PLS HELP WRITE ABSOLUTE VALUE EQUATION FOR GRAPH

Rounded to four decimal places, the answer is 0.7595, which is closest to option (a) 0.7598.

To find the total area between z=-0.75 and z=2.21, we need to find the area under the standard normal curve between these two z-values.

Using the standard normal table, we can find the area under the curve to the left of z=2.21 and subtract the area under the curve to the left of z=-0.75, as follows:

Area between z=-0.75 and z=2.21 = Area to the left of z=2.21 - Area to the left of z=-0.75

From the standard normal table, we can find that the area to the left of z=2.21 is 0.9861, and the area to the left of z=-0.75 is 0.2266.

Therefore, the total area between z=-0.75 and z=2.21 is:

Area between z=-0.75 and z=2.21 = 0.9861 - 0.2266 = 0.7595

Rounded to four decimal places, the answer is 0.7595, which is closest to option (a) 0.7598.

Learn more about “ standard normal table  “ visit here;

https://brainly.com/question/30401972

#SPJ4

The standard rotation matrix for a clockwise rotation of 135 degrees about the origin is:
  | cos(-(3π) / 4)  -sin(-(3π) / 4) |
  | sin(-(3π) / 4)   cos(-(3π) / 4) |

To find the standard matrix of the given linear transformation from R2 to R2, which involves a clockwise rotation through 135 degrees about the origin, we can follow these steps,

1. Convert the angle to radians: 135 degrees = (135 * π) / 180 = (3π) / 4 radians.

2. Since the rotation is clockwise, the angle should be negative: -135 degrees = -(3π) / 4 radians.

3. Compute the cosine and sine values for the angle: cos(-135°) = cos(-(3π) / 4) and sin(-135°) = sin(-(3π) / 4).

4. Fill in the standard rotation matrix with the computed values:
  | cosθ  -sinθ |
  | sinθ   cosθ |

In our case, the standard rotation matrix for a clockwise rotation of 135 degrees about the origin is:
  | cos(-(3π) / 4)  -sin(-(3π) / 4) |
  | sin(-(3π) / 4)   cos(-(3π) / 4) |

This is the standard matrix for the given linear transformation involving a matrix and a clockwise rotation through 135 degrees about the origin.

Learn more about "matrix": https://brainly.com/question/11989522

#SPJ11

To find the linearization l(x) of the function at a=32, we need to first calculate the slope or derivative of the function at a) f'(x) = (4/5)x^(-1/5).

Now we can use the point-slope form of a line to find the linearization: l(x) = f(a) + f'(a)(x-a), Substituting the values we get: l(x) = f(32) + f'(32)(x-32)
l(x) = (32^(4/5)) + ((4/5)(32^(-1/5)))(x-32)

Therefore, the linearization of the function at a=32 is l(x) = (32^(4/5)) + ((4/5)(32^(-1/5)))(x-32).
To find the linearization L(x) of the function f(x) = x^(4/5) at a = 32, we need to find the equation of the tangent line at that point. The formula for linearization is L(x) = f(a) + f'(a)(x - a).

First, find f(a):
f(32) = (32)^(4/5) = 16, Next, find the derivative f'(x):
f'(x) = (4/5)x^(-1/5)

Now, find f'(a):
f'(32) = (4/5)(32)^(-1/5) = (4/5)(1/2) = 2/5, Finally, plug these values into the linearization formula:
L(x) = 16 + (2/5)(x - 32), So, the linearization L(x) of the function f(x) = x^(4/5) at a = 32 is L(x) = 16 + (2/5)(x - 32).

To know more about derivative click here

brainly.com/question/29096174

#SPJ11

For a point P(x,y) on the terminal side of an angle θ in standard position, we let r=[tex]\sqrt{(x^2+y^2).}[/tex] Then sin θ= y/r, [tex]cos θ= x/r[/tex], and [tex]tan θ= y/x[/tex].

When we have a point P(x,y) on the terminal side of an angle θ in standard position, we can define r as the distance from the origin to P, which can be calculated using the Pythagorean theorem as r=[tex]\sqrt{(x^2+y^2)}[/tex]. Then, we can use this value of r to find the sine, cosine, and tangent of the angle θ. By using Pythagorean theorem

The sine of the angle θ is defined as the ratio of the y-coordinate of P to r, i.e., sin θ= [tex]\frac{y}{r}[/tex]. Similarly, the cosine of the angle θ is defined as the ratio of the x-coordinate of P to r, i.e., cos θ=[tex]\frac{x}{r}[/tex]. Finally, the tangent of the angle θ is defined as the ratio of the y-coordinate of P to the x-coordinate of P, i.e., tan θ= [tex]\frac{x}{y}[/tex].

To learn more about Pythagorean theorem, visit here

https://brainly.com/question/14930619

#SPJ4

The angle IHJ of the circle H is found to be 216 degrees where the value of HI is 10.

Let's denote the angle IHJ as θ. The area of a sector with angle θ in a circle with radius r is given by (θ/360)πr². Thus, we can write,

(θ/360)π(10)² = 40π

Simplifying this equation, we get,

θ = (40/25)360

θ = 576 degrees

Note that this angle is greater than 360 degrees, which means it's equivalent to a smaller angle that lies within one full revolution of the circle. To find this smaller angle, we can subtract 360 degrees from 576,

θ = 576 - 360

θ = 216 degrees

Therefore, the angle IHJ is 216 degrees.

To know more about angle in a circle, visit,

https://brainly.com/question/31858078

#SPJ1

Complete question - In circle H, HI=10 and the area of shaded sector = 40π . Find angle IHJ, where I and J are two point on the circle.

Based on the information given, we can determine that the equivalent Z score for someone who has completed 18 years of education is 1.3774. This indicates that the individual's education level is 1.3774 standard deviations above the mean.

To get the percentile rank for a score of 18 using the Frequencies procedure, we would need to know the complete distribution of the EDUC variable. However, assuming that the distribution is approximately normal, we can use the Z score we calculated earlier to estimate the percentile rank.
Using a standard normal table or calculator, we can find that a Z score of 1.3774 corresponds to a percentile rank of approximately 93.7. This means that an individual who has completed 18 years of education is at or above the 93.7th percentile in terms of education level compared to the rest of the population.

Learn more about percentile rank here, https://brainly.com/question/28839672

#SPJ11

Answer:

1, 2, 2, 4, 8, 32

Step-by-step explanation:

a₁ = 1

a₂ = 2

a₃ = a₂ × a₁ = 2 × 1 = 2

a₄ = a₃ × a₂ = 2 × 2 = 4

a₅ = a₄ × a₃ = 4 × 2 = 8

a₆ = a₅ × a₄ = 8 × 4 = 32

the first six terms are 1, 2, 2, 4, 8, 32

The first six terms of the recursively defined sequence are: 1, 2, 2, 4, 8, 32.

A recursively defined sequence is a sequence of numbers that is defined in terms of the previous terms in the sequence. In other words, each term in the sequence is defined as a function of one or more previous terms. This type of sequence is also known as a recurrence relation.

To give the first six terms of the sequence where the first term is 1 and the second term is 2, and the rest of the terms are the product of the two preceding terms, follow these steps:

1. Write down the first two terms: 1, 2
2. Find the third term by multiplying the first and second terms: 1 * 2 = 2
3. Find the fourth term by multiplying the second and third terms: 2 * 2 = 4
4. Find the fifth term by multiplying the third and fourth terms: 2 * 4 = 8
5. Find the sixth term by multiplying the fourth and fifth terms: 4 * 8 = 32

So, the first six terms of the recursively defined sequence are: 1, 2, 2, 4, 8, 32.

To know more about recursively defined sequence refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/12374893?#

#SPJ11

To determine the maximum tensile and compressive stress acting in the built-up beam, we need to use the formula σ = M*c/I

Where:
σ = stress
M = internal moment (75 kN⋅m in this case)
c = distance from the neutral axis to the extreme fiber
I = moment of inertia

Since the built-up beam is made up of multiple materials, we need to first calculate the moment of inertia for the entire cross-section. Let's assume the beam is rectangular in shape with dimensions of 200 mm (height) and 100 mm (width). The built-up section consists of two materials - steel and wood, with steel being on the top and bottom of the section. Let's assume the steel has a thickness of 10 mm and the wood has a thickness of 80 mm.

To calculate the moment of inertia, we need to first find the individual moments of inertia for each material:

For the steel:
I_st = (b*h^3)/12
I_st = (100*10^3)/12
I_st = 8.33 x 10^6 mm^4

For the wood:
I_wd = (b*h^3)/12
I_wd = (100*80^3)/12
I_wd = 6.44 x 10^8 mm^4

Now we can calculate the total moment of inertia:
I_total = I_st + I_wd
I_total = 6.52 x 10^8 mm^4

Next, we need to find the distance from the neutral axis to the extreme fiber. Since the beam is symmetric about the horizontal axis, the neutral axis is located at the center of the section. The distance from the center to the top or bottom of the section is:
c = h/2
c = 200/2
c = 100 mm

Finally, we can calculate the maximum tensile and compressive stress using the formula:
σ = M*c/I

For tension:
σ_tension = (75*10^3*100)/(6.52*10^8)
σ_tension = 1.15 MPa

For compression:
σ_compression = -(75*10^3*100)/(6.52*10^8)
σ_compression = -1.15 MPa

Therefore, the maximum tensile stress is 1.15 MPa and the maximum compressive stress is -1.15 MPa (which is equal in magnitude to the tensile stress).

Note that the negative sign indicates compression.

To learn more about “distance” refer to the https://brainly.com/question/26550516

#SPJ11

To find the length of a path between two points (3, 5) and (2, 5) over the interval 4 ≤ t ≤ 5, we need to understand what is happening within that interval. However, there's no mention of a function or curve that the points lie on.

Assuming that the path is a straight line between the two points, we can find the distance between them.

Step 1: Identify the coordinates of the two points. Point A: (3, 5) Point B: (2, 5)

Step 2: Use the distance formula to find the length of the path. Distance = √[(x2 - x1)^2 + (y2 - y1)^2]

Plugging in the coordinates: Distance = √[(2 - 3)^2 + (5 - 5)^2]

Distance = √[(-1)^2 + (0)^2] Distance = √[1 + 0] Distance = √1

Step 3: Calculate the result. Distance = 1 The length of the path between points (3, 5) and (2, 5) is 1 unit.

Learn more about Distance,

https://brainly.com/question/26046491

#SPJ11

To find the length of a path between two points (3, 5) and (2, 5) over the interval 4 ≤ t ≤ 5, we need to understand what is happening within that interval. However, there's no mention of a function or curve that the points lie on.

Assuming that the path is a straight line between the two points, we can find the distance between them.

Step 1: Identify the coordinates of the two points. Point A: (3, 5) Point B: (2, 5)

Step 2: Use the distance formula to find the length of the path. Distance = √[(x2 - x1)^2 + (y2 - y1)^2]

Plugging in the coordinates: Distance = √[(2 - 3)^2 + (5 - 5)^2]

Distance = √[(-1)^2 + (0)^2] Distance = √[1 + 0] Distance = √1

Step 3: Calculate the result. Distance = 1 The length of the path between points (3, 5) and (2, 5) is 1 unit.

Learn more about Distance,

https://brainly.com/question/26046491

#SPJ11

Solution to the initial-value problem with the given initial condition y(0) = 5 and differential equation [tex]dy/dt = e^{7t[/tex].

We are given the following:

1. Initial condition: y(0) = 5
2. Differential equation: dy/dt = e^(7t)

Here's a step-by-step solution:

Step 1: Integrate both sides of the differential equation with respect to t.
∫(dy/dt) dt = ∫[tex]e^{7t[/tex] dt

Step 2: Integrate the right side.
y(t) = (1/7)[tex]e^{7t[/tex] + C, where C is the integration constant.

Step 3: Apply the initial condition, y(0) = 5.
5 = (1/7)[tex]e^{7*0[/tex] + C

Step 4: Solve for the integration constant, C.
5 = (1/7)[tex]e^0[/tex] + C
5 = (1/7)(1) + C
C = 5 - 1/7
C = 34/7

Step 5: Write the final solution for y(t).
y(t) = (1/7)[tex]e^{7t[/tex] + 34/7

This is the solution to the initial-value problem with the given initial condition y(0) = 5 and differential equation [tex]dy/dt = e^{7t[/tex].

Learn more about initial-value problem.

brainly.com/question/30547172

#SPJ11

Logical expression that is equivalent to: b. ∃y∀x(¬P(x)∨Q(x,y))

We should analyze each option and compare them to the original statement. The given statement is:

∃y∀x(¬P(x)∨Q(x,y))

Now let's analyze each option:

a. Not provided.
b. ∃y∀x(¬P(x)∨Q(x,y)): This expression is identical to the given statement, so it is equivalent.
c. ∀y∃x(¬P(x)∨¬Q(x,y)): This expression is not equivalent to the given statement because it uses ¬Q(x,y) instead of Q(x,y).
d. ∃x∀y(¬P(x)∨¬Q(x,y)): This expression swaps the order of quantifiers (∃ and ∀) and uses ¬Q(x,y) instead of Q(x,y), so it's not equivalent to the given statement.
e. ∀x∃y(¬P(x)∨¬Q(x,y)): This expression swaps the order of quantifiers (∃ and ∀) but it also has ¬Q(x,y) instead of Q(x,y), so it's not equivalent to the given statement.

After analyzing each option, we can conclude that the logical expression equivalent to the given statement is:

Your answer: b. ∃y∀x(¬P(x)∨Q(x,y))

Learn more about Logical expression.

brainly.com/question/30038488

#SPJ11

The correct option: B. 8.19 X 10⁹ dollars. Thus, spending on mangers each year by national restaurant chain is  8.19 X 10⁹ dollars.

With scientific notation, one can express extremely big or extremely small values. When one number between 1 and 10 was multiplied by a power of 10, the result is represented in scientific notation.

Exponents but a base of 10 are used in this technique to write very big or extremely tiny numbers. You can simplify arithmetic processes and record quantities that are difficult to represent in decimal form by becoming familiar with writing in scientific notation.

Given data:

Number of managers in national restaurant  =  2.1 x 10⁵ .

Earning of each manager = $39,000 per year.

Spending on mangers each year = Number of managers in national restaurant  x Earning of each manager

Spending on mangers each year = 2.1 x 10⁵ x 39,000

Spending on mangers each year = 8.19 X 10⁹ dollars

Thus, spending on mangers each year by national restaurant chain is  8.19 X 10⁹ dollars.

Know more about the Scientific Notation

https://brainly.com/question/5756316

#SPJ1

Complete question:

A national restaurant chain has 2.1 x 10⁵ managers. Each manager makes $39,000 per year. How much does the restaurant chain spend on mangers each year?

A. 2.49 X 10⁸ dollars

B. 8.19 X 10⁹ dollars

C. 6 x 10⁹ dollars

D. 8.19 X 10²⁰ dollars

Answer:

the first one

Step-by-step explanation:

the first one is correct

Answer:

the first one

Step-by-step explanation:

the first one is correct

The series ∑n=1[infinity]n!(x−4)n converges for all values of x except x=4.

This is because when x=4, each term in the series becomes n! * 0ⁿ, which equals 0. Therefore, the series fails the nth term test for divergence and does not converge at x=4. For all other values of x, the series converges by the ratio test.

The ratio test states that if the limit of the absolute value of the ratio of consecutive terms of a series is less than 1, then the series converges. Applying the ratio test to our series, we get:

| (n+1)! * (x-4ⁿ⁺¹ / n!(x-4)ⁿ | = (n+1) |x-4|

Taking the limit as n approaches infinity, we see that this approaches infinity if |x-4| > 1 and approaches 0 if |x-4| < 1. Therefore, the series converges if |x-4| < 1, which means the values of x that make the series converge are x ∈ (3,5).

To know more about ratio test click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/31396912#

#SPJ11

The scenario which might be represented by the

expression below -100/4 is "Owing $100 on a credit card and making four equal payments totaling $25 each".

-100/4

= $-25

Hence, the expression is represented by the statement "Owing $100 on a credit card and making four equal payments totaling $25 each".

Read more on algebra:

https://brainly.com/question/4344214

#SPJ1

Therefore, the variance of X1 is (\sigma1)2 = k = 6.

We know that the variance of Y can be expressed as[tex]Var(Y) = E[(3X2 - X1)^2] - E[3X2 - X1]^2.[/tex]
Expanding this expression, we get[tex]Var(Y) = E[9X2^2 - 6X1X2 + X1^2] - [3E(X2) - E(X1)]^2.[/tex]
Since X1 and X2 are stochastically independent, we have[tex]E(X1X2) = E(X1)E(X2).[/tex]
Therefore, [tex]Var(Y) = 9E(X2^2) - 6E(X1)E(X2) + E(X1^2) - 9E(X2)^2 + 6E(X1)E(X2) - E(X1)^2.[/tex]

Simplifying this expression, we get [tex]Var(Y) = 8E(X2^2) - E(X1^2) - E(X1)^2 - 9E(X2)^2.[/tex]

Substituting the given values, we have[tex]Var(Y) = 8(2) - k - k - 9(2) = 25.[/tex]

Solving for k, we get k = 6.

Therefore, the variance of X1 is (\sigma1)2 = k = 6.

learn more about variance

https://brainly.com/question/14116780

#SPJ11

The equation you provided is:

8x - 6y + z = 4

The cylindrical coordinates of ta given equation is 8r * cos(θ) - 6r * sin(θ) + z = 4

To convert this equation into cylindrical coordinates, we'll use the following conversions:

x = r * cos(θ)
y = r * sin(θ)
z = z

Substitute these conversions into the equation:

8(r * cos(θ)) - 6(r * sin(θ)) + z = 4

Now, simplify the equation:

8r * cos(θ) - 6r * sin(θ) + z = 4

So, the given equation in cylindrical coordinates is:

8r * cos(θ) - 6r * sin(θ) + z = 4

To know more about Cylindrical coordinates:

https://brainly.com/question/31046653

#SPJ11

(a) The equation of the least squares line is: Y = -0.901X + 148.35.

(b) The coefficient of determination is 0.771.

(c) The estimate of the error standard deviation is 5.47 MPa.

(a) To obtain the equation of the least squares line, we need to calculate the slope and intercept of the regression line.

Using the given data, we can calculate the sample means and standard deviations of x and y as follows:

x-bar = [tex](112.3 + 97.0 + 92.7 + 86.0 + 102.0 + 99.2 + 95.8 + 103.5 + 89.0 + 86.7)/10 = 94.2[/tex]

[tex]s_x = sqrt(((112.3-94.2)^2 + (97.0-94.2)^2 + ... + (86.7-94.2)^2)/9) = 9.83[/tex]

[tex]y-bar = (75.1 + 70.6 + 58.2 + 49.1 + 74.0 + 74.0 + 73.3 + 68.2 + 59.6 + 57.4 + 48.2)/11 = 65.27[/tex]

[tex]s_y = sqrt(((75.1-65.27)^2 + (70.6-65.27)^2 + ... + (48.2-65.27)^2)^/^1^0^) = 10.99[/tex]

The correlation coefficient between x and y can be calculated as:

r =[tex]Σ[(x - x-bar)/s_x][(y - y-bar)/s_y]/(n-1) = -0.944[/tex]

The slope of the regression line can be calculated as:

b = [tex]r*s_y/s_x = -0.901[/tex]

The intercept of the regression line can be calculated as:

a =[tex]y-bar - b*x-bar = 148.35[/tex]

Therefore, the equation of the least squares line is:

Y = -0.901X + 148.35

(b) The coefficient of determination, denoted as [tex]R^2[/tex], is a measure of the proportion of the total variation in y that is explained by the regression on x. It can be calculated as:

[tex]R^2[/tex] = (SSR/SST) = 1 - (SSE/SST)

where SSR is the sum of squares due to regression, SSE is the sum of squares due to error, and SST is the total sum of squares.

Using the given data, we can calculate the following:

SST = Σ[tex](y - y-bar)^2[/tex] = 1146.16

SSE = Σ[tex](y - ŷ)^2 = 261.70[/tex]

SSR = Σ[tex](ŷ - y-bar)^2 = 884.46[/tex]

where[tex]ŷ[/tex]is the predicted value of y based on the regression line.

Therefore,

[tex]R^2[/tex]= SSR/SST = 0.771

The coefficient of determination is 0.771, which means that approximately 77.1% of the total variation in y is explained by the regression on x.

(c) The estimate of the error standard deviation, denoted as σ, can be calculated as:

σ = sqrt(SSE/(n-2)) = 5.47

where n is the sample size.

Therefore, the estimate of the error standard deviation is 5.47 MPa. This value represents the typical amount of variability in the axial strength that is not explained by the linear relationship with cube strength.

Learn more about Coefficient of determination

brainly.com/question/28975079

#SPJ11

Answer:

The probability: P(A, A) if two cards are randomly selected with replacement is 1/9, therefore, option B.

You should be aware that probability is the chance of occurrence of an event. The probability of an event is written thus...

(P(E) = Number of required outcomes divided by the total number of possible outcomes)

The possible outcomes are the spelling of the word ADD...

The probabilities are 1/3, 1/3, 1/3 respectively.

So, P(A, A) if two cards are randomly selected with replacement will be...

P(A, A) = 1/3 * 1/3

Therefore the probability of the event is 1/9.

Hope it helped! :)

a) At least 5,675 adults.

b) if we use the results from the 2014 survey, we still need to survey at least 5,675 adults.

c) It does not have much of an effect on the sample size.

Sample size refers to the number of observations or participants included in a study or survey. In statistical analysis, the size of the sample is an important consideration as it can affect the accuracy and reliability of the results. A larger sample size generally leads to more precise estimates and increased statistical power, while a smaller sample size may be more susceptible to sampling errors and variability.

(a) To find the minimum sample size needed, we can use the formula:

n = (z² × p × (1-p)) / E²

where z is the z-score corresponding to the desired confidence level (99%), p is the estimated proportion of e-cigarette users (3.65% or 0.0365), and E is the desired margin of error (3 percentage points or 0.03).

Plugging in these values, we get:

n = (2.576² × 0.0365 × 0.9635) / 0.03²

n = 5,674.85

Rounding up to the nearest integer, we get:

n = 5,675

Therefore, we need to survey at least 5,675 adults to obtain today's e-cigarette usage rate with a 99% confidence level and a margin of error of 3 percentage points.

(b) If we use the results from the 2014 survey, we can estimate the population proportion of e-cigarette users as 0.0365. Using the same formula as above, we get:

n = (2.576² × 0.0365 × 0.9635) / 0.03²

n = 5,674.85

Rounding up to the nearest integer, we get:

n = 5,675

Therefore, even if we use the results from the 2014 survey, we still need to survey at least 5,675 adults to obtain today's e-cigarette usage rate with a 99% confidence level and a margin of error of 3 percentage points.

(c) The use of the results from the 2014 survey does not have much of an effect on the sample size. This is because the desired confidence level and margin of error are fixed, and the estimated proportion from the 2014 survey is relatively close to the true proportion (since e-cigarette use is still a relatively new phenomenon).

To know more about the sample size visit:

brainly.com/question/5974251

#SPJ1

A) ) To compute f '(a) algebraically, we need to find the derivative of f(x) and then evaluate it at x = a.

f '(-5) = -6
b) [tex]f '(x) = 8x^3 + 6x^2 - 0\\So, f '(x) = 8x^3 + 6x^2[/tex]
c) the derivative of y with respect to x is 0.
dy/dx = 0
d) To find the derivative of f(x), we apply the power rule and chain rule.  [tex]f '(x) = 3/x^{0.5} + 3/x^{1.5}[/tex]

A) To compute f '(a) algebraically, we need to find the derivative of f(x) and then evaluate it at x = a.
f(x) = −6x + 7
f '(x) = -6 (by power rule for derivatives)
f '(-5) = -6

B) To use the shortcut rules to mentally calculate the derivative of f(x), we apply the power rule and constant multiple rule.
[tex]f(x) = 2x^4 + 2x^3 - 2\\f '(x) = 8x^3 + 6x^2[/tex]
(Note that the derivative of a constant is 0.)
[tex]f '(x) = 8x^3 + 6x^2 - 0\\So, f '(x) = 8x^3 + 6x^2[/tex]

C) To obtain the derivative dy/dx, we need to recognize that y is a constant function (always equal to 13). Therefore, the derivative of y with respect to x is 0.
dy/dx = 0

D) To find the derivative of f(x), we apply the power rule and chain rule.
[tex]f(x) = 6x^{0.5} + 3x^{-0.5}\\f '(x) = 3x^{-0.5} + (6)(0.5)x^{(-0.5-1)}\\f '(x) = 3x^{-0.5} + 3x^{(-1.5)}[/tex]
(Note that we simplified the second term using negative exponent rules.)
So, [tex]f '(x) = 3/x^{0.5} + 3/x^{1.5}[/tex]

learn more about derivative

https://brainly.com/question/30365299

#SPJ11

The relative minimum points are (-1/2, 1, -19/4) and no saddle points of the function f(x,y) = 7x² - 8y² + 7x + 16y + 8. The only critical point is (-1/2, 1).

To find the critical points of the function f(x,y) = 7x² - 8y² + 7x + 16y + 8, we need to solve the system of partial derivatives equal to zero:

f x = 14x + 7 = 0

f y = -16y + 16 = 0

Solving for x and y, we get:

x = -1/2

y = 1

So the only critical point is (-1/2, 1).

To classify the critical point, we need to calculate the second-order partial derivatives:

f xx = 14

f xy = 0

f yx = 0

f yy = -16

Using the Hessian matrix at the critical point is:

D = f xx f yy - f xy f yx = (14)(-16) - (0)(0) = -224

Since D < 0 and f xx > 0, we have a relative minimum at (-1/2, 1).

Since there is only one critical point, there are no saddle points.

Know more about critical point here:

https://brainly.com/question/31017064

#SPJ11

The lower bound of the 99% confidence interval for the population proportion of employed individuals who work at home at least once per week is 0.086.

To construct the 99% confidence interval for the population proportion (p), first find the sample proportion (p-hat) by dividing the number of people who work at home (41) by the total sample size (350): p-hat = 41/350 = 0.117.

Next, determine the standard error (SE) using the formula SE = √(p-hat * (1 - p-hat) / n) = √(0.117 * (1 - 0.117) / 350) ≈ 0.026. For a 99% confidence interval, use a z-score of 2.576.

Finally, calculate the margin of error (ME) by multiplying the z-score by the SE: ME = 2.576 * 0.026 ≈ 0.067. The lower bound of the 99% confidence interval is p-hat - ME: 0.117 - 0.067 = 0.086 (rounded to three decimal places).

To know more about confidence interval click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/29680703#

#SPJ11

Mr. Chen's statement is incorrect because 5 hundreds - 3 hundreds does not equal 2 hundreds. 5 hundreds - 3 hundreds equals 2 hundreds and eighty, which is 288. Therefore, Mr. Chen needs a total of 512 - 384 = 128 grams of loose green tea.

Claire fed Folly at 2 pm, gave Folly to Max at 2:10 pm. Folly belonged to either Max or Claire at 2:05 pm. Neither Mar nor Claire fed Folly at 2 pm or 2:05 pm. The event occurred between 1:55 pm and 2:05 pm. At 2 pm, Max took Folly from Claire. Folly wasn't hungry at 2 pm but was at 3 pm.

1. student(Mar) ∧ ¬pet(Mar)2. fed(Claire, Folly, 2pm) ∧ gave(Claire, Folly, Max, 2:10pm)3. (belongs(Folly, Max, 2:05pm) ∨ belongs(Folly, Claire, 2:05pm))4. ¬(fed(Mar, Folly, 2pm) ∨ fed(Claire, Folly, 2pm) ∨ fed(Mar, Folly, 2:05pm) ∨ fed(Claire, Folly, 2:05pm))5. between(2pm, 1:55pm, 2:05pm)6. ¬hungry(Folly, 2pm) ∧ hourLater(Folly, 2pm, 3pm)

1. Student(Mar) ∧ ¬Pet(Mar)2. Fed(Claire, Folly, 2pm) ∧ Gave(Claire, Folly, Max, 2:10pm)3. BelongsTo(Folly, Max, 2:05pm) ∨ BelongsTo(Folly, Claire, 2:05pm)4. ¬(Fed(Mar, Folly, 2pm) ∨ Fed(Claire, Folly, 2pm) ∨ Fed(Mar, Folly, 2:05pm) ∨ Fed(Claire, Folly, 2:05pm))

5. Between(2:00pm, 1:55pm, 2:05pm)6. Gave(Max, Folly, Claire, 2pm) ∧ ¬Hungry(Folly, 2pm) ∧ Hungry(Folly, 3pm)

Learn more about mathematics here: brainly.com/question/27235369

#SPJ11

The equation about the two angles must be true is  

D) cos 36 = sin 54.

What is complementary angles?

We know that when sum of two angles is add upto 90° then that is called as complementary angles and the equation must be cos A = sin B.

Then, [tex]\angle A+\angle B=90\textdegree[/tex]

Now solving the options then,

A) 54°+54°=108°≠90°

Then the equation is false.

B) Here sin 36=sin 54 is not correct equation.

C) 36°+36°=72°≠90°

Then the equation is false.

D) 36°+54° = 90°=90°

Then the equation is true.

Hence the equation about the two angles must be true is  

D) cos 36 = sin 54.

To learn more about complementary angles refer the below link

https://brainly.com/question/15168727

#SPJ1

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

y=7

y=12

y=42

y=52

sub in x with values to find y

The sum of the series [infinity] an n = 1 whose partial sums are given by sn = 4 − 3(0.7)n is 4.

To find the sum of the series [infinity] an n = 1, we need to take the limit as n approaches infinity of the partial sum formula. In this case, we have:

sn = 4 − 3(0.7)n

Taking the limit as n approaches infinity, we get:

lim n→∞ sn = lim n→∞ (4 − 3(0.7)n)

Since 0.7^n approaches zero as n approaches infinity, we have:

lim n→∞ sn = 4 - 0 = 4

Therefore, the sum of the series [infinity] an n = 1 whose partial sums are given by sn = 4 − 3(0.7)n is 4.

Learn more about Series and Sequences

brainly.com/question/31463410

#SPJ11

There is a 21.5% chance that the stock's price will exceed $105 after 10 days.

Given that the daily change of price of the company's stock has a mean of 0 and variance of 1 (σ2=1), we know that the standard deviation is σ=1. Using the formula for the mean and variance of the sum of independent random variables, we can find that the mean of the stock's price after 10 days is 0 and the variance is 10σ2=10.

To find the probability that the stock's price will exceed $105 after 10 days, we need to calculate the probability of the standardized variable being greater than (105-100)/σ√10, where σ√10 is the standard deviation of the sum of the 10 independent random variables.

Thus, the probability that the stock's price will exceed $105 after 10 days is the same as the probability that a standard normal variable Z is greater than 0.79 (=(105-100)/1√10). Using a standard normal distribution table or a calculator, we find that this probability is approximately 0.215, or 21.5%.

Therefore, we can say that there is a 21.5% chance that the stock's price will exceed $105 after 10 days.

Learn more about probability

brainly.com/question/29381779

#SPJ11

The general solution to the differential equation y''+y=sin(2x) is y(x) = c1cos(x) + c2sin(x) - x/4cos(2x) + Csin(2x)

[tex]u''(x)*(1 + cos(4x))/2 + v''(x)*sin(4x)/2 - 2u'(x)*sin(2x) + u(x)*cos(2x) + 2v'(x)*cos(2x) + v(x)*sin(2x) = sin(2x)/2[/tex]

[tex](1 + cos(4x))/2 * u''(x) + sin(4x)/2 * v''(x) + cos(2x) * u(x) + sin(2x) * v(x) = 0-2 * sin(2x) * u'(x) + 2 * cos(2x) * v'(x) = sin(2x)/2[/tex]

       [tex]u''(x) = -cos(2x)*sin(2x)/2\\v''(x) = (1-cos^2(2x))/2\\u'(x) = -1/4\\v'(x) = 0\\[/tex]

       u(x) = -x/4

       v(x) = C, where C is an arbitrary constant.

       [tex]y_p(x) = -x/4cos(2x) + Csin(2x)[/tex]

       [tex]y(x) = y_h(x) + y_p(x) = c1cos(x) + c2sin(x) - x/4cos(2x) + Csin(2x)[/tex]

So the general solution to the differential equation y''+y=sin(2x) is y(x) = c1cos(x) + c2sin(x) - x/4cos(2x) + Csin(2x), where c1, c2, and C are constants that depend on the initial conditions.

Learn more about homogeneous equation

brainly.com/question/30504189

#SPJ11