How did immigration change the American experience? Would industrialization and Westward expansion have been possible without the influx of immigrants the United States experienced during the time period? Why or why not?

Answer:

verify your observations

Explanation:

The Second Amendment allows citizens to own weapons and organize state militias. Option B is the correct answer.

According to the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution, "a well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." This amendment is part of the Bill of Rights, which contains the first ten amendments to the Constitution.

The Second Amendment guarantees the right of individuals to own firearms while simultaneously recognising the significance of a well-regulated militia for state protection. It ensures people' freedom to bear arms and provides the notion that this right should not be violated by the government. Therefore, Option B is the correct answer.

For such more question on Amendment:

https://brainly.com/question/20336789

#SPJ8

Answer:

thanks thanks thanks thanks thanks thanks thanks thanks thanks thanks thanks

Answer:

The American army suffered a signifigant defeat by UK forces and the White House was burned down.

A long-term effect is that the USA has not attemped to annex Canada since

Explanation:

Answer:

1.authorization 2.accept the child behavior without trying to change them in any way 3.all of them are correct 4.all of the above 5. a b and c 6.early childhood 7. middle childhood 8.a or c

Explanation:

Answer:

sure, but how?

Explanation:

Answer:

i added some more points about the topic

you can make this as a brief description:)

Explanation:

Revolt Edit

On August 1, rebels from the northern New Mexican communities gathered at Santa Cruz de la Cañada (near Chimayó) with Indians from the surrounding pueblos. They called themselves the Cantón (neighborhood or district). On August 3 their twelve leaders, including Esquibel, issued the following declaration:

For God and the Nation and the Faith of Jesus Christ! The principal points we defend are the following: 1. To be with God and the Nation and the Faith of Jesus Christ. 2. To defend our country until we shed every drop of our blood in order to obtain the victory we have in view. 3. Not to admit the Department Plan. 4. Not to admit any tax. 5. Not to admit any disorder desired by those who are attempting to procure it. God and the Nation! Encampment Santa Cruz de la Cañada, August 3, 1837.

When Pérez heard of the rebellion, he attempted to raise a militia of volunteers, but his call did not meet with an encouraging answer. On August 9, Pérez started for Santa Cruz with the troops at his command, meeting the rebels near San Ildefonso. Most of Pérez's men promptly abandoned him and joined the rebels. Pérez retreated to Santa Fe with the few men who remained loyal to him. Unable to find security in the capital, Pérez attempted to flee the city by night, but a group of Santo Domingo Indians intercepted and killed him. The rebels decapitated Pérez and returned his head to Santa Fe for public display. Secretary of the Department Jesús María Alarid, former interim governor Santiago Abreú (one of Ramón's brothers), and approximately 20 officials from the Pérez government were also killed, some by mutilation. That same day, the rebels entered the capital and placed José Gonzales, a Genizaro (of Taos Pueblo and Pawnee ancestry) from Chimayo, in possession of the palace and as governor of the territory.

Initially the rebel government was widely popular in the Department, but it soon made enemies by committing atrocities in gaining power and confiscating the massacre victims' property (at the expense of not only their heirs but also their creditors). The ruling junta popular was contentious and indecisive, its minutes full of crossed-out sections. Meanwhile, in Santa Cruz, the Cantón did not dissolve, instead continuing to imprison people and threaten them with death, outside the control of Gonzales's government (Lecompte 1985, pp. 40–46). In Taos, unrest broke out against the Catholic Church and its leader there, Padre Martínez, in early September (Lecompte 1985, pages 47–48).

Answer:

Explanation:

The image shows the timeline. I don't know if that helps or not.

they are all fighting for their freedom and rights to be treated equally in today's society this is what i think

Answer:the correct answers are b, d, and ethe correct answers are b, d, and e

Explanation:

Answer:

Approximately between 40K and 50K black Americans fought in France, mainly in the 93rd Division of the AEF.

Explanation:

Explanation:

The Congress of Vienna was a success because the congress got a balance of power back to the European countries. The congress also brought back peace among the nations. Europe had peace for about 40 years. ... Yes, because in the end, they did many things that benefited France such as maintain a balance of power in France.

Answer:

Nowadays, advertisements can be found everywhere in our daily life. When you are walking on the street, you can see advertisements in the shops or markets. When you are watching TV, advertisements appear between programs. When you are reading newspapers, there are advertisements in the newspapers.

Explanation:

Answer:

Option A and C

Explanation:

The exceptionally harsh winter put the American army to the test, and hundreds of the 11,000 troops stationed at Valley Forge died of illness. The suffering troops, on the other hand, were held together by their devotion to the Patriot cause and to General Washington, who remained with his men.

Thank you! Please Mark Brainliest!

Answer:

Several effects. Some of the more notable ones were, the lumber industry because of the vast forests, the small farming industry as the soil was not as fertile as it was in the South, a large amount of urban industries because of the lack of farmland, and the shipbuilding industry.

Explanation:

Answer:

exposition

Explanation:

Answer:

It did not give the federal government enough power to effectively lead and It imposed taxes that citizens found offensive

Answer:

they helped write new state constitutions after the war

Explanation:

Answer:

Public funding are funds or resources provided by the State/Government for political parties and/or candidates. Provisions often state that political parties and candidates should have an equitable access to public funds. Oftentimes, the rules regarding public funding are not clearly stated in law, and even if they are, there is often a (real or perceived) misuse of public resources by the incumbent party or candidate. The legal framework can be drafted in a way as to encourage the founding and sustainability of a multi-party system.  Ongoing oversight from a responsible government body combined with public (civil society) oversight through CSO watchdog capacity also can improve the monitoring and full disclosure of funding across party lines and in lines and consistent with the intent of full disclosure and fairness in campaign financing.[1]

Depending on the form in which public resources are made available, public funding is divided into direct public funding or indirect public funding.

Direct public funding is given to political parties and/or candidates in the form of money – usually as bank transfers but at times in cash or cheque.

Indirect public funding is when resources with a monetary value is provided by the Government to political parties and/or candidates.

Arguments against public funding

Those who oppose public funds to political parties or candidates often use one or several of the following arguments:

Public funding increases the distance between political elites (party leadership, candidates) and ordinary citizens (party members, supporters, voters)

When political parties and candidates do not depend on their supporters or members neither for monetary contributions (membership, donations) nor for voluntary labour, they might be less likely to involve them in party decisions or consult their opinions on policy issues.

Public funding preserves a status quo that keeps the established parties and candidates in power

Public funds are often allocated among political parties and candidates in the national legislature. This may make it more difficult for new political forces to gain representation. The legal framework can limit this negative influence by providing special funds for new political parties or candidates.

Through public funds, taxpayers are forced to support political parties and candidates whose views they do not share

Many believe that ordinary taxpayers should not be forced – through the public purse – to support political parties or candidates that they would never choose to vote for. Instead they should have the possibility to decide if and when they want to donate money to a political party or candidate.

Public funds to political parties and candidates takes money away from schools and hospitals to give to rich politicians

When introduced, public funding is often unpopular among the public. Public resources are scarce and needed for everything from schools and hospitals to roads and salaries for staff. To many people, using public funds to give to political parties and candidates would be far down their list of priorities.

Political parties and candidates both take the decision and collect the money

The decision to allocate public funds to parties and candidates is most often taken in the national legislature (or in some cases in the Government). This means that the political parties and candidates who will collect the money, also take the decision.

Political parties risk becoming organs of the State rather than parts of civil society

If all or a substantial amount of the party income comes directly from the State rather than from voluntary sources, political parties risk losing their independence and become organs of the State, thereby losing their ties to the civil society.

Answer:

Fiery American suffragette Alice Paul lights a fire under the older women's leaders in Washington DC. President Wilson refuses to give all women the vote, but Paul is prepared to go to prison for her cause.

Explanation:

Answer:

your answer is A

Explanation:

Hayes would also have to agree to name a leading southerner to his cabinet and to support federal aid for the Texas and Pacific Railroad, a planned transcontinental line via a southern route.

Explanation:

black

pls

Answer:

its true

Explanation:

trust me

During the summer of 2015.

Based on economic theory, when the unemployment rate is low, the prices of goods and services decrease.

During the rise in unemployment, many people have little money to buy goods and services. This, in turn, would lead to a decrease in demand.

As demand decreases, the price of goods and services would decrease to adjust to the quantity demanded.

This situation is based on the law of demand and supply relative to their quantities.

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the unemployment rate would affect the price of goods and services in society.

Learn more here: https://brainly.com/question/24565414

I would say the Middle east. Specifically the region of the Holy Land (Jerusalem) in Palestine.

The main point of the crusades was the take that land into the possession of the Christians.

Hope that helps

Answer:

After the farmers prayed to the Virgin Mary to protect their crops, ladybugs supposedly appeared to defend the crops. The farmers called the bugs "Beetles of Our Lady," which evolved into "ladybugs" -- hence a reference to the Virgin Mary.

Explanation:

Answer:

It was the main form of communication for Muslim traders.