Answer:Answer:
I would say that Yes, the United States was and is justified for going to war against Mexico in 1846. The reason for this is because in 1884, Mexico started the War when they attacked the Army that was led by General Zachary Taylor who was order by the United States to defend the territory on the Rio Grande that was in fact claimed by the United States of America. But, it was owned as a consequence because of the treaty between Texas and Mexico when Texas first became independent.
The United States of America tried to be peaceful and negotiate the disputed territory that had once been part of Texas. The United States of America did this by sending John Slidell to Mexico City that was empowered at that time to offer Mexico substantial amounts of money for the disputed territory.
IF, big IF, the United States of America had seriously provoked the war and would have taken advantage of the fuzziness that was going on with the relevant treaties, then the people in the relevant regions which included Texas and Alta California, would have been better off under the control of America then they would if they were under control of Mexico. And the reason for this is because while this was all going on, Mexico was corrupt and confused at the time because of the Presidency changing hands rapidly and also because of the democratic traditions being abandoned along the way. AND, in some cases but very few, there were settlers that were originally Americans, had asked to be part of the United States of America!!
Now, the only basis that Mexico could claim was any superior lands right to rule that piece of land was that they had to conquer that piece of land first. Now the Spanish aristocracy of Mexico didn’t even have an “original village settler” to claim the lands. The reason for that is Mexico had already acquired them by conquering and displacing the Indian and Mesoamerican inhabitants.
Explanation: just took the test
... [All settlers ] shall HAVE and enjoy all
Liberties, Franchises, and Immunities... as if they
had been abiding and born, within this our Realm of
England...
A. VA declaration of rights
B. U.S. Constitution
C. Charters of Virginia company of London
D. Arrivals of confederation
E. BA statue for religious freedom
Virginia Charter originated in April 10, 1606. It was said to be the first royal charter issued for the planting of a colony in America. The above statement was from Charters of Virginia
The Charters of Virginia were issued to private trading companies. It was made precisely to laid out boundaries, defined the relationship of the colony to the crown, and provided for a government.A document called the "Great Charter" of 1618, elections made.
The importance of Virginia's first charter is present in its provision that the colonists and their descendants "shall have and enjoy all Liberties, Franchises, and Immunities … as if they had been abiding and born, within this our Realm of England.…"
Conclusively the meaning of he above words has some form of restrictions at the time to legal rights of land tenure and inheritance, but it allowed American colonists to believe that they were entitled to all the rights of Englishment
Learn more from
https://brainly.com/question/19282917
Why did early farmers use slash-and-burn agriculture?
A. to keep undergrowth from drying out the earth
B. to get rid of pests
C. to keep the soil fertile
D.to get rid of old crops
Answer:
Probably D.
Explanation:
Early farmers used the slash and burn agriculture to clear land so they can make it suitable for crops and livestock. (Sorry if it's wrong.)
Helppp me plisssssss!!!!!!
Answer:
Explanation:
NAACP
Objective:It aimed to maintain equality, inform the public, and educate people about their rights. It also aimed to remove prejudices, barriers, and racial discrimination.
Views on segregation :W.E.B. DuBois, Mary White Ovington, Moorfield Storey, and Ida B. Wells established the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) in 1909. Its goal was to use the legal system to combat the segregation of african americans and Whites.It actively tried to remove these barriers on people of color.
Views on American society:
The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People's (NAACP) goal is to ensure that all people have equal political, educational, social, and economic rights and to end the race-based inferiority complex. The NAACP diverged racist ideologies that frightened and separated people of color. They were an intellectual group that helped to launch fairer schooling, kinder housing, and anti-lynching campaigns. They believed that all people deserved to be treated with justice, compassion, and equality, and they campaigned to promote good change in America.
UNIA
Objective: It aimed to instill African American and black nationalistic pride. Many wanted to create their own African country and create prosperity away from white people.
Views on segregation: It approved of segregation and believed black people must prosper without any white interference.Marcus Garvey, the head of UNIA at the time, felt that white people would never accept black persons as equals, even in a non-segregated society. As a result, he felt that black people should split from whites and establish their own civilization.
Views on American society:
They believed that all people should be treated with fairness, compassion, and equality, and they worked to effect good change in American history. They see American society as utterly corrupt and imprisoned in evil, with no prospect of redemption or escape from inside.
Select all that apply.
The three branches of government are:
n Initiative
Executive
Authority
Right Wing
Judicial
Legislative
O Cabinet
i
Answer:
B.Executive
E.Judicial
F.Legislative