In the 21 century, we see much of Africa ruled by cruel dictators or military leaders. How is this situation connected to European imperialism in Africa?
The colonial system of indirect rule in Africa started a tradition of rule by corrupt leaders.
Buropeans were so cruel that Africans learned to accept cruel treatment by their rulers.
O
Africans have never been able to establish ideals of human rights-after being treated as inferior.
The families of today's African dictators were put in power by impertalinations

Answer:  Byzantine style

Explanation: The Macedonian era prevails Macedonian Renaissance and it is the period that was begun with the end of the Byzantine iconoclasm until the fall od the Macedonian dynasty.

Trough the time the Byzantine Empire has improved with the flourishing of military, architecture, culture, and art.

Church decorations were based on the Byzantine church mosaic style which we can see in Hosios Lukas Monastery and the Nea Moni Katholiko. Besides it, we can also found the naturalistic style and Christian themes based on Roman and Greek culture and art.

The decolonization of Africa was caused by all of the following EXCEPT war between the colonies and the imperial powers.

What is decolonization? Decolonization is the process of ending the colonization of a region or people. It may include the withdrawal of an imperial power's forces, the establishment of independence, or both. The decolonization of Africa was caused by all of the following except war between the colonies and the imperial powers. The following were the reasons for decolonization of Africa :a. A changing attitude about imperialism in Europe b. War between the colonies and the imperial powers c. A rise in African nationalism international pressures exerted on the Imperial Powers Therefore, we can say that War between the colonies and the imperial powers is not a reason for the decolonization of Africa.

The decolonization of Africa refers to the process by which African nations gained independence from European colonial powers during the 20th century. It was a significant movement that reshaped the political and social landscape of the continent.

To get more information about imperialism in Europe visit:

https://brainly.com/question/12962109

#SPJ11

The decolonization of Africa is a process that began in the late 19th century and culminated in the late 20th century. It was caused by all of the following except: B. War between the colonies and the imperial powers.

The decolonization of Africa was caused by a changing attitude about imperialism in Europe, a rise in African nationalism, and international pressures exerted on the imperial powers. It led to the creation of independent African countries and the end of European colonial rule on the continent. The process of decolonization was marked by conflicts, violence, and struggles for power, as well as new political systems, economic structures, and cultural identities.African nationalism was a major factor that contributed to the decolonization of Africa. Nationalist movements emerged in many African countries during the early 20th century. They sought to promote African culture and identity, challenge European colonialism, and create independent African states. African leaders, intellectuals, and activists played a key role in these movements, organizing protests, strikes, and boycotts, and demanding political rights and social justice. The rise of African nationalism coincided with the decline of European imperialism and the weakening of colonial powers in the aftermath of World War II. International pressures also contributed to the decolonization of Africa. The United Nations, formed in 1945, supported the principles of self-determination and sovereignty, which gave colonies the right to choose their own political status and future. The Cold War also played a role in the decolonization process, as the Soviet Union and the United States sought to promote their influence in Africa by supporting nationalist movements and new governments.

To learn more about decolonization, visit :

https://brainly.com/question/32192879

#SPJ11

The answer to the question which would need to be true in order for Michael Ahern's story to be constitutionally protected free speech is "Michael Ahern made his story up with no knowledge that it was false.

"Explanation:To begin with, the constitution of the United States of America is a document that provides a framework for the governing of America, and one of the key things it protects is the right of people to express their opinions in speech without fear of retaliation from the government or other entities.Michael Ahern's story about Mrs. O'Leary's cow causing the Chicago Fire would have to be protected under the First Amendment as free speech. This would necessitate several elements of the story being true. If Michael Ahern made up his story with no knowledge that it was false, then it would be protected by the Constitution as free speech.Therefore, Michael Ahern made his story up with no knowledge that it was false, would need to be true in order for his story to be constitutionally protected free speech.

To know more about government , visit ;

https://brainly.com/question/1078669

#SPJ11

At the start of the deployment of U.S. Ground forces in South Vietnam in 1965, public opinion inside the United States about President Lyndon Baines Johnson's choice to escalate the war become normally supportive. In the years main as much as 1965, the U.S. Authorities gradually increased its army involvement in Vietnam, often thru advisory and help roles. However, the deployment of ground forces marked a giant escalation within the battle.

At the time, there was still a triumphing sentiment among the various American public that the United States had an ethical duty to prevent the unfolding of communism, referred to as the "domino idea." This belief, blended with fears of a communist takeover in South Vietnam and concerns about the credibility and recognition of the US, inspired public opinion in favor of escalation.

Furthermore, Johnson's management utilized a combination of propaganda, selective records, and patriotic appeals to rally public guidance for the battle attempt. They portrayed the warfare as necessary to guard American pursuits, steady freedom, and prevent the spread of communism in Southeast Asia.

Additionally, there has been a robust feeling of agreement within authorities establishments and the presidency at that time, as the United States became still in the submit-World War II technology and at the peak of the Cold War. Many Americans were willing to defer to the choices made by the president and believed that the government had to get the right of entry to statistics that justified the escalation.

However, because the warfare dragged on and U.S. Casualties increased, public opinion started out to shift. The credibility gap between the authorities' portrayal of the warfare and the realities on the floor became greater obvious. The anti-war movement won momentum, and voices of dissent and opposition to the struggle grew louder.

By the late 1960s, the general public's opinion on the conflict had come to be deeply divided, with a substantial portion of the populace thinking about the justification and effectiveness of U.S. Involvement. The Tet Offensive in 1968, in which the North Vietnamese and Viet Cong launched a sequence of marvel attacks, similarly eroded public support for the conflict effort.

In summary, at the start of the deployment of U.S. Ground forces in South Vietnam in 1965, public opinion within the United States changed into usually supportive of President Lyndon Baines Johnson's selection to amplify the warfare. However, because the war persisted and the realities of the conflict have become greater obvious, public opinion became more and more divided, main to a huge anti-struggle motion and growing opposition to the warfare effort.

To know more about President Lyndon Baines Johnson,

https://brainly.com/question/28869338

#SPJ4

Answer:

1. A: Threats to U.S. business interests

2. B: To increase U.S. influence in Latin America

Explanation:

Answer:

A.

Explanation:

Out of the options provided, the United States exported tea, bananas, and coffee in the late 19th century. Therefore, the correct options are b, c, and d.

During the late 19th century, the United States made significant strides in manufacturing, mining, and agriculture, making it one of the world's most productive and prosperous nations. America's economic success during this time was also due to a strong global market, which created opportunities for exports and expansion.In the late 19th century, the United States exported a variety of agricultural products, raw materials, and manufactured goods. Exports of agricultural products, including bananas, coffee, and tea, were a significant component of the country's trade. At the same time, manufactured goods such as machinery, clothing, and weapons also found their way into the world market.

To know more about machinery, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/9806515

#SPJ11

The United States began exporting option (d) coffee in the late 19th century. Coffee was one of the agricultural products that the United States began exporting in the late 19th century, along with sugar, tobacco, and cotton.

These items were grown mainly in the southern states, where the climate was favorable for their cultivation. Export refers to the exchange of goods and services between countries. It is a significant aspect of international trade, as countries specialize in producing goods that are in high demand and then trade them with other countries that require them. Exporting goods is critical for the economic growth of a country because it generates revenue, creates jobs, and increases domestic production. Therefore, many countries are actively seeking to increase their exports in a variety of sectors such as agriculture, manufacturing, and services.

To learn more about Export, visit :

https://brainly.com/question/15219318

#SPJ11

Cesar Chavez and Martin Luther King, Jr. shared a common agenda: to bring about social justice and equality for minorities, especially African Americans and Hispanic farm workers, respectively.

The main agenda, or purpose, that both Chavez and King shared was the fight against racism and discrimination, and to bring about social justice and equality for minorities in the United States. Chavez, a labor leader and civil rights activist, fought for the rights of Hispanic farm workers in California. He co-founded the United Farm Workers of America (UFW) and advocated for better wages, working conditions, and improved rights for farmworkers.

King, a Baptist minister and civil rights leader, fought for the rights of African Americans. He advocated for desegregation, equal rights, and an end to discrimination against African Americans in the United States. King's famous "I Have a Dream" speech during the March on Washington in 1963 called for an end to racism and the creation of a society in which all people are treated equally.

For more about social justice:

https://brainly.com/question/32229914

#SPJ4

The title of the excerpt tells the reader that the narrator is American. A clue from the excerpt that also reveals this fact is that the narrator states that "The catch of fish lasted into the early afternoon, and I caught more than my share.

We threw the excess fish back, as we always did." This sentence can be regarded as a subtle clue about the narrator's nationality. In the United States, fishing regulations limit the number of fish that may be caught in a day, known as the "daily bag limit."As a result, the narrator's statement that he caught "more than his share" and that the extra fish were "thrown back" demonstrates that the narrator is well-versed with American fishing laws.

Furthermore, the use of the word "always" when referring to throwing excess fish back is also an indication of his familiarity with the cultural practices of fishing in America, reinforcing the fact that the narrator is American.

To know more about demonstrates visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29360620

#SPJ11

The following is the answer to the question "characteristic of civilization".

The characteristic of civilization is responses economic activity, economic activity art and literature, art and literature bronze, tools and weapons, and bronze tools and weapons an army.A civilization is a community distinguished by cultural and technological growth and developments, characterized by political organizations, symbolic communication, and the production of large urban settlements. Economic activity is a significant aspect of civilization. Art and literature are considered to be two of the most significant cultural achievements of civilization.In summary, the option A "Responses economic activity, economic activity art and literature, art and literature bronze, tools and weapons, and bronze tools and weapons an army" is the correct answer to the question .

To know more about production , visit ;

https://brainly.com/question/16755022

#SPJ11

Answer:

a) true

Explanation:

in the spring of 1882, president Chester Arthur passed the Chinese exclusion act, which banned immigrants from China from coming to the U.S. for 10 years; this was passed because Americans didn’t like that the Chinese had many jobs that would been occupied by Americans

The expansion of France and England into the Ohio River Valley led to the French and Indian War, a conflict fought between the two powers and their respective Native American allies.

In the mid-18th century, both France and England sought to expand their colonial territories in North America. The Ohio River Valley, a region rich in resources and strategic importance, became a focal point of contention. France established a strong presence in the area, constructing forts and trading posts to protect their interests and maintain control over the fur trade. In response, England also claimed the region and sought to assert its authority by encouraging settlement and trade in the Ohio River Valley.

As the French and English interests clashed in the Ohio River Valley, tensions escalated, leading to armed conflict. The French and Indian War (1754-1763) ensued, involving not only the European powers but also Native American tribes aligned with either side. The war ultimately ended with an English victory, resulting in France ceding its North American territories to England.

To learn more about Ohio.

Click here:brainly.com/question/32464316?

#SPJ11

The spaces for circumambulation and meditation best explains the long-lasting durability of the Bamiyan Buddhas prior to their destruction in 2001.

The Bamiyan Buddhas were two monumental statues of Buddha carved into the side of a cliff in Bamiyan, Afghanistan. They were approximately 1,500 years old and considered one of the largest and most significant cultural heritage sites in the country. Unfortunately, in 2001, the Taliban destroyed both statues using explosives.How were the Bamiyan Buddhas built.The Bamiyan Buddhas were built using the rock-cut carving technique, which involves carving the statues directly into the side of the cliff. This technique involved chiseling away at the rock until the desired shape and form were achieved. The Buddhas were then covered in plaster and painted to add details and color.What explains the long-lasting durability of the Bamiyan Buddhas.The long-lasting durability of the Bamiyan Buddhas prior to their destruction in 2001 can be attributed to the spaces for circumambulation and meditation. These spaces were carved into the cliff surrounding the Buddhas, allowing pilgrims to walk around the statues in a clockwise direction, as is customary in Buddhist tradition. The spaces also provided a place for meditation, adding to the site's significance and meaning for Buddhists. The constant foot traffic and use of these spaces helped to preserve the statues and the surrounding area for centuries.

To know more about cultural , visit ;

https://brainly.com/question/514395

#SPJ11

In his book, "Climbing the Mountain: My Search for Meaning," William Massey referred to at least two instances where the US was able to "have its cake and eat it too."

The two instances Massey referred to were the US occupation of Japan and Germany following World War II and the end of the Cold War with the collapse of the Soviet Union.

The idiom "have your cake and eat it too" means you want to have it both ways or you can't have it both ways. It means wanting to have two incompatible things or wanting more than one thing when they are not possible together. The term was first recorded in John Heywood's A Dialogue Conteinyng the Nomber in Effect of All the Proverbes in the Englishe Tongue in 1546. It's also commonly stated as "you can't have your cake and eat it too."

For more about Mountain:

https://brainly.com/question/20709023

#SPJ4

Frederick Douglass is a skilled writer and often uses strong and precise language in his writing. In the given sentences, the one that best demonstrates Douglass’s use of precise adjectives is "I had known what it was to be kindly treated; they had known nothing of the kind.

Douglass had experienced a lot of mistreatment and cruelty during his time as a slave, but he had also encountered people who had shown him kindness. Douglass used this specific adjective to highlight the nature of the treatment he received.

He was not simply treated well; he was treated with kindness, a word that is more impactful and precise. By describing the other boys as having "known nothing of the kind," Douglass contrasts his experience with theirs and emphasizes the importance of the kindness that he was shown.

To know more about highlight visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29561974

#SPJ11

During the post-World War II economic boom, which group became a new target for advertisers? The correct answer to this question is b. teenagers. During the post-World War II economic boom, teenagers became a new target for advertisers.

Advertising and marketing during the post-World War II economic boom had grown in ways that were not possible before. They began to shift their advertising and marketing efforts to younger demographics, such as teenagers. Since teenagers were the fastest-growing population at the time, they were the new target of advertisers who wanted to increase their sales. Advertisers and marketers have been advertising to teenagers ever since, as it is a demographic that continues to have significant purchasing power.

The post-World War II economic boom, often referred to as the "Golden Age of Capitalism," was a period of remarkable economic growth and prosperity that occurred in many Western countries in the decades following the end of World War II. This era, which roughly spanned from the late 1940s to the early 1970s, was characterized by high rates of economic expansion, rising living standards, and technological advancements.

To get more information about post-World War II economic boom visit:

https://brainly.com/question/32358175

#SPJ11

During the post-World War II economic boom, the group that became a new target for advertisers was OPTION (B) teenagers. The post-World War II economic boom led to a new standard of living in America and the emergence of teenagers as a new target for advertisers.

Teenagers began to receive a significant amount of pocket money and became increasingly interested in popular music, fashion, and movie stars. In this period, there was a focus on consumerism and the increase in advertising to promote consumer goods led to the emergence of a consumer culture. Advertisers attempted to create a sense of desire among teenagers by connecting their products with music, movies, and celebrity idols. The media began to take a new shape during this time with an increase in magazines, television, and radio programs catering to teenagers. Advertisers began using these mediums to reach this target audience which gave rise to the youth market. As a result, the youth market soon became an important part of the US economy.

To learn more about Advertisers, visit :

https://brainly.com/question/30526690

#SPJ11

The statement best describes Mongol rule over their enormous empire as erratic and inconsistent. Thus, option A is correct.

The Mongol Empire was established by King Genghis Khan in the 13th century. He expanded his kingdom from Asia to Europe. His kingdom varied in different regions and periods. This Mongol rule was said to be in combination with peace and war behaviors during its ruling time.

The Mongol Empire is erratic and inconsistent because it always involves war and mainly focused on conquering the surrounding countries. They could be brutal and punish people who oppose the rules of Mongol rule.

To learn more about Mongol rule

https://brainly.com/question/30188039

#SPJ4

During the hearings, the names of communist conspirators that were gathered cannot be considered entirely accurate. The reason for this is that the hearings were marred by a lot of hysteria and overzealousness.

Senator Joseph McCarthy led a witch hunt against suspected communist agents, spreading fear among the public and government officials alike.

Besides, it is important to note that many of the people named were never proven to be actual communist agents. Many were simply accused based on suspicion and hearsay rather than concrete evidence.

This led to innocent people being blacklisted and their reputations ruined. Furthermore, many of the people who were named had done nothing wrong apart from holding certain political beliefs that were considered unacceptable by the government.

Therefore, it is impossible to consider all the names that were gathered during the hearings as entirely accurate.

Learn more about communist conspirators; brainly.com/question/16653941

#SPJ11

In the united states, Before OPEC (Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries) increased the price of crude oil in 1973, there was a period of relatively stable and low oil prices.

Before OPEC raised crude oil prices in 1973, oil prices were stable and low. International oil companies dominated the market, and the US relied on imported oil.

Stable oil prices and availability fueled US economic growth. In 1973, OPEC enforced an oil embargo against countries backing Israel in the Yom Kippur War. This caused a surge in crude oil prices and an oil crisis globally. Oil price hike affected global economy - led to inflation, energy shortages and economic downturn in several countries, including the US.

Learn more about crude oil from

https://brainly.com/question/31293019

#SPJ1

Answer:Iron ages

Neo-Babylonian, Neo-Assyrian and Persian Empires

Bronze age

Sumer

Babylonia in Mesopotamia

Athens in Ancient Greece

Explanation:

The lack of a definitive total number of Armenians who died at the hands of the Ottoman Empire during the early 20th century can be attributed to several factors.

Firstly, the events that unfolded, often referred to as the Armenian Genocide, occurred during a tumultuous period of war and political upheaval, making accurate record-keeping and documentation challenging.

Secondly, the Ottoman Empire denied the occurrence of a systematic genocide against the Armenian population, leading to deliberate suppression and destruction of evidence. This further hindered efforts to establish an exact count of the victims.

Additionally, the widespread displacement and forced migration of Armenians resulted in a fragmented and dispersed population, making it difficult to gather comprehensive data.

Furthermore, scholarly research and political debates surrounding the Armenian Genocide have been subject to denial, distortion, and politicization, further complicating efforts to establish an authoritative and universally accepted final tally.

The lack of a precise total number underscores the complexities and challenges associated with documenting historical atrocities, particularly when deliberate efforts are made to conceal the truth and when historical events are highly contentious and politically sensitive.

Learn more about Armenian Genocide:

https://brainly.com/question/17096037

#SPJ4

Answer: Sons of Liberty

Explanation:

Answer:

The Bostonian branch of the Sons of Liberty were responsible for organizing and executing the famous Boston Tea Party of 1773 in response to the Tea Act. Early in the American Revolution, the former Sons of Liberty generally joined more formal groups, such as the Committee of Safety.

Following WWII, countries all around the world responded to the Holocaust in a variety of ways, although none of the possibilities above adequately captures the entire response. The following are some major parts of the response:

War Crimes Trials: The establishment of international tribunals to punish and hold accountable those guilty for the Holocaust and other war crimes was the most significant response. The Nuremberg cases in Germany (1945-1946), as well as following cases such as the Eichmann Trial in Israel (1961), established major precedents for prosecuting individuals for crimes against humanity, genocide, and war crimes.

International Law Development: The horrors committed during the Holocaust spurred the international community to create new legal structures. In 1948, the United Nations approved the Genocide Convention, which designated genocide as a crime.

Refugees and Displaced Persons: Many governments, including the United Nations Relief and Rehabilitation Administration (UNRRA) and the  International Refugee Organisation  (IRO), launched programmes to assist Holocaust survivors and refugees. Attempts were undertaken to resettle displaced people and give them with assistance.

Restitution and reparations: Following the Holocaust, there were debates and negotiations about restitution and reparations for Jewish victims. Germany, in particular, entered into reparations agreements with Israel and Jewish organisations in order to compensate survivors and their families financially.

It is crucial to highlight that reactions to the Holocaust differed between countries and regions, and it took years for a comprehensive understanding of the scope of the atrocities to emerge. The alternatives in the question are inaccurate.

For more questions on Organisation

https://brainly.com/question/4997809

#SPJ8

The option that belongs in the category of types of travel available to all Americans is a trek across the United States in the early 1800s.

Trek across the United States in the early 1800s was the type of travel available to all Americans.Westward Expansion was the significant movement of people to the Western United States during the 1800s. The land west of the Mississippi River and east of the Pacific Ocean was regarded as the American West. The western region of the United States included two-thirds of the nation's landmass but only a small fraction of its population.

The United States government began promoting westward migration after purchasing the Louisiana Territory from France in 1803. The United States added Florida in 1819, Texas in 1845, and the Oregon Territory in 1846.

To know more about trek visit:

https://brainly.com/question/32051444

#SPJ11

Answer:1) Hungary voted to become a multiparty democracy.

Explanation:

the rest of the answers where a bit off because it wasn't even true so i choose  1  cause it was true.

The statement "The list of individuals who composed material in the Psalms includes Moses" is false because the Book of Psalms is an anthology of religious poems that was compiled over centuries and is the most commonly studied book in the Hebrew Bible.

The Psalms were composed by several individuals, including King David, Solomon, Asaph, the Sons of Korah, and Heman the Ezrahite, among others. While Moses is credited with the writing of several of the Old Testament books, such as Exodus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy, he is not included in the list of those who wrote the Psalms. Therefore, the statement "The list of individuals who composed material in the Psalms includes Moses" is incorrect.

For more about religious:

https://brainly.com/question/28234636

#SPJ4

One reason the colonists had difficulty coming together to revolt against Britain is that they had conflicting ideologies and interests.What is meant by conflicting ideologies and interests?Conflicting ideologies and interests mean that the colonists had different beliefs and values which meant that their goals and objectives were not the same. Some of them wanted to have total independence while others wanted a more peaceful settlement with the British. There were others who were not willing to fight the British since they had interests and businesses with them.Some wanted to continue being part of the British empire, while others saw the need for the colonies to be independent of British control. Some colonists also had a sense of loyalty to Britain and believed that they could resolve their differences through negotiation rather than going to war.Therefore, the colonists had difficulty coming together to revolt against Britain due to their conflicting ideologies and interests. They were not united in their beliefs and goals, which made it challenging to mobilize a unified resistance against British rule.

One reason the colonists had difficulty coming together to revolt against Britain is b. They had conflicting ideologies and interests.

The colonists encountered challenges in uniting to rebel against Britain because they held disparate ideologies and priorities that clashed.

The American colonies differed greatly in their economic frameworks, political ideologies, and social compositions. Their varied motivations and concerns occasionally conflicted with each other. Ideology is a social or political philosophy that considers both theoretical and practical aspects at an equal level.

Learn more about colonists  from

https://brainly.com/question/24736605

#SPJ4

The dictator whose involvement in drug trafficking activity led to the United States removing him from power in 1989 was Manuel Noriega.

Noriega, the military ruler of Panama, was a key figure in the international drug trade and had close ties to various drug cartels, including the notorious Medellín Cartel led by Pablo Escobar.

Noriega's involvement in drug trafficking became a matter of concern for the United States as it threatened regional stability and had a direct impact on American interests. The U.S. government had previously supported Noriega due to his cooperation in intelligence sharing and anti-communist efforts, but his criminal activities eventually outweighed any perceived benefits.

The United States took action against Noriega through a military intervention known as Operation Just Cause. In December 1989, U.S. forces invaded Panama with the objective of removing Noriega from power and bringing him to justice for drug trafficking and other criminal charges. The operation was swift and resulted in Noriega's capture and subsequent imprisonment in the United States.

The removal of Noriega from power highlighted the United States' commitment to combatting drug trafficking and its determination to hold accountable those involved in such illicit activities, even if they held positions of political power. The operation also signaled  a shift in U.S. foreign policy towards Latin America, emphasizing the importance of democratic governance and the rule of law.

Final answer:

In summary, Manuel Noriega's involvement in drug trafficking activity prompted the United States to intervene militarily and remove him from power in 1989, reflecting the U.S. government's determination to address the issue of drug trafficking and uphold regional stability in the Americas.

For more questions on drug trafficking

https://brainly.com/question/29993903

#SPJ8

Turkey's membership of the customs union is recognised as having played a significant part in its economy's transition from agrarian to industrial. As Turkey is in a customs union with the EU, it has to adjust its tariffs and duties to match those of the EU.

Answer:

Without prejudice to WTO provisions, the Turkey-EU Customs Union constitutes the major legal basis of Turkey’s free trade agreements (FTA). Under the Customs Union, Turkey aligns its commercial policy with the EU’s Common Commercial Policy. This alignment concerns both autonomous regimes and preferential agreements with third countries.

In the excerpt, Jefferson wrote that the purpose of these rights "was to withdraw certain subjects from the vicissitudes of political controversy, to place them beyond the reach of majorities and permanently to preserve them as fundamental principles of society."

In other words, Jefferson was conveying that the purpose of the language of the excerpt was to protect certain inalienable rights as the cornerstone of society. He described it as "an exploration to limit and restrain the mischievous activity of the majority," or an effort to secure and protect the rights of minorities.

In this sense, Jefferson's language was intended to create a sort of "wall of separation" between politics and rights, safeguarding those rights from any political tumult.

To know more about Jefferson , click here:

https://brainly.com/question/15686009

#SPJ4