The purpose of an executive agreement are as follows-
An executive agreement is a contract made between the executive branch of the United States and a foreign nation. The agreement is as legally binding on the United States as a treaty, although it is not as formal and does not need Senate approval.
The only person who can bind the US to international responsibilities is the president, who enters into executive agreements. Executive agreements are constrained by laws so that they can only handle issues that fall inside the president's authorised powers. The constitutional requirement that treaties be ratified by two-thirds of the Senate does not apply to executive agreements.
The US Constitution does not specifically give the president the authority to carry out executive agreements. The president obtains the authority to establish these either through congressional authorisation or on the basis of the president's capacity to manage international affairs.
In its 1937 ruling in United States v. Belmont, 301 U.S. 324, the U.S. Supreme Court determined that executive agreements carry the same weight as treaties. However, unless they are approved by Congress, executive agreements are not legally obligatory on succeeding presidents.
After 1939, executive agreements became more and more common. In actuality, presidents made close to 1,200 executive agreements and signed close to 800 treaties before 1940. However, the presidents only signed 800 treaties between 1940 and 1989, although entering into more than 13,000 executive agreements.
For more information about executive agreement- https://brainly.com/question/26046200
A legally binding international agreement known as an "executive agreement" is one that the President enters into without the advice and consent of the Senate. Executive agreements are frequently utilized to get around ratification restrictions in national constitutions. Many republican countries with written constitutions have provisions governing treaty ratification.
What accomplishes executive agreements?An agreement between the United States and a foreign government known as an executive agreement is less formal than a treaty and is exempt from the constitutional requirement that it be approved by two-thirds of the U.S. Senate. Presidents have repeatedly entered the United States into foreign accords in recent decades without the Senate's advice or authorization. "Executive agreements" are what these are called. Executive agreements are still legally enforceable even when they are not submitted to the Senate for approval.
To learn more about executive agreement, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14272566
#SPJ4
one problem with special purpose districts is that sometimes local government officials work in relative obscurity, avoiding media and public scrutiny. true or False
The given statement is true. Special purpose districts have the drawback that occasionally local government representatives operate out of the public eye and the media.
- More about special purpose districts :
- A district that provides any governmental power or function, including but not limited to fire protection, sewage treatment, water or natural gas distribution, or recreation, is referred to as a special purpose district. This district was established by an act of the General Assembly or in accordance with general law.
- Numerous local governments in Texas known as special purpose districts offer a range of services, such as water conservation, toll roads, hospitals, libraries, utilities, and fire control efforts.
To know more about special purpose districts, kindly click on the link below :
https://brainly.com/question/27871644?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ4
How has Congress sought to limit inmate appeals?
(Your answer should briefly explain each of these congressional actions.)
Congress via the Prison Litigation Reform Act modified the statutes related to prisoner litigation. This is how they limited inmate appeals. According to the act, after three strikes, the case is sticken out. the purpose of this modification was to place a moratorium on litigations that had no merit.
The United States Congress is the federal government of the United States legislature. It is bicameral, with a lower chamber, the House of Representatives, and an upper chamber, the Senate. It has its sessions in the United States Capitol in Washington, D.C.
Congress makes laws that affect the daily lives of all Americans and is designed to be the people's voice. Its duties include financing government activities and programs, holding public hearings to inform the legislative process, and overseeing the executive branch.
The Constitution vests considerable powers in Congress as one of the three coequal institutions of government. Congress has sole legislative authority in the government, which means it is the only branch of government that may enact new laws or amend existing ones.
Learn more about the congress:
https://brainly.com/question/4736734
#SPJ1
Saudi arabia's system of government is an example of an autocratic monarchy. Choose two items that describe this type of government.
A sort of monarchy where the monarch rules through their own right or power is known as an autocratic monarchy (or authoritarianism as an ideology).
Even though some nations may have a limited constitution, the king or queen in an authoritarian state has absolute power and is in no way constrained. These monarchies are frequently hereditary. However, under constitutional monarchies, where the head of state's authority is also constrained or limited by that of the constitution, a legislature, and unwritten traditions, the monarch or queen is not the only decision-maker; in these countries, it is primarily the prime minister.
To know more about autocratic monarchy:
brainly.com/question/27138064
#SPJ4
What is ethical decision
Answer:
An ethical decision is one that engenders trust,and indicates responsibility, fairness and caring to an individual.
negligence is defined as failure to use reasonable care in the performance of services.
A. true
B. false
In what year did the sec first issue an interpretive release stating that registrants should consider disclosing the financial impact of compliance with environmental laws?.
Legal proceedings are underway. A registrant must also describe any material pending legal actions in which its property is involved. In 1971, the Environmental Protection Agency issued its first interpretive release on environmental disclosure.
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has proposed new climate-related disclosure requirements for public companies. The SEC proposed rule amendments in March 2022, with the "issuer rule," that would require public companies to provide certain climate-related financial data, as well as greenhouse gas emissions insights, in public disclosure filings.
Environmental law is a broad term that refers to aspects of the law that protect the environment. A related but distinct set of regulatory regimes, now heavily influenced by environmental legal principles.
To know more about Environmental law here
https://brainly.com/question/28332577
#SPJ4
which of the following is among the limitations imposed by the supreme court on affirmative action? group of answer choices race cannot be used as the sole criterion for admissions. race cannot be used as a tiebreaker between competing applicants. quotas cannot be used. points systems cannot guarantee admissions to racial minorities. all of these are correct.
Answer:
all of these are correct
Race cannot be used as the sole criterion among the limitations imposed by the supreme court on affirmative action. Thus, the option A is correct.
Affirmative action is the endeavor in the United States to increase the employment and educational prospects for women and members of underrepresented groups by preferential treatment in job hiring, college admissions, the granting of government contracts, and the allocation of other social benefits.
Affirmative action was first used at the federal level after the historic Civil Rights Act of 1964 was passed, and it was created to combat the residual consequences of years of prior discrimination. Race, sex, ethnic origin, religion, handicap, and age are the primary inclusion criteria in affirmative action initiatives.
Therefore, option A is the ideal selection.
Learn more about affirmative action here:
https://brainly.com/question/33722382
#SPJ4
Susan Bean, a citizen of Illinois, sued Wallis Turk, a citizen of the state of Colorado, for the breach of a construction contract on Bean’s new Chicago residence. More than $600,000 was at stake. Bean filed the suit in Illinois state court. Turk filed a motion to remove the case to the federal courts.
Will the case be heard in federal or state court?
The laws of each state establish state courts, which have extensive jurisdiction.
Cases involving everything from family law disputes to criminal matters can be heard in these courts. Federal courts, on the other hand, are established by the U.S. Constitution and have much more limited jurisdiction.
What distinguishes local, state, and federal courts?
State courts handle the majority of cases and interact with the general public more frequently than federal courts. Despite the fact that the federal courts hear fewer cases than the state courts, the cases that they do hear tend to be of greater national significance more frequently. Consider the court cases that you have heard about the most.
Learn more about Federal courts here:
https://brainly.com/question/25947870
#SPJ4
when both parties to a contract are mistaken about the same material fact, the contract cannot be rescinded.
a. true
b. false
the fact that the supreme court has been more willing to rule on affirmative action in recent years illustrates that the
In 2016, the last time the Supreme Court ruled on affirmative action, the justices narrowly upheld the University of Texas at Austin's admissions policy on a 4-3 vote, with retiring conservative Justice Anthony Kennedy casting the decisive vote.
How was affirmative action ruled by the Supreme Court?-The Supreme Court ruled that some policies for affirmative action are against the Fourteenth Amendment. Affirmative action policies must withstand scrutiny, according to the Court's decision.
Which Supreme Court case was the first to uphold affirmative action?Bakke (1978):Race can be taken into consideration by universities. The Supreme Court took into account a quota system that was in place at the University of California when it decided Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, which established affirmative action programs' constitutionality.
Learn more about Supreme Court here:
https://brainly.com/question/25903338
#SPJ4
if a plaintiff wants a court to order a neighbor to stop burning grass on their property because it might burn her (the plaintiff's property) she would be asking for: .
If a plaintiff wants a court to order a neighbor to stop burning grass on their property because it might burn her (the plaintiff's property) she would be asking for an injunction.
An injunction is a court order that requires a person to do or stop doing a specific activity.The plaintiff would need to show that the burning of the grass presents a real and immediate threat of harm to her property. She would also need to show that she has tried to resolve the issue with her neighbor but has been unable to do so. If the court grants the injunction, the neighbor would be required to stop burning the grass. If the neighbor does not comply, he or she could be held in contempt of court.
Learn more about court at : https://brainly.com/question/13375489
#SPJ4
Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words.
• In what ways can developing your information literacy help you in your personal and professional
life? Provide at least one specific example.
What types or sources of information that you have used in the past might not be appropriate for
academic writing? Why?
What are information literacy skills?
Information literacy skills, are referred to as media literacy or digital literacy skills, it is the ability to identify, assess, organize, utilize and communicate information in any procedure . These skills are very vital in a wide range of situations.
Example of information literacyResearch skills allow you to evaluate and fine solution to any problem e or answer to a question by gathering, analyzing and interpreting data to get information about a specific topic. This process vital skills, include
Problem-solving
Time managementNote-takingAttention to detaillearn more about information Literacy skills herebrainly.com/question/15870593
#SPJ1
An executive ________ is a clarification of congressional policy issued by the president and having the full force of law.
An executive agreement is a clarification of congressional policy issued by the president and having the full force of law.
Coverage is a deliberate device of guidelines to manual choices and reap rational consequences. A policy is a declaration of rationale and is carried out as a technique or protocol. rules are commonly followed via a governance body inside a corporation.
A policy is a fixed of ideas or plans that is used as a foundation for making selections, especially in politics, economics, or business. ... plans which include adjustments in overseas policy and financial reforms.
Learn more about policy here:https://brainly.com/question/3006046
#SPJ4
How have the courts played a vital role in protecting the media under the first amendment?.
The opportunity of the press, safeguarded by the Principal Change, is basic to a majority rules system in which the public authority is responsible to individuals. A free media can investigate and report on government wrongdoing as a watchdog.
The right to privacy is safeguarded by the First Amendment in what way?
The right to freedom of assembly and, according to judicial interpretation, freedom of association provides the strongest protection for privacy under the First Amendment. However, this protection is not absolute: Legally questionable organizations are not protected.
Is journalism protected by the First Amendment?
The Press Clause of the First Amendment ensures that everyone's right to share information with the public is protected. Washington's law favors corporate news media over citizen journalists by favoring the institutional press.
Learn more about First Amendment here:
https://brainly.com/question/26448398
#SPJ4
How does hamilton further define the role of the courts? what line of reasoning does he employ here to support his claim?.
Hamilton acknowledged that no federal judge could defy the Constitution by imposing his or her will on the people: The assertion that every delegated authority action that goes against the spirit of the commission under which it is exercised is null and void is the clearest principle-based position.
Why did Hamilton support the Supreme Court's creation?In Federalist 78, Hamilton wrote, "Justly regarded as an indispensable ingredient in its constitution, and, in a great measure, as the citadel of the public justice and the public security."
What was Alexander Hamilton's take on the judicial system?The judicial systempossesses no power over the purse or sword; no indication of the strength or wealth of the community; and cannot tolerate any active resolution."It may truly be said to have only judgment, not FORCE or WILL," Alexander Hamilton writes in The Federalist Papers, No.78.
Learn more about Hamilton here:
brainly.com/question/24714949
#SPJ4
What was Carr's argument in Baker v Carr?
After a census, a process called "aportionment" is used to plan up legislative districts with an equitable population distribution.
What is arguments and example?A statement or series of assertions used to try to persuade others that your point of view is accurate is known as an argument. There is a compelling case for reducing the price. A group of statements form an argument (premises and conclusion). The premises give support, justification, and foundation for the conclusion.
Why is argument important in critical thinking?A key component of critical thinking is the capacity to create, recognize, and assess arguments. We can persuade others and hone our presenting and debating skills by making strong arguments.
To know more about Argument visit:
https://brainly.com/question/17373422
#SPJ4
Based on your reading of the following, why would the fire captain most likely participate in the cleaning and maintenance of quarters and equipment? The fire captain must foster a program of discipline for the maintenance of apparatuses and equipment in a fire station. All maintenance and repair work must be approved by the fire captain. While the fire captain may supervise the cleaning and maintenance of quarters and equipment, one may also find him or her participating in the activities as well. Responses This prepares the fire captain for a possible promotion. This prepares the fire captain for a possible promotion. This ensures the fire captain has a full schedule of activities. This ensures the fire captain has a full schedule of activities. This allows the fire captain to observe the work of the firefighters in order to create departmental routines. This allows the fire captain to observe the work of the firefighters in order to create departmental routines. This provides the fire captain with information of where procedures might need to be adjusted. This provides the fire captain with information of where procedures might need to be adjusted.
The fire captain is responsible for fostering a disciplined program for the upkeep of tools and equipment in a fire station.
The fire captain is in charge of the crew's performance and well-being as well as the upkeep of the equipment. In a fire station with only one apparatus, the captain also serves as the station's general manager. Typically, fire departments set up their schedules so that a captain can be on hand for the majority of emergencies.
By overseeing the operations of staff members throughout a shift and carrying out duties related to firefighting, emergency treatment, hazardous materials, and fire prevention, the Fire Captain protects lives and property.
A lot of firefighters are in charge of giving medical aid. Firefighters tackle and extinguish flames as well as deal with other situations that endanger people, property, or the environment.
To learn more about fire station
https://brainly.com/question/12816186
#SPJ1
Why did the professional field of paralegals develop?
The American Bar Association (ABA), law firms, local bar associations, and Congress began significant efforts in the late 1960s to increase access to legal services and reduce poverty in the United States.
These efforts laid the groundwork for the paralegal profession.
What are the most important characteristics of a paralegal?
The paralegal (PL) contributes to the planning, development, and management of cases, conducts legal research, conducts client interviews, collects facts and information, drafts and analyzes legal documents, and gathers, compiles, and makes use of technical information in order to provide advice to an attorney.
What is a paralegal's most important job?
A paralegal's role in preparing for trials, hearings, and closings is one of their most important ones. The gathering of relevant information for the case and conducting legal research constitute a significant portion of this.
Learn more about paralegal here:
https://brainly.com/question/25507890
#SPJ1
Why is our legal system and imperfect
the creation of new crime legislation and the size of criminal justice agency budgets are decided by legislators responding to the demands of
The creation of new crime legislation and the size of criminal justice agency budgets are decided by legislators responding to the demands of voters.
Agency is the capability of individuals to have the strength and resources to satisfy their capacity. for instance, structure is composed of those elements of impact that determine or restriction sellers and their choices.
Man or woman organization is whilst someone acts on their personal behalf, while proxy corporation is whilst an person acts on behalf of someone else (including an organization). Collective organisation happens while people act together, along with a social movement.
Learn more about agency here:https://brainly.com/question/28043694
#SPJ4
Imagine you are a lawyer at the narrator’s trial. How would you either defend him or prosecute him? would you say that his actions indicate he is mad and not responsible for his crime or that, as the narrator says, the steps he takes to commit his crime show he is not mad and is responsible for the murder. Write an essay of at least 300 words that describes your plan in detail. Use quotations from the essay to support your ideas.
I would prosecute him for his deeds by proving that his deeds are serious in nature and I would give evidence to show that he had guilty mind and intention to commit such heinous act.
The narrator's act with deliberation and planning shows that he is sane enough to do a well planned act. I would refute the claim of insanity by defense by showing the intent of the accused by his acts. The steps he takes to do his criminal acts show he is sane enough to know the nature of the act and is responsible for the murder.
To know more about insanity:
brainly.com/question/28249990
#SPJ4
the employee retirement income security act (erisa) does not require employers to offer a pension plan
ERISA does now not require any employers to set up a retirement plan. It most effective calls for that folks who set up plans must meet positive minimal standards. The law usually does now not specify how plenty cash a player have to be paid as a advantage.
Greater mainly, an company is an enterprise, institution, government entity, agency, organization, professional offerings firm, nonprofit affiliation, small commercial enterprise, store, or character who employs or puts to paintings folks who may be called personnel or group of workers contributors.
An employers is a person who works for a company and earns a profits, even as an organization is someone or an organization who recruits workers to carry out paintings and responsibilities.
Learn more about employers here:https://brainly.com/question/26463698
#SPJ4
which group of attorneys for indigent clients is part of a system paid for and supported by tax dollars
A public defender program is a public or private nonprofit organization that is designated by a given jurisdiction to represent indigent criminal defendants and is staffed by full- or part-time attorneys.
What exactly is a defense group?
State-incorporated non-profit defense counsel organizations are known as community defender organizations. Community defender organizations receive initial and sustaining grants from the federal judiciary to fund their operations when they are designated in the CJA plan for the district in which they operate.
In the United States, what are the three main structures for public defenders?
The public defender system generally falls into one of three categories for the offices that are included:
1. funded and run by the state (the state)
2. county-operated and funded (county)
3. county-based but with some funding or oversight from the state (hybrid).
Learn more about defender program here:
https://brainly.com/question/17101905
#SPJ4
write down an ethical mission statement for yourself that you want to follow for every story you take as a journalist
Avoiding conflicts of interest, whether they are genuine or imagined, is a journalist's ethical duty. Avoid political and other outside activities that could undermine credibility or threaten integrity by refusing gifts, favors, fees, free travel, and special treatment.
Why is it crucial that journalists abide by a code of ethics?Journalists have a duty to uphold a code of ethics whether they are covering sports, entertainment news, the financial market, or current affairs. This is done to prevent conflicts of interest that could jeopardize their objectivity or integrity.
What exactly does journalism ethics entail?Journalists are obligated to: Seek Truth and Report It, according to the Society of Professional Journalists' Code of Ethics. Fact-checking, not purposefully misrepresenting data, citing sources, eschewing stereotypes, and encouraging a free exchange of ideas are all part of this.
To know more about ethics of journalism visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/17195637
#SPJ1
which of the following philosophers argued that a law is nothing more than a command issued by a ruler, backed by threats of punishment and maintained by a habit of obedience?
Philosopher John Austin argued that a law is nothing more than a command issued by a ruler, backed by threats of punishment and maintained by a habit of obedience.
A Philosopher is someone who practices or investigates philosophy. The time period logician comes from the historic Greek: romanized: philosophos, meaning 'lover of awareness'. The coining of the term has been attributed to the Greek philosopher Pythagoras.
Pretty literally, the term "philosophy" approach, "love of awareness." In a wide experience, philosophy is an pastime humans undertake after they searching for to understand essential truths about themselves, the arena in which they stay, and their relationships to the world and to each different.
Learn more about philosopher here:https://brainly.com/question/25266978
#SPJ4
Hey can anyone help my friend with these practice question
1. The history of judicial decisions regarding constitutional protections for prisoners is best described as ______.
a. consistently restricting rights
b. continually advancing reform
c. making the issue a top priority
d. producing ambiguous results
2. You have just become the chief of police for a mostly rural county that is next to a tribal territory. Would you expect that tribal territory to be a high-crime area? Why or why not?
a. If the tribal territory has a higher per capita income than the counties around it, then it is likely to have more crime.
b. If the tribal territory has less money than the county and state governments around it, then it is likely to have fewer law enforcement resources and more crime.
c. If the tribal territory has a lower population than the counties around it, then it is likely to have less crime.
d. Tribal territories usually have the same crime rates as the non-tribal territories surrounding them.
3. Years of attempts to regulate and control scandals and major problems in the corrections field have ______.
a. been largely successful
b. achieved limited gains
c. left conditions unchanged
d. worsened the situation
4. In the 2011 case of Brown v. Plata, the Supreme Court ______.
a. excluded double celling as a form of cruel and unusual punishment
b. set prisoner rights to basic human needs back by decades
c. clarified the definition of a prisoner as being a "slave of the state"
d. expanded the definition of cruel and unusual punishment
The history of court rulings pertaining to inmates' constitutional safeguards can best be characterized as advancing change. Thus option (B) is correct.
What is court?A court is any person or institution with the jurisdiction to arbitrate legal disputes between parties and administer justice in civil, criminal, and administrative affairs in conformity with the rule of law. A court, often known as a court of law, is a person or group of people with the legal jurisdiction to hear and settle disputes in civil, criminal, ecclesiastical, or military issues.
The Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishment protects inmates even when they do not have full constitutional rights. Prisoners must also be provided with a minimal level of living as part of this protection. As in the case of Brown v.
Therefore, Thus option (B) is correct.
Learn more about the court here:
https://brainly.com/question/13375489
#SPJ1
Select all the correct answers. Which of these statements are true about scientific theories and laws?.
Regarding scientific theories and laws, these claims are accurate. An idea is not an
What constitutes theory and what does not?A theoretical model is more than just a list of assumptions. A hypothesis is a prediction of what will happen, not why it will happen. Predictions devoid of reason are not theories. Strong theory papers are related and simple at the same time. A theory never turns into reality. It is a justification for a truth or facts. Until it is refuted, a well-supported, fact-based theory is accepted. That is a fact. It never becomes a fact. A well considered explanation for observations of the natural world that has been developed through the scientific method and that combines numerous facts and hypotheses is known as a theory.
To learn more about theories refer to
https://brainly.com/question/28427679
#SPJ4
A defensive driver makes themselves invisible, by turning off headlights, not using turn signals, and
driving in other driver's blind spot
True or false ?
Which amendment of the u. S. Constitution is most often used to ensure federal civil liberties are protected at the state and local level?.
U.S. Constitution's 14th Amendment The most frequent use of the Constitution is to guarantee that state and local governments uphold federal civil freedoms.
Give a brief account on the 14th Amendment.By adding the words "all individuals born or naturalized in the United States" to the Constitution of the United States in 1868, African Americans and freed slaves following the American Civil War were granted citizenship as well as equal civil and legal rights. The amendment consists of a total of five sections, four of which were separate proposals that were dropped during the legislative process and then combined with a fifth enforcement provision to form a single amendment.
The so-called Reconstruction Amendment prohibited the states from denying anyone who was under their jurisdiction "life, liberty, or property, without due process of law" and from denying them equal protection under the law.
To know more about, Fourteenth Amendment, visit :
https://brainly.com/question/1643008
#SPJ4
Riley, who is three years old, has never met her dad since he was sent to the state penitentiary for check fraud just after she was born. He was sentenced to five years for his part in the scam. One day when she returns from daycare. he is waiting there to meet her. What MOST likelv hannener to Riley's father?
As Riley father was sentenced to five years for his part in the scam but, in one he waits daycare to meet her, what has most likely happened to Riley's father is he was released early on parole.
What is a parole in law?Basically, a parole refers to the conditional release of prisoners before they complete their sentence. The paroled prisoners are alwats supervised by a public official, usually called a parole officer. If the paroled prisoners violate the conditions of their release, they may be returned to prison.
For example, a paroled prisoners must get and keep a job, avoid drugs and alcohol, avoid their victims, not commit any crimes, and report regularly to their parole officer. But if the paroled prisoner violated his parole by violently assaulting someone, he would probably be returned to prison. If he ran a stop sign, he probably would not be.
Read more about parole
brainly.com/question/14467348
#SPJ1