Many Americans requested that the government regulate commerce and industry in response to the excesses of the millionaires of the Gilded Age. When a result, as the 20th century began, a collection of autonomous regulatory commissions appeared.
What is a significant factor in the federal bureaucracy's long-term growth?Along with the complexity of the duties it must complete and the demands for services made upon it by the American people, the federal bureaucracy has risen exponentially throughout time.
How has the federal government's bureaucracy grown over time?Due to the increased usage of outside contractors, the bureaucracy has decreased recently (private business, being paid to perform specific jobs).
To know more about growth of regulatory visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/29455894
#SPJ4
While holding your instruction permit you may practice driving with any licensed adult ____ years of age or older.
A. 18
B. 21
C. 25
While holding your instruction permit you may practice driving with any licensed adult 25 years of age or older.
It is crucial to have a capable, knowledgeable driver at your side when you are learning to drive. A licensed adult who is at least 25 years old makes the ideal practice driver.Since he is 25 years old, he has sufficient experience and has likely been a driver for at least 7 years, which has given him sufficient insight into road etiquette. Holders of instruction permits under the age of 18 must. If you are under the age of 18, you must have your instruction permit for at least six months before applying for a probationary license.Thus the correct answer is C.
Refer here to learn more about instruction permit: https://brainly.com/question/7934886
#SPJ4
cowper summarizes _____ by saying that we will have 100 years of progress in the next 25 years and 20,000 years of progress in the next 100 years.
We will make 100 years of advancement in the next 25 years, and 20,000 years of progress in the following 100 years, according to Cowper (2003), who also describes the law of accelerating returns.
Who was the first police woman recognized by the government?One of the earliest recognized commissioned policewomen in Chicago, Illinois, was Marie Owens in 1890. Portland, Oregon's Lola Baldwin became the first woman to receive a police commission in 1908.
What is one of the objectives of civilian control over the police?Civilian oversight panels are designed to give community members a voice and increase transparency and accountability through an independent review and investigation of cases involving excessive force and complaints from the general public about improper conduct by police.
To know more about Cowper visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/934461
#SPJ4
southern politicians justified seceding from the union and creating the confederate states of america by stating ........................
Southern politicians justified seceding from the union and creating the confederate states of America by stating that the states had voluntarily joined the Union and the had the right to leave it too.
About confederate states of America
From February 8, 1861, to May 9, 1865, Confederate States of America (CSA), sometimes known as the Confederate States, Confederacy, and simply "the South," was an unrecognised breakaway republic in North America. The Confederacy was made up of American states that had secessionist policies and fought the Union during American Civil War. Dixie, or eleven U.S. states, proclaimed secession and made up the majority of the CSA. They were North Carolina, Virginia, Arkansas, Tennessee, Florida, Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, and South Carolina. During the occupation by the Union forces, Kentucky and Missouri also declared their secession and had proper representation with in Confederate Congress.
To know more about confederate states of America:
brainly.com/question/14372354
#SPJ4
Jamar and Natasha had the following income and expenses for 2021:
$45,000 in wages.
$24,000 in rental income.
$8,000 in rental expenses.
$48,000 in self-employment receipts.
$12,000 in self-employment expenses.
Assuming there are no income adjustments, what is their California gross income?
A $97,000
B $105,000
C $109,000
D $117,000
The California gross income of Jamar and Natasha is $97,000. The correct response is option (A).
Define California gross income.Gross income in California includes what you are paid as a salary and wages, as well as gratuities, pensions, interest, and dividends that are taxed, capital gains from mutual funds (on Form 1099-DIV, Box 2a).
Gross income is the total of all earnings, profits, interest payments, rent, and other sources of income that families and individuals get before any deductions or taxes. It differs from net income, which is calculated by deducting from gross income all applicable taxes and other deductions.
The income portion of the federal form 1040 is duplicated here. There are no more changes to CA 540NR. Jamar and Natasha's combined gross income in California is therefore $97,000.
To know more about California gross income, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28879319
#SPJ1
How many days before closing must you deliver a copy of the appraisal to the borrower?.
police agencies use license plate readers (lprs) to identify vehicles owned by persons of interest or those who pose a threat to law enforcement.
Police agencies use license plate readers (plus) to identify vehicles owned by persons of interest or those who pose a threat to law enforcement.
Law enforcement is the activity of some members of government who act systematically by detecting, deterring, rehabilitating, or punishing those who violate the rules and norms of society. The term includes police, courts, and correctional facilities.
Law Enforcement describes the agencies and officials responsible for enforcing the law, maintaining public order, and managing public safety. Law enforcement's primary responsibilities include identifying, arresting, and detaining individuals suspected of committing crimes.
In its modern form, US police departments have four primary responsibilities. law enforcement, crime prevention, providing emergency response, and providing support services.
Learn more about Law enforcement https://brainly.com/question/24324910
#SPJ4
If a bill is submitted to the president within 10 days of the end of the congressional session and he/she takes no action on the bill - he/she neither signs the bill nor vetoes it...A. this is referred to as a pocket vetoB. the bill does not become lawC. the bill becomes lawD. congress extends the session until action is takenE. only A and B
If a bill is submitted to the president within 10 days of the end of the congressional session and he/she takes no action on the bill this is referred to as a pocket veto, the bill does not become law.
The veto is the president's authority to reject a bill or joint resolution and halt its passage into law. A measure enacted by Congress must be signed by the president within 10 days. In the case of a conventional veto, the President sends the piece of legislation back to the house where it was first introduced, usually with a message outlining his or her reasons. Only a two-thirds vote in both the Senate and the House is required to override this veto. In this case, despite the President's objections, the bill becomes a law. When Congress adjourns during the ten-day timeframe, a pocket veto happens. The bill cannot be sent back to Congress by the president.
Learn more on law
https://brainly.com/question/29553499
#SPJ4
What is the essential factor that defines whether a government has legitimacy?
O strong democratic institutions
O strong coercive power (police, etc.)
O the consent of the people
O providing social services to the people
the___within article i, section 8 of the u.s. constitution authorizes congress to pass laws protecting intellectual property.
The correct answer is the clause 8 within Article I, Section 8 of the US constitution authorizes congress to pass laws protecting intellectual property.
The clause actually bestows two separate powers: the ability to secure for a finite period of time the exclusive right to authors' writings, which serves as the foundation for U.S. copyright law, and the ability to secure for a finite period of time the exclusive right to inventors' discoveries, which serves as the foundation for U.S. patent law.
Trademarks are instead protected under the Commerce Clause because the clause is silent on whether Congress may protect them. Some of the terminology in the clause have dated connotations, which could be misleading to readers today.
For instance, "useful Arts" refers to all knowledge, not only the disciplines of current scientific investigation, and "Sciences" refers to all knowledge, not just the domains of modern scientific study.
To know more about 'intellectual property' related questions
visit- https://brainly.com/question/29452183
#SPJ4
A group of citizens is concerned about the safety of their city park at night. Their city council has limited funds, and does not want to pay for
new safety initiatives.
Which scenario is an example of how persuasion could be used to resolve this situation?
The citizens work with other community members to build a fence around the park.
The city council votes to close the park at night without meeting with the concerned citizens.
The concerned citizens present evidence at a city council meeting showing that additional lighting in parks prevents crime.
The city council agrees to consider installing a fence around the park if the citizens volunteer to form a community watch group.
The scenario is an example of The concerned citizens present evidence at a city council meeting showing that additional lighting in parks prevents crime .
Option C is correct .
Concerned citizen :A person who is a member of a country and has rights because he was born or entitled to it, or lives in a particular city.
What does it mean to be a concerned citizen?Concerned Citizens are participating members of the political community. Citizenship is obtained by fulfilling national, state, or local legal requirements. A state grants its citizens certain rights and privileges. In return, concerned citizens are expected to obey the laws of their country and defend the country against enemies.
Importance of being a concerned citizen :Being a concerned citizen of a country has many legal advantages, such as voting rights, the right to hold public office, social security, health services, public education, permanent residency, and property rights, depending on the country. Around including land, or employment.
Learn more about concerned citizen :
brainly.com/question/25656843
#SPJ1
The exclusionary rule was established to punish officers for their errors in collecting evidence by not allowing illegally obtained evidence to be admitted into a criminal hearing.
TrueFalse
The exclusionary rule was brought into an enforcement for the purpose of punishment of public officers if they presented illegally obtained evidence into a criminal hearing. Therefore, the statement given above holds true.
The exclusionary rule of the legal and justice system can be referred to or considered as the regulation that prohibited the presentation of an illegally obtained evidence and presenting it into the criminal hearing. Non-compliance with this regulation also meant that the officers presenting the evidence were being severely punished with respect to the same.
Learn more about the exclusionary rule here:
https://brainly.com/question/12239906
#SPJ4
Under the Uniform Residential Landlord and Tenant Act, if a lease does not state a clear expiration date, the lease is regarded as
Answer:
Hello. Under Uniform Residential Landlord and Tenant Act, if the lease does not specify or make clear an expiration date, the lease will be regarded as: A tenancy from period-to-period.
Explanation:
Question does not ask for an explanation, so one will not be given. Have a nice day user.
Lawmakers in new zealand will vote on whether the country should lower the voting age to. ?.
The national voting age in New Zealand will be lowered from 18 to 16, Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern said on Monday.
She made her declaration shortly after the nation's Supreme Court decided that denying 16 and 17-year-olds the right to vote constituted age discrimination. Although Ardern stated that she personally supports decreasing the age, a 75% supermajority of parliamentarians would need to approve for the move. Even the supporters admit they do not yet have the numbers. The question of lowering the voting age is being debated in a number of nations. Several countries, like Austria, Malta, Brazil, Cuba, and Ecuador, let citizens vote at 16 years old. Sanat Singh, co-director of the Make It 16 campaign in New Zealand, expressed his utter delight at the court's ruling.
learn more about new zealand voting age here:
https://brainly.com/question/26211549
#SPJ4
Why does leslie gordon think it is a good idea for the government to make the sale of alcohol legal?.
Leslie Gordon believes legalizing the sale of alcohol is a good idea for the government because the tax revenue would raise more than $200,000,000 for critically important needs.
People tend to purchase alcohol on the black market since it is illegal to sell it, which has caused both a financial and a political issue for the government. As a result, Leslie Gordon believe that the government should legalize the sale of alcohol. that it would be wise for the government to legalize alcohol sales.The 18th Amendment was intended to make it illegal to sell and buy alcohol. But its proper execution was a failure.
learn more about sale of alcohol here:
https://brainly.com/question/21599095
#SPJ4
codis is a dna database that allows law enforcement agencies to compare dna profiles to identify suspects or link serial crimes. True or False ?
In the Supreme Court case of _____, the Court struck down Section 7 of the Military Commissions Act, which declared that Guantanamo prisoners could not bring habeas corpus petitions to federal courts to seek their release.
Section 7 of the Military Commissions Act, which prohibited Guantanamo prisoners from filing habeas corpus petitions in federal courts to request their release, was overturned by the Supreme Court in the Marbury v. Madison decision.
In a 2006 decision, what did the Supreme Court rule on military commissions?Without a congressional act, the President is not permitted to establish military commissions. Five officers must make up the board of a military commission rather than a single federal judge.
Which decision of the Supreme Court is most closely related to the exclusionary rule?Weeks v. United States provided the first explanation of the exclusionary rule (1914). The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in that case that the Fourth Amendment's safeguard against unauthorized searches and seizures should be interpreted to prohibit using incriminating evidence that was obtained unlawfully.
To know more about Military Commissions Act visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/6327433
#SPJ4
Firms that operate in a market-directed economy attempt to develop ______ markets for themselves and their new products.
In a market-directed economy, businesses work to create monopolistic markets for both their existing products and any new ones they introduce.
Which of the following statements best describes a market-driven economy?The choices made by the economy's numerous producers and consumers at the micro level serve as the foundation for macroeconomic decisions. They presumptively believe that a customer's decision to buy a product, rather than an aggressive sales team, drives a sale.
What is the fundamental goal of the market-driven economic system in the US?The fundamental goal of the market-driven economic system in the United States is to fulfill consumer requirements as they are perceived by the customers. Customer satisfaction: based on individual expectations and aspirations.
To know more about monopolistic markets visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/29407851
#SPJ4
According to Kathleen Dolan, one of the reasons that Congress is less popular than the presidency and the Supreme Court is because...
There are many Congress members while there is only one president and nine Supreme Court members
According to Kathleen Dolan, one of the reasons that Congress is less popular than the presidency and the Supreme Court is because there are many Congress members while there is only one President and nine Supreme Court members.
Because there are divides in many laws, it's difficult to appease everyone, which is why Congress is so unpopular. To understand the rules changes and the power dynamics between the Speaker and committee chairs, read through the six stages of the House of Representatives. Congress is the government branch with the lowest popularity. Some imagine it as the damaged branch that needs to be fixed. But it's also the most crucial.
Learn more on laws
https://brainly.com/question/29553499
#SPJ4
The doctrine of caveat emptor means that the law may be justifiably used to restrict the freedom of individuals for their own good. A. TrueB. False
Option B is correct. False, doctrine of caveat emptor does not mean that the law may be justifiably used to restrict the freedom of individuals for their own good.
About Caveat Emptor
Latin phrase "Let the buyer beware" is caveat emptor. It is now a part of English idiom. The contract law concept known as caveat emptor often governs the selling of real estate just after date of closure, though it could also apply to the sale of other types of products. Because purchasers frequently know less about the product or service they are buying than the seller, the phrase "caveat emptor" and its usage as the disclaimer of the warranties are a result. This characteristic of the circumstance is referred to as "information imbalance." Defects in the product or service might only be apparent to the seller and concealed from the buyer.
To know more about caveat emptor:
brainly.com/question/28084786
#SPJ4
Legal privileges are protections against certain types of testimony. Which of the following is not a legal privilege?
A. Attorney-client privilege
B. Librarian-patron privilege
C. Attorney work-product privilege
D. Physician-patient privilege
Patron-librarian privilege is not a recognized legal privilege. Any person or group who visits the library physically or electronically to use its resources is referred to as a library patron. This person or group must have paid the library's yearly membership fee.
What does a library user consist of?The term "library patron" refers to a person or group who has paid the library's yearly membership fee in order to borrow materials from it or to access its resources online or in person. It also refers to circulation records that contain information about identifiable people.
How did librarians participate in the French Revolution?During the French Revolution, librarians had full charge of choosing books for the nation's citizens to read. As a result of this action, the idea of modern library service—the democratic extension of library services to all members of society, regardless of income or education—was put into practice.
To know more about Privilege visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/25657425
#SPJ4
How does mock trial help students? Write 1 paragraph 5 sentences each
Answer:
Mock trial is a great way for students to learn about the legal system and develop their critical thinking and public speaking skills. It allows students to gain an understanding of the court system and the roles of the different participants. It also provides an opportunity for students to practice their argumentation and presentation skills in a safe and supportive environment. Mock trial also helps students to develop their research and analytical skills as they prepare for their cases. Finally, mock trial helps students to develop their confidence and self-esteem as they learn to think on their feet and present their arguments in a persuasive manner.
Explanation:
Supreme court justices who support judicial activism and those who support judicial restraint.
Judicial activism supporter's are Chief Justice John Roberts, became one of the most prominent proponents and Judicial restraint supporter's are Thomas Jefferson, Learned Hand and Hugo Black.
A philosophy of judicial interpretation, or how judges interpret the law, is known as judicial restraint. Definitions fluctuate a little bit from source to source, like the majority of abstract ideas. Judicial restraint is the idea of a judge not introducing his or her personal preferences into court cases and decisions. Judicial activism is a method of using the court review process or a term used to describe a specific judicial decision in which the judge was seen as being more inclined to rule on constitutional questions and to invalidate legislative or executive measures.
learn more about Supreme Court here:
https://brainly.com/question/1755400
#SPJ4
How did the supreme court rulings regarding segregation differ in the time between plessy v. Ferguson and swann v. Charlotte-mecklenburg?.
In Plessy v. Ferguson (1896), the Supreme Court decided that racial discrimination in accommodations was permissible. After 58 years, the Supreme Court ruled in Brown v. The Board of Education of Topeka (1954) that racial accommodations were fundamentally unfair and therefore unconstitutional.
What impact did the Plessy rulings from the Supreme Court have?Evidently, the US Supreme Court did not consider this when it rendered its decision in the Plessy v. Ferguson case in 1896. The Supreme Court upheld segregated areas for blacks and whites as long as they were treated equally, a ruling that would stand for nearly 60 years before being overturned.
What distinguishes the cases of Plessy and Ferguson?Ferguson set a precedent in 1896. The "separate but equal" doctrine was used by the U.S. Supreme Court to rule that racial segregation was constitutional.
To know more about court rulings visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/14566452
#SPJ4
in 1916, congress approved legislation for the creation of the national park service, a power expressly given in which clause?
Answer:
The Necessary and Proper Clause or the Elastic Clause
Explanation:
Elastic Clause, is a clause in Article I, Section 8 of the United States Constitution, Article I, Section 8, Clause 18:
"[The Congress shall have Power . . . ] To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof."
in barker v. wingo (1972) the u.s. supreme court identified four factors that courts should assess in determining whether a particular defendant has been deprived of the right to a speedy trial. they are:
According to the Supreme Court of the United States, the duration of the delay, the causes of the delay, the appellant's assertion of the right to a prompt review and appeal, and prejudice are the four (4) criteria that should be taken into consideration by the courts.
What was the decision of the Supreme Court in Barker v. Wingo?Held: The defendant's constitutional right to a speedy trial cannot be established by any rigid criteria; rather, it can only be evaluated on an as-needed basis by weighing the prosecution's and the defendant's actions.
What does Barker v. Wingo 1972 signify?The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution, specifically the right of defendants, was the subject of the United States Supreme Court case Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 (1972).
To know more about U.S. Supreme Court visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/224703
#SPJ4
Lawmakers in new zealand will vote on whether the country should lower the voting age to. ?.
The national voting age in New Zealand will be lowered from 18 to 16, Prime Minister announced. She made her declaration after Supreme Court decided that denying 16 and 17-year-olds.
Although Ardern stated that she personally supports decreasing the age, a 75% supermajority of parliamentarians would need to approve for the change. Even the supporters admit they do not yet have the numbers. The question of lowering the voting age is being debated in a number of nations. Several countries, like Austria, Malta, Brazil, Cuba, and Ecuador, let citizens vote at 16 years old. Sanat Singh, co-director of the Make It 16 campaign in New Zealand, expressed his utter delight at the court's ruling. It's a significant day, he remarked. Not just for our campaign, but also for the nation, this is historic.
learn more about new zealand here:
https://brainly.com/question/26211549
#SPJ4
After reading the scenario, respond to A, B, and C below:
a. Describe the specific bureaucratic power being exercised in the scenario.
b. Explain how Congress could limit the exercise of bureaucratic power described in the scenario.
c. Explain how the President could limit the exercise of bureaucratic power described in the scenario.
Congress uses open hearings to keep an eye on administrative behavior. In some cases, Congress can also exert control over the bureaucracy by revising the law and making changes to the budget in order to provide those charged with carrying out its policies more guidance.
What do you mean by bureaucracy?Both a collection of non-elected leaders and an administrative policy-making body are referred to as bureaucracies.
A bureaucracy, historically, was a form of government administration where departments were run by non-elected people. Any significant institution today, whether it is privately or publicly held, is governed by bureaucracy.
Bureaucracy is exemplified by the public administration in many jurisdictions and sub-jurisdictions, but it may also be seen in any institution with a centralized hierarchical structure, such as hospitals, academic institutions, commercial businesses, professional societies, social clubs, etc.
Many pundits have suggested that bureaucracy are necessary in today's society. Whether bureaucrats should be independent or directly answerable to their political overlords is the first conundrum.
Learn more about bureaucracy, here
https://brainly.com/question/3950164
#SPJ1
An attorney was employed by the United States Department of Health and Human Services in a regional office located in a tobacco-growing state. A labor contract between the agency and the clerical workers union contained a policy providing for termination of union employees only for certain specified grounds. The attorney, however, was not a member of the union and not covered by such a policy. The attorney was angered by the regional director's refusal to adopt a no-smoking policy for employees and visitors in the office. She posted a notice in the employee cafeteria ridiculing what she called the hypocrisy of an agency promoting health issues and nonsmoking programs while refusing to provide its employees with those same opportunities. The notice prompted a great deal of debate among the employees and was brought to the attention of the regional director, who was very displeased.
Which of the following statements is most accurate regarding the director's right to dismiss the attorney?
A The attorney has a liberty interest in the exercise of her First Amendment rights that entitles her to a hearing to contest the grounds of her dismissal.
B The attorney has a property interest as a public employee that precludes her from being fired without notice and an opportunity to respond.
C The attorney has no right to a hearing because her statements were not an expression of views on public issues.
D The attorney has both a liberty interest and a property interest that entitles her to a pre-termination evidentiary hearing.
The process of generating organizational policies is now more properly referred to as "policy making."
Free corporations should adhere to policy 1, as doing so will provide applicants who belong to underrepresented groups or have disabilities an extra point. Because of this method, Free Corporation won't have to alter its hiring criteria or other factors like technical expertise, personality type, experience, and many others. Therefore, by awarding extra points, they are merely providing this group of individuals a competitive advantage over other individuals, and by doing so, they may gradually instil this group of individuals into the company's culture and performance. The union that represents the workers at the Miracle Medical research company has opted against bargaining with them about the hiring of more personnel because it is their choice and has nothing to do with breaking any local, state, or federal laws.
Learn more about Policy making here:
https://brainly.com/question/29765758
#SPJ4
positions such as justice of the peace and county tax assessor are important to a functioning democracy. State True or False your answer:
a. True
b. False
The statement is accurate. A functional democracy depends on positions like county tax assessor and justice of the peace.
What is the tax assessor's function?An assessor, sometimes known as a tax assessor, is a hired or elected representative tasked with figuring out the value of each taxable property in a county, municipality, or township in the United States.
Why is tax collection necessary for governments?Tax revenue is essential for governments to function. Real estate, personal property, and income are assessed for taxes by the federal, state, and local governments.
To know more about Justice visit:-
brainly.com/question/978006
#SPJ4
We can easily see that a terrorist might fit into a category when it comes to evaluating someone’s actions. What if another group is organized such as a Drug Cartel? They are organized and use violence against police, government and civilians. Should Drug Cartels be labeled terrorists and be subject to drone strikes and limited civil rights protections? Why and or why not?
Yes, Drug Cartels should be labeled terrorists and be subject to drone strikes and limited civil rights protections. They should be labelled terrorists and be subjected to drone strikes and limited civil rights protection because they are major financiers of the terrorist groups.
Also, the United Nations has recognized the connection between both groups and to safeguard the lives of many and ensure peace in our world, they should be labelled terrorists.
Who are terrorists?A terrorist is an individual who employs violence, especially murder and bombing, in order to achieve political aims. Terrorism, in its general sense, is the application of criminal violence to inject or institute a state of terror or fear, popularly with the intention to achieve political or religious aims.
Therefore, the correct answer is as given above. The fact that they finance criminal violence to achieve political or religious goals is enough evidence to prove or label them as terrorists.
learn more about terrorists: https://brainly.com/question/510393
#SPJ1