Answer:
A confession can serve as powerful evidence of a suspect's guilt, but criminal defendants have a constitutional right against self-incrimination. An involuntary confession that was coerced by a police officer cannot be used against a defendant in court, regardless of whether it was true.
Explanation:
You can put it in your own words if you want. Hope this helps!
In Australia, what are the factors that may decide the ‘jurisdiction’ for a particular court?
Answer:
The Court's jurisdiction is broad, covering almost all civil matters arising under Australian federal law and some summary and indictable criminal matters. Central to the Court's civil jurisdiction is s 39B(1A)c of the Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth).This jurisdiction includes cases created by a federal statute, and extends to matters in which a federal issue is properly raised as part of a claim or of a defence and to matters where the subject matter in dispute owes its existence to a federal statute.
The Court has jurisdiction under the Judiciary Act to hear applications for judicial review of decisions by officers of the Commonwealth. Many cases also arise under the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (ADJR Act) which provides for judicial review of most administrative decisions made under Commonwealth enactments on grounds relating to the legality, rather than the merits, of the decision. The Court also hears appeals on questions of law from the Administrative Appeals Tribunal. This jurisdiction falls under the Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights National Practice Area (NPA) which also includes complaints about unlawful discrimination no longer being dealt with by the Australian Human Rights Commission and matters concerning the Australian Constitution.
The Court hears taxation matters on appeal from the Administrative Appeals Tribunal. It also exercises a first instance jurisdiction to hear objections to decisions made by the Commissioner of Taxation.
The Court shares first instance jurisdiction with the Supreme Courts of the states and territories in the complex area of intellectual property (copyright, patents, trademarks, designs and circuit layouts). All appeals in these cases, including appeals from the Supreme Courts, are to a full Federal Court.
Jurisdiction
residence;
cause of action;
the place where the dispute arose;
the quantum and nature of the claim;
consent;
location of the property; and.
other factors.
please give me brainliest.
The opposite of abuse of authority is
Discretion
Integrity
Respect
Solidarity
3. Could the federal government amend the Constitution by
making a treaty with another country? Explain.
Answer:
NAO TENHO SERTESA SE ESTA SERTO
Explanation:
Segundo o entendimento da Suprema Corte, qualquer tratado internacional que seja, desde que ratificado pelo Brasil, passa a fazer parte do nosso direito interno, no âmbito da legislação ordinária. Esta, como é sabido, não tem força nenhuma para mudar o texto constitucional.
whats a good explanation for constitutional law?
Constitutional law is a body of law which defines the role, powers, and structure of different entities within a state, namely, the executive, the parliament or legislature, and the judiciary; as well as the basic rights of citizens and, in federal countries such as the United States and Canada, the relationship between the central government and state, provincial, or territorial governments.
I hope this helps!
Laurie was arrested for some very minor traffic violations. Her bail was set unseasonably high at $500,000 which she will not be able to pay, so she will have to remain in jail until her hearing. Were her rights violated? If so list the amendment.
Answer:
8th amendment
Explanation:
Protection against cruel and unusual punishments
Select the correct answer. What is a treaty? A. an informal agreement between two or more nations B. a formal agreement between two heads of state C. an informal agreement between two heads of state D. a formal agreement between two or more nations
Answer:
d
Explanation:
Multiple Choice
What was the reason for establishing penal colonies in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries?
O People wanted to exile criminals to remote settlements
O Prisoners could be closely watched and put to harsh labor on penal colonies.
O The penal colonies were established for prisoners to do masonry tasks
O The king set up these prisons far away so that the citizens would be out of harm's way
Answer:
The king set up these prisons far away so that the citizens would be out of harm's way
Explanation:
What is the court paradox?
You think to escape my question!!!!!
You won’t escape
STOP
STOP TRYING TO ESCAPE I PROMISE YOU WONT
WHY ARE YOU TRYING SO HARD
are you still trying?
*yawns*
Oh they are still trying to escape *opens bag of chips and a can of coke*
*sips drink*
Okay fine you can leave jeez you are very stubborn ):
have a nice day haha
Which service is performed by local government?
\ (•◡•) / Hey There!
Answer → Providing Fire Protection
*:･ﾟ✧*:･ﾟ✧ Hope This Helps! *:･ﾟ✧*:･ﾟ✧
What is true about economic resources?
A : Economic resources include only money.
B: Economic resources are limited.
C: Economic resources exist only at the individual level.
D: Economic resources are always controlled by the government.
A body is dropped from rest at a height of 150 m, and simultaneously, another body is dropped from rest from a point 100 m above the ground. What is their difference in height after they have fallen
(i) 2 s
(ii) 3 s? How does the difference in height vary with time? (Take g = 10 ms 2.)
Answer:
[tex]\huge \mathbb{ \pink {★᭄ꦿ᭄A} \green{N}\purple{S} \red {W} \orange{E} \pink{R}\pink{࿐}}[/tex]
Explanation:
Answer. The difference in hights of the objects will remain same with time as both the objects have been dropped from rest and are falling with same acceleration i.e., (acceleration due to gravity).
✶⊶⊷⊶⊷❍ ❥ ❍⊶⊷⊶⊷✶
Hope you understand
✶⊶⊷⊶⊷❍ ❥ ❍⊶⊷⊶⊷✶
a=b but b=c and d=e and r=t so what eqUals rtjjsghffsdgsdjfnkahsfksjdsaj
Answer:
a
Explanation:
Which statement is NOT correct regarding the arrest of suspects?
O a. Male suspects are more likely to be arrested than females.
O b. Juvenile suspects are more likely to be arrested than males.
c. Black suspects are more likely to be arrested that White suspects.
d. Sober suspects are more likely to be arrested than intoxicated suspects
Answer:
D
Explanation:
police wouldn't bother seeing an innocent sober person but when they see someone drunk and intoxicated they would try help or assist (if the intoxicated person gets hostile then they will arrest them) if that makes sense
Why do you need to know who your U.S. Senators are?
Answer:
Because they represent you state in the senate
Explanation:
They are like people that have the same believes as their state
This is not a Question
I know a lot of you when you go ask a question you are wanting answers. But if you see LINKS do NOT CLICK ON THEM! I have had friends who have click on some and it is not good. Some may look like the following:
Answer:
Thank you for sharing! Please be safe everyone!
Answer:
oh thank you!!!
Explanation:
I ran into that many times and I hate it
true or false: Chief Justice Earl owen wrote about Miranda’s case for the supreme court
Answer:
True, the Chief Justice delivered the verdict of a 5-4 majority, stating that the defendant's interrogation violated his Fifth Amendment Right..
Explanation:
Chief Justice Earl Owen wrote about Miranda’s case for the supreme court. The statement is True.
What was Supreme Court?The Supreme Court is the highest judiciary body in the country which evaluates whether the laws are practiced properly or not. It helps to check the activities that are unconstitutional in the country and take strict actions against them.
The United States Supreme Court held in the landmark decision of Miranda v. Arizona (1966) that police must tell individuals of their constitutional rights prior to questioning them while they are in custody.
Ernesto Miranda was taken into custody and brought in for interrogation in relation to a kidnapping case in this case. Miranda was not made aware of his access to an attorney or his Fifth Amendment right to remain silent.
Learn more about the supreme court, here:
https://brainly.com/question/10739091
#SPJ2
The President of Mexico is elected by popular vote for a term of this number of years.
6 years
a. 2 years
b. 4 years
d. 8 years
Answer:
6 Years
Explanation:
This is called sexenio, The Mexican constitutional follows primarily on a Presidential Term, and can only server ONE term.
what social impact does racism have in the U.S?
Answer:
social discrimination and hatred between individuals of different complexion
Need help?????????!!!!!!!!!!!!
Was there a national judiciary during the AOC?
Answer:
No independent judiciary. The Articles of Confederation offered no system of courts in the jurisdiction of the national government. This meant that the entire judiciary branch was dependent on the states.
Explanation: hope it helped
True or False? The founding fathers of the U.S. were greatly influenced by the Roman Empire, which had a Representative form of government where representatives of the people made laws.
Answer: false
Explanation:
Which law allows an artist the right to prevent his or her work from being subject to derogatory treatment?
Answer: The president has the power to nominate ambassadors and appointments are made with the advice and consent of the Senate. The State Department formulates and implements the president's foreign policy. Country Reports on Human Rights Practices are submitted each year to the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations.
Explanation: here UwU
Question 34
Which of the following is a right protected through procedural due process?
O A) the right to free speech
O B) the right to jury
ting
O C) the right to travel
O D) the right to vote
Answer:
D) the right to vote
Out of these options the answer that is a right protected through procedural due process is the right to Jury. The answer to this question is option B.
The procedural process refers to the process that the government of the United States has to follow before they can deprive a citizen of several of his rights.
The due process that has to be followed has to do with the right to the establishment of the jury.
The judge would have to carry out the sentencing only after the jury have established their facts.
Read more on https://brainly.com/question/15242689?referrer=searchResults
The first duty of the first responder is to begin collecting evidence.
O True
O False
The first duty of the first responder is to begin collecting evidence. The statement is False.
What is the evidence?Evidence is referred to as proof based on factual information which helps to validate the occurrence of the event. it helps to determine whether the action took place or not by providing credentials.
Safeguarding the general public, establishing control over modifications made to the scene of the crime, and protecting the crime scene itself are the first responder's primary responsibilities.
Upon responding at a crime scene, first responders are typically police officers, Emergency medical technicians, and firefighters. Help and support should be given in order to prevent any serious medical problems brought on by the crimes at the crime scene.
Therefore, the statement is False.
Learn more about Evidence, here:
https://brainly.com/question/14370298
#SPJ2
The training of a forensic nurse is very specialized, finishing with a degree in both nursing and forensics.
True
False
Answer:
I'm pretty sure its true
Explanation:
Answer:
False
Explanation:
As consumers, we use goods and services. This is known as
What
Answer:
Consumption
Explanation:
People whose wants are satisfied by using goods and services/using goods and services.
Forces need to have a direct contact with an object to change its motion. true or false
Answer:
False hope this helps pls mark brainliest
Answer:
false
Explanation:
Why are the US Military expenses so high financially?
Why is malice difficult to prove? i need this ASAP
Answer:
Although defined within the context of a media defendant, the rule requiring proof of actual malice applies to all defendants including individuals. The standard can make it very difficult to prevail in a defamation case, even when allegations made against a public figure are unfair or are proved to be false.
Explanation: