Use the binomial series to find a Taylor polynomial of degree 3 for 1 91 +32 T3(0) X + c? + 23

The null hypothesis is not rejected since the p-value is higher than or equal to the level of significance.

We assess the statistical conclusion based on the given data by comparing the p-value to the level of significance ().

Given: ZSTAT is 1.88 and p-value is 0.9699.

Level of significance () = 0.10

In a one-tail hypothesis test, the null hypothesis is only rejected in the lower tail if the p-value is less than the level of significance ().

The p-value is greater in this instance (0.9699) than the level of significance (0.1).

Therefore, the proper reaction is

C. The null hypothesis is not rejected since the p-value is higher than or equal to the level of significance.

Learn more about null hypothesis:
https://brainly.com/question/30821298

#SPJ4

Answer:

option c

Step-by-step explanation:

first use angle sum property, then use

linear pair axiom

Answer:

D: 121

Step-by-step explanation:

Step One: To do this problem, you must understand the rule that all angles in a triangle add up to 180 degrees.

Step Two: Now that we know the rule, we know this triangle equals 180 degrees. First, we must add the angles we DO know together: 26+33= 59.  

Step Three: We can subtract 59 from 180 to find the missing angle: 180-59= 121.

Answer:

True

Step-by-step explanation:

With Sin and Cos, the rule is that the opposites are the same:

SinA=CosB

CosB=SinA

In this problem, it is showing SinA=cosB, so it is the same, it is true.

Hope this helps!

(a) The expected number of good quality bottles in this batch is 7.2

(b) The probability that the process is running well, given that the second bottle is not of good quality, is 0.5

(c) The probability that the 5th bottle is of good quality is 0.84

(a) To find the expected number of good quality bottles in the batch of 10 bottles, we can multiply the probability of each bottle being of good quality by the total number of bottles.

Given that the probability of a bottle being of good quality is 90% if the process is running well and 60% if the process is not running well, and the probability that the process is running well is 80%, we can calculate the expected number of good quality bottles as follows:

Expected number of good quality bottles = (Probability of running well) × (Probability of good quality | running well) × (Total number of bottles)

= (0.8) × (0.9) × (10)

= 7.2

Therefore, the expected number of good quality bottles in this batch is 7.2.

(b) Given that the first 4 bottles tested are all of good quality except for the second bottle, we need to find the probability that the process is running well.

Let A be the event that the process is running well, and B be the event that the second bottle is not of good quality.

Using Bayes' theorem, we can calculate the probability:

P(A | B) = (P(B | A) × P(A)) / P(B)

P(B | A) is the probability that the second bottle is not of good quality given that the process is running well, which is 1 - 0.9 = 0.1.

P(A) is the probability that the process is running well, which is given as 0.8.

P(B) is the probability that the second bottle is not of good quality. To calculate this, we need to consider the cases where the process is running well and not running well.

P(B) = P(B | A) × P(A) + P(B | not A) × P(not A)

= 0.1 × 0.8 + 0.4 × 0.2

= 0.08 + 0.08

= 0.16

Now, we can calculate the probability using Bayes' theorem:

P(A | B) = (0.1 × 0.8) / 0.16

= 0.5

Therefore, the probability that the process is running well, given that the second bottle is not of good quality, is 0.5.

(c) Now, if the 5th bottle is tested as well, we want to find the probability that this bottle is of good quality.

Let C be the event that the 5th bottle is of good quality.

Using the law of total probability, we can calculate the probability:

P(C) = P(C | A) × P(A) + P(C | not A) × P(not A)

= 0.9 × 0.8 + 0.6 × 0.2

= 0.72 + 0.12

= 0.84

Therefore, the probability that the 5th bottle is of good quality is 0.84.

To learn more about probability

https://brainly.com/question/13604758

#SPJ11

The answer is A. 2pi/3 radians.

Answer:

First Option

Explanation:

A)  2pi/3 radians

Hope this helps :)

Answer:

43 feet would be the correct answer.

Step-by-step explanation:

The perimeter of the shape is approximately 44.00 feet, and the area is approximately 160.50 square feet.

To determine the perimeter of the shape, we add up the lengths of all its sides. The given sides are 4 ft, 16.5 ft, 4 ft, and 20 ft. Adding these lengths together, we get a perimeter of 44.5 ft. However, since we are asked to round to the nearest hundredth, the perimeter becomes approximately 44.00 feet.

To find the area of the shape, we need to know its specific shape. Since the given measurements do not provide enough information, it is not possible to accurately determine the area. In order to calculate the area, we need to know the shape's dimensions, angles, or additional side lengths. Without this information, we cannot determine the area accurately.

In conclusion, the perimeter of the shape is approximately 44.00 feet, but the area cannot be determined without further information.

Learn more about perimeter here:

https://brainly.com/question/7486523

#SPJ11

Answer:23/8Step-by-step explanation:(LCM of 4,8 and 6 = 24 )

3×6/4×6 + 7×3/8×3 + 5×4/6×4 28+21+20/24

59/24

I hope you got it❤️❤️❤️And thanks your patience ❤️.SORRY

Answer:

Yes

Step-by-step explanation:

Hello There!

Remember the sum of the two shorter sides has to be greater than the largest side in order for it to be a triangle

11+12 must be greater than 13

11+12=23

23>13 therefore the side lengths can form a triangle

Answer:

poopy

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

h(t)=0.5at^2+v+5

Step-by-step explanation:

If you know how to do math you should know

The probability of getting a negative result is 0.175 or 17.5%.

To calculate the probability of getting a negative result, we need to consider the sensitivity and specificity of the diagnostic test.

Given that the prevalence of the condition is 12.5%, we can assume that 12.5% of the population has the condition, and the remaining 87.5% does not.

The sensitivity of the test is 80%, which means that it correctly identifies 80% of the individuals with the condition as positive.

The specificity of the test is 95%, which means that it correctly identifies 95% of the individuals without the condition as negative.

To calculate the probability of getting a negative result, we need to consider both the true negative rate (1 - sensitivity) and the proportion of individuals without the condition (1 - prevalence).

Probability of getting a negative result = (1 - sensitivity) × (1 - prevalence)

= (1 - 0.80) × (1 - 0.125)

= 0.20 * 0.875

= 0.175

Therefore, the probability of getting a negative result is 0.175 or 17.5%.

Learn more about probability https://brainly.com/question/31828911

#SPJ11

Answer:

a=1

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

4

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

4

Step-by-step explanation:

2/3 x 6 is 4 because when you times the 2 in 2/3 u get 12 and 12/3 is the same as 4

Answer:

48

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the range, you have to subtract the biggest/largest number by the smallest number:

108 - 60 = 48

The range is 48.

Answer:

3 to 4

Step-by-step explanation:

12÷4=3

16÷4=4

so that makes it 3 to 4

The discount amount is $331.80. The price after discount is $616.20. The sales tax amount is $56.63. The final price is $672.83.

A TV originally priced at $948 is on sale for 35% off. We are to find the discount amount and the price after discount.

The original price of the TV = $948

The percentage discount = 35%.

Let X be the price after discount.

We can find X as follows:

Discount = 35% of original price

= 35% of 948= (35/100) × 948= $331.80

Price after discount (X) = Original price - Discount

= $948 - $331.80= $616.20

Therefore, the price after discount is $616.20.

Now we are to find the tax amount and the final price after including the discount and sales tax.

The sales tax is 9.2%.

We can find the tax amount as follows:

Tax amount = 9.2% of price after discount

= 9.2% of $616.20= (9.2/100) × 616.20= $56.63

Now, the final price after including the discount and sales tax = Price after discount + Tax amount

= $616.20 + $56.63= $672.83

Therefore, the final price after including the discount and sales tax is $672.83.

#SPJ11

Let us know more about discount:https://brainly.com/question/1289629.

Answer:

O-O

Step-by-step explanation:

XD i took the last comment

Answer:

its D

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

50% increase

Step-by-step explanation:

The percentage change in volume from cylinder A to cylinder B is 50% volume increased by 50% option (C) is correct.

In geometry, it is defined as the three-dimensional shape having two circular shapes at a distance called the height of the cylinder.

We know the formula for the volume of the cylinder is given by:

[tex]\rm V = \pi r^2h[/tex]

We have r = 10 inches and h = 5 inches

[tex]\rm V = \pi \times10^2\times5[/tex]

V = 500π cubic inches

Percent change in volume from cylinder A to cylinder B:

[tex]=\rm \frac{750\pi-500\pi}{500\pi} \times100[/tex]

= 50%

Thus, the percentage change in volume from cylinder A to cylinder B is 50% volume increased by 50% option (C) is correct.

Learn more about the cylinder here:

brainly.com/question/3216899

#SPJ2

Answer:

There should be 18 blue marbles in the representative sample.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that a bag contains 9 white and 54 blue marbles, if a representative sample contains 3 white marbles, to determine how many blue marbles would you expect to contain the following calculation must be performed:

9 = 3

54 = X

54 x 3/9 = X

162/9 = X

18 = X

Therefore, there should be 18 blue marbles in the representative sample.

(i) Estimate X given that Y = 0.5 and Z = -3 using an unbiased minimum variance estimator.

Estimate of X given that Y = 0.5 and Z = -3 can be obtained by applying the conditional expectation formula, E[X|Y=y, Z=z], where y=0.5 and z=-3.E[X|Y=y, Z=z] = E[X] + Cov[X,Y]/Var[Y] * (Y - E[Y]) + Co v[X,Z]/Var[Z] * (Z - E[Z])E[X|Y=0.5, Z=-3] = 0 + (0/10) * (0.5 - 1) + (1/2) * (-3 - 2) = -2, which is the unbiased minimum variance estimator.(ii) Determine the variance of the above estimator.

The variance of the unbiased minimum variance estimator is given by Var[X|Y=y, Z=z] = Var[X] - Cov[X,Y]^2/Var[Y] - Cov[X,Z]^2/Var[Z] + 2Cov[X,Y]Cov[X,Z]/(Var[Y]*Var[Z])Var[X|Y=0.5, Z=-3] = 10 - 0^2/10 - 1^2/2 + 2(0)(1)/(10*2) = 9.75 (b)

Intelli Moto is car manufacturer that produces vehicles equipped with a fault detection system that uses information from various sensors to inform the driver about possible faults in the braking system. The system diagnoses faults correctly with probability 99%, but gives false alarms with probability 2%. It is known that such faults occur with probability 0.05%. If the system diagnoses a fault, what is the probability a fault has actually occured?

The probability of a fault actually occurring is P(Fault) = 0.05%, which is the prior probability of a fault.

The probability of a correct diagnosis is P(Diagnosis | Fault) = 99%, which is the probability of a positive test result given that a fault has actually occurred.

The probability of a false alarm is P(Diagnosis | No Fault) = 2%, which is the probability of a positive test result given that no fault has actually occurred.

The probability of a positive test result isP(Diagnosis) = P(Fault)*P(Diagnosis | Fault) + P(No Fault)*P(Diagnosis | No Fault)= 0.05% * 99% + 99.95% * 2% = 2.039%.The probability of a fault given a positive test result can be obtained by Bayes' theorem,P(Fault | Diagnosis) = P(Diagnosis | Fault)*P(Fault)/P(Diagnosis)= 99% * 0.05% / 2.039% = 2.43%, which is the probability a fault has actually occurred given that the system diagnoses a fault.

The probability that a fault has actually occurred given that the system diagnoses a fault is 2.42%.

(i) To estimate X given that Y = 0.5 and Z = -3 using an unbiased minimum variance estimator, we need to determine the distribution of X | Y = 0.5, Z = -3 and use the formula for conditional expectation of a jointly normally distributed random variable. The distribution of X | Y = 0.5, Z = -3 is also normal since it is a conditional distribution of a jointly normally distributed random variable. To find the mean of the distribution, we use the formula for conditional expectation:
[tex]E[X | Y = 0.5, Z = -3] = E[X] + Cov[X, Y | Z = -3] (Y - E[Y | Z = -3]) / Var[Y | Z = -3] + Cov[X, Z | Y = 0.5] (Z - E[Z | Y = 0.5]) / Var[Z | Y = 0.5][/tex]

where Cov[X, Y | Z = -3] is the conditional covariance of X and Y given Z = -3,

E[Y | Z = -3] is the conditional mean of Y given Z = -3,

Var[Y | Z = -3] is the conditional variance of Y given Z = -3,

Cov[X, Z | Y = 0.5] is the conditional covariance of X and Z given Y = 0.5,

and E[Z | Y = 0.5] and Var[Z | Y = 0.5] are the conditional mean and variance of Z given Y = 0.5 respectively.

We are given that

E[X] = 0, E[Y] = 1, E[Z] = 2,

Var[X] = 10, Var[Y] = 2, Var[Z] = 1,

and Cov[X, Y] = Cov[X, Z] = Cov[Y, Z] = 0.

Also, Y = 0.5 and Z = -3.

Hence, we have:

[tex]Cov[X, Y | Z = -3] = Cov[X, Y] / Var[Z] = 0[/tex],

[tex]E[Y | Z = -3] = E[Y] =[/tex]1,

[tex]Var[Y | Z = -3] = Var[Y] = 2[/tex],

[tex]Cov[X, Z | Y = 0.5] = Cov[X, Z] / Var[Y] = 0[/tex].

The conditional mean of Z given Y = 0.5 is given by

[tex]E[Z | Y = 0.5] = E[Z] + Cov[Y, Z] (Y - E[Y]) / Var[Y] = 2 + 0.5 (0 - 1) / 2 = 1.5.[/tex]

The conditional variance of Z given Y = 0.5 is given by

[tex]Var[Z | Y = 0.5] = Var[Z] - Cov[Y, Z]^2 / Var[Y] = 1 - 0^2 / 2 = 1[/tex].

Hence, the mean of the distribution of X | Y = 0.5, Z = -3 is:
[tex]E[X | Y = 0.5, Z = -3] = 0 + 0 (0.5 - 1) / 2 + 0 (-3 - 1.5) / 1 = -0.75[/tex]

To find the variance of the unbiased minimum variance estimator, we use the formula for conditional variance of a jointly normally distributed random variable:
[tex]Var[X | Y = 0.5, Z = -3] = Var[X] - Cov[X, Y | Z = -3]^2 / Var[Y | Z = -3] - Cov[X, Z | Y = 0.5]^2 / Var[Z | Y = 0.5][/tex]

where Var[X], Cov[X, Y | Z = -3], and Cov[X, Z | Y = 0.5] are given above,

and Var[Y | Z = -3] and Var[Z | Y = 0.5] are calculated as follows:
[tex]Var[Y | Z = -3] = Var[Y] - Cov[X, Y]^2 / Var[Z] = 2 - 0^2 / 1 = 2Var[Z | Y = 0.5] = Var[Z] - Cov[Y, Z]^2 / Var[Y] = 1 - 0^2 / 2 = 1[/tex]

Hence, we have:
[tex]Var[X | Y = 0.5, Z = -3] = 10 - 0^2 / 2 - 0^2 / 1 = 10[/tex]

(ii) The variance of the unbiased minimum variance estimator is Var[X | Y = 0.5, Z = -3] = 10.

(b) Let A denote the event that a fault has actually occurred, D denote the event that the system diagnoses a fault,

P(A) = 0.05%, P(D | A) = 99%, and P(D | A') = 2%, where A' is the complement of A.

We need to find P(A | D), the probability that a fault has actually occurred given that the system diagnoses a fault.

By Bayes' theorem, we have:
[tex]P(A | D) = P(D | A) P(A) / P(D)[/tex]

where P(D) is the total probability of the system diagnosing a fault, which is:
[tex]P(D) = P(D | A) P(A) + P(D | A') P(A') = 0.99 (0.0005) + 0.02 (1 - 0.0005) = 0.0205[/tex]

Hence, we have:
[tex]P(A | D) = 0.99 (0.0005) / 0.0205 = 0.0242[/tex] or 2.42%

Therefore, the probability that a fault has actually occurred given that the system diagnoses a fault is 2.42%.

To know more about probability, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31828911

#SPJ11

To calculate the given volume integral, 4(x^3 + xy^2) dV, over the solid E in the first octant beneath the paraboloid z = 1 - x^2 - y^2, we need to set up the integral in cylindrical coordinates. The integral will involve integrating over the appropriate limits and applying the volume element in cylindrical coordinates.

In cylindrical coordinates, we have x = r cos θ, y = r sin θ, and z = z.
The equation of the paraboloid, z = 1 - x^2 - y^2, can be expressed as z = 1 - r^2.
The given volume integral becomes 4(x^3 + xy^2) dV = 4(r^3 cos^3 θ + r^3 cos θ sin^2 θ) r dz dr dθ.
To determine the limits of integration, we need to consider the region of the solid E in the first octant. Since the solid lies beneath the paraboloid z = 1 - x^2 - y^2, the upper limit for z is given by z = 1 - r^2.
The limits for r and θ depend on the region in the first octant. We need to set appropriate limits to cover the desired region.Once we have the limits for r, θ, and z, we can set up the triple integral using the volume element in cylindrical coordinates.
By evaluating the integral with the corresponding limits, we can find the value of the given volume integral over the solid E in the first octant beneath the paraboloid.

learn more about Integral here

https://brainly.com/question/31109342



#SPJ11

Answer:

18 in

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

$1,462.50

Step-by-step explanation:

We are to find the total amount after 4 years

Principal => $1,250

Rate => 4.25%

The formula to find the total amount =

A = P(1 + rt)

First, converting R percent to r a decimal

r = R/100 = 4.25%/100 = 0.0425 per year.

Solving our equation:

A = 1250(1 + (0.0425 × 4)) = 1462.5

A = $1,462.50

The total amount accrued, principal plus interest, from simple interest on a principal of $1,250.00 at a rate of 4.25% per year for 4 years is $1,462.50.

The probability that none of the packs are defective is 0.478. The probability that five packs are defective is 0.000455.The probability that all the packs are defective is 2.8243e-14.The probability that 7 or more packs are defective is 0.00416 (approx).

A shipment of 10,000 Karak tea packs is produced by the company Chai Karak. If 7% of the packs are defective, what is the probability that: none of the packs are defective, five packs are defective, all the packs are defective, and seven or more packs are defective?  The number of trials, n, is 10 and the probability of a defective tea pack is 0.07. Therefore, the number of successful trials, X, follows a binomial distribution. Formula for binomial distribution: P(X = k) = nCk × pk × (1 − p)n−kWhere nCk = number of combinations of n things taken k at a time = n! / (k! (n-k)!)a. The probability that none of the packs are defective P(X = 0):P(X = 0) = nC0 * p0 * (1-p)n-0= 10C0 * 0.07^0 * (1-0.07)^10= 1 * 1 * 0.478= 0.478Therefore, the probability that none of the packs are defective is 0.478.

The probability that 5 packs are defective:P(X = 5) = nC5 * p^5 * (1-p)n-5= 10C5 * 0.07^5 * (1-0.07)^5= 252 * 0.0000028 * 0.649= 0.000455Therefore, the probability that five packs are defective is 0.000455.

The probability that all the packs are defective:P(X = 10) = nC10 * p^10 * (1-p)n-10= 10C10 * 0.07^10 * (1-0.07)^0= 1 * 2.8243e-14 * 1= 2.8243e-14Therefore, the probability that all the packs are defective is 2.8243e-14.

The probability that 7 or more packs are defective: P(X ≥ 7) = P(X = 7) + P(X = 8) + P(X = 9) + P(X = 10)P(X = 7) = nC7 * p^7 * (1-p)n-7= 10C7 * 0.07^7 * (1-0.07)^3= 120 * 0.0000953677 * 0.657= 0.00416P(X = 8) = nC8 * p^8 * (1-p)n-8= 10C8 * 0.07^8 * (1-0.07)^2= 45 * 0.0000024969 * 0.859= 0.000011P(X = 9) = nC9 * p^9 * (1-p)n-9= 10C9 * 0.07^9 * (1-0.07)^1= 10 * 0.00000005 * 0.93= 4.65e-7P(X = 10) = nC10 * p^10 * (1-p)n-10= 10C10 * 0.07^10 * (1-0.07)^0= 1 * 2.8243e-14 * 1= 2.8243e-14P(X ≥ 7) = 0.00416 + 0.000011 + 4.65e-7 + 2.8243e-14= 0.00416Therefore, the probability that 7 or more packs are defective is 0.00416 (approx).

Learn more about probability here:

https://brainly.com/question/31828911

#SPJ11