1/2) + (11√x+5)(1).

Simplifying this expression, we get f'(x) = (11/2)(x + 3)x^(-1/2) + 11√x+5.

In summary, the derivative of y = (x + 3)(11√x+5) using the product rule is f'(x) = (x + 3)(11/2)x^(-1/2) + (11√x+5)(1).

To learn more about the product rule, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/847241

#SPJ11

If X is a continuous random variable having the probability density:

f(x)={2(x−1) 1 0 elsewhere then the variance of X is 1/6.

To find the variance of X, we need to use the formula:

Var(X) = [tex]E(X^2)[/tex] - [tex][E(X)]^2[/tex]

To find the expectation E(X) and E(X^2) for the continuous random variable X with the given probability density function (pdf), we integrate the respective expressions over the entire support of the random variable.

Given the pdf:

f(x) = { 2(x - 1), 1, 0 elsewhere }

We can calculate E(X) as follows:

E(X) = ∫x*f(x) dx

      = ∫x*2(x - 1) dx

      = 2∫([tex]x^2[/tex] - x) dx

      = 2[([tex]x^3[/tex]/3) - ([tex]x^2[/tex]/2)] evaluated from 0 to 1

      = 2[(1/3) - (1/2) - (0 - 0)]

      = 2[(1/3) - (1/2)]

      = 2[-1/6]

      = -1/3

Similarly, we can calculate E(X^2) as follows:

E(X^2) = ∫[tex]x^2[/tex]*f(x) dx

         = ∫[tex]x^2[/tex]*2(x - 1) dx

         = 2∫([tex]x^3[/tex] - [tex]x^2[/tex]) dx

         = 2[([tex]x^4[/tex]/4) - ([tex]x^3[/tex]/3)] evaluated from 0 to 1

         = 2[(1/4) - (1/3) - (0 - 0)]

         = 2[(1/4) - (1/3)]

         = 2[1/12]

         = 1/6

Therefore, the expectation E(X) is -1/3 and E(X^2) is 1/6 for the given continuous random variable X with the specified pdf.

Therefore, the variance of X is 1/6.

To know more about variance refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/14116780

#SPJ11

we need to add at least 12 terms to find the sum of the series to within 0.01.

To find the sum of the series [infinity] 1 [n(1 ln n)3] n = 1 within 0.01, we need to use the Cauchy condensation test.

First, we need to check the convergence of the series. We can use the integral test:

[tex]\int_1^{oo}{x(lynx)^3}dx[/tex]
[tex]=\int u^3du\\\\= (\frac{1}{4}) u^4 + C\\\\= (\frac{1}{4}) [1 ln x]^4 + C[/tex]
As x approaches infinity, the integral converges, and therefore, the series also converges.

Now, using the Cauchy condensation test, we have:

[tex]2^n [2^n (1 ln 2^n)3]\\\\= 2^{4n} [(n ln 2)3]\\\\= (8 ln 2)3 (n ln 2)3\\\\= (8 ln 2)^3 [\frac{1}{2}^{3n}}] [(n ln 2)^3]\\\\[/tex]

The series [infinity][tex](8 ln 2)^3 [\frac{1}{2}^{3n}] [(n ln 2)^3] n = 1[/tex]converges, and its sum is equal to[tex]\frac{ [(8 ln 2)^3]}{[2^3 - 1]}.[/tex]

We can use the error formula for alternating series to estimate how many terms we need to add to find the sum to within 0.01:

[tex]error \leq a_{(n+1)}[/tex]

where [tex]a_n = (8 ln 2)^3 [{1/2}^{3n}] [(n ln 2)3][/tex]

Let's solve for n:

[tex]0.01 \leq a_{(n+1)}\\0.01 \leq (8 ln 2)^3 [1/2^{(3(n+1))}] [(n+1) ln 2]3[/tex]

n ≥ 11.24

Therefore, we need to add at least 12 terms to find the sum of the series to within 0.01.

learn more about sum of the series,

https://brainly.com/question/4617980

#SPJ11

The value of the integral is π/16 - (π/4sqrt(2)).

To convert the integral to polar coordinates, we need to express x and y in terms of r and θ. The region of integration is the area under the curve √(4-x^2), which is a semicircle with radius 2 centered at the origin, and above the x-axis. This region can be described as:

0 ≤ θ ≤ π (since we are integrating over the upper semicircle)

0 ≤ r ≤ 2cos(θ) (since r ranges from 0 to 2 and x = rcos(θ))

So, the integral in polar coordinates becomes:

∫(from θ=0 to π) ∫(from r=0 to 2cos(θ)) √(4-r^2cos^2(θ)) e^(-r^2) r dr dθ

To evaluate this integral, we first integrate with respect to r:

∫(from θ=0 to π) [- e^(-r^2)/2 √(4-r^2cos^2(θ))] (from r=0 to 2cos(θ)) dθ

= ∫(from θ=0 to π) [- (1/2) e^(-4cos^2(θ)) + (1/2) e^(-r^2)cos^2(θ)] dθ

We can now integrate with respect to θ:

= [- (1/2) ∫(from θ=0 to π) e^(-4cos^2(θ)) dθ] + [(1/2) ∫(from θ=0 to π) e^(-r^2)cos^2(θ) dθ]

The first integral is a bit tricky, but can be evaluated using a well-known result from calculus called the Gaussian integral:

∫(from θ=0 to π) e^(-4cos^2(θ)) dθ = π/2sqrt(2)

For the second integral, we use the fact that cos^2(θ) = (1/2)(1+cos(2θ)):

(1/2) ∫(from θ=0 to π) e^(-r^2)cos^2(θ) dθ = (1/4) ∫(from θ=0 to π) e^(-r^2)(1+cos(2θ)) dθ

= (1/4) [∫(from θ=0 to π) e^(-r^2) dθ + ∫(from θ=0 to π) e^(-r^2)cos(2θ) dθ]

The first integral evaluates to π/2, while the second integral evaluates to 0 (since the integrand is an odd function of θ). Therefore:

(1/2) ∫(from θ=0 to π) e^(-r^2)cos^2(θ) dθ = (1/8) π

Substituting these results back into the original integral, we get:

integral^2_-2 integral √(4-x^2) e-x^2-y^2 dy dx = [- (1/2) (π/2sqrt(2))] + [(1/2) (1/8) π]

= - (π/4sqrt(2)) + (π/16)

= π/16 - (π/4sqrt(2))

So the value of the integral is π/16 - (π/4sqrt(2)).

To learn more about  Gaussian visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30509247

#SPJ11

The probability approximation for P(p≥0.14) is 0.0495

(a) The mean of the sample proportion p is equal to the population proportion, which is 0.12:

μp = 0.12

(b) The standard deviation of the sample proportion p can be calculated as:

σp = sqrt[(0.12(1-0.12))/1650]

  = 0.0121

Therefore, the standard deviation of the sample proportion p is 0.0121.

(c) To compute an approximation for P(p≥0.14), we can use the central limit theorem and assume that the distribution of the sample proportion p is approximately normal.

The mean and standard deviation of the sample proportion have already been calculated in parts (a) and (b).

z = (0.14 - 0.12) / 0.0121

 = 1.65

Using a standard normal distribution table or calculator, the probability that a standard normal random variable is greater than or equal to 1.65 is approximately 0.0495.

For similar question on probability:

https://brainly.com/question/11234923

#SPJ11

Therefore, there are 176,851,200 combination to award the prizes if there are no restrictions.

If there are no restrictions on how the prizes are awarded, we can use the formula for combinations with repetition to calculate the number of ways to award the prizes. Specifically, we want to choose 4 winners from 100 participants, where order does not matter and each winner can win multiple prizes.

The formula for combinations with repetition is:

(n + r - 1) choose r = (n + r - 1) / (r! * (n - 1)!)

where n is the number of objects to choose from (100 in this case), and r is the number of objects to choose (4 in this case).

Using this formula, we can calculate the number of ways to award the prizes as:

(100 + 4 - 1) choose 4 = (103 choose 4)

= (103 * 102 * 101 * 100) / (4 * 3 * 2 * 1)

= 176,851,200

To know more about combination,

https://brainly.com/question/20211959

#SPJ11

The given sequence an = 4ne(-7n) is decreasing and bounded.

To determine whether the sequence is increasing, decreasing, or not monotonic, and if it's bounded or not, let's consider the given sequence: an = 4ne(-7n).

First, we need to find the behavior of the sequence as n increases. To do this, let's analyze the derivative of the function f(n) = 4ne^(-7n) with respect to n.

f'(n) = 4[e(-7n) - 7ne(-7n)].

Now, let's analyze the signs of f'(n) to determine if the sequence is increasing or decreasing:

1. When n > 0, e(-7n) is always positive, but as n increases, its value decreases.
2. For 7ne(-7n), the product of 7n and e(-7n) is always positive when n > 0, but as n increases, the product's value also decreases.

Since f'(n) is positive for n > 0 and decreases as n increases, the sequence is decreasing.

Now, let's analyze if the sequence is bounded:

1. Lower bound: Since the sequence is decreasing, and the values of the function are always positive, the lower bound is 0.
2. Upper bound: Since the sequence is decreasing, the highest value is at n = 1. So, the upper bound is 4e(-7).

Since the sequence has both lower and upper bounds, it is bounded.

Know more about sequence here:

https://brainly.com/question/30262438

#SPJ11

The given statement, "Spearman's rank order correlation coefficient may assume a value from -1 to +1" is true.

Spearman's rank-order correlation coefficient is a statistical metric that is used to determine the degree and direction of a link between two variables. The coefficient can have a value ranging from -1 to +1, with -1 being a fully negative correlation, 0 representing no connection, and +1 representing a perfectly positive correlation. A -1 correlation indicates that when one variable grows, the other variable declines, whereas a +1 correlation indicates that as one variable increases, the other variable increases as well.

A correlation value of 0 shows that the two variables have no linear relationship. The coefficient is calculated by ranking the values of each variable and then calculating the differences between the ranks for each observation, and then applying a formula to calculate the coefficient.

To learn more about correlation coefficient, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/24018552

#SPJ11

The final expression of integral ∫(x²+1)/[(x-5)(x-4)²] dx  is

= -1/9 ln|x-4| - 1/9(x-4)⁻¹ + C

To evaluate the integral ∫(x²+1)/[(x-5)(x-4)²] dx, we can use partial fraction decomposition and then integrate each term separately:

First, we decompose the rational function into partial fractions:

(x²+1)/[(x-5)(x-4)²] = A/(x-5) + B/(x-4) + C/(x-4)²

Multiplying both sides by the denominator and simplifying, we get:

x² + 1 = A(x-4)²+ B(x-5)(x-4) + C(x-5)

Expanding the right-hand side and equating coefficients, we get:

Therefore, the partial fraction decomposition of the rational function is:

(x²+1)/[(x-5)(x-4)²] = -1/9/(x-4) + 1/9/(x-4)²

The integral now becomes:

∫(x²+1)/[(x-5)(x-4)²] dx = -1/9∫1/(x-4) dx + 1/9∫1/(x-4)² dx

Integrating each term separately, we get:

where C1 and C2 are constants of integration.

Substituting these values back into the original integral, we get:

∫(x²+1)/[(x-5)(x-4)²] dx = -1/9ln|x-4| + 1/9(-1/(x-4)) + C

Simplifying further, we get:

∫(x²+1)/[(x-5)(x-4)²] dx = -1/9 ln|x-4| - 1/9(x-4)⁻¹ + C

where C is a constant of integration.

Learn more about integration

brainly.com/question/31038797

#SPJ11

Answer: Option B: 67.0

Step-by-step explanation: To find Q3, we need to first find the median (Q2) of the dataset.

Arranging the data in order, we get:

49, 52, 52, 55, 55, 67, 74

The median (Q2) is the middle value of the dataset, which is 55.

Next, we need to find the median of the upper half of the dataset, which consists of the values:

55, 67, 74

The median of this upper half is 67.

Therefore, Q3 (the third quartile) is 67.0, option B.

To approximate the sum of the series with an error less than 0.0001, we need to find the partial sum up to the value of n found in part a. From part a, we know that n = 9.

So, we need to find the sum of the first 9 terms of the series. Using the formula for the nth term of the series, we can write:
an = 1/(n*(n+1))

So, the first few terms of the series are:

a1 = 1/2
a2 = 1/6
a3 = 1/12
a4 = 1/20
a5 = 1/30
a6 = 1/42
a7 = 1/56
a8 = 1/72
a9 = 1/90

To find the sum of the first 9 terms, we can simply add these terms:

s9 = a1 + a2 + a3 + a4 + a5 + a6 + a7 + a8 + a9
s9 = 0.5 + 0.1667 + 0.0833 + 0.05 + 0.0333 + 0.0238 + 0.0179 + 0.0125 + 0.0111
s9 = 0.8893

To ensure that our approximation has an error less than 0.0001, we need to check the error term. We know that the error term for the nth partial sum is bounded by the (n+1)th term of the series. So, in this case, the error term is bounded by a10:

a10 = 1/110

We want the error to be less than 0.0001, so we need:

a10 < 0.0001
1/110 < 0.0001

Therefore, we know that s9 is an approximation of the actual sum of the series with an error of less than 0.0001.

Rounding s9 to 4 decimal places, we get:
s9 = 0.8893

So, the sum of the series with an error less than 0.0001 is approximately 0.8893.

To learn more about Sequences, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/6561461

#SPJ11

The answer is (B) converges, since the terms alternate.

The Alternating Series Test states that if the following conditions are met, the series converges:

The absolute value of the terms a_n approaches zero as n approaches infinity.

The terms of the series are alternately positive and negative (i.e., the series is an alternating series).

The absolute value of the terms is decreasing (i.e., |a_n+1| < |a_n| for all n).

The series Σ (-1)^n/(n^2 + 7) can be tested for convergence using the Alternating Series Test.

The terms of the series alternate in sign and the absolute value of each term is decreasing, since:

|a(n+1)| = 1/((n+1)^2 + 7) < 1/(n^2 + 7) = |an|

Also, lim n->∞ an = 0.

Therefore, the series converges by the Alternating Series Test.

The answer is (B) converges, since the terms alternate.

To learn more about Alternating Series Test. visit:

https://brainly.com/question/16969349

#SPJ11

The marginal mean and variance of X, nor the covariance of X and Y, we cannot find the correlation coefficient.

To find the correlation coefficient, we first need to find the marginal means and variances of X and Y, as well as their covariance.

Marginal mean of X:

E[tex](X) = ∫∫ xf(x,y) dy dx[/tex]

[tex]= ∫2^∞ ∫0^1 x(16y/x^2) dy dx[/tex]

[tex]= ∫2^∞ [8x] dx[/tex]

= ∞ (diverges)

The integral diverges, so we cannot calculate the marginal mean of X.

Marginal mean of Y:

E [tex](Y) = ∫∫ yf(x,y) dy dx[/tex]

[tex]= ∫2^∞ ∫0^1 y(16y/x^2) dy dx[/tex]

[tex]= ∫2^∞ [8/x^2] dx[/tex]

[tex]= 4[/tex]

Marginal variance of X:

Var[tex](X) = E(X^2) - [E(X)]^2[/tex]

[tex]= ∫∫ x^2f(x,y) dy dx - [E(X)]^2[/tex]

[tex]= ∫2^∞ ∫0^1 x^2(16y/x^2) dy dx - ∞[/tex]

[tex]= ∫2^∞ [8x] dx - ∞[/tex]

= ∞ (diverges)

The integral diverges, so we cannot calculate the marginal variance of X.

Marginal variance of Y:

Var[tex](Y) = E(Y^2) - [E(Y)]^2[/tex]

[tex]= ∫∫ y^2f(x,y) dy dx - [E(Y)]^2[/tex]

[tex]= ∫2^∞ ∫0^1 y^2(16y/x^2) dy dx - 16[/tex]

[tex]= ∫2^∞ [8/x^2] dx - 16[/tex]

[tex]= 4 - 16/3[/tex]

[tex]= 4/3[/tex]

Covariance of X and Y:

Cov [tex](X,Y) = E(XY) - E(X)E(Y)[/tex]

[tex]= ∫∫ xyf(x,y) dy dx - ∞(4)[/tex]

[tex]= ∫2^∞ ∫0^1 xy(16y/x^2) dy dx - ∞(4)[/tex]

[tex]= ∫2^∞ [8x] dx - ∞(4)[/tex]

[tex]= ∞ - ∞(4)[/tex]

= -∞ (diverges)

The integral diverges, so we cannot calculate the covariance of X and Y.

Since we cannot calculate the marginal mean and variance of X, nor the covariance of X and Y, we cannot find the correlation coefficient.

To learn more about coefficient visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28975079

#SPJ11