which is the best example of how reconstuction affected politics in the south in the late 1800s

Answer:

The Awakening was a movement that was based off people looking for ways they could make living on Earth as heavenly as possible. One was the abolitionists movement that wanted to end slavery. Since people looked for a world that was basically perfect, they figured the enslavement of people had to end. Another reform movement was utopian societies. Utopian societies emerged during the awakening such as Brooks Farm and New Harmony to create a perfect government for everyone. Everyone would share everything and would put in the same amount of work to get the same benefits. However, these utopians would not work out since people would get the same benefit for less work.

Answer:

Landed, I think

Explanation:

Answer:

the answer is d Clarence Darrow

Hope this helps! :)

Answer:

For art of for spiritual reasoning.

Explanation:

Is there supposed to be answer choices?

Answer:

A,C maybe C but I don't want to give you wrong info

Explanation:

These answers sound more reasonable to me

French and Indian War/Seven Years’ War, 1754 – 63 is that a good choice

i couldn't think of anything within the 1763 - 17775 :?

After reading the statement given by Abraham Lincoln concerning the Kansas-Nebraska Act, it can be concluded that the right to personal sovereignty is an inalienable human right. Therefore, the option C holds true.

The Kansas-Nebraska Act was enforced into the American constitutional governance under the  Presidency of the then President, Abraham Lincoln. Moreover, this Act governed the test of sovereignty under which each of citizens was seen differently.

There were controversial and contradictory statements made by Lincoln under the Act, where there was a confusing regulation of citizens having right to personal sovereignty as an inalienable right, but it was granted only to the White Americans.

Therefore, the option C holds true and states regarding the significance of Kansas-Nebraska Act.

Learn more about Kansas-Nebraska Act here:

https://brainly.com/question/21577804

#SPJ2

Answer:

the answer should be C

Explanation:

Answer:

confidence boost

Explanation:

Despite their loss, the inexperienced colonial forces inflicted significant casualties against the enemy, and the battle provided them with an important confidence boost during the Siege of Boston (April 1775-March 1776).

Despite their loss, the inexperienced colonial forces inflicted significant casualties against the enemy, and the battle provided them with an important confidence boost during the Siege of Boston (April 1775-March 1776).

HOPE THIS HELPED <3

Answer:

We could all be educated on freedom- PROPERLY -and how everyone in the U.S., or even the whole world, should have freedom not based on race, language or skin color.

Answer: 20 points for the Major Party the candidate of which has won a plurality of the State vote for President in the most recent election for that office (at the present time, this would be the 2016 Presidential Election, of course).

Explanation:

Answer:

No, he had no money and no crew to sail with him. Ferdinand and Isabella provided him with the money for the ships and the supplies he would've needed, which he couldn't obtain otherwise.

Explanation:

Christopher Columbus could not have sailed in the country of America without the financial support of Ferdinand and Isabella.

Christopher Columbus was the navigator and explorer who had completed their journey to the Atlantic Ocean in four voyages.

Christopher Columbus has no crew for the sailing of their ships as well as he had no money. Ferdinand and Isabella provided Christopher Columbus with the needed financial support in the form of money for the ships and supplies required through his journey voyages towards America.

Therefore, Ferdinand and Isabella supported Christopher Columbus in sailing his ships to the country of America.

Learn more about the Christopher Columbus in the related link;

https://brainly.com/question/10813507

#SPJ2

Answer: The Northern Union States

Answer:

More nearly than any of his predecessors, Andrew Jackson was elected by popular vote; as President he sought to act as the direct representative of the common man.

Born in a backwoods settlement in the Carolinas in 1767, he received sporadic education. But in his late teens he read law for about two years, and he became an outstanding young lawyer in Tennessee. Fiercely jealous of his honor, he engaged in brawls, and in a duel killed a man who cast an unjustified slur on his wife Rachel.

Jackson prospered sufficiently to buy slaves and to build a mansion, the Hermitage, near Nashville. He was the first man elected from Tennessee to the House of Representatives, and he served briefly in the Senate. A major general in the War of 1812, Jackson became a national hero when he defeated the British at New Orleans.

In 1824 some state political factions rallied around Jackson; by 1828 enough had joined “Old Hickory” to win numerous state elections and control of the Federal administration in Washington.

In his first Annual Message to Congress, Jackson recommended eliminating the Electoral College. He also tried to democratize Federal officeholding. Already state machines were being built on patronage, and a New York Senator openly proclaimed “that to the victors belong the spoils. . . . ”

Jackson took a milder view. Decrying officeholders who seemed to enjoy life tenure, he believed Government duties could be “so plain and simple” that offices should rotate among deserving applicants.

As national politics polarized around Jackson and his opposition, two parties grew out of the old Republican Party–the Democratic Republicans, or Democrats, adhering to Jackson; and the National Republicans, or Whigs, opposing him.

Henry Clay, Daniel Webster, and other Whig leaders proclaimed themselves defenders of popular liberties against the usurpation of Jackson. Hostile cartoonists portrayed him as King Andrew I.

Behind their accusations lay the fact that Jackson, unlike previous Presidents, did not defer to Congress in policy-making but used his power of the veto and his party leadership to assume command.

The greatest party battle centered around the Second Bank of the United States, a private corporation but virtually a Government-sponsored monopoly. When Jackson appeared hostile toward it, the Bank threw its power against him.

Clay and Webster, who had acted as attorneys for the Bank, led the fight for its recharter in Congress. “The bank,” Jackson told Martin Van Buren, “is trying to kill me, but I will kill it!” Jackson, in vetoing the recharter bill, charged the Bank with undue economic privilege.

His views won approval from the American electorate; in 1832 he polled more than 56 percent of the popular vote and almost five times as many electoral votes as Clay.

Jackson met head-on the challenge of John C. Calhoun, leader of forces trying to rid themselves of a high protective tariff.

When South Carolina undertook to nullify the tariff, Jackson ordered armed forces to Charleston and privately threatened to hang Calhoun. Violence seemed imminent until Clay negotiated a compromise: tariffs were lowered and South Carolina dropped nullification.

In January of 1832, while the President was dining with friends at the White House, someone whispered to him that the Senate had rejected the nomination of Martin Van Buren as Minister to England. Jackson jumped to his feet and exclaimed, “By the Eternal! I’ll smash them!” So he did. His favorite, Van Buren, became Vice President, and succeeded to the Presidency when “Old Hickory” retired to the Hermitage, where he died in June 1845.

Explanation:

Answer:

the commander of the navy or air force or basically any force

Explanation:

Answer:

Through the period from the armistice on 11 November 1918 until the signing of the peace treaty with Germany on 28 June 1919, the Allies maintained the naval blockade of Germany that had begun during the war. As Germany was dependent on imports, it is estimated that 523,000 civilians had lost their lives.[1] N. P. Howard, of the University of Sheffield, says that a further quarter of a million more died from disease or starvation in the eight-month period following the conclusion of the conflict.[2] The continuation of the blockade after the fighting ended, as author Robert Leckie wrote in Delivered From Evil, did much to "torment the Germans ... driving them with the fury of despair into the arms of the devil."[citation needed] The terms of the Armistice did allow food to be shipped into Germany, but the Allies required that Germany provide the means (the shipping) to do so. The German government was required to use its gold reserves, being unable to secure a loan from the United States.[citation needed]

Historian Sally Marks claims that while "Allied warships remained in place against a possible resumption of hostilities, the Allies offered food and medicine after the armistice, but Germany refused to allow its ships to carry supplies". Further, Marks states that despite the problems facing the Allies, from the German government, "Allied food shipments arrived in Allied ships before the charge made at Versailles".[3] This position is also supported by Elisabeth Gläser who notes that an Allied task force, to help feed the German population, was established in early 1919 and that by May 1919 " Germany [had] became the chief recipient of American and Allied food shipments". Gläser further claims that during the early months of 1919, while the main relief effort was being planned, France provided food shipments to Bavaria and the Rhineland. She further claims that the German government delayed the relief effort by refusing to surrender their merchant fleet to the Allies. Finally, she concludes that "the very success of the relief effort had in effect deprived the [Allies] of a credible threat to induce Germany to sign the Treaty of Versailles.[4] However, it is also the case that for eight months following the end of hostilities, the blockade was continually in place, with some estimates that a further 100,000 casualties among German civilians due to starvation were caused, on top of the hundreds of thousands which already had occurred. Food shipments, furthermore, had been entirely dependent on Allied goodwill, causing at least in part the post-hostilities irregularity.

After the Paris Peace Conference of 1919, the signing of the Treaty of Versailles on 28 June 1919, between Germany on the one side and France, Italy, Britain and other minor allied powers on the other, officially ended war between those countries. Other treaties ended the relationships of the United States and the other Central Powers. Included in the 440 articles of the Treaty of Versailles were the demands that Germany officially accept responsibility for starting the war and pay economic reparations. The treaty drastically limited the German military machine: German troops were reduced to 100,000 and the country was prevented from possessing major military armaments such as tanks, warships, armored vehicles and submarines.

mark me  brainliest if this helped :D

Answer:

hiiii

Explanation:

Answer:

In the fall of 2010, 88-year-old Horst-Eberhard Richter was invited to present his newly published book, Moral in Zeiten der Krise  in Berlin. The chairperson introduced him as the one who had given the peace movement its intellectual and analytical basis, and went on to say that Richter was credited with intellectually binding together psychoanalysis, perspectives on peace, and political protest. The author almost brusquely responded that this was not what it was all about. It was about a common future, social involvement, and a new sense that science carried a political responsibility. The peace movement was a social movement comprised of diverse individuals devoted to a common cause with a common collective identity and typically organized on democratic grassroots principles, with self-organization, through a Coordinating Committee. As such, it took a skeptical view of political leaders. However, notwithstanding its grassroots-inspired structures of decision-making, there were key players who succeeded in developing particularly high public profi les with regard to certain issues. For the purpose of introducing such “protagonists” of the peace movement and their celebrity status, the movement is divided here into the following social and political groups: Christians, politically independent participants.

Explanation:

Answer:

C

Explanation:

Demand for labor in war industries helped increase employment.

Answer:

In 1836 Santa Anna marched into Texas to quell a rebellion primarily by U.S. settlers there.

Explanation:

During this expedition, Texas declared its independence from Mexico. His army defeated Texan forces at the Alamo and Goliad before moving eastward to the San Jacinto River, where he was defeated and captured by Gen

Answer:

Houston's Efforts to solve issues Facing the Republic

Explanation:

Answer:

It means A specific nation/part of land believes in god and trusts him

Explanation:

This is because you know nation is like a part of land and under god is like god carries you and you are protected.

Answer:

The Establishment Clause of the firsts amendment says the government must remain neutral in religious matters. Keeping "under God" in the pledge means that the government endorses religion as desirable.

Answer:

i do all the time and its normal

Answer:

C, they raised the taxes on tea.

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

C. The tea acts raised the taxes on the tea, making the colonists disgruntled.

Answer:

D.It set up a democratic form of government

Explanation:

Answer: D

Explanation:

Answer:

the second were able to transport raw material by train steam engines

Explanation:

Answer:

Homer was the god of poetry,

Poseidon was the god of seas,

Athena was the god of wisdom and war

Explanation:

plz give brainliest