2. Using 3.14 as a value of n, find the approximate volume of each sphere below. Round to
the nearest cubic inch.
a)
4 in
Like
example 1
b)
12 in

Answer:

4/5

Step-by-step explanation:

The sin of B is equal to opposite/hypotenuse

So, the equation would be 4/5 because 4 is equal to the opposite side length of B and 5 is equal to the hypotenuse of the triangle.

So, the answer would be 4/5

The surface area of the region S is 75√14.

Find the surface area of the region Slon the plane z=2x+3y such that 0 ≤x≤ 25 and 0 ≤ y ≤ 15 by finding a parameterization of the surface and then calculating the surface area.

The region S is the part of the plane z = 2x + 3y that lies in the rectangular region 0 ≤ x ≤ 25 and 0 ≤ y ≤ 15. To find the surface area of S, we need to parameterize the surface and then calculate the surface area using the formula:

S =∫∫√[tex](1 + (fx)^2 + (fy)^2)dA[/tex]

where fx and fy are the partial derivatives of z with respect to x and y, respectively, evaluated at the point (x,y).

To parameterize the surface, we can use the following equations:

x = u

y = v

z = 2u + 3v

where (u,v) ∈ R² is a point in the rectangular region 0 ≤ u ≤ 25 and 0 ≤ v ≤ 15.

To calculate the surface area, we need to find the partial derivatives fx and fy:

fx = 2

fy = 3

Then, the surface area of S is given by:

S = ∫∫√[tex](1 + (fx)^2 + (fy)^2)dA[/tex]

= ∫∫√[tex](1 + 2^2 + 3^2)dudv[/tex]

= ∫∫√(1 + 13)dudv

= ∫₀²⁵ ∫₀¹⁵ √14 dudv

= √14 ∫₀²⁵ ∫₀¹⁵ 1 dudv

= √14 ∫₀²⁵ v|₀¹⁵ du

= √14 ∫₀¹⁵ 25 dv

= √14 * 25 * 15

= 75√14

Therefore, the surface area of the region S is 75√14.

Learn more about  surface area

brainly.com/question/16560289

#SPJ11

Answer:

(a) Yes, the statement is true. If the null hypothesi is true, we can retain the null. 

(b) Yes, the statement is true

Answer:

(a) Yes, the statement is true. If the null hypothesi is true, we can retain the null. 

(b) Yes, the statement is true

The equation of the tangent line is y = (x/2) + (√3/2).

To find an equation of the tangent line to the curve y = √(3x²) that is parallel to the line x - 2y = 1, we need to follow these steps:

        y - √3/2 = (1/2)(x - √3/2)

        y = (1/2)x + (√3/4)

Therefore, the equation of the tangent line to the curve y = √(3x²) that is parallel to the line x - 2y = 1 is y = (1/2)x + (√3/4).

Learn more about Tangent line

brainly.com/question/31326507

#SPJ11

Option C is the correct answer: Select a row from the random number table. Read 20 single digits. Count the number of digits that are zeros.

Here's how you can use a random number table to simulate one trial of this situation:

By using a random number table, you can simulate this situation and get a sense of the likelihood of different outcomes. Keep in mind that the more trials you run, the more accurate your estimate of the actual distribution will be.

Learn more about number table here: https://brainly.com/question/30242913

#SPJ1

The differential equation y4 - 27y' = x2 + x in the form L (y) = g(x) is D(D - 3)(D^2 + 3D + 9)y = x^2 + x. So, the answer is option B.

Explanation:

The given differential equation is y4 - 27y' = x2 + x.

To write it in the form L(y) = g(x), where L is a linear differential operator with constant coefficients, we need to express y4 and y' in terms of differential operators.

We can write y4 as (D^4)y, where D is the differential operator d/dx.

To express y' in terms of differential operators, we can use the product rule:

y' = dy/dx = (D)(y)

Therefore, the given differential equation can be written as:

(D^4)y - 27(D)y = x^2 + x

Now, we need to factor the linear differential operator L = (D^4) - 27D.

We can factor out D from the second term:

L = D(D^3 - 27)

Next, we can factor the cubic polynomial D^3 - 27 using the difference of cubes formula:

D^3 - 27 = (D - 3)(D^2 + 3D + 9)

Therefore, we can express L as:

L = D(D - 3)(D^2 + 3D + 9)

Finally, we can write the differential equation in the desired form:

D(D - 3)(D^2 + 3D + 9)y = x^2 + x

So, the answer is option B.

Know more about the linear differential operator click here:

https://brainly.com/question/31476689

#SPJ11

Answer:

a, b, and d

Step-by-step explanation:

A, B, and D are Pythagorean triples (the sum of the squares of the first two numbers is equal to the square of the third number).

Position vector r(t) is given by

[tex]r(t) = (1/3)t^3 i + e^t j + e^{5t} k.[/tex]

Here's the step-by-step explanation:

1. Integrate each component of r'(t) with respect to t:
  ∫[tex](t^2) dt = (1/3)t^3 + C1[/tex] (for i-component)
  ∫[tex](e^t) dt = e^t + C2[/tex] (for j-component)
  ∫[tex](5te^{5t}) dt = e^{5t} + C3[/tex] (for k-component)

2. Apply the initial condition r(0) = i + j + k:
  r(0) = (1/3)(0)³ + C1 i + e⁰ + C2 j + e⁵ˣ⁰ + C3 k = i + j + k
  This implies that C1 = 1, C2 = 0, and C3 = 0.

3. Plug in the values of C1, C2, and C3 to find r(t):
  [tex]r(t) = (1/3)t^3 + 1 i + e^t j + e^{5t} k[/tex]

So, the position vector r(t) is given by [tex]r(t) = (1/3)t^3 i + e^t j + e^{5t} k.[/tex]

Learn more about Position vector.

brainly.com/question/14552074

#SPJ11

The fact that the sum can be approximated by an integral. we can approximate the sum as the area under the curve y=√x from x=1 to x=10000. This can be written as: ∫1^10000 √x dx

Using integration rules, we can evaluate this integral to get:
(2/3) * (10000^(3/2) - 1^(3/2))
This evaluates to approximately 66663.33. Therefore, an estimate for the sum ∑ i=1 to 10000 √i is 66663.33.

In mathematics, integrals are continuous combinations of numbers used to calculate areas, volumes, and their dimensions. Integration, which is the process of calculating compounds, is one of the two main operations of computation, [a] the other being derivative. Integration was designed as a way to solve math and physics problems like finding the area under a curve or determining velocity. Today, integration is widely used in many fields of science.

To estimate the sum of ∑ from i=1 to 10000 of √i using an integral, we'll approximate the sum with the integral of the function f(x) = √x from 1 to 10000.

The integral can be written as:

∫(from 1 to 10000) √x dx

To solve this integral, we first find the antiderivative of √x:

Antiderivative of √x = (2/3)x^(3/2)

Now, we'll evaluate the antiderivative at limits 1 and 10000:

(2/3)(10000^(3/2)) - (2/3)(1^(3/2))

(2/3)(100000000) - (2/3)

= (200000000/3) - (2/3)

= 199999998/3

Thus, the integral estimate of the sum from i=1 to 10000 of √i is approximately 199999998/3.

Learn more about Integral:

brainly.com/question/18125359

#SPJ11

The temperature of the soup after 5 minutes is [tex]26 + 42.5(e^4 - 1)[/tex]degrees Celsius.

1. The given expression represents the accumulation function of the population of the beachside resort. It is the integral of the rate function r(t) over the time interval [2, t], where t is the current time in years. The value of the integral at t is added to the initial population of 4823 to get the current population. In other words, the expression represents the total number of residents that have moved into the resort from time 2 to time t.

So, the expression can be written as: [tex]4823 + \int 2t r(x) dx = 7635 + \int 2t r(x) dx[/tex]

2. To find how much the temperature increased between t = 0 and t = 10 minutes, we need to evaluate the integral of the rate function r(t) over the time interval [0, 10]. The value of the integral will give us the total increase in temperature during this time period.

So, the expression can be written as[tex]\int 0^{10} 34e^{0.8t} dt[/tex]

Simplifying the integral, we get[tex]: [42.5e^{0.8t}]0^{10} = 42.5(e^8 - 1)[/tex] degrees Celsius

Therefore, the temperature of the soup increased by[tex]42.5(e^8 - 1)[/tex]degrees Celsius between t = 0 and t = 10 minutes.

3. To find the temperature of the soup after 5 minutes, we need to evaluate the expression for the accumulation function of temperature at t = 5, given that the initial temperature is 26 degrees Celsius.

So, the expression can be written as:[tex]26 + \int 0^5 34e^{0.8t} dt[/tex]

Simplifying the integral, we get: [tex]26 + [42.5e^{0.8t}]0^5 = 26 + 42.5(e^4 - 1)[/tex] degrees Celsius

Therefore, the temperature of the soup after 5 minutes is[tex]26 + 42.5(e^4 - 1)[/tex]degrees Celsius.

learn more about accumulation function,

https://brainly.com/question/30243173

#SPJ11

The answer is 143.90. We used the formula for the standard error of the mean to find the expected value of the sample mean, then added 1.5 standard deviations to that value to find the answer.

To begin, we can use the formula for the standard error of the mean to calculate the expected value of the sample mean. The formula is as follows:

standard error of the mean = standard deviation / √(sample size)

In this case, the standard deviation is 8 minutes and the sample size is 40, so we can plug those values into the formula:

standard error of the mean = 8 / √(40)
standard error of the mean = 1.2649

Next, we can use the formula for the mean of the means to find the expected value of the sample mean:
mean of the means = average

In this case, the average is given as 142 minutes, so the mean of the means is also 142 minutes.

Now we can find the value that is 1.5 standard deviations above the expected value of the sample mean:

1.5 standard deviations = 1.5 * standard error of the mean
1.5 standard deviations = 1.5 * 1.2649
1.5 standard deviations = 1.8974

Finally, we add this value to the mean of the means to find the answer:

[tex]\bar{X} + 1.5\; standard \; deviations = 142 + 1.8974[/tex]

[tex]\bar{X} + 1.5 \;standard \;deviations = 143.8974[/tex]

Rounding to 2 decimal places, the answer is 143.90.

In summary, we used the formula for the standard error of the mean to find the expected value of the sample mean, then added 1.5 standard deviations to that value to find the answer. This calculation helps us understand the range of values we might expect to see in a sample of runners in this category.

To know more about standard deviations refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/23907081#

#SPJ11

an+1 ≤ √(2(n+1)) + 1/2.

Since we have shown

To show that an = floor(√(2n) + 1/2), we need to prove two things:

an ≤ √(2n) + 1/2

an + 1 > √(2(n+1)) + 1/2

We will prove these statements by induction.

Base case: n = 1

a1 = 1 = floor(√(2*1) + 1/2) = floor(1.5)

The base case holds.

Induction hypothesis:

Assume that an = floor(√(2n) + 1/2) for some positive integer n.

Inductive step:

We need to show that an+1 = floor(√(2(n+1)) + 1/2) based on the induction hypothesis.

By definition of the sequence, a1 through an represent the first 1+2+...+n = n(n+1)/2 terms. Therefore, an+1 is the (n+1)th term.

The (n+1)th term is k if and only if 1+2+...+k-1 < n+1 ≤ 1+2+...+k.

Using the formula for the sum of the first k integers, we can simplify this condition to:

k(k-1)/2 < n+1 ≤ k(k+1)/2.

Multiplying both sides by 2 and rearranging, we get:

k^2 - k < 2n+2 ≤ k^2 + k.

Adding 1/4 to both sides, we get:

k^2 - k + 1/4 < 2n+2 + 1/4 ≤ k^2 + k + 1/4.

Taking the square root, we get:

k - 1/2 < √(2n+2) + 1/2 ≤ k + 1/2.

Now, we want to show that an+1 = k = floor(√(2(n+1)) + 1/2).

First, we will show that an+1 > √(2(n+1)) - 1/2.

Assume, for the sake of contradiction, that an+1 ≤ √(2(n+1)) - 1/2. Then:

k ≤ √(2(n+1)) - 1/2

k + 1/2 ≤ √(2(n+1))

(k + 1/2)^2 ≤ 2(n+1)

k^2 + k + 1/4 ≤ 2n + 2

This contradicts the fact that k is the smallest integer satisfying k^2 - k < 2n+2.

Therefore, an+1 > √(2(n+1)) - 1/2.

Next, we will show that an+1 ≤ √(2(n+1)) + 1/2.

Assume, for the sake of contradiction, that an+1 > √(2(n+1)) + 1/2. Then:

k > √(2(n+1)) + 1/2

k - 1/2 > √(2(n+1))

(k - 1/2)^2 > 2(n+1)

k^2 - k + 1/4 > 2n + 2

This contradicts the fact that k is the smallest integer satisfying 2n+2 ≤ k(k+1)/2.

Therefore, an+1 ≤ √(2(n+1)) + 1/2.

Since we have shown

To learn more about Multiplying visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30875464

#SPJ11

We used the fact that y goes to 1 as x goes to infinity to determine the value of the constant C in the equation we got from part B. This allowed us to find the equation for the curve.

C) To find the equation for the curve given the condition that as x goes to infinity, y goes to 1, we need to use the solution obtained in part B and determine the constant C. Here's how to do it:

As x approaches infinity, we have:
1 = sqrt((x^4 + 8x^2 + 16) / (2x)) + C

Since x is going to infinity, we can consider x^4 to be dominant over the other terms in the numerator, so:
1 ≈ sqrt((x^4) / (2x)) + C

Simplifying the above expression, we get:
1 ≈ sqrt(x^3 / 2) + C

As x goes to infinity, the term sqrt(x^3 / 2) also goes to infinity. For the equation to hold true, C must be equal to negative infinity. However, since C is a constant and not a variable, we cannot consider it to be equal to negative infinity.

Thus, there seems to be a mistake in the solution obtained in part B, as it does not satisfy the given condition in part C. Please double-check the solution and steps taken in part B to ensure the correctness of the answer.

Learn more about variables here: brainly.com/question/2466865

#SPJ11

Answer: D. The two rotations map the same image since 350° is a full rotation and 180° + 360° = 540°.

In the circle on the left bottom, 4

the circle on the right bottom, 5

the square on the right, -15

The value of C in the equation is C = (D - F)/(A - B).

We have,

We need to isolate the variable C on one side of the equation, which we can do by moving all the other terms to the other side:

So,

AC + F = BC + D

Subtract BC from both sides:

AC - BC + F = D

Factor out C on the left-hand side:

C(A - B) + F = D

Subtract F from both sides:

C(A - B) = D - F

Divide both sides by (A - B):

C = (D - F)/(A - B)

Therefore,

The value of C in the equation is C = (D - F)/(A - B)

Learn more about equations here:

https://brainly.com/question/17194269

#SPJ1

Answer: Paul's front wheel completed 21,147 full revolutions.

Step-by-step explanation:

The distance traveled by the bike is equal to the circumference of the front wheel times the number of revolutions made by the wheel. The circumference C of a circle is given by the formula C = 2πr, where r is the radius of the circle.

In this case, the radius of the front wheel is 56 cm, so its circumference is:

C = 2πr = 2π(56 cm) ≈ 351.86 cm

To convert the distance traveled by Paul from kilometers to centimeters, we multiply by 100,000:

distance = 75.1 km = 75,100,000 cm

The number of full revolutions N made by the front wheel is therefore:

N = distance / C = 75,100,000 cm / 351.86 cm ≈ 213,470.2

However, we need to round down to the nearest integer since the wheel cannot complete a fractional revolution. Therefore:

N = 21,147

Therefore, Paul's front wheel completed 21,147 full revolutions.

18, 21, 24, 27, 30 can be gotten when 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 are multiplied three times.

Sequence is  an ordered list of numbers that often follow a specific pattern or rule. Sequence is a list of things that are in order.

How to determine this

6, 7, 8, 9, 10 are related to 18, 21, 24, 27, 30

6 * 3 = 18

7 * 3 = 21

8 * 3 = 24

9 * 3 = 27

10 * 3 = 30

All of them followed the same sequence of being multiplied by 3.

6, 7, 8, 9, 10 when multiplied thrice will give 18, 21, 24, 27, 30.

Read more about Sequence

https://brainly.com/question/15458247

#SPJ1

The sequence above is an arithmetic sequence.

The common difference is -4.

In Mathematics and Geometry, the nth term of an arithmetic sequence can be calculated by using this expression:

aₙ =  a₁ + (n - 1)d

Where:

Next, we would determine the common difference as follows.

Common difference, d = a₂ - a₁

Common difference, d = 13 - 17 = 9 - 13

Common difference, d = -4.

Next, we would determine the common ratio as follows;

Common ratio, r = a₂/a₁

Common ratio, r = 13/17 ≠ 9/13

Common ratio, r = 0.7647 ≠ 0.6923

Read more on arithmetic sequence here: brainly.com/question/24989563

#SPJ1

The value of ∂z/∂r at r=1 and s=0 is -9.

To find ∂z/∂r at r=1 and s=0, we need to use the chain rule:

∂z/∂r = ∂z/∂w * ∂w/∂x * ∂x/∂r

First, let's find ∂z/∂w:

f'(w) = dz/dw

Since f'(7) = -1, we know that dz/dw = -1 when w = 7.

Next, let's find ∂w/∂x and ∂x/∂r:

[tex]w = g(x,y) = g(2r^3 - s^2, res)[/tex]

∂w/∂x = ∂g/∂x = g_x = -2 (given)

∂x/∂r = [tex]6r^2[/tex](chain rule)

Now we can put it all together:

∂z/∂r = ∂z/∂w * ∂w/∂x * ∂x/∂r
    [tex]= (-1) * (-2) * 6r^2[/tex]
      [tex]= 12r^2[/tex]
So, at r=1 and s=0, we have:

[tex]∂z/∂r|r=1,s=0 = 12(1)^2 = 12[/tex]
To find ∂z/∂r at r=1 and s=0, we need to apply the chain rule. First, let's find the derivatives of x and y with respect to r and s:

∂x/∂r = 6r, ∂x/∂s = -2s
[tex]∂y/∂r = e^s, ∂y/∂s = re^s[/tex]

Now, we'll use the chain rule to find ∂z/∂r:

∂z/∂r = ∂z/∂w * (∂w/∂x * ∂x/∂r + ∂w/∂y * ∂y/∂r)

We have the following information:

gx(2,1) = ∂w/∂x = -2
gy(2,1) = ∂w/∂y = 3
f'(7) = ∂z/∂w = -1
g(2,1) = 7

Now, substitute the values for r=1 and s=0:

∂x/∂r = 6(1) = 6
∂y/∂r = e^(0) = 1

Plug in the given values:

∂z/∂r = (-1) * ((-2) * 6 + 3 * 1)

Calculate the result:

∂z/∂r = (-1) * (9)

∂z/∂r = -9

To learn more about derivatives visit;

brainly.com/question/30365299

#SPJ11

The Partial F test is used to compare two nested linear regression models, where Model B is a more complex version of Model A. The null hypothesis of the test is that the additional variables in Model B do not have a significant impact on the dependent variable, while the alternative hypothesis is that they do.

To compute the Partial F test statistic, we need to first fit both models and obtain their respective residual sum of squares (RSS). Then, we can use the formula:

F = (RSS_A - RSS_B) / (p - q) * (RSS_B / (n - p))

where p is the number of variables in Model A (excluding the intercept), q is the number of additional variables in Model B (excluding those already in Model A), and n is the sample size.

The resulting F value follows an F-distribution with (q, n - p) degrees of freedom. We can then calculate the p-value by comparing this F value to the critical value of the F-distribution with the same degrees of freedom, using a significance level of 0.05.

If the p-value is less than 0.05, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that Model B is a better fit than Model A. Otherwise, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is no significant difference between the two models.

To learn more about linear regression model : brainly.com/question/31328926

#SPJ11  

Note that the use of the term "implicitly" in the question suggests that there is some other equation or context that defines y, but without that information, we can only assume that y is an arbitrary function. To differentiate 4/9 with respect to an implicitly defined function, we first need to clarify what that function is.

Let's call it y, so we have: 4/9 = f(y)
Now, we can differentiate both sides with respect to y using the chain rule: d/dy (4/9) = d/dy (f(y))
0 = f'(y)
So, the derivative of 4/9 with respect to an implicitly defined function y is 0. We can write this as:
d/dy (4/9) = 0
Note that the use of the term "implicitly" in the question suggests that there is some other equation or context that defines y, but without that information, we can only assume that y is an arbitrary function.

Learn more about differentiation here, https://brainly.com/question/954654

#SPJ11

The angle ACB is tan⁻¹(80/a), the range of tan⁻¹(x) is (0, 90) and the time taken to reach the shore is a/30

The measure of ACB can be calculated using the following tangent trigonometry ratio

tan(ACB) = Opposite/Adjacent

So, we have

tan(β) = 80/a

Take the arc tan of both sides

So, we have

β = tan⁻¹(80/a)

So, the angle is tan⁻¹(80/a)

Given that the angle is an acute angle

The range of tan⁻¹(x) for acute angles can be found by considering the values of the tangent function for angles between 0 and 90 degrees.

Since tan(0) = 0 and tan(90) is undefined, the tangent function takes on all positive values in this range.

So, the range of tan⁻¹(x) for acute angles is (0, 90) degrees.

Here, we have

Distance = a

Speed = 30 km/h

The time taken to reach the shore can be calculated using the formula:

time = distance / speed

Substituting the given values, we get:

time = a / 30 km/h

Simplifying this expression, we get:

time = a / 30 hours

Therefore, the time taken to reach the shore is a/30 hours, where a is the distance to the shore in kilometers.

Read more about bearing distance at

https://brainly.com/question/22719608

#SPJ1

Answer:If Chloe rolls the number cube twice and flips the coin once, there are 2 possible outcomes for the coin flip (heads or tails) and 6 possible outcomes for each roll of the number cube.

To find the total number of possible outcomes, we can use the multiplication principle of counting. The total number of possible outcomes is given by the product of the number of outcomes for each event.

Therefore, the total number of possible outcomes is:

2 x 6 x 6 = 72

So, there are 72 possible outcomes when Chloe rolls the number cube twice and flips the coin once.

Step-by-step explanation:

Therefore, the distance AB when the bridge is lifted to the position shown in the diagram is approximately 17.32 units.

Distance refers to the numerical measurement of the amount of space between two points, objects, or locations. It is a scalar quantity that has magnitude but no direction, and it is usually expressed in units such as meters, kilometers, miles, or feet. Distance can be measured in a straight line, or it can refer to the length of a path or route taken to travel from one point to another. It is an important concept in mathematics, physics, and other fields, and it has many practical applications in daily life, such as in navigation, transportation, and sports.

Here,

In the diagram, we can see that the bridge is divided into two halves and pivots around point B. When the bridge is lifted, it forms a right triangle with legs AB and BC, and hypotenuse AC. Since the bridge divides exactly in half, we can see that angle BCD is a right angle and angle ACD is equal to 30 degrees.

Using trigonometry, we can find the length of AB as follows:

tan(30) = AB/BC

tan(30) = AB/30

AB = 30 * tan(30)

AB ≈ 17.32

To know more about distance,

https://brainly.com/question/15172156

#SPJ1

Answer:

  RS = 38

Step-by-step explanation:

Given ∆XYZ ~ ∆RST with XY=5x-3, XZ=60, RS=3x+2, RT=40, you want the length of RS.

Corresponding sides of similar triangles have the same ratios:

  XY/XZ = RS/RT

  (5x -3)/60 = (3x +2)/40 . . . substitute given lengths

  2(5x -3) = 3(3x +2) . . . . . . . multiply by 120

  10x -6 = 9x +6 . . . . . . . . . . . eliminate parentheses

  x = 12 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . add 6-9x to both sides

Using this value of x we can find RS:

  RS = 3x +2

  RS = 3(12) +2

  RS = 38

__

Additional comment

The value of XY is 5(12)-3 = 57, and the above ratio equation becomes ...

  57/60 = 38/40 . . . . . both ratios reduce to 19/20.

Since these matrices have the same eigenvalues, their products will be the same. Therefore, det AB = det BA

To show that det AB = det BA, we can use the fact that the determinant of a product of matrices is equal to the product of the determinants of those matrices. That is, det AB = det A det B and det BA = det B det A.

Now, let's consider the matrices AB and BA. Even though they may not be equal, they have the same set of eigenvalues. This means that the determinant of AB and the determinant of BA have the same factors. We can see this by considering the characteristic polynomials of these matrices, which are the same up to a sign.

Therefore, we can write det AB as the product of the eigenvalues of AB, and det BA as the product of the eigenvalues of BA. Since these square matrices have the same eigenvalues, their products will be the same. Thus, det AB = det BA.

Learn more about square matrix: https://brainly.com/question/13179750

#SPJ11

The assertion "H: > 125" can be part of a legitimate statistical hypothesis when accompanied by a corresponding null hypothesis.

We will determine if the assertion "H: > 125" is a legitimate statistical hypothesis and explain why.

A statistical hypothesis is a statement about a population parameter that can be tested using sample data. There are two types of hypotheses: null hypothesis (H0) and alternative hypothesis (H1 or Ha). The null hypothesis is a statement of no effect, while the alternative hypothesis is a statement of an effect or difference.

In this case, the assertion "H: > 125" appears to be an alternative hypothesis, as it suggests that some parameter is greater than 125. However, for it to be a legitimate statistical hypothesis, it must be paired with an appropriate null hypothesis.

For example, if we were testing the mean weight of a certain species of animal, our hypotheses could be as follows:

- Null hypothesis (H0): The mean weight is equal to 125 (μ = 125)
- Alternative hypothesis (H1): The mean weight is greater than 125 (μ > 125)

With this pair of hypotheses, we can conduct a statistical test to determine whether the data supports the alternative hypothesis or not. In conclusion, the assertion "H: > 125" can be part of a legitimate statistical hypothesis when accompanied by a corresponding null hypothesis.

To know more about legitimate statistical hypothesis refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/30893254

#SPJ11

By averaging the two middle numbers, we can determine that the median is $75 million.

Based on the information provided, we know that there are six Marvel movies and we need to put their domestic gross income in order from smallest to largest. However, we're also given a specific piece of information about the median, which is that it's a certain amount of million dollars and that about 25% of the movies made more than this amount.

To start, let's define what the median is.

The median is a measure of central tendency that represents the middle value in a set of data. In this case, we have six Marvel movies, so the median would be the third value when the movies are arranged in order from smallest to largest. If we arrange the movies by their domestic gross income, we can determine the median and use that information to put them in order.

So, let's say the six Marvel movies are:

Movie A: $50 million
Movie B: $60 million
Movie C: $70 million
Movie D: $80 million
Movie E: $90 million
Movie F: $100 million

Using these values, we can determine that the median is $75 million. This means that about 25% of the movies made more than $75 million and the remaining 75% made less than $75 million. To put the movies in order from smallest to largest, we can use this information and arrange them as follows:

Movie A: $50 million
Movie B: $60 million
Movie C: $70 million
Movie D: $80 million
Movie E: $90 million
Movie F: $100 million

So, the movies are now arranged in order from smallest to largest based on their domestic gross income. This information can be useful for analyzing trends and making predictions about future movie releases.

To know more about median refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/21396105

#SPJ11