Answer:
the Neutrality Act allowed to buy U.S arms as long they paid cash and found a way to transport them on their own ships.
Summarise this paragraph please
Negotiations on borders should be based in the pre-1967 "green line" – the armistice line drawn in 1949 at the end of the war that followed Israel's declaration of a state – with agreed land swaps to compensate for Jewish settlements in the West Bank that would be incorporated into Israeli territory. Foe Israel this would mean giving up settlements deep inside the West Bank and the area also has important strategic factors for the defence of Israel. Israel has occupied the West bank and Gaza Strip (about 2,200 square miles) since the 1967 6-day war, and has built settlements with a population of about 220,000, mostly in the West Bank. Palestinians demand withdrawal from all of the land conquered in the 1967 and evacuation of the settlements. Israel continued to expand settlements throughout the peace process that began in 1993 and continues to do so today. In the final status negotiations at Camp David and Taba, Israel offered to turn over 97% of the land in the West Bank and all of Gaza, as well as Arab sections of Jerusalem. This offer was turned down by the Palestinians.
I really need this quickly pleaseee thanks ☺
[tex]\huge{\textbf{\textsf{{\color{pink}{An}}{\blue{sw}}{\pink{er}} {\color{blue}{:}}}}}[/tex]
Negotiation on border should be based in pre-1969 "green line" – the armistice line grown in 1949 at the end of the war that followed israel's declaration of a state – with agreed land swaps to compensate for Jewish settlements in the West Bank that would be incorporated into to Israeli territory.
Thanks ☺️Answer:
in the past few decades, an apparent international consensus has developed regarding a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict. However, in spite of this consensus and the fact that peace talks between Israelis and Palestinians have been ongoing in one way or another for over 17 years, peace has been elusive at best. The frustration and the suffering of the people on both sides of the conflict have led many to believe that the two-state-solution consensus is, in fact, unattainable, and this has fueled the emergence of alternative solutions. On one end of the spectrum, there are those on the Israeli side that advocate the idea of conflict management, instead of conflict resolution. At the other end of the spectrum are those (mostly on the pro-Palestinian side) who champion the proposal of a single, bi-national state. It was in this context that a group of academics from the U.S., Israel, and Palestine, gathered at a conference aptly titled "Pathways to Peace" in March 2008 to explore, discuss, and generate fresh, new ideas to bring forth an academic perspective of peace along with the aim of attaining justice and security for both the peoples of Palestine and Israel. Essays arising from this meeting were written to note down these ideas from some of the most important researchers in this area, such as Professor Herbert Kelman from Harvard University, Professor Naomi Chazan from Hebrew University of Jerusalem, and Dr. Sami Adwan from Bethlehem University, as well as other renowned academics from a diverse variety of scholarly backgrounds. This multidisciplinary perspective presents an academic and holistic method of examining and seeking out the elusive resolution to what is one of the longest conflict of the modern era. This edited volume is a collection of essays based on the papers and keynote presentations that were delivered at this conference in a number of different academic disciplines, including political sciences, economics, psychology, philosophy, and literature. It is unique not only in its inclusion of authors from all sides and different political views but also in how it incorporates the various disciplines and theoretical perspectives in proposing and advocating varied solutions to the conflict. This volume makes a substantial contribution to scholarship on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict by its application of academic thinking to the solution for one of the most serious conflicts of our time.
What did Zachary Taylor and Winfield Scott have in common?
Both led troops US troops in the Mexican-American War.
Both were elected president of the United States.
Both were named vice president at different times.
Both ran for president as members of the Democratic Party.
Answer:
Both led troops US troops in the Mexican-American War.
Answer:
Both led troops US troops in the Mexican-American War.
A monarchy is almost always considered legitimate by its own people because it is instituted in traditional ways.
true or false
Answer:
i would say " false "
Explanation:
A monarchy is a form of government in which a person, the monarch, is head of state for life or until abdication. The political legitimacy and authority of the monarch may vary from purely symbolic, to restricted, to fully autocratic, and can expand across the domains of the executive, legislative and judicial.
if im right please give brainlest :3to do that just wait until there are two answers, then choose which one is the best...and then click the crown at the bottom right of the answer
NEED HELP RIGHT NOW PLEASE..Super Tool This is considered by some to be the ultimate tool. With its waterproof properties, it was quickly adopted for a specific military application when originally introducedThe US Government also has recommended that all homes have it available. Along with its waterproof properties, it is known for its superior bonding, is heat resistant, and is extremely strong. It is easy to use with no training required and is widely available in various sizes and colors. NASA thinks so highly of this, it is included on every flight that leaves the launch pad. No home, military unit, or spacecraft should be without it. What is it?
3. All the following countries were influenced by the United States after World War II EXCEPT
A) Germany
B) China
C) Korea
D) Vietnam
What can we do to interrupt hate when we see it before it gets so powerful that it leads to widespread harm of a particular population?
Answer:
Explanation:
Hate is a worldwide problem, it is not isolated to a single geographic region. Because of this, it is nearly impossible to exterminate hate, but there are things that can be done to interrupt it. For starters, join forces with others and speak up. Many hate crimes (not all) occur because people allow them to happen by not standing up for the victims that are being targeted. Another thing that can be done is to teach love and acceptance. Humans are not born with hate in their hearts, they are taught to hate. Teaching love and acceptance to children would have a chain effect worldwide that will drastically reduce the number of hate crimes worldwide.
1/3 to 2/3 percent of change and pls answer 1/3 to 1/6
Answer:
50%
Explanation:
((1/6)/(1/3))*100=50% or (((1/3)-(1/6))/(1/3))*100%=50%
Hope this helped, and please mark as Brainliest <3
sort each description into the branch is describes. executive
Is the answer I put correct? Will give brainliest
Answer:
Yes, Hong Kong would be correct.
Explanation:
Answer:
Yes, you're right. It's Hong Kong
Explanation:
Why did many replace the barter system ? The evolution of money:
Answer:
Why did money replace the barter system? ... With the gold standard, the money supply would be tied to the amount of gold the country possessed, and a restricted money supply could impede economic growth.
Explanation:
PLEASE HELP ILL GIVE BRAINLEAST TO CORRECT ANSWER
I think the answer is ---> C. To advance the common good
Sorry if i am wrong.
comparison between the marshall plan and the treaty of versailles 
The Treaty of Versailles is the document that ends World War I.In this treaty, Germany is forced to take full responsibility for World War I and must pay reparations to countries like France and Britain. This ultimately ruins the Germany economy and allows for the rise of Hitler.
The Marshall Plan is put into place after World War II. This plan gives $13 billion worth of economic aid to Western European countries whose economy's are struggling after World War II. The ultimate goal of this plan (implemented by the US federal government) is to ensure that these Western European countries do not fall under the control of the Soviet Union and their communist system.
how is a svanna different from a plateau
Answer:
How is a savanna different from a plateau? A savanna is a tropical grassland dotted with small trees and shrubs while a plateau is an area of high and mostly flat land.
Explanation:
Answer:
Definitely less thick rockey mountains, more clay and plan life in the plateau
How did the Edict of Milan, which was issued in 313 CE, affect the spread of Christianity?
PLS HELP PLS
Why is Jerusalem such a place of conflict?
Answer:The Arab-Jewish conflict escalated into a nationalistic conflict, with Jerusalem at its center,” he said. “Jerusalem was a city holy to three religions, ...
Explanation:
Which statement best explains the events shown on the timeline above?
(
Answer:
The second answer from the top
Explanation:
Please help
Unlike the bombing of military targets in the United Kingdom, the London Blitz:
Question 4 options:
Killed many innocent civilians
Forced the U.K. to surrender
Was carried out by Japan
Occurred after the U.S. entered the war
Answer:
Killed many innocent civilians
can someone please help me
Your Assignment
1. Think about the character you used during the "Living the Great Depression"
activity. Is your character male or female? How old is your character? What
is your character's position in life? What is your character's background?
Does your character have other people who are dependent on him or her?
Everything about a person and his or her background can influence the
thoughts and opinions a person has.
2. Next, think of all the details about your character and how they might
influence his or her opinion. Fill out a RAFTS chart to identify your
character's point of view when telling about his or her experiences during
the Great Depression. In doing this, you will need to decide who your
character is going to communicate with in this assignment because you
will be writing a letter reflecting on your situation and your opinions about it.
3. Acting as if you were your character, write a letter to the person you have
identified as your audience (perhaps a teacher would be best). In your letter,
make sure that you write using your character's point of view and voice.
Also, make sure to include whatever feelings you may have had when you
were in that person's role.
Answer:
Be a girl
Explanation:
Do equal rights really exist ?
Answer:
in my opinion not at all
officially yes but actually no
Answer:
yes and belive it or not we have actually achieved that in america
Explanation:
The Founding Fathers believed strongly in limiting the number of qualifications needed to be a member of Congress.
In one paragraph, using your own words, describe how the Founding Fathers established the qualifications for Congress, and why they decided that this was important. Be sure to use correct spelling, grammar, and punctuation.
Answer:
They did this to ensure that everyone had the experience and knew what their were getting into. The founding father could've easily made it that anyone 18 years or older can become a Senator, but they didn't because they wanted people to know their state and what the problems is, and they want you to have somewhat wisdom.
I need a 2-3 sentence paragraph if who the goddess Gaea was...please help. Worth 50 points.
Answer: Gaea was a common figure in Greek myths, often referred to as mother earth. She is the daughter of chaos and represents the earth as a whole. She is the lover of Tartarus and mother of the titans and giants, as well as many other figures of Greek myth.
Explanation:
Answer:
Gaea is mother earth; mother of all living and non-living. She was the mother of the titans, who bore the Olympians. She seeks incessant revenge on the Olympians who imprison her son in Tartarus.
Explanation:
Hope u have a good day! Can u mark me as brainlist?
Write 4-6 sentences and use the Answer-Cite-Explain format to answer the
following question:
Evaluate the extent to which the Haitian Revolution marked a change in World
History
(No links or files )
Answer:
The Haitian Revolution
Explanation:
The Haitian revolution was a revolt against slavery and colonial rule in the French colony of Saint-Domingue. The revolution was the anti-slave revolt that began in 1791 and ended in 1804. The Haitian revolution gave a cause to fight slavery around the world. This Haiti Revolution became the first successful revolt against slavery. They were able to establish the first independent black state named Haiti.
Compare and contrast the 19th and 26th Amendments. What was the purpose of BOTH Amendments? A) to lower the minimum voting age B) to allow women the right to vote C) to prevent discrimination on the basis of race D) to get more people involved in the voting process
i will mark brainlist
Answer:
the answer is A
to decrease the voting age requirement. As a result, choice (A) is the right one.
What is meant by an Amendment ?A constitutional amendment amends the foundation documents of a state, nation, or other legal entity. In a well-established constitution, changes are typically directly incorporated into the relevant sections by being braided into the language.
They may also be included in the constitution as extra amendment (codicils), changing the way government is organized without altering the text of the original document.
Changes must first pass a stricter special procedure than is required for regular legislation, according to the majority of constitutions, before they may be put into effect.
These unusual procedures can take many different forms, such as supermajorities in the legislature, direct voter approval in a referendum, or even a combination of two or more unique special procedures. The constitution might potentially be changed in a referendum.
Learn more about Amendment, from :
brainly.com/question/12124635
#SPJ6
Can someone help me with this one. Thank you.
Answer:
Picture B.Explanation:
Picture B makes the most sense since it is a boat. We know that the English colonies used boats to travel. We can also the England flag on the boat.
Also A, C and D make no sense
Why did people oppose court- ordered busing? Why was Nixon's stance on this issue especially appealing to blue-collar workers and southern whites?
Answer:
I know the first one but not the second part sorry.
Here it is:
Many opponents of busing claimed the existence of "white flight" based on the court decisions to integrate schools. Such stresses led white middle-class families in many communities to desert the public schools and create a network of private schools.
Explanation:
Answer question above
Answer: 38 th
plz mark brainliest
Explanation:
1.) The Soviet people initially supported the idea of a communist society because they:
a.) had good experiences with previous authoritarian rulers.
b.) liked the idea of a new world order that promised equality and social justice.
c.) disliked Vladimir Lenin and didn’t want him to be president.
d.) None of these choices are correct.
2.) Which of the following leaders tried to reform the Soviet Union to expand freedoms of the press, religion, and speech within the country?
a.)Tsar Nicholas II
b.) Vladimir Lenin
c.) Mikhail Gorbachev
d.) Joseph Stalin
3.) A coup is a:
a.) sudden overthrow of the government.
b.) member of parliament.
c.) religious leader of a country.
d.) type of democratic election.
1. B)
The Russian people were barely getting by while their king sat on a gold throne. This upset them, and they wanted a society where no one would have more than anyone else.
2. C)
Mikhail Gorbachev gave people these rights because he saw how much they struggled in the past due to not having them.
3. A)
January 6 is a great example to think of.
Who is Puti? In Anne frank dairy
Answer:
Putti Van Daan: An irritable former business partner of Mr. Frank, Mr. Van Daan's family is invited to stay in the attic with the Franks. He is selfish and openly critical of others, especially Anne.
Explanation:
Match each characteristic to the correct philosopher.
wrote the Second
Treatise on Government
wrote the Commentaries
on the Laws of England
supported the concept
of popular sovereignty
believed that natural law was
given to humans by God
maintained that the government
cannot block a citizen’s rights to
life, property, and liberty
William Blackstone or John Locke
Answer:
John Locke- Maintained that the government cannot black a citizen's rights to life, liberty, and property, Believed that natural law was given to humans by God, wrote the Second Treatise on Government, Supported the concept of popular sovereignty.
Hope this helps :)
Explanation: