Please help.
Is algebra.

Answer:

The 6th term of the sequence is 6144/243

Step-by-step explanation:

From what we have, we can see that the sequence might be geometric

to confirm this, we have to check if the common ratio is the same all through

To know this, we have to divide the succeeding term by the preceding term and check if the results for two sets are equal

thus, we have it that;

32/3 * 1/8 = 8/6

= 4/3 = 4/3

We can confirm that the sequence is thus geometric

Now, to find the nth term of a geometric sequence, we have it that;

Tn = ar^(n-1)

where a is the first term, given as 6

r is the common ratio given as 4/3

n is the term number given as 6

Thus, we have this as:

T6 = 6 * (4/3)^(6-1)

T6 = 6 * (4/3)^5

T6 = 6144/243

Answer:

A = 1413.72 unit²

Step-by-step explanation:

area of a semicircle formula: A = (πr²)/2

To find the area of a semicircle that has a radius of 30 feet, apply r = 30 to the formula A = (πr²)/2:

A = (π30²)/2

A = 1413.72 unit²

Answer:

D

Step-by-step explanation:

please mark brainliest thanks:)

Statistic 1 would you recommend for estimating average of smallest and largest values in the sample

To compute Statistics 1, 2, and 3 for the given samples, and determine which statistic would be recommended for estimating the average of the smallest and largest values, let's go through each sample one by one:

1. 2,3,3*

 Statistics 1: Sum of the values = 2 + 3 + 3 = 8

 Statistics 2: Average of the values = (2 + 3 + 3) / 3 = 2.67

 Statistics 3: Median of the values = 3

2. 2,3,4

   Statistics 1: Sum of the values = 2 + 3 + 4 = 9

   Statistics 2: Average of the values = (2 + 3 + 4) / 3 = 3

   Statistics 3: Median of the values = 3

3.  2,3,4*

    Statistics 1: Sum of the values = 2 + 3 + 4 = 9

    Statistics 2: Average of the values = (2 + 3 + 4) / 3 = 3

    Statistics 3: Median of the values = 3

4. 2,3*,4*

Statistics 1: Sum of the values = 2 + 3 + 4 = 9

Statistics 2: Average of the values = (2 + 3 + 4) / 3 = 3

Statistics 3: Median of the values = 3

5. 2,4,4*

Statistics 1: Sum of the values = 2 + 4 + 4 = 10

Statistics 2: Average of the values = (2 + 4 + 4) / 3 = 3.33

Statistics 3: Median of the values = 4

6. 3,3*,4

Statistics 1: Sum of the values = 3 + 3 + 4 = 10

Statistics 2: Average of the values = (3 + 3 + 4) / 3 = 3.33

Statistics 3: Median of the values = 3

7.  3,3*,4*

Statistics 1: Sum of the values = 3 + 3 + 4 = 10

Statistics 2: Average of the values = (3 + 3 + 4) / 3 = 3.33

Statistics 3: Median of the values = 3

8.  3,4,4*

Statistics 1: Sum of the values = 3 + 4 + 4 = 11

Statistics 2: Average of the values = (3 + 4 + 4) / 3 = 3.67

Statistics 3: Median of the values = 4

9.  3*,4,4*

Statistics 1: Sum of the values = 3 + 4 + 4 = 11

Statistics 2: Average of the values = (3 + 4 + 4) / 3 = 3.67

Statistics 3: Median of the values = 4

For estimating the average of the smallest and largest values in the sample, the recommended statistic would be Statistics 1, which is the sum of the values. Taking the average of the smallest and largest values can be obtained by dividing the sum by the number of values, which in this case is 3.

Therefore, the recommended statistic for estimating the average of the smallest and largest values is Statistics 1 (sum of the values).

To learn more about Statistics

https://brainly.com/question/12805356

#SPJ11

Answer:

1 hour

Step-by-step explanation:

Travels 18 km/h

km/h = kilometers per hour

Answer:

1 hour

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

equal

Step-by-step explanation:

Most quadratic equations have equal roots.

Answer: $50 withdrawl $50 withdrawl and $65 deposite

Step-by-step : $50 withdrawl $50 withdrawl and $65 deposite

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

This is a quartic  equation with a positive coefficient for x^4 so it is shaped like an M xo ir rises to both the left and the right.

Answer:

The equation is x-18 + 8x = 180 (because they form a linear pair of angles.

Each angle measure:-

x-18 + 8x = 180

x + 8x = 180 + 18 (-18 becomes +18)

9x = 198

x = 198/9

x = 22

Angle 1 = x-18 = 22-18 = 4 degrees

Angle 2 = 8x = 8 * 22 = 176 degrees

Hope it helps :')

In Euler's Formula for graphs that are not necessarily connected states that the number of vertices minus the number of edges plus the number of connected components is equal to the Euler characteristic of the graph.

Euler's Formula, which states that the number of vertices minus the number of edges plus the number of faces is equal to 2 for planar graphs, can be extended to graphs that are not necessarily connected. In this generalization, we consider the number of connected components in the graph. A connected component is a subgraph where there is a path between any two vertices.

Let V be the number of vertices, E be the number of edges, C be the number of connected components, and X be the Euler characteristic of the graph. The generalization of Euler's Formula for non-connected graphs is given by V - E + C = X.

To prove this formula, we start with Euler's Formula for connected graphs, which states V - E + F = 2, where F is the number of faces. For a disconnected graph, the number of faces can be defined as the sum of the number of faces in each connected component minus the number of edges that belong to more than one connected component. This can be written as F = F1 + F2 + ... + FC - N, where Fi is the number of faces in the i-th connected component and N is the number of edges connecting different components.

By substituting F = F1 + F2 + ... + FC - N into Euler's Formula for connected graphs and rearranging terms, we get V - E + C = X, which is the generalization of Euler's Formula for non-connected graphs. Therefore, the formula holds true for any graph, whether connected or not.

Learn more about Euler's Formula here:

https://brainly.com/question/12274716

#SPJ11

Answer:

he needs to play 24 games of basketball

Answer:

The height of the kite from the ground is 13.617 feet  

Step-by-step explanation:

Given as :

The measure of the string = 30 feet

The angle of elevation from the boy to his kite = 27°

Let the height of the kite from ground = H feet

So, From Triangle

Sin angle =

Or, Sin 27° =  

or, H = 30 ×  Sin 27°

I.e H = 30 × 0.4539

∴ H = 13.617 feet

Hence the height of the kite from the ground is 13.617 feet   Answer

The correct answer to 0.125 x 0.08 is 0.01. Dina's calculator provided the correct result.

The rule Dina mentioned about multiplying 125 x 8 and then moving the decimal point 5 places is not applicable in this case. When multiplying decimal numbers, we need to consider the number of decimal places in each factor.

Here's the correct approach to multiply 0.125 x 0.08:

Step 1: Ignore the decimal point and multiply the numbers as if they were whole numbers:

0.125 x 0.08 = 125 x 8

Step 2: Count the total number of decimal places in the original numbers:

0.125 has three decimal places

0.08 has two decimal places

Step 3: Add the number of decimal places from the original numbers:

Three decimal places + two decimal places = five decimal places

Step 4: Place the decimal point in the result by counting five places from the right:

125 x 8 = 1000

Adding the decimal point five places from the right gives us the final answer: 0.01000

Therefore, the correct answer to 0.125 x 0.08 is 0.01. Dina's calculator provided the correct result.

Learn more about Decimal here:

https://brainly.com/question/30958821

#SPJ1

jawkfjrnsidbjekwbxk2jw dlf 2kqbdkkebakdnrk8w Fflint

Answer:

740%

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

I need help with math too. Can u help me and I’ll help u

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

$4.20 / box

Step-by-step explanation:

12.60 / 3 = 4.20

Answer:

50 x 100=5,000

Step-by-step explanation:

50 x 100

Both (4, 1) and (5, 2) is the solution to the given equation. Therefore, option C is the correct answer.

The given equation is y+1=3(x-4).

A) The given coordinate point is (4, -1).

Substitute (x, y)=(4, -1) in y+1=3(x-4), we get

-1+1=3(4-4)

0=0

So, (4, -1) is the solution to the given equation.

B) The given coordinate point is (5, 2).

Substitute (x, y)=(5, 2) in y+1=3(x-4), we get

2+1=3(5-4)

3=3

So, (5, 2) is the solution to the given equation.

C) Here, both (4, 1) and (5, 2) is the solution to the given equation.

Therefore, option C is the correct answer.

To learn more about an equation visit:

https://brainly.com/question/14686792.

#SPJ1

Answer:

381 in^3

Step-by-step explanation:

The volume of the green block is V1 = length(width)(height), or

                                                         V1 = (16 in)(7 in)(3 in) = 336 in^3, and

the volume of the red triangular prism is V2 = (1/2)(3 in)(5 in)(6 in) =

                                                           V2 = 45 in^3

So the total volume is the sum of these two results:  381 in^3

The volume, in cubic inches, of the cylinder will be   [tex]\frac{990}{7}[/tex]  or [tex]45\pi[/tex] cubic inches.

Cylinder is a [tex]3D[/tex] solid shape which holds two parallel bases joined by a curved surface, at a fixed distance. These bases are circular in shape and the center of the two bases are joined by a line segment.

Volume is define as capacity of cylinder.

Volume of cylinder [tex]=\pi r^{2} h[/tex]

We have,

Radius [tex]=3[/tex] inches

Height [tex]=5[/tex] inches,

Then,

Volume of cylinder [tex]=\pi r^{2} h[/tex]

                              [tex]=\frac{22}{7} *(3)^{2} *5[/tex]

                               [tex]=\frac{990}{7}[/tex]  or [tex]45\pi[/tex] cubic inches

Hence, we can say that The volume, in cubic inches, of the cylinder will be     [tex]\frac{990}{7}[/tex]  or [tex]45\pi[/tex] cubic inches

To know more about volume click here

https://brainly.com/question/1578538

#SPJ2

The income elasticity of demand for tennis balls is -1.5. The negative sign indicates an inverse relationship between income and the quantity demanded of tennis balls, suggesting that tennis balls are an inferior good.

To calculate the income elasticity of demand, we need to use the formula:

Income Elasticity of Demand = Percentage change in quantity demanded / Percentage change in income

Given that incomes increase by 58% and the quantity demanded of tennis balls drops by 87%, we can plug these values into the formula:

Income Elasticity of Demand = (-87%)/58%

Simplifying the calculation:

Income Elasticity of Demand = -1.5

The income elasticity of demand for tennis balls is -1.5. The negative sign indicates an inverse relationship between income and the quantity demanded of tennis balls, suggesting that tennis balls are an inferior good.

Visit here to learn more about Income elasticity brainly.com/question/29564308

#SPJ11

Answer:

The population of the town in Iowa after 13 years is 9,130

Step-by-step explanation:

The given parameters of the town are;

The population of the town in Iowa in 2007, a = 12,355

The rate at which the people of the town leave Iowa for Minnesota, r = 2.3% per year

We are required to find the population of the town after t = 13 years

The given population decay function is presented as follows;

[tex]f(t) = a \cdot (1 - r)^t[/tex]

Where;

a = The initial population of the town = 12,355

r = The annual percentage rate at which the people of the town leave Iowa for Minnesota = 2.3% per year = 0.023

t = The number of years over which the population changes = 13 years = 13

∴ f(13) = 12,355 × (1 - 0.023)¹³ = 9130.02734094

Therefore, the population of the town in Iowa after 13 years ≈ 9,130 (we round down to the nearest whole number).

Answer:

46.08

Step-by-step explanation:

you have to make your percentage a decimal, which 60% will be .60 and 20% will be .20. you then multiply your initial number which is 36 by .60 and add that on because youre adding 60%. After that you will multiply that given number by .20 and you subtract what that product is from your last product you received (36x.60) which if im not mistaken will give you $46.08.

Answer:

C

Step-by-step explanation:

I took the test

The specificity of the diagnostic test is 88%, indicating its ability to accurately identify individuals without the disease as negative.

Specificity is a measure of the test's ability to correctly identify individuals without the disease as negative. To calculate the specificity, we need to consider the number of true negatives (controls who yield negative tests) and the total number of controls.

In this case, the number of controls tested is 250, and out of those, 30 yield positive tests. The number of true negatives can be calculated by subtracting the number of false positives (controls who yield positive tests) from the total number of controls:

Negatives which are true = Total Controls - False Positives

True Negatives = 250 - 30 = 220

The specificity is then calculated as the ratio of true negatives to the total number of controls:

Specificity = True Negatives / Total Controls

Specificity = 220 / 250 ≈ 0.88

Therefore, the specificity of this test is approximately 0.88 or 88%. This means that the test correctly identifies 88% of individuals without the disease as negative.

Learn more about specificity here:

brainly.com/question/31112216

#SPJ11

The general solution to the differential equation is: y = -(3/2)x + C, where C is the constant of integration.

To solve the differential equation 6x dx + 4x dy = 0 using separation of variables, we need to rearrange the equation so that all the x terms are on one side and all the y terms are on the other side.

Let's start by dividing both sides of the equation by 4x:

(6x dx + 4x dy) / 4x = 0

(6x / 4x) dx + (4x / 4x) dy = 0

(3/2) dx + dy = 0

Now we can separate the variables by moving the dy term to the other side:

dy = -(3/2) dx

Integrating both sides with respect to their respective variables, we have:

∫ dy = ∫ -(3/2) dx

The integral of dy with respect to y is simply y, and the integral of -(3/2) dx with respect to x is -(3/2)x:

y = -(3/2)x + C

where C is the constant of integration. Thus, the general solution to the differential equation is:

y = -(3/2)x + C

This is the final solution using separation of variables.

To learn more about differential equation visit:

brainly.com/question/32538700

#SPJ11

Answer:

Answer is A.  -296x+960/ -636x+3,024

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

HEREEE besties

Answer:

Part I:  The degree of a polynomial is the greatest of the degrees of its terms.

Part II:  In order to write a polynomial in descending order, you must write the terms with the exponents decreasing from left to right.

Part III: A. -4x² + 11x - 12, degree = 2,

B. 5x³ + 4x + 14, degree = 3.

Step-by-step explanation:

Part I : Since the degree of a polynomial is the highest power of its monomials ( single term ),

e: degree of is 5.

Thus, in part I, the correct option is 'greatest'

Part II: When we write a polynomial then we write the terms of the polynomial in descending order of their degrees.

Thus, in part II the correct option is 'least'

Part III: A.  

∵ -4x² has the highest power in the polynomial.

⇒ Degree = 2,

Also, in the polynomial descending order of degrees,

2 > 1 > 0

⇒ polynomial in descending order,

B.  

Combining like terms,

∵ 5x³ has the highest degree,

⇒ Degree = 3,

Also, the order of the degrees in the polynomial is,

3 < 2 < 1 < 0

Thus, the polynomial in descending order,

Answer: I had trouble with this one too.

Step-by-step explanation:

The lifetimes of a certain brand of photographic light are normally distributed with a mean of 210 hours and a standard deviation of 50 hours. We need to find the probability that a particular light will last more than 250 hours.

Given mean = μ = 210 hours. Standard deviation = σ = 50 hours. Let X be the lifetime of a photographic light. X ~ N (μ, σ) = N (210, 50). The probability that a particular light will last more than 250 hours can be calculated as follows: P(X > 250) = 1 - P(X < 250)Let Z be the standard normal variable.

Then, (250 - μ) / σ = (250 - 210) / 50 = 0.8P(X < 250) = P(Z < 0.8). Using the z-table, the probability that Z is less than 0.8 is 0.7881. Therefore, P(X > 250) = 1 - P(X < 250) = 1 - 0.7881 = 0.2119. Hence, the probability that a particular light will last more than 250 hours is 0.2119.

To know more about probability, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/31828911

#SPJ11

a.  The 68% of the widget weights lie between  33 ounces and  55 ounces.

b. The percentage of widget weights lying between 11 and 55 ounces is approximately 68%.

c. The percentage of widget weights lying above 22 ounces is approximately = 5%.

Based on the given data points: 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, the five-number summary can be identified as follows:

Minimum: 5

First Quartile (Q1): 7

Median (Q2): 11

Third Quartile (Q3): 15

Maximum: 18

Now, let's answer the questions related to the distribution of widget weights using the Empirical Rule:

a) The Empirical Rule states that for a bell-shaped distribution, approximately 68% of the data lies within one standard deviation of the mean. Since the mean is 44 ounces and the standard deviation is 11 ounces, we can say that approximately 68% of the widget weights lie between 44 - 11 = 33 ounces and 44 + 11 = 55 ounces.

b) To determine the percentage of widget weights lying between 11 and 55 ounces, we need to calculate the z-scores for these values. The z-score is calculated using the formula: z = (x - mean) / standard deviation.

For 11 ounces: z1 = (11 - 44) / 11 = -33/11 = -3

For 55 ounces: z2 = (55 - 44) / 11 = 11/11 = 1

Using the Empirical Rule, we know that approximately 68% of the data lies within one standard deviation of the mean. Therefore, the percentage of widget weights lying between 11 and 55 ounces is approximately 68%.

c) To determine the percentage of widget weights lying above 22 ounces, we need to calculate the z-score for 22 ounces: z = (22 - 44) / 11 = -22/11 = -2.

Using the Empirical Rule, we know that approximately 95% of the data lies within two standard deviations of the mean. Therefore, the percentage of widget weights lying above 22 ounces is approximately 100% - 95% = 5%.

Learn more about widget Visit: brainly.com/question/29411327

#SPJ11