the assize of arms required all british citizens between the ages of and to own arms corresponding with the financial ability to purchase the arms. group of answer choices 15, 45 20, 45 20, 40 15, 40
The Assize of Arms was established in 1181 by Henry II, who is regarded as the founder of common law. All British citizens between the ages of 15 and 40 were mandated to acquire and maintain guns.
What did the 1181 Assize of Arms entail?Navigation jump Go to search now. King Henry II of England issued a proclamation in 1181 called the Assize of Arms outlining the requirement for all English freemen to carry weapons for the king.
What does King Henry's oath of armed service mean?Additionally, each of them must promise to possess these weapons before the feast of St. Hilary, to be loyal to the lord king Henry, who is the son of the Empress Matilda, and to use them in his service as per his orders and in devotion to the lord king and his realm.
To know more about Arms visit:-
brainly.com/question/28862538
#SPJ4
In order to appease both Federalists and Anti-Federalists, it was agreed at the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia that a group of delegates would be charged with selecting the president, in what would be called the "electoral college." This was designed to assure that
Capable individuals would decide which candidate would become president
President is chosen, after which a Constitutional Commission is appointed.
Who makes the presidential selection?The Electoral College is used in presidential elections instead. A candidate needs to obtain a majority of the electoral votes in order to win the election. The House of Representatives elects the president, while the Senate selects the vice president, if no candidate obtains a majority.
How do they pick a candidate for president?People now take part in primaries or caucuses in 48 states to choose delegates who will support their preferred presidential candidate. The presidential candidate who receives the most state delegate votes obtains the party nomination at national party conventions.
To know more about electoral visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/9813520
#SPJ4
Describe the power the house judiciary committee used to address the concerns outlined.
The power of the House Judiciary Committee helped address the concerns outlined by representative Frank Guinta by taking his proposed bills to fix the concern and passing it.
What is the purpose of the House Judiciary Committee?Because of its jurisdiction over topics pertaining to the administration of justice in federal courts, administrative bodies, and law enforcement organizations, the Committee on the Judiciary has been dubbed the House of Representatives' lawyer.
The power of the House Judiciary Committee assisted in addressing the issues raised by Representative Frank Guinta by accepting and approving his proposed measures to address the problems. The measure will assist in removing legal hurdles, allowing Guinta to assist in protecting individuals from responsibility laws.
Learn more about House Judiciary Committee here:
https://brainly.com/question/14457414
#SPJ2
From what source did the writers of the Declaration of Sentiments of 1848 likely draw inspiration?
The British Common Law
Haudenosaunee Confederation
Ancient Greeks
Abraham Lincoln
The writers of the Declaration of Sentiments of 1848 likely drew inspiration from The British Common Law. Thus the correct option is A.
What is the Declaration of Sentiments?The Declaration of Independence formed the foundation for the Declaration of Sentiments. It stated that all people are built the same way and that women should take measures to assert the civic rights that men had previously rejected them.
The language used in the Declaration of Sentiments was taken from the antislavery struggle and inspired by the American Declaration of Independence. It proclaimed that both men and women have the fundamental right to life, freedom, and the desire for happiness.
Therefore, option A is appropriate.
Learn more about the Declaration of Sentiments, here:
https://brainly.com/question/17178282
#SPJ1
Rashid retired from active duty in 2021 and began taking disbursements from his traditional Thrift Savings Plan (TSP). His contributions over the years included $12,000 of combat pay. Which of the following statements is TRUE about his distributions?
Answer: If Rashid retired from active duty in 2021 and began taking disbursements from his traditional Thrift Savings Plan (TSP), the distributions from his TSP would likely be taxable. However, it is not clear from the information provided whether Rashid's combat pay would be subject to any special tax treatment. It is also not clear how much money Rashid has in his TSP or what type of disbursements he is receiving, so it is difficult to provide a definitive answer.
buchanan thought the crisis would disappear if he maintained a sectional balance in his appointments and could persuade the people to accept constitutional law as the supreme court interpreted it
Answer: 1+1=2
Explanation: Solve it its not even a question
In the summer of 1942, blacks began to train at Camp Lejune to serve in what branch of the military, overturning an exclusionary policy which was as old as the service itself?
Marines
In the summer of 1942, blacks began to train at Camp Lejune to serve in Marines branch of the military, overturning an exclusionary policy which was as old as the service itself.
The structure, which was built in 1942 but decommissioned in 1949, is now a museum dedicated to the roughly 20,000 men who served as the first Black recruits in the U.S. Marine Corps. Black soldiers have participated in every American war. Around 5,000 soldiers in the American Revolution, according to the U.S. Army History Office, were Black. These guys served in the infantry, the artillery (at the time, the most technologically advanced part of the military), as labourers, and even as musicians.
Learn more on exclusionary policy
https://brainly.com/question/29544396
#SPJ4
Which of the following best describes the legal basis for protection of trade secrets, patents, and copyrights in the United States?
A) Trade secrets, patents, and copyrights are protected by federal statutes.
B) Trade secrets, patents, and copyrights are protected by state law.
C) Trade secrets are protected by state law, while patents and copyrights are protected by federal statutes.
D) Trade secrets are protected by federal statutes, while patents and copyrights are protected by state law.
E) Trade secrets, patents, and copyrights are not protected by any laws.
The legal basis for the protection of trade secrets, patents, and copyrights in the United States is state law for trade secrets and federal statutes for patents and copyrights.
Are antitrust laws applicable to trade secrets?Patents and copyrights are protected by federal statutes, whereas trade secrets are protected by state law. A recent patent license arrangement between S.C. Johnson & Sons and Bayer AG was challenged by the US Justice Department.
Is it possible to safeguard a trade secret without a patent?Contrary to patents, trade secrets are protected without registration, i.e., they don't need to go through any formalities to be protected. A trade secret can be kept a secret for as long as it remains undiscovered or until it is legitimately obtained by another party.
To know more about Legal visit:-
brainly.com/question/18462276
#SPJ4
Spoliation means destroying a report before the final resolution of a case called.
What is a counterclaim? a statement that includes personal opinions about a topic a statement that provides evidence for a claim a statement that takes a stand on an issue a statement that addresses an opposing perspective.
A counterclaim is a statement that addresses an opposing perspective. Without supporting proof, an argument is referred to be a claim. Thus, option D is correct.
This argument is founded on the beliefs and presumptions of the general public. There is no supporting evidence that demonstrates any incident.
After the original demand has been issued, the defendant may respond with a counterclaim for damages. A frequent accusation was made against the plaintiff by the defendant.
Anyone can respond to the opposing argument and defend their position by making a counterclaim. A writer is rebutting an allegation when they do so. Only if you have enough verifiable proof to support your claim will this be possible.
Therefore, option D is the ideal selection.
Learn more about counterclaims here:
https://brainly.com/question/1757292
#SPJ12
in legal terminology, this is the state of a child who has not yet reached the specified age to be considered an adult.
in legal terminology, this is the state of a child who has not yet reached the specified age to be considered an adult is Substantive.
Here is an example of a great noun getting used successfully inside the context of a sentence. "On his stroll home from his task, the person decided to prevent by means of at the ordinary and order a hearty Southern dinner." on this sentence, the term "regular" is an adjective getting used as a Substantive noun.
In short, an important is described as a word or group of phrases that acts as a noun or noun word in a sentence. often a sizeable noun or a pronoun, but it could be any part of speech that acts as a noun, which includes an adjective, adverb, or verb.
Learn more about Substantive here https://brainly.com/question/11724982
#SPJ4
Write a 5-6 sentence paragraph to express how the rights listed above would protect Dominic from the crime he has been accused of. This should be done on a separate piece of line paper.
Dominic is an African American man who lives with his White roommate Keith. Dominic comes home one day and the police are waiting for him with Keith. The police went into his home and found evidence implicating him, from what they have said, in stealing a car that has gone missing. The police immediately blame Dominic and arrest him, taking his car as well. Dominic waits two years in prison, not being allowed to leave, until he is finally given a trial with police members as the jury. At the trial, Dominic argues for himself that he did not do and that there is no proof. He is declared innocent, but the police later bring him back and declare him guilty of the crime, declaring his punishment that he can never go within ten feet of a car again.
Within this scenario, there are TEN different violations of due process rights from the different amendments. For your paragraph, you can reflect on the following to meet your requirements:
List three rights violated here.
Explain how these three rights were violated.
Describe how using his rights would have helped Dominic in this situatio
Answer:
Dominic's rights to an impartial jury, a prompt trial, the presumption of innocence, and immunity from double jeopardy would all apply in this case. Dominic would be shielded by these rights from unjust treatment and punishment by the criminal justice system. His right to a speedy and fair trial would appear to have been violated given that he was imprisoned for two years before being tried and that the police served as the jury in his case. Additionally, it would appear that his right to be shielded from double jeopardy was being violated given that he was initially found innocent at his trial but later found guilty of the same crime.
Explanation:
Attached is the question
The A can get a prohibitory injunction in equity and stop B from spraying the land with pesticides, even though A claims compensation at law.
Do remedies in equity include injunctions?Injunctions, specific performance, and prohibitory injunctions are some examples of equitable remedies. An injunction is a court order telling someone to stop doing something that is against the law. Injunctions and particular performance are the two primary equitable remedies, and in informal legal jargon, allusions to equitable remedies are sometimes phrased as referring to those two remedies alone.
An injunction can be prohibitive, preventing someone from doing something, or mandatory, ordering them to do something. The harm includes payment for the "market value" of your animal as well as related "economic damages" such as veterinarian costs. Additionally, noneconomic and punitive damages may be awarded in certain circumstances, such as when the individual intentionally hurt your animal.
To learn more about punitive damages, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14001157
#SPJ1
Which of the following rules has the Supreme Court said is an undue burden on the right to have an abortion?
a. Women must make more than one visit to an abortion clinic before the procedure can be performed.
b. Minors must gain the consent of a parent or judge before seeking an abortion.
c. Women must notify their spouses before having an abortion.
d. Women must be informed of the health consequences of having an abortion
The Supreme Court declared that the requirement that women inform their spouses before obtaining an abortion was an excessive burden on that right.
How does the Texas abortion case include a "undue burden"?The Supreme Court has revived the "undue burden" threshold and, with it, the fundamental right to abortion with its decision in Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt, a Texas abortion case.
What are the implications for abortion rights of the Whole Woman's Health decision?Following the Supreme Court's ruling in Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt, abortion rights supporters gather in front of the court to celebrate. EVAN VUCCI/Associated Press With its decision in Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt, a Texas abortion case, the Supreme Court revived the "undue burden" threshold.
To know more about Abortion visit:-
brainly.com/question/28459534
#SPJ4
which of the following options is not a form of power moves designed to bring reluctant bargainers back to the table?
Exploding offers are not a type of power play meant to persuade reluctant negotiators to return to the table.
Of the following, which is not a bargaining tactic?The term "negotiation" does not refer to all of the interactions between a business and a consumer, including those that are service- or sales-related. Keep your emotions unattached to the result. Even as the argument gets heated, keep your composure and work together. When the opposing side is considering your opening offer, counteroffers, and closing offer, be patient.
Marketing strategy: What is it?The process of strategic marketing management begins with the following steps: developing product-market strategies; identifying organizational opportunities; defining the organization's goals.
To know more about negotiation visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/28461798
#SPJ4
Qualified education expenses for purposes of the deduction of interest on educational loans are expenses paid for the education of the taxpayer, the taxpayer's spouse, or a taxpayer's dependent to attend a postsecondary institution of higher education.
TRUE
Qualified education expenses for purposes of the deduction of interest on educational loans are expenses paid for the education of the taxpayer, the taxpayer's spouse, or a taxpayer's dependent to attend a postsecondary institution of higher education.
This statement is True.
A teaching qualification refers to an official confirmation, usually in the form of a certificate, diploma or degree, attesting to the successful completion of a part of an educational program or study.
Eligible Expenses are amounts paid for tuition, fees, and other related expenses necessary for an eligible student to enroll or attend an eligible educational institution. Fees must be paid for the study period* beginning in her first three months during the tax year or in the following tax year.
An “eligible student” is a student who has reached the age of 18 or is attending a post-secondary institution regardless of age. When a student becomes an "eligible student," the rights granted to parents under FERPA transfer to that student.
Learn more about eligible student https://brainly.com/question/26052183
#SPJ4
Members of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors:
a. are appointed to 4 year terms.
b. are members of the Federal Open Market Committee.
c. frequently need to deal with political pressure.
d. are confirmed by the House of Representative
Members of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors: are members of the Federal Open Market Committee.
The Federal Reserve video display units monetary gadget risks and engages at home and abroad to help make sure the system helps a healthful economy for U.S. households, communities, and groups.
The Federal Reserve device is taken into consideration to be an impartial significant bank. it's so, however, only in the experience that its decisions do not need to be ratified by using the President or every body else in the government department of the authorities.
Federal Reserve Banks are often referred to as the "bankers' banks" due to the fact they offer services to business banks just like the offerings that commercial banks offer for their customers. Federal Reserve Banks distribute forex and coin to banks, lend cash to banks, and technique electronic payments.
Learn more about Federal Reserve here
https://brainly.com/question/25817380
#SPJ4
Upon the death of a President, the Vice President assumes the powers and duties of the presidency, but technically does not become President.A. TrueB. False
The assertion is accurate that the death of a President, the Vice President assumes the powers and duties of the presidency, but technically does not become President.
What transpires if the president and vice president pass away while he is in office?Order of Presidential Succession If the President of the United States becomes incapable of holding office due to illness, death, resignation, or any other reason, or is removed from office, the following individuals shall succeed him or her in office: Deputy President.
In the president's absence, who assumes control of the government?The Chief Justice of India or, in his absence, the seniormost Supreme Court of India judge available will fill the positions if there are vacancies in either the President's or Vice-posts President's due to death, resignation, removal, or other reasons.
To know more about Justice visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/978006
#SPJ4
If Congress enacts a law that either establishes a religion or prohibits the free exercise of religion, then that law is unconstitutional. Therefore, if Congress enacts a law that establishes a religion, then that law is unconstitutional. E=Congress enacts a law that establishes a religion. P= Congress enacts a law the prohibits the free exercise of E religion. U= the law is unconstitutional. Premise: ___________Conclusion: ________Indirect truth tablePremise Conclusion (Write Premise Here) (Write Truth Values Here) Conclusion: Premise Proof:
Using the rule of Conditional Proof :- Premise: E3(F36} ~l € H 2.H3(GsI} (FsIls(v~H) I :(E'H)3J B: 1. If B3(Cv~D) ~Cv(B ~ D), then B3(C) is true.
Conclusion: If B3(Cv~D) ~Cv(B ~ D), then H3(GsI} (FsIls(v~H)) is true. 3. If E'H)3J is true, then H3(GsI} (FsIls(v~H)) is true.
Conditional proofs, in their plural form (logic) a demonstration that, if an assumption A is true, then a logical conclusion or assertion B must likewise be true, i.e., B is true provided that A is true. A conditional proof is one that asserts a conditional and demonstrates that the conditional's antecedent inevitably results in the consequent. The conditional proof assumption refers to the presumptive antecedent of a conditional proof (CPA). Therefore, the purpose of a conditional proof is to show that the desired conclusion would logically follow if the CPA were true.
To know more about conditional proof:
https://brainly.com/question/28547068
#SPJ4
in the united state court system, the defendant is considered innocent until evidence are provided to prove guilty. in our hypothesis testing framework, which term describes the situation that a defendant is guilty but there is no sufficient evidence for a guilty verdict?
The null hypothesis is the assumed price earlier than the take a look at is achieved. within our legal device, someone is presumed innocent of being against the law until tested responsible. therefore, the null speculation in a jury trial is the defendant is not guilty.
The decision determines the perfect regulation that must be carried out in the case and the jury reveals the facts within the case based on what's presented to them throughout the court cases. at the top of a tribulation, the choose instructs the jury on the relevant law.
However, many agree that it can be a piece volatile to rely on one person's choice. The decision is aware of all the evidence. At a tribulation, the judge in the end comes to a decision about what evidence might be admitted. The jury by no means sees untrustworthy, beside-the-point, or prejudicial evidence, as it's miles excluded by way of the choice.
Learn more about jury here https://brainly.com/question/4559559
#SPJ4
antitrust laws can reduce social welfare if they prevent mergers that would lower costs through more efficient joint production.
It does not provide an incentive for the monopolist to reduce its cost.
Antitrust laws can reduce social welfare if they prevent mergers that reduce costs through more efficient co-production. There is no incentive for monopolists to lower their costs. We have many competitors. Antitrust laws generally prohibit illegal mergers and business practices.
Leaving it to the courts to determine which are illegal based on the facts of each individual case. Antitrust laws protect competition. Free and open competition benefits consumers by bringing new and better products at lower prices. In a free market competing companies generally try to attract consumers by lowering prices and improving the quality of their products and services.
Learn more about Antitrust laws here:- https://brainly.com/question/971420
#SPJ4
In most circumstances, a supreme court is best described as a(n) ________ court.
a. uniform b. trial c. advisory d. appellate e. elected
The general jurisdiction trial courts of the federal court system are the United States district courts. Since they do not reside in Louisiana, Louisiana will not have broad jurisdiction over them.
Cases involving the U.S. government, the Constitution, federal statutes, or significant disputes between states or between the U.S. government and governments of concerned foreign states fall under the preview of federal courts that are concerned with general forms of jurisdiction. A general type of jurisdiction exists when a court in a specific state has jurisdiction over a defendant there, regardless of the nature of the claims made. However, if the state in question is claimed to have jurisdiction over a particular defendant because of the defendant's actions there that state itself has given rise to some claims. This would be regarded as a particular category of jurisdiction.
Learn more about Jurisdiction here:
https://brainly.com/question/28644932
#SPJ4
The EEOC regulations ensure that people who have served in the armed forces are reemployed in their civilian jobs upon return to service. A. True
B. False
The Code of Federal Regulations contains the EEOC regulations that carry out the federal laws prohibiting workplace discrimination (CFR).
What is the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's mission?Federal rules prohibiting discrimination against job applicants or employees based on their race, color, religion, sex (including pregnancy and conditions connected to it, gender identity, and sexual orientation), or nationality are enforced by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC).
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Quizlet enforces what laws?The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission is a federal administrative body with the power to enforce anti-discrimination rules in the workplace. The EEOC was established by Congress to carry out the 1964 Civil Rights Act.
To know more about EEOC visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/17272424
#SPJ4
steven recently purchased a meat-packing plant in which the employees are unionized. steven confesses that he knows almost nothing about labor law. in advising him about the national labor relations act, you should tell him that he is prohibited from engaging in all of the following except:
Steven confesses that he knows almost nothing about labor law. In advising him about the national labor relations act, you should tell him that he is prohibited from engaging in all of the following except protecting employees' right to strike.
Employees shall have the right to engage in such concerted activities for the purpose of collective bargaining or other mutual help or protection, according to Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act. Among the coordinated activities that this clause protects for employees are strikes.
Learn more on Law
https://brainly.com/question/29553499
#SPJ4
A foreign policy of human rights seeks to ensure which of the following? (choose all that apply)
A foreign policy of human rights seeks to ensure the following-
- that people have basic needs adequately met- that people live in freedom- that people can live in peaceA country's foreign policy or external policy is its targets and activities in terms of its interactions with other states, unions, and different political entities, whether bilaterally or through multilateral systems.
the primary goal of overseas coverage is to use international relations — or speaking, meeting, and making agreements — to solve international issues. they try to hold troubles from growing into conflicts that require army settlements. The President nearly always has the number one obligation for shaping foreign coverage. foreign coverage is the mechanism country wide governments use to guide their diplomatic interactions and relationships with other international locations. A country's overseas coverage displays its values and desires, and allows pressure its political and financial goals in the global arena.
Learn more about foreign policy here: https://brainly.com/question/9909886
#SPJ4
In July 1863, the union won two key victories that are often identified as turning points in the war. These victories occurred at:
Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, and Vicksburg, Mississippi.
In July 1863, the Union won two key victories that are often identified as turning points in the war. These victories occurred at:
Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, and Vicksburg, Mississippi.
The Union victory at Gettysburg (July 1-3, 1863) significantly boosted Northern morale just two months after the North's significant defeat at Chancellorsville, Virginia, in May 1863. The Confederacy was militarily divided in two by the fall of Vicksburg, Mississippi, on July 4, and Ulysses S. Following the Battle of Gettysburg, Union forces drove Confederates from the North while seizing the Confederate cities of Vicksburg and Port Hudson, giving them total control over the Mississippi River.
Learn more on Union
https://brainly.com/question/28347503
#SPJ4
Tort law is intended to compensate injured parties for losses resulting in harm from some _______ conduct by the _______.
Tort law is intended to compensate injured parties for losses resulting in harm from some unreasonable conduct by the tortfeasor.
Negligence suits do not entail purposeful behavior, as contrast to intentional torts. Negligence happens when someone doesn't behave carefully enough and hurts someone else as a result. A person must have an obligation to another person in this kind of situation.
An injury or wrong committed with or without force against another person or his property; a civil wrong that is a breach of a legal duty owed by the person who commits the tort to the victim of the tort.
To learn more about Negligence suits visit:https://brainly.com/question/15010405
#SPJ4
___(1)___ unconscionability occurs if a contract is entered into, or a term becomes part of the contract, because of a party's lack of knowledge or understanding of the contract or the terms. Facts that courts consider are: Is the print inconspicuous? Is the language ___(2)___ ? Did one party lack an opportunity to ask a question about the contract? Was there a ___(3)___ of bargaining power between the parties?(1) Procedural(2) unintelligible(3) disparity
Procedural unconscionability takes place if a settlement is entered into, or a time period becomes a part of the agreement, because of a celebration's lack of knowledge or understanding of the settlement or the terms. information that courts don't forget are: Is the print inconspicuous? If the language is unintelligible, is there a disparity of bargaining strength among the parties?
Unconscionable is an adjective that means without a conscience; unscrupulous; so unfair or unjust that it shocks the conscience. The adjective is frequently used in the context of agreement regulation for contracts that have grossly oppressive and unfair phrases. while a court unearths an agreement unconscionable, it's far unenforceable.
Unconscionability is a doctrine in contract regulation that describes phrases that are so extraordinarily unjust, or overwhelmingly one-sided in desire of the party who has the advanced bargaining energy, that they are opposite to the precise moral sense
Learn more about Unconscionable here
https://brainly.com/question/14426554
#SPJ4
sets a deadline for commencement of criminal actions.
The Statute of Limitations
The preliminary arraignment
The arraignment
The grand jury
Answer:
Hi, here's the answers
The Statute of Limitations is a legal deadline for the commencement of criminal actions. It sets the maximum time that the government has to bring criminal charges against an individual for a particular offense. The Statute of Limitations begins to run from the date that the crime was committed, and the length of time varies depending on the type of crime and the jurisdiction in which it was committed.The Statute of Limitations is a law that sets a deadline for the commencement of criminal actions. This means that if a crime is not prosecuted within the statute of limitations, the accused cannot be charged with the crime. So, The correct answer is The Statute of Limitations.
Depending on the crime and the state, the statute of limitations' duration varies. The normal statute of limitations for murder, for instance, is seven years, whereas the typical statute of limitations for theft is three years.
An important legal principle known as the Statute of Limitations shields people from prosecution for offenses that occurred in the past. It also aids in preventing the loss or destruction of evidence in a criminal prosecution over time.
The alternate choices are false. The grand jury hears evidence during the preliminary arraignment. The accused is presented with the charges at the arraignment and is given the opportunity to enter a plea. The grand jury is made up of ordinary people.
To know more about Limitations :
https://brainly.com/question/34194923
#SPJ2
If the red dot on the Fed's bullseye chart is located northwest or southeast of the center, then the Fed will ______.
a. automatically implement an expansionary monetary policy
b. have an unclear stance on monetary policy
c. have a clear stance on monetary policy
d. automatically implement a restrictive monetary policy
If the red dot on the Fed's bullseye chart is located northwest or southeast of the center, then the Fed will have a clear stance on monetary policy. Option C.
What is monetary policy?A nation's overall money supply is managed by monetary policy, which also aims to promote economic growth.
Interest rate changes and adjustments to bank reserve requirements are examples of monetary policy strategies.
It is conventional to categorize monetary policy as either expansionary or restrictive.
The Federal Reserve frequently employs the discount rate, open market operations, and reserve requirements as its three primary monetary policy tools.
Read more on monetary policy here: https://brainly.com/question/13926715
#SPJ1