The history of court rulings pertaining to inmates' constitutional safeguards can best be characterized as advancing change. Thus option (B) is correct.
What is court?A court is any person or institution with the jurisdiction to arbitrate legal disputes between parties and administer justice in civil, criminal, and administrative affairs in conformity with the rule of law. A court, often known as a court of law, is a person or group of people with the legal jurisdiction to hear and settle disputes in civil, criminal, ecclesiastical, or military issues.
The Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishment protects inmates even when they do not have full constitutional rights. Prisoners must also be provided with a minimal level of living as part of this protection. As in the case of Brown v.
Therefore, Thus option (B) is correct.
Learn more about the court here:
https://brainly.com/question/13375489
#SPJ1
recent shootings of unarmed black men by polic may be explained by socioal psychologists as examples of implicit racial
Social psychologists offer an explanation for the recent police shootings of unarmed black men as instances of implicit racial prejudice.
What is an illustration of prejudice?Prejudice based on a person's race, gender, nationality, social status, sexual orientation, or religious affiliation are some common examples. Controversies can arise from any topic.
What distinguishes prejudice from discrimination?To recap, we now know that discrimination is based on prejudice, which is merely a negative attitude that is unsupported by any facts.
How can racial prejudice be used in a sentence?The book's central theme is her struggle against poverty and racial prejudice. It is evident that the authors are emphasizing the racial prejudice that frequently follows linguistic prejudice.
Learn more about Prejudice here:
https://brainly.com/question/25189630
#SPJ4
1.One of the major responsibilities of a SWAT team is to enter residences by force, with no warning, to serve criminal warrants. Do you think ‘no knock warrants’ conducted by SWAT teams should be legal? Why or why not?
2.Which of the following SWAT team roles (serving warrants, raiding residences, serving as security as high-profile events, helping with hostage and barricade situations) do you think would be the most challenging? Explain.
3.Do you think it’s fair to promote someone to a detective position solely because they’ve worked as an officer for a long period of time?
4.There are many different kinds of Border Patrol officers. Which do you think would be the most interesting role and why?
5.Becoming a DEA Agent is an extensive process. Which part of the process do you feel would be the most difficult? Explain.
No-knock warrants are used in drug-related cases, violent situations, or situations where evidence sought may be destroyed before police can declare their presence. Hence, I think it should be legal so serious crimes can be prevented.
Raiding residences can be said to be most challenging task of SWAT as during such operations they face dangerous criminals who are hiding while they have to take care of innocent residents as well.
Its fair to promote someone to a detective position solely because they’ve worked as an officer for a long period of time because during their stint as offers they gain much experience and know the intricacies of the job.
I feel job of all the border patrol officers is interesting in nature as they all work in difficult situations.
Being able to obtain a Top Secret security clearance is most difficult part of process of becoming a DEA agent as scrutiny is very rigid in the process.
To know more about SWAT:
brainly.com/question/14665659
#SPJ1
is when judges who go beyond what the law requires seek to impose their own policy preferences on society through their judicial decisions.
The refusal to apply judicial review in accordance with normal politics is known as judicial restraint.
Which part of the government is in charge of determining what the laws mean?
Members of the Judicial Branch are appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate in countries where the people elect the executive and legislative branches.
What examples of judicial activism can you give?One of the most significant instances of judicial activism in the history of the United States is the Roe v. Wade decision, which stated that laws against abortion were illegal because they violated an individual's right to privacy.
Learn more about judicial here:
https://brainly.com/question/25903338
#SPJ4
a material breach occurs when performance is substantial, but not complete.
a. true
b. false
Key points in determining the lawfulness of force used in self-defense include:
a. unlawfulness
b. necessity
c. reasonableness
d. all of these are key points in determining the lawfulness of force used in self-defense
Richard, an 11-year-old boy, bangs his head against the wall because doing so typically leads to his mother backing off on requests for him to do chores. He has been banging his head more frequently for the past 2 weeks. According to the Four-Factor Model of NSSI, which function seems to be the MOST relevant to Richard’s NSSI?
As Richard bangs his head against the wall because doing so typically leads to his mother backing off on requests for him to do chores. The act of banging his head for past 2 weeks according to the Four-Factor Model of NSSI shows that the automatic-positive reinforcement function seems to be the MOST relevant to Richard’s NSSI.
What should we know about 4 Factor Model of NSSI?The acronym "NSSI" means a nonsuici-dal self-injury, which refers to a repeated and intention damage to the surface of body with intent to cause bleeding, bruising or pain and no suidi-cal intent.
According to Nock & Prinstein, they demonstrated that both structural and construct validity of a four-factor model of NSSI functions includes a automatic-negative reinforcement, automatic-positive reinforcement, social-negative reinforcement and social-positive reinforcement.
Read more about nonsuic-idal self-injury
brainly.com/question/4036744
#SPJ1
although james madison personally did not believe that the tenth amendment was necessary, he urged that it be adopted. a.true b.false
True although james madison personally did not believe that the tenth amendment was necessary, he urged that it be adopted.
What is the significance of the 10th Amendment to federalism?Because it is also known as the 10th Amendment to the Constitution, this is significant: The states have exclusive control over any powers not specifically granted to the national government. Because the powers are shared or divided between the national government and the states, this amendment preserved the idea of federalism.
What is the significance of the 10th Amendment to federalism?The states and their citizens are authorized to exercise powers not specifically granted to the federal government by the 10th Amendment. It permits states to establish distinct rules and regulations independent of the federal government.
Learn more about james madison here:
https://brainly.com/question/12918316
#SPJ4
in _______________, the government prosecutes an individual for breaking the law.
In appeals the government prosecutes an individual for breaking the law.
A legal procedure by which a case is taken before a higher court for review of a lower court's decision is known as an appeal. an application for confirmation, justification, or decision (as to a recognized authority): a sincere request: entreaty. a request for aid.
a request made to a court of law or an authoritative figure to overturn a prior judgment: The appeals court was consulted in this instance. He prevailed on appeal, and the sentence was reduced by halfIf you think a judge made a mistake in a lower court (the trial court), you can ask a higher court to review their ruling through the legal procedure known as an appeal. An appellant is a party to a lawsuit who appeals a decision. An appellee is the party who is the subject of the appeal.
Learn more about to prosecutes visit here;
https://brainly.com/question/27415132
#SPJ4
florida law prohibits anyone under the age of _____ from operating a personal watercraft (pwc):
Florida law prohibits anyone under the age of 14 from operating a personal watercraft (pwc). In Florida, you have to be at least 18 to rent a personal watercraft and at least 14 years old to operate a personal watercraft.
What is prohibited from using a PWC in Florida?Personal watercraft (PWC) use is not allowed when using an inflatable PFD. Anyone operating a PWC with a lanyard cut-off switch is required by law to fasten the lanyard to their person, clothes, or life jacket. If the self-circling device of a PWC has been modified, operating the PWC is not permitted.
The most crucial factor to keep in mind when operating the majority of PWC is that electricity is a constant requirement for maintaining control. If you let a PWC's or another jet-propelled vessel's engine return to idle or turn off during operation, you may lose all steering control.
To learn more about a personal watercraft (PWC), visit:
https://brainly.com/question/4548809
#SPJ4
according to the 9th u.s. circuit court of appeals, a photojournalist or a video journalist does not have the first amendment privilege against disclosure of information when the recorded information or activity
What is an example of a political gaff? Why are they important?
A political gaff are important because they sometimes tells about a politician views. Some example of a popular political gaff includes:
Howard Dean Goes Out in a Blaze of GloryGeorge W. Bush Declares 'Mission AccomplishedJoe Biden Tries to Make a Disabled Man StandRonald Reagan Almost Starts World War IIIWhat is the meaning of political gaffe?Basically, a political gaffe refers to an error in speech made by a politician. Its also means an unintentional comment that causes a politician embarrassment. In other words, it means a politician inadvertently saying something publicly that they privately believe is true, but would ordinarily not say because it is politically damaging.
According to Barack Obama, he defined the political gaffe as any maladroit phrase by a candidate that reveals ignorance, carelessness, fuzzy thinking, insensitivity, malice, boorishness, falsehood or hypocrisy which is deemed to veer sufficiently far from the conventional wisdom to make said candidate vulnerable to attack.
Read more about political gaffe
brainly.com/question/13276167
#SPJ1
court process that determines probable cause?
Court process that determines probable cause is -
The standard by which police authorities have justification for making an arrest of a person or obtaining a search warrant in American criminal law is known as probable cause. Probable cause does not have a standard meaning or wording. When "at [the moment of the arrest] the facts and circumstances within [an officer's] knowledge and of which they had reasonably trustworthy information [are] sufficient to warrant a prudent [person] in believing that [a suspect] had committed or was committing an offence," according to a traditional definition from the 1964 Beck v. Ohio ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court.
Additionally, it serves as the benchmark for indictments of criminals by grand juries. The standard's guiding idea is to restrict the ability of authorities to conduct arbitrary or abusive searches (illegal search and seizure) and to encourage the collection of legal evidence and proper procedure during criminal detention and prosecution. The same rules apply to searches of people or property.
It is important to distinguish between probable cause and reasonable suspicion when determining whether to conduct a terry stop in the United States of America. Probable cause is a higher criterion than reasonable suspicion. In this context, "probable" might refer to statistical probability or to a broader norm of accepted practises.
To learn more about the court process that determines probable cause-
https://brainly.com/question/8107016
Under the code, an athlete in the registered testing pool with any combination of three whereabouts filing failures and/or missed tests from any entity in __________ may result in an anti-doping rule violation.
Under the code, an athlete in the registered testing pool with any combination of three whereabouts filing failures and/or missed tests from any entity in Registered Testing Pool may result in an anti-doping rule violation.
About Registered Testing Pool
The ITTF and National Anti-Doping Organizations separately formed the Registered Testing Pool (RTP), a group of the highest priority athletes, at the international and national levels. The International Standard for Testing & Investigations and Code Art. 5.5 (Athletes Whereabouts Information) both require athletes who are a part of the ITTF RTP to provide their whereabouts information because they are relevant to both in- and out-of-competition testing as part of the ITTF's test distribution plan.
To know more about Athletes:
brainly.com/question/15385581
#SPJ4
What did the stolen valor act attempt to prohibit?lying about military servicelying about crimes committed during servicelying about receiving a military medal of honorlying about being honorably discharged from the military.
The response is lying about earning a medal of honor from the military.
Explanation:
The Stolen Value Law makes it a federal criminal to falsely claim to have received a military medal or award; if the act involves the highest honors of the military, it carries a sentence of up to one year in jail. The FBI maintains a close eye out since it is against the law to purchase, sell, or falsely possess a Medal of Honor in the United States. The recipient or a designee are the only people who are permitted to own a Medal of Honor, according to Sanborn. Only when someone makes a false claim about a specific military decoration, such as the Purple Heart, Bronze Star, or a few others, in order to profit financially or otherwise directly from a crime is it against the law. Someone making a fake military claim
To learn more about 'law' refer to
https://brainly.com/question/11658910
#SPJ4
in blank law countries, accounting is conservative, focusing on the balance sheet and the company's assets
In code-law countries, accounting is conservative, focusing on the balance sheet and the company's assets.
An asset is any useful resource owned or controlled by means of a commercial enterprise or an monetary entity. it is something that may be used to produce effective financial fee. belongings represent price of possession that may be transformed into cash.
An asset is anything that has current or destiny monetary cost to a enterprise. essentially, for corporations, property encompass the entirety controlled and owned through the enterprise it's presently valuable or ought to provide economic gain within the destiny. Examples encompass patents, equipment, and investments.
Learn more about assets here:https://brainly.com/question/25746199
#SPJ4
when the congress investigates federal agencies to make sure that they are following us laws, it is exercising its
when the congress investigates federal agencies to make sure that they are following us laws, it is exercising its oversight function.
Congress is using its oversight power when it looks into federal agencies to make sure they are abiding by American laws. The legislative branch's crucial role in ensuring executive branch accountability and transparency is Congressional oversight. Through oversight Congress is able to look over and assess how federal agencies are run, what programs and policies they have and whether they are upholding the law and effectively serving the public interest.
This may entail holding hearings requesting papers and data, speaking with witnesses, and generating reports. Through oversight Congress is able to spot any potential wrongdoing, inefficiencies or opportunities for improvement within the federal government and take the necessary steps to address any problems that may arise.
learn more about oversight power here
brainly.com/question/33593160
#SPJ2
Older workers are generally undependable and operate like free agents.
Answer:
false
Explanation:
alot of older men and women work witt the same determination as younger generations, like my grandfather
which of the following is demonstrative of the recent difficulties the democratic party has had in defining itself?
Social programs, labor unions, consumer protection, workplace safety regulations, equal opportunity, disability rights, racial equity, environmental pollution regulations, and criminal justice reform are all aims of democratic platforms.
What are the five obstacles that political parties must overcome?A lack of internal democracy, dynamic succession, financial resources, and muscle power are just a few of the issues that confront a political party. Internal democracy deficit: Internal conflicts arise from the concentration of power in the hands of a few ministers.
What were the most pressing concerns of Democratic Republicans?Diverse factions of the Democratic-Republican party placed an emphasis on local and humanitarian issues, state rights, agrarian interests, and democratic processes.
Learn more about democratic here:
https://brainly.com/question/22468379
#SPJ4
identify 5 relationship between Constitution and constitutionlization
There is a relationship between Constitution and constitutionlization. The Constitution is said to ensure that the government does not own the state. Whereas, constitutionlization is the opposite of despotism.
This modern idea of the Constitution is said to result from a basic shift which took place in conceiving the relationship between government and people. Thus, the Constitution ensures that the government does not own the state and thus simply manage the state.
However, in this sense, constitutionlization is considered to be the opposite of despotism. Despotism is a system of government wherein the governing authorities are a law unto themselves.
Hence, the Constitution is the highest law in the land.
To learn more about the Constitution here:
https://brainly.com/question/14453917
#SPJ9
"voting in elections" and "volunteering at a homeless shelter" can both be important in society because they are.
Answer:
both help the economy and the country grow
Explanation:
match each supreme court case to its description(s). note that every item may not have a match, while some items may have more than one match. drag each item on the left to its matching item on the right. note that every item may not have a match, while some items may have more than one match. mcdonald v. chicago district of columbia v. heller this ruling stated that the second amendment right was absolute, overturning all existing gun ownership restrictions. press space to open for the first time, the court ruled that the second amendment provides a constitutional right to keep a loaded handgun at home for self-defense. press space to open the court left room for some restrictions to gun ownership. press space to open for the first time, the court extended second amendment rights beyond the national level to the state and local levels.
The correct answer is 4 (Slightly fewer than a majority, at 4). To avoid confusion with the outstanding Sherlock Holmes book The Sign of Four, it is alternatively referred to as "The Rule of Four."
There is a filed petition for a writ of certiorari Nearly all cases that the Supreme Court might review start here. Legal assistants assess the petition (The "cert pool" makes it easier for justices to get a handle on the thousands of potential cases they could hear.) A writ of certiorari is given by the court (Once granted, a case with certiorari will appear before the Court.) Oral deliberations begin (Once a case is argued before the Supreme Court, the justices vote on their decision and issue an opinion.) -Only the government has the authority to file charges against a person (In criminal law, the government brings a case against a specific party.)
To learn more about Supreme Court click the link below:
brainly.com/question/1755400
#SPJ4
the essence of the rule of law is
The essence rule of law means that everyone from the government to its officials, together with citizens should act according to the law.
The rule of law requires that the government should be subject to the law rather than the law subject to the government”According to Black’s law dictionary, Rule of Law may be specifically defined as supremacy of law where decision is made by applying known principles or laws, where there is no intervention of discretion in application of such principles or laws.The rule of Law is one of the basic and general principles of the constitution.
So, in essence rule of law means that everyone from the government to its officials, together with citizens should act according to the law.
To know more about Rule of law visit:https://brainly.com/question/5132663
#SPJ4
when a majority of the supreme court justices agree on a decision but not the legal reasoning behind it, the court issues a , which is the opinion having the most justices in support of it.
Answer:
plurality opinion
Explanation:
According to the information provided in this class, what sort of warning is a vehicle's electronic warning of low tire pressure intended to provide (i.e., when the dashboard warns of low tire pressure)?
The TPMS low tyre pressure indication is a yellow symbol with an exclamation point that glows on the dashboard instrument panel in the shape of a tyre cross-section (that resembles a horseshoe). When the tyre pressure becomes too low or too high, the TPMS light illuminates.
The tire-pressure warning light is positioned in the gauge cluster on the dashboard of your vehicle. When the vehicle's TPMS detects low air pressure in one or more tires, this amber-colored warning sign glows to alert you (tire pressure monitoring system).
How does a tyre pressure monitoring system notify the driver of low tyre pressure?"The indirect system's central processor employs powerful algorithms to detect slight differences in tyre rotation speed caused by various inflation levels among the four wheel positions." A tire-pressure monitor informs drivers when pressure falls below the recommended level.
To know more about TPMS refer:
https://brainly.com/question/14973549
#SPJ1
lucy is single and has $225,000 of taxable income from services outside her employment before the qualified business income deduction. which of the following types of services,
Answer: Engineering
Explanation: Engineering services are not a specified trade or business, thus, her income from engineering services would be QBI.
2. Most drivers take an average of 3 seconds to react.
O True
O False
False. Most drivers do not take an average of 3 seconds to react.
The average reaction time of most drivers is 0.75 seconds.
The amount of time it takes to respond to a situation by switching your foot from the gas pedal to the brake pedal is known as the reaction time. A typical reaction takes around 3/4 of a second. A few accident reconstruction experts employ 1.5 seconds.
Driver response time comprises recognizing the changed light, choosing to go or stop, and using the brakes if necessary (remove foot from accelerator and apply brake). It also depends on other factors such as age of the driver, driving experience, weather, etc.
Whether or whether the driver is aware of the need to brake has a significant impact on reaction times.
Reaction times range widely from person to person and from situation to situation between between 0.75 and 3 seconds or maybe more
To know more about reaction times, refer:
https://brainly.com/question/28661660
#SPJ1
T/F: The most obvious failure of monopoly markets lies in the high prices they allow the monopoly companies to charge, violating capitalist justice.
Negate rights by preventing other businesses from entering the market, allowing a monopolist to compel consumers to buy products they don't want, and allowing the monopolist to set prices and quantities that consumers are forced to accept.
What is the primary social issue brought on by monopoly?Due to the lack of service provided to some customers who would be willing to pay the product's marginal cost (MC), Monopoly results in a social cost known as a deadweight loss. Since monopolists are price setters rather than price takers, there is no supply curve in a monopoly.
Can monopolies be a part of capitalism?The market might be free in name as it were: In a capitalist system, a private owner may hold a monopoly in a particular industry or region, preventing genuine competition. In contrast, a free market system relies solely on supply and demand, with little or no government oversight.
Learn more about monopolist here:
https://brainly.com/question/13113415
#SPJ4
European courts permit contract rescission for a mistake of value when the mistake involves more than 50 percent of the value at the time of the contract. True or False
It is true that European courts allow contract cancellation for a value error where the error represents more than 50% of the contract's original worth.
Reasons:
European courts concur with American courts' unwillingness to modify a contract simply because value of the subject matter has altered since the agreement. It is presumed that the parties understood going into the contract that the value would vary in the future. However, European courts allow contract cancellation for a value error if the error represents more than 50% of the contract's original worth.
Basic contract terms in use by traders must be fair under EU legislation. Whether they are referred to as "terms and conditions" or are a part of a comprehensive contract that you must actually sign, this remains the case.
To know more about European courts:
brainly.com/question/2669219
#SPJ4
journalists who refuse to comply with subpoenas or court orders to identify confidential sources are forced to turn to privileges to ward off contempt orders, jail sentences, and monetary fines.
To avoid contempt orders, jail time, and monetary fines, journalists who fail to comply with subpoenas or court orders to identify confidential sources must resort to First Amendment privileges.
In journalism, what exactly is an anonymous source?The data can be used, but no credit is required. Even on the condition of anonymity, the source does not want to be identified in any way. In general, information gathered in any of these situations can be gathered from other sources and recorded.
What are journalists banned from doing?The right not to be forced to testify or reveal sources or information in court is referred to as the "Journalists Privilege," and it is also referred to as the "journalist shield law."Defaming someone by publishing false information or negative information about them could be illegal.
Learn more about First Amendment here:
https://brainly.com/question/26448398
#SPJ4
If you could change or improve one way in which bills become laws, what would you do any why?
Answer: Make the process easier, there are too many hoops a bill has to jump through to become a law. I'm reminded of Schoolhouse Rock, " I'm just a bill, yeah I'm only a bill and I'm sitting here on Capital Hill."
Explanation: