how much heat is gained by copper when 51.8 g of copper is warmed from 15.5°c to 76.4°c? the specific heat of copper is 0.385 j/(g · °c)..

(i) CaCO3 CaO + CO2 is the equation for the breakdown process of marble (CaCO3). (ii) Each product will have a mass equal to the weight of the marble used, or 25 g. Therefore, the mass of CaO and CO2 that are produced will both be 25 g.

(iii) The ideal gas law equation, PV = nRT, can be used to determine the volume of gas produced at S.T.P. where P is pressure, V is volume, n is the number of moles of gas, R is the ideal gas constant, and T is temperature.

We can determine the number of moles of CO2 produced using the formula since the mass of CO2 formed is 25 g.n is therefore 25/44 = 0.568 mol. The volume of gas created at STP may now be determined using the ideal gas law equation: V = (0.568 mol)(8.314 J/mol.K)(273 K)/(101.3 kPa) = 16.9 L. As a result, 16.9 L of petrol are produced at STP.

Learn more about  mass  at:

https://brainly.com/question/19694949

#SPJ1

The value of dT/dP for ice at its normal melting point is approximately -7.4 x 10⁻³ K/Pa and the molar enthalpy of fusion of ice at 273.15 k and 1 atm is 6010 j mol and v under the same condition is -1.63 cm.

To determine the value of dt/dp for ice at its normal melting point, we need to use the Clapeyron equation:
dt/dp = ΔHfus / TΔV
Where ΔHfus is the molar enthalpy of fusion, T is the temperature in Kelvin, and ΔV is the molar volume change during the phase transition.
Substituting the given values, we get:
dt/dp = (6010 J/mol) / (273.15 K x (-1.63 x 10^-6 m^3/mol))
Simplifying this expression, we get:
dt/dp = -13.4 K/MPa
Therefore, the value of dt/dp for ice at its normal melting point is -13.4 K/MPa.
To determine the value of dT/dP for ice at its normal melting point, you can use the Clapeyron equation:
dT/dP = ΔH_fus / (T * ΔV)
where dT/dP is the change in temperature with respect to pressure, ΔH_fus is the molar enthalpy of fusion (6010 J/mol), T is the temperature (273.15 K), and ΔV is the change in volume (-1.63 cm³/mol, converted to m³/mol).
First, convert ΔV from cm³/mol to m³/mol:
-1.63 cm³/mol * (1 m³ / 10⁶ cm³) = -1.63 * 10⁻⁶ m³/mol
Now, plug the values into the Clapeyron equation:
dT/dP = (6010 J/mol) / (273.15 K * -1.63 * 10⁻⁶ m³/mol)
dT/dP ≈ -7.4 x 10⁻³ K/Pa
The value of dT/dP for ice at its normal melting point is approximately -7.4 x 10⁻³ K/Pa.

To learn more about Molar, click here:

brainly.com/question/8732513

#SPJ11

You must compare the actual yield of the product to the theoretical yield that was calculated based on the stoichiometry of the reactants in order to determine the percent yield of a reaction.

Stoichiometry can be used to determine the theoretical yield if the initial reactants and the reaction's balanced equation were known.

For instance, if the reaction's balanced equation is

[tex]3 Cr + 2 AlCl_3 = 2 Al + 3 CrCl_3.[/tex]

And you might determine the potential yield of chromium (Cr) as follows if you started with 200 grams of aluminum (Al) and enough chromium (|||) chloride (CrCl3) to react completely with the aluminum:

Determine the aluminum's moles:

moles Al = mass of Al / molar mass of Al

= 200 g / 26.98 g/mol

= 7.41 mol

Calculate the number of moles of chromium to be formed using the stoichiometry of the balanced equation:

moles Cr = (3/2) moles CrCl3

= (3/2) (moles Al / 2)

= (3/2) (7.41 mol / 2)

= 11.11 mol

Using the molar mass of chromium, convert the moles of chromium to mass:

mass of Cr = moles Cr x molar mass of Cr

= 11.11 mol x 52.00 g/mol

= 577.8 g

Therefore, 577.8 g of chromium are theoretically produced.

Now, you can use the following formula to determine the percent yield:

(Actual Yield / Theoretical Yield) x 100% equals percent yield

The % yield would be: if the actual yield of chromium (|||) chloride is 337g.

yield calculated as (337 g/577.2 g) x 100% = 58.3%

Therefore, the reaction's percent yield is 58.3%. This suggests that only 58.3% of the theoretical yield that may have been attained if the reaction had proceeded to completion was actually produced in the experiment.

Learn more about percent yield here:

https://brainly.com/question/17042787

#SPJ1

Molar mass of unknown acid = quantity of acid used / moles of unknown acid. Molar mass of unknown acid = volume of second equivalence point / 2.

The second equivalence point happens once NaOH has neutralised all of the acid in the solution and all that is left is NaOH. Because NaOH is a potent base, it totally dissociates in solution and interacts with one mole of acid for every mole of NaOH present. Since there are two moles of acid in the solution, two moles of NaOH are required to achieve the second equivalence point. We divide the volume of the second equivalence point by two to determine the moles of the unknown acid. With this information, we can determine how many moles of acid are in the solution at the second equivalence point. Knowing the mass of the unknown acid is necessary to determine its molar mass.

learn more about mass here:

https://brainly.com/question/15959704

#SPJ11

The pH of a 9.1 x 10^-6 M solution of [tex]HB_{r}[/tex] is approximately 5.04. To find the pH of a 9.1 x 10^-6 M solution of [tex]HB_{r}[/tex], you can use the following equation: HBr + [tex]H_{2}O[/tex]→ [tex]H_{3}O[/tex]+ + [tex]B_{r}[/tex]-

The acid dissociation constant (Ka) for [tex]HB_{r}[/tex] is very high, meaning it is a strong acid and will dissociate completely in water. Therefore, we can assume that the concentration of [tex]H_{3}O[/tex]+ ions in the solution is equal to the initial concentration of [tex]HB_{r}[/tex].

So, the concentration of [tex]H_{3}O[/tex]+ ions in the solution is:

[[tex]H_{3}O[/tex]+] = 9.1 x 10^-6 M

To find the pH of the solution, you can use the following equation:

pH = -log[[tex]H_{3}O[/tex]+]

Substituting the value of [[tex]H_{3}O[/tex]+] into the equation, we get:

pH = -log(9.1 x 10^-6)

pH = 5.04

To knw more about ions

brainly.com/question/14982375

#SPJ11

When Q is decreased by a factor of 10, the cell potential changes by 0.0592/n volts.

This is based on the Nernst equation, which relates the cell potential to the standard cell potential and the concentrations of reactants and products.

In this case, since Q is decreasing, the concentration of products is increasing relative to the concentration of reactants, and this shift in equilibrium results in a change in the cell potential.

The value of n represents the number of electrons involved in the reaction, and v 2 refers to the stoichiometric coefficient of the species in question.

To know more about Nernst equation click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/31593791#

#SPJ11

The amount in grams of potassium dichromate needed to prepare 50 mL solution with a concentration of 1.05 x 10⁻⁵ M is 1.54 x 10⁻⁴ grams.

To calculate the grams of potassium dichromate (K₂Cr₂O₇) needed to prepare a 50 mL solution with a concentration of 1.05 x 10⁻⁵ M, you can use the formula:

mass = volume × concentration × molar mass

First, find the molar mass of K₂Cr₂O₇:
2 K (39.10 g/mol) + 2 Cr (51.996 g/mol) + 7 O (16.00 g/mol) = 294.18 g/mol

Now, plug in the values:
mass = (50 mL × 1.05 x 10⁻⁵ mol/mL) × 294.18 g/mol

Convert mL to L:
mass = (0.050 L × 1.05 x 10⁻⁵ mol/L) × 294.18 g/mol

Calculate the mass:
mass ≈ 1.54 x 10⁻⁴ g

Thus, you will need 1.54 x 10⁻⁴ grams of potassium dichromate to prepare a 50 mL solution with a concentration of 1.05 x 10⁻⁵ M.

Learn more about concentration here: https://brainly.com/question/26255204

#SPJ11

The amount in grams of potassium dichromate needed to prepare 50 mL solution with a concentration of 1.05 x 10⁻⁵ M is 1.54 x 10⁻⁴ grams.

To calculate the grams of potassium dichromate (K₂Cr₂O₇) needed to prepare a 50 mL solution with a concentration of 1.05 x 10⁻⁵ M, you can use the formula:

mass = volume × concentration × molar mass

First, find the molar mass of K₂Cr₂O₇:
2 K (39.10 g/mol) + 2 Cr (51.996 g/mol) + 7 O (16.00 g/mol) = 294.18 g/mol

Now, plug in the values:
mass = (50 mL × 1.05 x 10⁻⁵ mol/mL) × 294.18 g/mol

Convert mL to L:
mass = (0.050 L × 1.05 x 10⁻⁵ mol/L) × 294.18 g/mol

Calculate the mass:
mass ≈ 1.54 x 10⁻⁴ g

Thus, you will need 1.54 x 10⁻⁴ grams of potassium dichromate to prepare a 50 mL solution with a concentration of 1.05 x 10⁻⁵ M.

Learn more about concentration here: https://brainly.com/question/26255204

#SPJ11

To find the [H+] concentration in the resulting solution when 25.0 mL of 6.0 M HCl is mixed with 45.0 mL of 3.0 M HNO3. Hence, the [H+] concentration in the resulting solution when 25.0 mL of 6.0 M HCl is mixed with 45.0 mL of 3.0 M HNO3 is approximately 4.07 M.

Follow these steps:
1. Calculate the moles of H+ ions contributed by each solution:
- Moles of H+ from HCl: (25.0 mL)(6.0 mol/L) = 150 mmol
- Moles of H+ from HNO3: (45.0 mL)(3.0 mol/L) = 135 mmol
2. Determine the total moles of H+ ions in the resulting solution:
- Total moles of H+ = moles from HCl + moles from HNO3 = 150 mmol + 135 mmol = 285 mmol
3. Calculate the total volume of the resulting solution:
- Total volume = volume of HCl + volume of HNO3 = 25.0 mL + 45.0 mL = 70.0 mL
4. Calculate the [H+] concentration in the resulting solution:
- [H+] = (total moles of H+)/(total volume) = (285 mmol)/(70.0 mL) = 4.07 M (rounded to two decimal places)
So, the [H+] concentration in the resulting solution when 25.0 mL of 6.0 M HCl is mixed with 45.0 mL of 3.0 M HNO3 is approximately 4.07 M.

Visit here to learn more about  [H+] concentration:

brainly.com/question/14462709

#SPJ11

No, it is not possible for a native protein to be entirely irregular that is, without α helices, B sheets or other repetitive secondary structure. The length of a 100-residue segment of the α keratin coiled-coil is 150 angstroms.

It is highly unlikely for a native protein to be entirely irregular without any α-helices, β-sheets, or other repetitive secondary structures. Most proteins consist of a combination of these structures, which are critical for protein folding and stability.

Now let's calculate the length in angstroms of a 100-residue segment of the α-keratin coiled-coil.

1. The α-keratin coiled-coil is a right-handed helix formed by two α-helices wrapped around each other. Each α-helix has 3.6 residues per turn.
2. To find the number of turns in the 100-residue segment, divide 100 residues by 3.6 residues per turn: 100 ÷ 3.6 ≈ 27.8 turns.
3. The rise per residue in an α-helix is 1.5 angstroms.
4. Multiply the rise per residue by the number of residues to obtain the length of the 100-residue segment: 1.5 angstroms/residue × 100 residues ≈ 150 angstroms.

So, the length of a 100-residue segment of the α-keratin coiled-coil is approximately 150 angstroms.

Know more about α keratin here:

https://brainly.com/question/30215402

#SPJ11

The enolate of acetone is less basic than the allyl anion derived from propene because one of the resonance structures for the enolate places the negative charge on the more electronegative oxygen, resulting in greater stability and decreased basicity.

In the enolate of acetone, the negative charge can be delocalized between the oxygen atom and the alpha carbon. This resonance stabilization occurs due to the negative charge being placed on the more electronegative oxygen atom, which stabilizes the molecule more effectively.

On the other hand, in the allyl anion derived from propene, the negative charge is localized on the less electronegative carbon atom, resulting in a less stable structure. Since greater stability correlates with decreased basicity, the enolate of acetone is less basic than the allyl anion derived from propene.

To know more about resonance structures click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/23287285#

#SPJ11

The pH of the 1.1 M (C2H5)2NH(aq) solution is approximately 12.44.

To calculate the pH of a 1.1 M (C2H5)2NH(aq) solution, given its Kb value of 6.9×10⁻⁴, first determine the pOH and then convert it to pH. Use the formula:

Kb = [NH+] [OH-] / [(C2H5)2NH]

Since the initial concentration of (C2H5)2NH is 1.1 M, and assuming that x is the concentration of the dissociated species, the equation becomes:

6.9×10⁻⁴ = x² / (1.1 - x)

Approximate the equation, assuming x is small compared to 1.1:

6.9×10⁻⁴ ≈ x² / 1.1

Solve for x (which represents [OH-]):

x = √(6.9×10⁻⁴ × 1.1) ≈ 0.0275

Now calculate the pOH:

pOH = -log10(0.0275) ≈ 1.56

Finally, convert the pOH to pH:

pH = 14 - pOH ≈ 14 - 1.56 = 12.44

Thus, the pH of the 1.1 M (C2H5)2NH(aq) solution is approximately 12.44.

Know more about pH here:

https://brainly.com/question/30656928

#SPJ11

Answer:

hydrogen bonding

Explanation:

Carboxylic acid molecules are capable of forming hydrogen bonds between their hydrogen and oxygen atoms. This is due to the presence of a highly electronegative oxygen atom attached to a hydrogen atom, as well as the availability of a lone pair of electrons on the oxygen atom.

The hydrogen bonding between carboxylic acid molecules is relatively strong and contributes to their high boiling points and solubility in water. Additionally, carboxylic acids can also participate in dipole-dipole interactions and London dispersion forces with other molecules, depending on their size and shape.

Therefore, the intermolecular bonding that occurs between carboxylic acid molecules includes hydrogen bonding, as well as other types of weaker intermolecular forces.

The aldol reaction between acetone and 4-methylbenzaldehyde results in the formation of a beta-hydroxy ketone, which undergoes dehydration to yield the condensation product, 4-methylchalcone.

To explain the aldol reaction between acetone and 4-methylbenzaldehyde, follow these steps:

1. Acetone acts as an enolate ion, generated by the deprotonation of the alpha carbon by a base.

2. The enolate ion then attacks the carbonyl group of 4-methylbenzaldehyde, resulting in a nucleophilic addition.

3. A new carbon-carbon bond forms, creating an alkoxide intermediate.

4. The alkoxide intermediate is protonated by a proton source, forming a beta-hydroxy ketone.

5. Lastly, the beta-hydroxy ketone undergoes dehydration, which involves the elimination of a water molecule, to yield the final condensation product, 4-methylchalcone.

To know more about nucleophilic addition click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/31158017#

#SPJ11

The ranking from largest to smallest atomic radius is: Po > Te > Se > O.
To rank the atomic radii of O (Oxygen), S (Sulfur), Se (Selenium), Te (Tellurium), and Po (Polonium) from largest to smallest, we can use the periodic table trends. As you move down a group (vertical column), the atomic radius generally increases due to the addition of electron shells.

Based on this trend, the order from largest to smallest atomic radius is:

Po > Te > Se > S > O

The ammonium bromide solution in this case is an aqueous solution of NH4Br.

The ammonium ion, NH4+, is the conjugate acid of the weak base ammonia (NH3), which means that NH4+ will donate a proton in water.

The corresponding pKa value for NH4+ is found to be 9.24, while the pKb value for NH3 is found to be 4.75.

Here is the solution to this problem:

We know that;

NH4+ + H2O → NH3 + H3O+Kb(NH3) = Kw/Ka(NH4+)

Thus, Kb(NH3) = 10^-14/10^-9.24 = 1.8 × 10^-5.

The expression for Kb is given below:

Kb = [NH3][OH-]/[NH4+]

We can neglect the contribution from the water.

Thus, Kb = [NH3]^2/[NH4+][OH-]

Let us define the moles of NH3 and NH4+ present in 1 L of the solution as x.

Then, moles of OH- present in 1 L of the solution is (x + 0.29).

The expression for Kb now becomes:

Kb = x^2 / (0.29 x) + x + 1.8 × 10^-5

Solving for x, we get x = 5.6 × 10^-5 M.

So, the concentration of NH3 is 5.6 × 10^-5 M, and the concentration of NH4+ is 0.29 M.

The equilibrium expression for NH3 is given by:

NH3 + H2O ⇌ NH4+ + OH-pKa(NH4+) = pKb(NH3) + pKw= 4.75 + 14 = 18.75

pH = 14 - pOH = 14 - (- 8.35) = 22.35

But pH should not be more than 14 so, pH = 14 - 8.35= 5.65 at 25°C.

The pH of the solution is 5.7

Know more about pKa:

https://brainly.com/question/31835062

#SPJ12

Lithium aluminum hydride (LiAlH₄) cannot be directly substituted for sodium borohydride (NaBH₄) in the lab manual's procedure to reduce aldehydes and ketones to the corresponding alcohols because LiAlH₄ is a much stronger and more reactive reducing agent than NaBH₄.

Lithium aluminum hydride is a much more powerful reducing agent compared to sodium borohydride, and as a result, it requires more careful handling and specific reaction conditions. Lithium aluminum hydride reacts violently with water and can generate highly flammable hydrogen gas, which can lead to dangerous situations in the lab if not properly handled. Additionally, the reaction conditions for lithium aluminum hydride reduction are typically more rigorous, including higher temperatures and longer reaction times.

Therefore, simply substituting lithium aluminum hydride for sodium borohydride in the lab manual procedure would not be appropriate or safe. Specific precautions and modifications to the procedure would need to be taken to ensure safe and successful use of lithium aluminum hydride as a reducing agent.

Learn more about Lithium aluminum hydride: https://brainly.com/question/14405070

#SPJ11

The selenide ion concentration [Se2-] for a 0.300 M H2Se solution with the given stepwise dissociation constants is option D) 3.9 x 10^-16 M.

To find the selenide ion concentration [Se2-], we first need to write out the chemical equation for the dissociation of H2Se:

H2Se ⇌ H+ + HSe-  (Ka1 = 1.3 x 10^-4)
HSe- ⇌ H+ + Se2-  (Ka2 = 1.0 x 10^-11)

At equilibrium, we can use the equilibrium constant expression to relate the concentrations of the species:

Ka1 = [H+][HSe-]/[H2Se]
Ka2 = [H+][Se2-]/[HSe-]

We know the initial concentration of H2Se is 0.300 M, and since the dissociation constants are small, we can assume that the concentration of H+ is negligible compared to the initial concentration of H2Se. Therefore, we can simplify the equilibrium expressions to:

Ka1 = [HSe-]/[H2Se]
Ka2 = [Se2-]/[HSe-]

Using the first equilibrium expression and solving for [HSe-], we get:

[HSe-] = Ka1[H2Se] = (1.3 x 10^-4)(0.300) = 3.9 x 10^-5 M

Now we can use the second equilibrium expression and substitute in the value we just found for [HSe-]:

Ka2 = [Se2-]/[HSe-]
1.0 x 10^-11 = [Se2-]/(3.9 x 10^-5)
[Se2-] = (1.0 x 10^-11)(3.9 x 10^-5) = 3.9 x 10^-16 M

To know more about Concentration:

https://brainly.com/question/26996160

#SPJ11

The true statements regarding the products obtained from the following reactions:

1) (Z)-hex-3-ene treated with D2 in the presence of Pd:

2) (E)-hex-3-ene treated with D2 in the presence of Pd.

3) (Z)-hex-3-ene treated with Br2 in the cold and dark.

4) (E)-hex-3-ene treated with Br2 in the cold and dark.

Chemical reaction, the transformation of one or more chemicals (the reactants) into one or more distinct compounds (the products). Chemical elements or chemical compounds make up substances. In a chemical reaction, the atoms that make up the reactants are rearranged to produce various products.

Chemical reactions are a fundamental component of life itself, as well as technology and culture. Burning fuels, smelting iron, creating glass and pottery, brewing beer, producing wine, and making cheese are just a few examples of ancient processes that involved chemical reactions. The Earth's geology, the atmosphere, the seas, and a wide variety of intricate processes that take place in all living systems are rife with chemical reactions.

Learn more about Reactions:

https://brainly.com/question/25769000

#SPJ4

The true statements regarding the products obtained from the following reactions:

1) (Z)-hex-3-ene treated with D2 in the presence of Pd:

2) (E)-hex-3-ene treated with D2 in the presence of Pd.

3) (Z)-hex-3-ene treated with Br2 in the cold and dark.

4) (E)-hex-3-ene treated with Br2 in the cold and dark.

Chemical reaction, the transformation of one or more chemicals (the reactants) into one or more distinct compounds (the products). Chemical elements or chemical compounds make up substances. In a chemical reaction, the atoms that make up the reactants are rearranged to produce various products.

Chemical reactions are a fundamental component of life itself, as well as technology and culture. Burning fuels, smelting iron, creating glass and pottery, brewing beer, producing wine, and making cheese are just a few examples of ancient processes that involved chemical reactions. The Earth's geology, the atmosphere, the seas, and a wide variety of intricate processes that take place in all living systems are rife with chemical reactions.

Learn more about Reactions:

https://brainly.com/question/25769000

#SPJ4

Discuss the similarities and differences in the behavior of metals tested with water relative to their positions in the periodic table.

The periodic table is organized by increasing atomic number and is divided into groups (vertical columns) and periods (horizontal rows). Metals in the same group have similar properties, while metals in the same period show varying properties.

The reactivity of metals with water generally increases as you move down a group and across a period from left to right. This trend is due to the increasing size of the atoms and the ease with which they lose electrons, as well as the relative reactivities of the metals.

Within a family (group), the reactivity with water increases as you move down the group. For example, in Group IA (alkali metals), lithium reacts with water relatively slowly, while cesium reacts explosively. Similarly, in Group IIA (alkaline earth metals), magnesium reacts with water slowly, whereas barium reacts more vigorously.

When comparing the same period, metals on the left side of the periodic table are more reactive with water than those on the right. For instance, sodium (Group IA) reacts more vigorously with water than magnesium (Group IIA).

Based on these trends, cesium, being lower in Group IA than lithium, is predicted to be much more reactive with water, potentially resulting in an explosive reaction.

Comparing the reactivities of Groups IIA and IIIA with dilute acids, Group IIA metals are generally more reactive due to their higher tendency to lose electrons and form positive ions. As a result, Group IIA metals will typically react more vigorously with dilute acids than Group IIIA metals.

To learn more about periodic table, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/15987580

#SPJ11

Advantage: mining asteroids in space would be able to gain a larger amount resources from one asteroid then a mine for 1 month and it would be able to some what stop the destruction of earth's natural resources

Disadvantage: finding and asteroid close to earth then stopping it and mining will be very expensive and transporting it back even if calculations were in place to these things then it would will take time for and asteroid to come near

salts in order of decreasing lattice energy:MgS > NaF > KBr > K2S

The order of decreasing lattice energy is determined by the charges of the ions and their distance from each other. Magnesium sulfide has the highest lattice energy due to the presence of a 2+ ion and a 2- ion that are closely packed together. Sodium fluoride has the next highest lattice energy due to the presence of a 1+ ion and a 1- ion that are also closely packed. Potassium sulfide and potassium bromide both have lower lattice energies than the previous two salts because the ions are further apart and the charges are smaller.

The order between these two salts is determined by the size of the anion - sulfide is larger than bromide and thus has a lower lattice energy.

To know more about lattice energy- https://brainly.com/question/13169815

#SPJ11

The enthalpy of formation of water is -571.6 kJ/mol, which is option (a).

The enthalpy of formation of water can be calculated using Hess's Law and the given change in enthalpy for the reaction. The enthalpy of formation of a compound is defined as the energy change when one mole of the compound is formed from its elements in their standard states.

The reaction given is the formation of two moles of water from its elements: 2H2(g) + O2 → 2H2O(1). To calculate the enthalpy of formation of water, we need to first balance the equation and reverse the reaction to get the formation of water:

2H2(g) + O2 → 2H2O(1) (given reaction)

1/2O2(g) + H2(g) → H2O(1) (reverse and balance the reaction)

The enthalpy change for the reverse reaction is the negative of the enthalpy change for the forward reaction, so the change in enthalpy for the reverse reaction is +571.6 kJ/mol.

According to Hess's Law, the enthalpy change for a reaction is equal to the sum of the enthalpy changes for the reactions that occur in the steps of the overall reaction. We can use this principle to calculate the enthalpy of formation of water by comparing the given reaction to the formation of water from its elements in their standard states:

1/2O2(g) + 2H2(g) → 2H2O(1) (formation of water from its elements)

The enthalpy change for this reaction is the enthalpy of formation of water, and it can be calculated by subtracting the enthalpy change for the reactants from the enthalpy change for the products:

ΔH°f = [ΔH°(H2O) - ΔH°(H2) - 1/2ΔH°(O2)]

Substituting the given values, we get:

ΔH°f = [-571.6 kJ/mol - (0 kJ/mol) - 1/2(0 kJ/mol)]

ΔH°f = -571.6 kJ/mol

Therefore, the enthalpy of formation of water is -571.6 kJ/mol, which is option (a).

Know more about  enthalpy - brainly.com/question/14047927

#SPJ11

The purpose of using a pH of 2.0 for retention and dilute ammonia for extraction is to enhance the separation and recovery of specific compounds in a sample.

Using a pH of 2.0 for retention serves the following purposes:

1. It promotes the ionization of acidic compounds, making them more readily retained on a reversed-phase column in chromatography. This enhances the separation of the compounds in the sample.

2. It maintains a constant pH environment, which is crucial for reproducible retention times and peak shapes in chromatographic analysis.

Dilute ammonia for extraction is used for the following reasons:

1. It acts as a weak base, which helps to neutralize acidic compounds and make them more soluble in an aqueous phase. This assists in the extraction of the target compounds from a sample matrix.
2. It can also help to selectively extract and separate basic compounds from a mixture. By adjusting the pH of the extraction solvent, you can control which compounds are extracted and which are not.

To know more about Ammonia:

https://brainly.com/question/17392683

#SPJ11

Order in which the compounds would be eluted from an hplc column containing a reversed-phase -

(a) benzene > diethyl ether > n-hexane.

(b) acetamide > acetone > dichloroethane.

For a reversed-phase HPLC column, the compounds with the highest hydrophobicity will be retained the longest, and those with the lowest hydrophobicity will elute first. In other words, the order of elution will be the opposite of the order of polarity.

(a) The order of decreasing hydrophobicity for the compounds is benzene > diethyl ether > n-hexane. Therefore, n-hexane will elute first, followed by diethyl ether, and then benzene.

(b) The order of decreasing hydrophobicity for the compounds is acetamide > acetone > dichloroethane. Therefore, dichloroethane will elute first, followed by acetone, and then acetamide.

Know more about hplc - brainly.com/question/30915499

#SPJ11

The maximum amount of moles of P2O5 that can be theoretically be made from 112g of O2 and excess Phosphorus is 1.4 mole.

To determine the maximum amount of moles of P2O5 that can be produced from 112g of O2 and excess phosphorus, you'll need to use stoichiometry. Firstly, we need to write the balanced chemical equation for the reaction between O2 and phosphorus, which is

P4 + 5O2 → 2P2O5.

Then, we need to convert the given mass of O2 to moles, which is 112g O2 * (1 mol O2 / 32g O2) = 3.5 mol O2.

Using the stoichiometry from the balanced equation, we can find the moles of P2O5 produced, which is (3.5 mol O2) * (2 mol P2O5 / 5 mol O2) = 1.4 mol P2O5. Therefore, the maximum amount of moles of P2O5 that can be theoretically produced from 112g of O2 and excess phosphorus is 1.4 mol. This means that if we have an unlimited amount of phosphorus, we can produce up to 1.4 moles of P2O5 using 112g of O2.

Know more about Stoichiometry here:

https://brainly.com/question/30215297

#SPJ11

The metal that would not be capable of acting as a sacrificial anode when used with iron is B) magnesium, Mg, E° = 2.37 V.

For a metal to act as a sacrificial anode with iron, it needs to have a more negative E° value than iron (E° Fe = -0.44 V).

The more negative E° value indicates that the metal will corrode more easily and preferentially compared to iron. In this case, magnesium has a more positive E° value (2.37 V), which means it will not corrode more easily than iron and thus cannot act as a sacrificial anode.

The other metals (A) manganese, Mn, E° = -1.18 V; C) zinc, Zn, E° = -0.76 V; and D) cadmium, Cd, E° = -0.40 V, have more negative E° values than iron, so they can act as sacrificial anodes.

To know more about sacrificial anode click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/29822341#

#SPJ11

The freezing points of 1 liter of water with added solutes are: a) -0.28°C with 25g glucose; b) -0.28°C with 25g sucrose; and, c) -0.93°C with 25g sodium chloride. The vapor pressure of CO2 at the boiling point of liquid nitrogen is 517 kPa.

To estimate the freezing point depression, we use the formula ΔTf = Kf * molality * i, where ΔTf is the freezing point depression, Kf is the cryoscopic constant of water (1.86°C kg/mol), molality is moles of solute per kg of solvent, and i is the van't Hoff factor.

For glucose and sucrose, i=1, and for sodium chloride, i=2. Divide the mass of each solute by its molar mass to find moles, and then divide by the mass of solvent in kg (1 kg for 1 liter of water) to find molality. Calculate ΔTf for each case and subtract it from the freezing point of pure water (0°C).

The vapor pressure of CO2 is found using the sublimation pressure at the boiling point of liquid nitrogen (-195.8°C). Using the Clausius-Clapeyron equation, we calculate the vapor pressure to be approximately 517 kPa.

To know more about freezing point depression click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/31357864#

#SPJ11

The balanced net ionic equation is:

Ag⁺(aq) + ClO₄⁻(aq) + Al³⁺(aq) + 3Cl⁻(aq) → AgCl(s) + AlCl₃(aq)

The balanced net ionic equation for the reaction between silver perchlorate and aluminum chloride in aqueous solution is shown above. In this reaction, the silver ion (Ag⁺) and perchlorate ion (ClO₄⁻) from silver perchlorate (AgClO₄) react with the aluminum ion (Al³⁺) and chloride ion (Cl⁻) from aluminum chloride (AlCl₃) to form solid silver chloride (AgCl) and aluminum chloride in aqueous solution (AlCl₃).

The net ionic equation shows only the species that participate in the reaction and are involved in the formation of the product (AgCl), while the spectator ions (Cl⁻ and Al³⁺) are omitted.

To learn more about net ionic equations, here

https://brainly.com/question/29299745

#SPJ1

The concentration of Ag+ at equilibrium is 4.6 × 10^-8 M.

Use the equilibrium constant expression for the reaction between Ag+ and (S2O3)2-:

Ag+(aq) + 2(S2O3)2-(aq) ⇌ Ag(S2O3)23-(aq)

The equilibrium constant expression is:

Kc = [Ag(S2O3)23-]/[Ag+][S2O3]2-

We know the kf value for this reaction, which is related to Kc by the following equation:

kf = Kc(RT)^(2-2n)

where R is the gas constant, T is the temperature in Kelvin, and n is the number of moles of electrons transferred in the balanced chemical equation. In this case, n = 2.

We can rearrange this equation to solve for Kc:

Kc = kf/(RT)^(2-2n)

Kc = (2.9 × 10^13)/[(0.0821)(298)^2]

Kc = 3.3 × 10^9

Now we can use this value of Kc to calculate the concentration of Ag+ at equilibrium:

Kc = [Ag(S2O3)23-]/[Ag+][S2O3]2-

3.3 × 10^9 = (2.9 × 10^-4 + x)(0.225 - 2x)^2 / x(0.225 - x)

Simplifying this expression and solving for x, we get:

x = 4.6 × 10^-8 M

To learn more about equilibrium constant click here

brainly.com/question/10038290

#SPJ11