Answers
We can see here that contrasting between the Qin and Han dynasties, we have:
The Han used a combination of large-scale armies, maneuverability, colonization, military adventurers operating independently of the imperial court, and small expeditions to expand their domain, in contrast to the Qin, who built their military to take advantage of the weaknesses of the feudal armies of the Chinese states opposing them.
What is a dynasty?A dynasty is a line of kings who govern over a certain area or nation for a protracted period of time and come from the same family or bloodline.
The Song Dynasty is noted for its economic progress and cultural sophistication, whereas the Tang Dynasty is known for its military might and expansion.
The Tang Dynasty was actually known to be marked with a cosmopolitan culture while Song dynasty had a homogeneous culture.
Learn more about dynasty on https://brainly.com/question/3710009
#SPJ1
Related Questions
What world-wide event, recently discovered by scientists, is used by some historians to describe the two hundred years near the end of the 3rd Millennium to explain civil unrest in many of the ancient river valley civilizations?
Answers
Whilst there has been no global phenomenon discovered by scientists that historians can solely attribute to the occurrence of civil unrest.
Why is this so.?This is because, within many ancient river valley civilizations during the final two centuries of the 3rd millennium, several factors have been identified as contributing significantly towards their eventual collapse.
Among these decisive influences are environmental deterioration, aggression from external parties, internal disputes and conflicts, as well as a failure in effective centralized political and economic structures.
Read more about civil unrest here:
https://brainly.com/question/242118
#SPJ1
Can somebody please help me with this essay?? I'd greatly appreciate it!!
(I'll raise the points & mark brainlest) Do not copy & paste someone else's please
Using at least 4 sources (an encyclopedia, the Internet, or other resources), discuss your chosen topic in a detailed report of at least 750-800 words. Make sure you use proper grammar, punctuation, and spelling. At the end of the report, include a bibliography listing all your sources.
Korean War:
Division after World War II
Invasion and Pusan Perimeter
Landing at Inchon
Stalemate on the battlefield and negotiating table
Truce, no treaty, remained divided
Answers
The Korean War was a significant conflict that took place on the Korean Peninsula from 1950 to 1953. It was a result of the division of Korea after World War II, where the Soviet Union occupied the northern half, and the United States occupied the southern half. The North was led by Kim Il-sung, a communist dictator, while the South was led by Syngman Rhee, a pro-Western authoritarian.
Division after World War II:
The division of Korea occurred in 1945 after the end of World War II. The Soviet Union occupied the northern half of the peninsula, while the United States occupied the southern half. The division was supposed to be temporary until a unified Korean government could be established. However, the two superpowers had different ideas on how to achieve this goal.
The Soviet Union supported the establishment of a communist government in North Korea, while the United States supported the establishment of a pro-Western government in South Korea. As a result, both Koreas developed very different political and economic systems.
Invasion and Pusan Perimeter:
On June 25, 1950, North Korea invaded South Korea, hoping to reunify the peninsula under communist rule. The North Korean army quickly advanced, taking control of most of South Korea in a matter of weeks. The United Nations Security Council, led by the United States, intervened and authorized a military coalition to support South Korea.
The coalition's initial strategy was to establish a defensive line along the southern coast of South Korea, known as the Pusan Perimeter, while reinforcements arrived from other countries. The Pusan Perimeter held off the North Korean advance for several months, but the situation was becoming increasingly dire.
Landing at Inchon:
General Douglas MacArthur, the commander of the United Nations forces, devised a daring plan to turn the tide of the war. He proposed an amphibious landing at the port of Inchon, which was behind North Korean lines. The landing would cut off the North Korean supply lines and force them to retreat.
The landing took place on September 15, 1950, and was a stunning success. The North Korean army was caught off guard, and their supply lines were cut off. The UN forces quickly advanced and liberated the South Korean capital of Seoul.
Stalemate on the battlefield and negotiating table:
After the landing at Inchon, the UN forces pushed into North Korea and came close to the Chinese border. China, fearing a UN invasion, intervened and sent hundreds of thousands of troops to support the North Koreans.
The war quickly became a stalemate, with both sides fighting over the same ground for months. The UN forces tried several times to break through the North Korean lines, but they were met with fierce resistance. The Chinese troops proved to be a formidable opponent, and the war became a bloody and costly stalemate.
Negotiations to end the war began in 1951, but progress was slow. Both sides were unwilling to compromise, and the fighting continued for two more years. In 1953, an armistice was signed, ending the fighting, but no treaty was ever signed.
Truce, no treaty, remained divided:
The armistice established a demilitarized zone (DMZ) along the 38th parallel, which was supposed to be a buffer zone between North and South Korea. However, tensions remained high, and occasional skirmishes continued to occur.
Today, North Korea remains a communist dictatorship, while South Korea is a democratic republic. The two countries are still technically at war, and the DMZ remains one of the most heavily fortified borders in the world.
In conclusion, the Korean War was a significant conflict that had a lasting impact on the Korean Peninsula and the world. It was a result of the division of Korea after World War II
[tex]\huge{\colorbox{black}{\textcolor{lime}{\textsf{\textbf{I\:hope\:this\:helps\:!}}}}}[/tex]
[tex]\begin{align}\colorbox{black}{\textcolor{white}{\underline{\underline{\sf{Please\: mark\: as\: brillinest !}}}}}\end{align}[/tex]
[tex]\textcolor{blue}{\small\texttt{If you have any further questions,}}[/tex] [tex]\textcolor{blue}{\small{\texttt{feel free to ask!}}}[/tex]
♥️ [tex]{\underline{\underline{\texttt{\large{\color{hotpink}{Sumit\:\:Roy\:\:(:\:\:}}}}}}\\[/tex]
How the impact of power endured or change over time during the Mongol empire ?
Answers
Answer:
The impact of power during the Mongol Empire changed over time in several ways.
Expansion and Conquest: At the height of its power, the Mongol Empire, under the leadership of Genghis Khan and his successors, rapidly expanded its territories through conquest. The Mongols established one of the largest empires in history, stretching from Asia to Europe, and their military conquests brought significant changes in political power, economic systems, and social structures in the regions they conquered.
Centralization and Consolidation: The Mongols established a centralized system of government in their empire, where power was concentrated in the hands of the Great Khan and his family. The Mongols implemented policies to consolidate their rule, including the establishment of a hierarchical administrative structure, adoption of a census system, and imposition of Mongol laws and customs in the territories they conquered.
Cultural Exchange and Influence: The Mongols were known for their tolerance of different cultures and religions, which resulted in cultural exchange and influence between the Mongols and the conquered peoples. This led to the adoption of Mongol customs, language, and practices by some of the conquered populations, and also influenced the Mongols themselves, leading to changes in their way of life and governance.
Decline and Fragmentation: Over time, the Mongol Empire faced challenges such as internal conflicts, succession struggles, and external pressures from other powers. As a result, the empire started to decline and eventually fragmented into different Khanates, each with its own rulers and power centers. This led to a loss of central authority and a weakening of Mongol power over time.
Legacy and Impact: Despite the eventual decline of the Mongol Empire, its impact on the regions it conquered and its legacy endured. The Mongols left lasting influences on the political, economic, social, and cultural systems of the regions they ruled. Their conquests and rule had long-term effects on trade routes, diplomatic relations, cultural exchange, and governance structures in Eurasia, shaping the history of those regions for centuries to come.
In summary, the impact of power during the Mongol Empire changed over time due to expansion, centralization, cultural exchange, decline, and fragmentation. The legacy of the Mongol Empire continued to endure in the regions it conquered, shaping the history and development of those regions in various ways.
Your welcome!
Which of the following is an ideology by John Locke
a) The poor should have property
The occultation of smallpox
c) Christianity should be spread through emotions
d) The idea of life, liberty, and property
Answers
Answer:
I'm sure it's
d) The idea of life, liberty, and property.
Let me know if it's right. :)
Hope it helped! :)
Answer:
d
Explanation:
I'm pretty sure so yea bye
Plans for talks between the United States and China stalled when:
A. The United States said it would reduce its military presence in
Asia.
B. The United States sent troops into Cambodia.
C. The United States asked permission to send an official to China.
D. The United States said it would consider agreements with China
over Taiwan.
Answers
Answer:
its BExplanation:
The United States sent troops into Cambodia in 1970 to disrupt and destroy North Vietnamese supply lines along the H o Chi Minh trail, which ran through Cambodia. President Nixon argued that this was necessary to protect American troops in Vietnam and to encourage the Vietnamese to negotiate a peace agreement. However, the invasion was highly controversial and led to widespread protests domestically and internationally. It also increased tensions with the Cambodian government and fueled the growth of the Khmer Rouge, which eventually took power and committed genocide in Cambodia.
Plans for talks between the United States and China stalled when the United States sent troops into Cambodia. Thus, option B is correct.
What was the US China conflict?Since January 2018, when American President Donald Trump started imposing tariffs and other trade restrictions on China in an effort to pressure it to stop what the U.S. claims are longstanding unfair trade practices and intellectual property theft, there has been a growing economic rift between the two countries.
According to the Trump administration, these practices can add to the trade imbalance between the United States and China, and the Chinese government demands that American technology be transferred to China. China's government retaliated against US trade sanctions by accusing the Trump administration of acting in a nationalist and protectionist manner. A tough phase one deal between the two parties was achieved in January 2020 after the trade war intensified through 2019; it ended with China in December 2021.
Learn more about U.S China conflict here:
https://brainly.com/question/12023017
#SPJ5
The United States gained a virtual right of intervention in Cuba in the a. insular cases. b. Platt Amendment. c. Teller Amendment. d. Foraker Act.
Answers
The Platt Amendment effectively made Cuba a protectorate of the United States, as it gave the U.S. significant control over Cuban affairs. The U.S. used this control to intervene in Cuban politics and economy, leading to resentment among many Cubans and contributing to anti-American sentiment in the country.
Your assignment, you need to look at what was happening in Germany under Hindenburg (the leader prior to Hitler). What did he do that set in motion the rise of the Nazis? What economic factors were at play in Germany that Hindenburg couldn’t control? Leadership matters, and how did his impact the era?
AND…how did Hitler and the Nazis step into the vacuum? In other words, how did they rise to power? Do you think it was inevitable that they would have seized power…or do you think Hitler’s rise could have been averted? Really the question is about, “how did Hitler come to power”...but I really want you to look at the process, the leadership styles etc.
Answers
During the Weimar Republic in Germany, Hindenburg served as president from 1925 until his death in 1934. His presidency was marked by political and economic instability in Germany, which paved the way for the rise of the Nazis.
What actions triggered the rise of the Nazis?One of Hindenburg's main actions that sparked the rise of the Nazis was his decision to appoint Hitler as Chancellor of Germany in January 1933. Hindenburg believed that he could control Hitler and that the Nazis would help stabilize the country.
Therefore, this decision proved to be a grave mistake, as Hitler and the Nazis quickly seized power and established a dictatorship, which led to the horrors of the Holocaust and World War II.
Find out more about Nazis at:
https://brainly.com/question/11331942
#SPJ1
Select the correct answer.
Which of the following statements describes the command economy of the Soviet Union?
OA. The government allowed private businesses to produce goods and services demanded by the market
O B.
The government decided what goods and services would be produced and supplied to the market.
O C.
The government allowed workers to own the means of production.
OD. The government ensured high wages for workers.
Answers
Answer:
O B.
Explanation:
The answer is B, since the Soviet Union tightly controlled what would be allowed in the market.
Think about the news article excerpt you just read, and highlight the sentences that reveal the reporter's point of view.
The utterances of the speakers were still of a most inflammatory character, however, and the hearers who still remained grew riotous in demeanor. The police concluded to put an end to the disturbance, and advancing, ordered the crowd to disperse. At first the socialists fell back slowly, one of the speakers still urging them to stand firm. Suddenly the bombs were thrown. The police retorted instantly with a volley from their revolvers. The rioters answered with theirs, which shots showed they were provided with pistols. The mob appeared crazed with a frantic desire for blood and holding its ground, poured volley after volley into the midst of the officers.
Answers
But, the speakers' comments remained in being highly explosive, and the remaining audience members began behaving violently.
It was clear from their shooting that the rioters were armed as they fired back with their own weapons. The seemingly insane crowd held its position by firing volley after volley of shots at the police.
What is the main idea of the news story?News articles are written with the intention of informing and educating readers about current events and concerns. They are employed to inform readers on the topics they need or want to learn about.
What does the theory of crowd behavior entail?In a nutshell, the contagion theory holds that groups of individuals have an infectious effect that leads to irrational collective behavior. The contagion theory contends that individuals in a group exhibit emotional and impulsive behavior as a result of being influenced by the group's moods.
Learn more about contagion theory: https://brainly.com/question/12488533
#SPJ1
You learned that the author's message in "The Battle of Greasy Grass" is that the battle "was a watershed moment in the history of Indigenous-U.S. relations." You also learned that the message in "The Little Horn Massacre" is that the battle was a disaster for the United States. Since the two accounts have the same general purpose, explain how the perspective of the accounts helps communicate the different messages.
Answers
By exposing the divergent perspectives of Indigenous peoples as well as the United States, the stories points of view aid in the communication of the various messages.
"The Little Horn Massacre" message:In addition to highlighting Indigenous peoples , "The Battle at Greasy Grass" under scores the battle's significance in influencing Indigenous U.S. relations.
Yet, "Some Little Horn " presents the conflict as a dreadful American defeat, showing the American military officials.
Both narratives aim to inform readers about the war, but they approach the task from various perspectives, shedding light on the complexity and subtleties of historical occurrences.
Readers are prompted to reflect critically on the events and draw their own judgements about the meaning and influence of the through the presentation of several viewpoints.
To know more about Indigenous peoples visit:
https://brainly.com/question/27960189
#SPJ1
Answer:
Explanation:
"The Battle of Greasy Grass" focuses on the struggle of Native Americans in the United States, emphasizing the effects of the battle on the community. "The Little Horn Massacre" focuses on the failure of the United States and the poor performance of the US military. Both have the same reason for looking at the war, but the diversity of points of view highlights particular angles of events and leads to different conclusions.
true or false: between 1000-1800, the worship of islam in africa was primarily concentrated to egypt and other regions adjacent to the arabian peninsula.
Answers
Answer:
true
Explanation:
25 This map shows a trade system that emerged in the 1500s and
reached its height in the 1700s.
Transatlantic Slave Trade
on Line ape
IN
-E
A Labor demands of the factory system
B Invention of the steamboat
C Labor demands of the plantation system
D Invention of the mechanical loom
Recons
construct
Which factor was a reason for the trade system illustrated on this
map?
Answers
Answer:
A B and
Explanation:
i think it'sone of the.
What were the causes of the rise of the ‘New Right’ and how did that movement dramatically shift the nature of American politics?
Answers
1. Disillusionment with government: Many Americans were frustrated with the perceived inefficiency and corruption of government, which led to a desire for limited government.
2. Social issues: The New Right was fueled in part by opposition to the cultural changes of the 1960s and 70s, including a push for increased rights for women, LGBTQ+ individuals, and people of color.
3. Economic concerns: There was a growing sense among many Americans that the country's economic problems were related to government intervention in the economy, high taxes and inflation.
4. Conservative movement building: Conservative intellectuals over a period of time focused on building a movement by working on issues related to lower taxation, deregulation and family values.
The New Right movement transformed the nature of American politics in a number of ways:
1. It shifted the center of political gravity in America to the right. The New Right helped lead to the election of Ronald Reagan, and the increasing dominance of a conservative agenda in national politics.
2. It helped to create the modern Republican Party, emphasizing smaller government, pro-life, pro-gun and pro-family values, which still holds sway today.
3. It also contributed to the rise of a polarized political culture in the country, as progressives pushed back against the New Right agenda with a more liberal outlook on economic, social and environmental policies.
4. Finally it also inspired similar conservative movements in other countries, leading to the rise of the global right-wing populist movement.
HIS THE IPACT OF PSEUDOSCIENTIFIC IDEAS OF RACE ON THE JEWISHNATION DURING THE PERIOD 1933 To 1946
Answers
Answer:
From 1933 to 1945, Nazi Germany carried out a campaign to “cleanse” the German society of individuals viewed as biological threats to the nation’s “health.” Enlisting the help of physicians and medically trained geneticists, psychiatrists, and anthropologists, the Nazis developed racial health policies that began with the mass sterilization of “genetically diseased” persons and ended with the near annihilation of European Jewry. With the patina of legitimacy provided by “racial” science experts, the Nazi regime carried out a program of approximately 400,000 forced sterilizations and over 275,000 euthanasia deaths that found its most radical manifestation in the death of millions of “racial” enemies in the Holocaust.
Under the Great Compromise, representation in the Senate was:
Answers
Under the Great Compromise, representation in the Senate was evenfor all states
How the Great Compromise affect the senateThe Great Compromise, better referred to as the Connecticut Compromise, was devised in order to allot equivalent Senate representation towards each state of the union, regardless of their population size.
Every single state received two Senators as part and parcel of this arrangement; thereby assuring that smaller states would partake in an identical role as large and populous states within this legislative unit. This compromise sought to satisfy both large and small states concerning the formation of a new nation's legislative body during the inceptive United States Constitution drafting process of 1787.
Learn more about great compromise at
https://brainly.com/question/5172111
#SPJ1
Who discovered the South Pass to the Oregon Territory?
O Dr. Marcus Whitman
O Jason Lee
O Jedediah Smith
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
Jedediah Smith is often credited with discovering the South Pass to the Oregon Territory.
PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST
Module 6 DBA us history
the questions are
he start of the second Red Scare, and how it was similar and different from the first
Joseph McCarthy, McCarthyism, and its impact
Loyalty review boards
Goals of the United Nations, how it was similar and different from the League of Nations
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights and Roosevelt’s Four Freedoms
Reason for the Warsaw Pact
Significance of the Berlin Blockade
The Truman Doctrine and the Marshall Plan and how they compared
Effects of Soviet expansion/spread of communism on US foreign policy
Ethel and Julius Rosenberg
Second nation to acquire atomic weapons after the U.S.
Difference between hydrogen bomb and atomic bomb
Causes and effects of the arms race
The Cuban Missile Crisis, key actions, and its effects
How/Why the US got involved of the Korean War, key details during the war, and its effects
President who won election against Truman
Reasons for the creation of NASA
Containment policy
Why SEATO was formed
Peace Corps and how it related to the Cold War
How Geneva accords relate to the Vietnam War
How/why US got involved in Vietnam, protests, effects of the war
Gulf of Tonkin and its impact
Effects of GI bill on US economy
Post WWII population in US
Impact of advertising/groups that were targeted
Influence of Beatnik and Counterculture Movements
Watergate and its impact
Nuremberg trials and why they were held
Answers
Answer:
1. The start of the second Red Scare, and how it was similar and different from the first
The second Red Scare began after World War II, in the late 1940s and early 1950s, and was characterized by a fear of communism and Soviet influence in the United States. It was similar to the first Red Scare, which occurred after World War I, in that it was fueled by fear and paranoia about the spread of communism. However, the second Red Scare was different in that it was much more intense and far-reaching, with the government and private organizations actively seeking out suspected communists and punishing them through blacklisting, loyalty oaths, and other measures.
2. Joseph McCarthy, McCarthyism, and its impact
Joseph McCarthy was a US Senator from Wisconsin who became famous for his accusations that there were communists in the US government and military. McCarthyism refers to the practice of making accusations of subversion or treason without proper regard for evidence. McCarthyism had a major impact on American society, as it led to a climate of fear and suspicion, with many people being falsely accused of being communists and losing their jobs and reputations.
3. Loyalty review boards
Loyalty review boards were established during the second Red Scare to investigate the political beliefs and affiliations of government employees. These boards were intended to identify and remove communist sympathizers from government jobs, but they often operated with little oversight and often ruined the reputations and careers of innocent people.
4. Goals of the United Nations, how it was similar and different from the League of Nations
The United Nations was founded in 1945 with the goal of maintaining international peace and security, promoting human rights, and facilitating international cooperation on issues such as economic development and environmental protection. It was similar to the League of Nations, which had been founded after World War I with similar goals, but the United Nations was more successful in achieving these goals because it had the support of the United States and other major powers.
5. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights and Roosevelt’s Four Freedoms
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights was adopted by the United Nations in 1948 and sets out a list of fundamental human rights that are to be protected and upheld by all nations. Roosevelt’s Four Freedoms, which he outlined in a speech in 1941, included freedom of speech, freedom of worship, freedom from want, and freedom from fear. Both the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and Roosevelt’s Four Freedoms reflect a commitment to human dignity and freedom.
6. Reason for the Warsaw Pact
The Warsaw Pact was a military alliance established by the Soviet Union and its satellite states in response to the formation of NATO by Western powers. The Pact was intended to provide a counterbalance to NATO and to ensure Soviet dominance in Eastern Europe.
7. Significance of the Berlin Blockade
The Berlin Blockade was a Soviet attempt to cut off access to the city of Berlin, which was divided into four zones of occupation after World War II. The blockade was a significant event in the early Cold War, as it demonstrated the Soviet Union’s willingness to use force to achieve its goals and prompted the United States to launch the Berlin Airlift to provide food and supplies to the city.
8. The Truman Doctrine and the Marshall Plan and how they compared
The Truman Doctrine and the Marshall Plan were both policies adopted by the United States in the early Cold War. The Truman Doctrine was announced in 1947 and provided military and economic assistance to countries threatened by communism. The Marshall Plan, which was announced the same year, provided economic aid to help rebuild Europe after World War II. The two policies were complementary, with the Truman Doctrine providing military support and the Marshall Plan providing economic support, and both were aimed at containing the
Evaluate the extent to which religion was the primary factor leading to conflict in
the period 1450–1750.
Answers
Answer:
The Incas, Mughals, and the Ottomans were examples of the empires that did practice religious tolerance, unlike many other states.
Explanation:
What happened to the price of goods that the colonists exported? What action(s) did the colonists take in response to mercantilism?
Answers
In response to mercantilism, the colonists took several actions. They engaged in smuggling to evade British import and export duties and taxes, particularly on goods that were heavily regulated. They also organized boycotts and non-importation agreements to protest against British trade policies and pressure British merchants to lobby the government for change. The colonists also developed their own industries, such as shipbuilding, to become more self-sufficient and less dependent on British goods.
Ultimately, the colonists' frustration with British mercantilism was one of the factors that led to the American Revolution and the independence of the United States. The colonists' efforts to resist British trade policies and develop their own industries helped lay the groundwork for the emergence of a new nation that was not beholden to Britain's economic interests.
3
Federalism in the U.S.: Mastery Test
Select the correct answer from the drop-down menu.
If the Supreme Court rules that a new state law conflicts with a federal law,
Reset
Next
Answers
If the Supreme Court rules that a new state law conflicts with a federal law, the federal law will take precedence over the state law.
How does federalism relate to state laws ?The Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution grants the principle of federal supremacy, indicating that both the Constitution and all other laws established in its name embody the highest law of the land. As a result, they prevail over state laws on American soil.
In situations where a discrepancy arises between federal and state regulations, it is the responsibility of the federal courts to interpret the Constitution's terms and decide which sets of legislation claim priority. This duty applies to all federal courts, including the Supreme Court itself.
Find out more on Supreme Court at https://brainly.com/question/3176565
#SPJ1
Tibetans who claim to have journeyed to the afterlife are known as:
a. Calisorts
b. Delogs c. Bon Priests d. Jadu
Answers
Answer: B
Tibetans who claim to have journeyed to the afterlife are known as Delogs.
Write a letter pretending you are an American soldier in the Vietnam war to your mother. Use the words: Vietminh, Gulf of Tonklin Incident, Gulf of Tonklin Resolution, Battle of Ia Drang Valley
Answers
Answer:
Dear Mom,
I hope this letter finds you well. Life here in Vietnam is tough, but I'm doing my best to stay strong. I know you must be worried about me, but I want you to know that I'm doing everything I can to stay safe.
We've been fighting against the Vietminh for what seems like forever now. It's a difficult and dangerous war, but we're all dedicated to the cause. You may have heard about the Gulf of Tonkin Incident in the news. It was a scary time for us, but we knew we had to keep fighting. The Gulf of Tonkin Resolution was passed shortly after, which gave us more support and resources to continue the fight.
Recently, we were involved in the Battle of Ia Drang Valley. It was a long and grueling battle, but we managed to hold our ground and come out victorious. It's moments like these that make me proud to be a soldier, knowing that we're making a difference in this war.
I miss you and the rest of the family terribly, but I know that I need to be here fighting for what's right. Please take care of yourself and know that I love you.
Your son,
[Your Name]
How would the US be different if the 1st Amendment didnt exist? you can put personal thoughts to :D
Answers
Answer:
Since the first amendment protects our freedom of expression, without it, we would be living in a world where the government controls us to a greater degree (no rallies/protests, the government can force one religion on everyone...etc)
What were the three reasons the industrial revolution began in england
Answers
If you need anything in the interim, please contact my assistant"
A block of wood has a density of 0. 6 g/cm3 and a volume of 1. 2 cm3. What is the mass of the block of wood?
AYUDA RAPIDO TENGO 1 HORA PARA RESPONDER ESTO NESESITO DE AYUDA
Answers
The mass of the block of wood is 0.72 g in the given case
The formula to calculate the mass of an object is:
Mass is a measure of the amount of matter in an object. It is a scalar quantity and its unit is measured in kilograms (kg) in the SI system. Mass is different from weight, which is a measure of the force exerted on an object by gravity and is dependent on the object's mass and the acceleration due to gravity at a particular location.
mass = density x volume
In this case, the density of the block of wood is 0.6 g/cm3 and the volume is 1.2 cm3. Plugging in these values, we get:
mass = 0.6 g/cm3 x 1.2 cm3
mass = 0.72 g
Therefore, the mass of the block of wood is 0.72 g.
To know more about assistant HERE
https://brainly.com/question/25964907
#SPJ4
Make a list of TEN reasons that explain why Dr. king's dreams came or did not come true for people living in the USA.
Answers
Major Takeaways. The "I Have a Dream" speech by Martin Luther King Jr. was originally intended as a call to combat job and economic disparities. King thought that the market-based structure of the American economy encouraged discrimination, unemployment, and other forms of economic injustice.
What about Martin Luther King?From 1955 until his death in 1968, American Baptist clergyman and activist Martin Luther King Jr. was one of the most well-known figures in the civil rights movement. King attended graduate school at Boston University and obtained his Ph. D. there after graduating with a degree in divinity from Pennsylvania's Crozer Theological Seminary. The civil rights activist was killed by a bullet in the jaw while on his way to supper while in Memphis to support a strike by sanitation workers. His spinal cord was also cut. After King arrived at a hospital in Memphis, his death was officially declared. He had 39 years on him.To learn more about Martin Luther King, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/17746240
In the 1928 presidential election, Herbert Hoover:
A. only won the popular vote.
B. only won with the support of labor unions.
C. won by a small margin.
D. won the election by a landslide.
Answers
Option (d), Herbert Hoover won the 1928 presidential election with a resounding victory.
Who was chosen to serve as president in 1928, just as the American financial crisis began?Hoover beat Democratic nominee Al Smith in a landslide after winning the Republican nomination for president in 1928. Hoover became president in 1929 at a time of general economic stability.
Why did Hoover achieve victory in 1928?Hoover became the party's front-runner once President Calvin Coolidge decided against running for reelection. Due to the inability of Hoover's rivals in his party to agree on a nominee, Hoover won a landslide majority of the vote at the Republican National Convention in 1928.
Learn more about Herbert Hoover: https://brainly.com/question/12255447
#SPJ1
Answer:
D
Explanation:
on what basis does douglass demand the end of slavery? how do his arguments relate to the ideology of the american revolution?
Answers
was the allied dual-thrust strategy the best one to use in the pacific war? why or why not?
Answers
Answer: The Allied dual-thrust strategy, which involved simultaneous advances towards Japan through the Pacific Islands and the Asian mainland, was a controversial strategy in the Pacific War.
On one hand, the strategy allowed the Allies to engage Japanese forces on multiple fronts, spreading their resources thin and making it more difficult for them to mount a cohesive defense. It also allowed the Allies to maintain pressure on Japan and prevent them from consolidating their forces in any one area.
On the other hand, the strategy required significant resources and stretched Allied supply lines, making it difficult to maintain momentum and supply troops effectively. The terrain and climate of the Pacific Islands also posed significant logistical challenges for the Allies, making it difficult to maintain troop morale and momentum.
Ultimately, the effectiveness of the dual-thrust strategy is difficult to evaluate definitively. Some argue that it was the best strategy given the circumstances of the war, while others argue that a more focused strategy on either the Pacific Islands or the Asian mainland would have been more effective. However, it is worth noting that the strategy did ultimately lead to Allied victory in the Pacific War.
Explanation:
What does Chapman mean when he writes, "I am sure you
agree that this is not just a problem for Jewish people to work out alone, but one of urgent
concern for America and all the United Nations"?
Answers
Chapman could be making a statement about the need for cooperation and collaboration among different groups to tackle societal issues that affect us all.
What major problems faced by the Jews that concerned America and the rest of the world?Amongst major problems that have faced the Jews which have concerned America and the rest of the world included:
1. Anti-Semitism: Anti-Semitism has been a major problem that has affected Jews around the world, including in Europe, the Middle East, and America.
2. Holocaust: During World War II, the Nazi regime led by Adolf Hitler systematically murdered six million Jews in what is known as the Holocaust.
3. Israeli-Palestinian conflict: The Israeli-Palestinian conflict has been an ongoing issue for decades, and it has had a significant impact on the Jewish community and the rest of the world.
These are some of the major problems that have faced the Jews and have concerned America and the rest of the world.
learn more about Chapman: https://brainly.com/question/30016202
#SPJ1