You have read a passage from “The Growin’ of Paul Bunyan.” Think about how the story would be different if it were told from Johnny’s point of view. Write the story from the point of view of Johnny.
Paul Bunyan's friendship changed my life forever, teaching me the value of hard work, friendship, and stewardship of the land. I'll forever cherish our incredible adventures together.
From the first time I met Paul Bunyan, I knew my life was about to change. You see, I was just a young lad, working on my pa's farm, when this larger-than-life figure strode into town. Everyone was in awe of him, and I was no exception.
Paul took a liking to me right away. He saw potential in this scrawny kid and took me under his wing. We became fast friends, embarking on incredible adventures together. But it wasn't all fun and games. Paul had a job to do - to clear the land and make way for progress.
I watched in amazement as Paul wielded his gigantic ax, toppling trees with a single swing. He taught me how to handle a saw and an ax, and I soon became his trusted sidekick. Together, we transformed the wilderness into bustling cities and built highways that stretched for miles.
Paul's strength was unmatched, and he could outwork anyone. But he had a heart of gold. He cared for the environment and the creatures that lived in it. I remember the time he created the lakes by digging with his mighty shovel, ensuring that the animals had enough water to thrive.
As we traveled from place to place, Paul became a legend. People would gather to hear tales of his extraordinary feats. And I was right there, by his side, telling them our incredible stories.
Being with Paul Bunyan changed my life forever. He taught me the value of hard work, friendship, and stewardship of the land. The story of Paul Bunyan will forever be etched in my memory, and I'm honored to have been a part of it.
For more such questions on friendship
https://brainly.com/question/31234166
#SPJ8
What does Giselle learn about her parents' relationship from aunt Leslie? Explain using evidence from the text.
The context clues show that In Edwidge Danticat's acclaimed novel, "Untwine," Giselle gains insight into her parents' marriage through her Aunt Leslie. She candidly reveals that the union between Giselle's folks had been onerous prior to the mishap that cut short their lives.
How to explain the informationAunt Leslie imparts to her niece, "Your parents were having difficult times for some time, sweetheart. Problems over funds, your dad's work and your mom's illness frequently caused them to quarrel, however it wasn't out of a scarcity of love, but often sufficient passion simply is not enough." (Chapter 5).
This makes clear that even though the pair loved each other deeply, they sustained severe argumentation in their relationship before the tragedy took place.
Learn more about context clues on
https://brainly.com/question/11247029
#SPJ1
what is fate to you? Is fate good or bad? any stories about it? Thanks!
Answer:
I think fate is good and scary. Sometimes I think it's good because sometimes good things happen when fate's around. But It's scary because sometimes scary things happen when fate's around. So I would say it's good and a bit scary, and bad.
Answer:
good
Explanation:
because fate makes you believe in yourself
is the theme unfolding.? if so what is it? how do u know? if not what questions do you have? have the characters grown, changed or learned anything about themselves.? the fault in our stars
Suffering plays a significant role in the lives of the characters, as one might expect from a book about children dying of cancer.
A lot of physical and emotional suffering is experienced by Hazel, Augustus, and Isaac. Hazel is forced to go to the emergency department because the accumulation of fluid in her lungs prevents her from getting enough oxygen.
Isaac must deal with losing his remaining eye, leaving him blind and causing his lover to abandon their relationship. As Augustus's physical condition worsens to the point where he must take painkillers that are practically incomprehensible, he struggles from the knowledge that he will never be able to carry out any of the selfless deeds he had hoped to undertake with his life.
Learn more about Isaac Augustus here:
https://brainly.com/question/20035851
#SPJ1
change into reported speech Sophie said to me , "Do you like pizza ?"
Answer:
Sophie asked me if I like pizza
The author means that when people with power attempt to be fair they will be torn between two groups the people (critics) who feel that their choice is incorrect and the ones who feel that it is correct due to the situation. So kind of like the subject of bringing beheading back in the US many feel it is a horrible idea but many also feel it is correct. And for the second one, I am not sure because I have not read your article only the seventh paragraph.
The author is saying that when leaders try to make decisions that are fair, they are often in a difficult situation.
According to the author, leaders frequently find themselves in a tough predicament while attempting to make decisions that are fair. Their choices can easily be criticized as being unjust or biassed because they are continuously balancing the requirements of many parties.
They must also take into account the shifting public sentiment as well as the present political correctness norms. This comment elaborates on the article's main premise, which is that it can be challenging for leaders to make decisions that are fair and equal and that can easily cause controversy.
To learn more about predicament link is here
brainly.com/question/30157155
#SPJ1
The complete question is:
What does the author mean by the following quote from paragraph 7, and how does it develop the central ideas of the article?: “When leaders attempt to navigate the slippery slope of fairness, they will find themselves arbiter of public opinion and hostage to the politically correct.”
The author is saying that when leaders try to make decisions that are fair, they are often in a difficult situation.
According to the author, leaders frequently find themselves in a tough predicament while attempting to make decisions that are fair. Their choices can easily be criticized as being unjust or biassed because they are continuously balancing the requirements of many parties.
They must also take into account the shifting public sentiment as well as the present political correctness norms. This comment elaborates on the article's main premise, which is that it can be challenging for leaders to make decisions that are fair and equal and that can easily cause controversy.
To learn more about predicament link is here
brainly.com/question/30157155
#SPJ1
The complete question is:
What does the author mean by the following quote from paragraph 7, and how does it develop the central ideas of the article?: “When leaders attempt to navigate the slippery slope of fairness, they will find themselves arbiter of public opinion and hostage to the politically correct.”
Name:
Date:
Use the article "The Power of the Wind" to ans
1. How does Kyle feel about his family's move?
Wb.
Answer:
He's excited to learn more about what it's like in the "country" but he also doesn't like the feeling of leaving his friends.
List two preferences that you will include in the research project?( What is Cyber terrorism?)
Explanation:
Sure, here are two preferences that could be included in a research project on cyber terrorism:
1. Focus on a specific type of cyber terrorism: Cyber terrorism is a broad and complex topic, so narrowing the focus of the research project can make it more manageable and allow for a deeper exploration of a specific type of cyber terrorism. For example, the research project could focus on cyber terrorism that targets critical infrastructure, such as power grids or transportation systems.
2. Analyze the impact of cyber terrorism on national security: Cyber terrorism has the potential to cause significant damage to a country's national security. Therefore, the research project could aim to analyze the impact of cyber terrorism on national security, including the effectiveness of current measures in place to prevent and respond to cyber attacks.
"In habit for the chase arrayed" meaning
Answer: The phrase "In habit for the chase arrayed" is not a common expression in modern English, but it appears to refer to someone who is dressed or equipped for hunting or pursuing game.
The word "habit" in this context is an archaic term that refers to the clothing or attire worn for a particular activity or occasion. In this case, the "habit" would be the clothing worn for hunting, such as a hunting jacket, boots, or other gear.
The phrase "arrayed for the chase" suggests that the person is fully prepared and outfitted for hunting, indicating that they are likely skilled and experienced in this activity. Overall, the phrase implies a sense of readiness and purposefulness in pursuit of the hunt.
Explanation:
V
Revising Your Argument
How can you make your argument stronger?
Argumentative essays can be challenging to write because there are so many parts and pieces to an argument-it's easy to leave something out
Before you turn your essay in for a grade, spend some time making sure your argument makes sense and flows smoothly. The tabs below will
provide some hints and reminders to use as you revise.
Check Your Claim
Address Counter- Clarify Connections
Claims
<11 of 11
Activity
To be an argument, your essay must prove a pol r persuade readers to accept your perspective on an issue. Therefore, your claim should
present just one side of an issue, making a statement that some readers will oppose or need convincing in order to believe.
Which of these statements would work well as a claim in an argumentative essay? Click on the Show Me button to reveal the answer.
We can see here that an argumentative essay can be stronger if the writer adds more evidence using facts, statistics and data to buttress points. Writers can be creative too in their essays.
What is an argumentative essay?A rational and well-reasoned argument on a particular issue is presented in an argumentative essay, a style of academic writing.
An argumentative essay's objective is to persuade the reader to share the writer's point of view by presenting arguments and supporting data.
It is important that in order to write an argumentative essay, a writer should out research properly. This will help the writer gather information.
Learn more about argumentative essay on https://brainly.com/question/22740197
#SPJ1
How is the ending in “The Shrinking Banana” like the ending in “Ginger Disappears”?
We can see here that ending in “The Shrinking Banana” is like the ending in “Ginger Disappears” due to the way the two of the stories ended. We can also infer that the events that play were likely similar.
What is a story?A story is a description or account given to others of a sequence of real or imagined events or experiences.
Novels, short stories, plays, movies, and even oral storytelling are all examples of different types of stories. Characters are frequently introduced in stories and then confront various difficulties or conflicts that must be overcome.
We can see here that the plot of a story is actually seen in a way that it tells us how a story plays out.
Learn more about story on https://brainly.com/question/25336781
#SPJ1
I don't know its telling me to write this so like hi guys
Hi<3
(the things I write here are unimportant but just space fillers.)
what new statements and ideas about art did courbet espouse? in what ways is courbet’s the artist’s studio an example of realism, but not really "realistic"?
Courbet espoused the ideas of Realism, an art movement that aimed to depict everyday subjects and scenes as accurately as possible, rather than idealizing them.
He believed that art should represent the world as it truly is, reflecting the experiences and lives of ordinary people. In Courbet's painting "The Artist's Studio," he exemplifies the principles of Realism by portraying himself in the process of painting, surrounded by various figures representing different aspects of society. However, the painting is not entirely "realistic" in the sense that it's not a direct representation of reality. Instead, it serves as an allegory, using symbolic elements to convey deeper meanings about the artist's role in society and the importance of truth in art.
Overall, Courbet's ideas and "The Artist's Studio" embody Realism by emphasizing authenticity and the representation of everyday life while still incorporating symbolic elements that transcend pure visual accuracy.
To know more about Courbet, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/10687381
#SPJ11
The photo-realist painting "Phil" by Chuck Close utilizes scale to question the nature of _____.
a. Fame and notoriety
b. Portraiture
c. All of the above
Chuck Close's "Phil," a photo-realist painting, uses size to query the purpose of b.) Portraiture.
Describe Chuck Close's technique.
Close first added a grid to the photograph before transferring a proportional grid to his gigantic canvases to produce his paintings. Then, using an airbrush and a razor blade, he painted acrylic paint, replicating the exact shadings of each grid in the photograph.
What method does Chuck employ to produce lifelike accuracy in his portraits?To translate his subject from a photograph to a painting or print, Chuck Close employs a grid. He is able to decide on the nature and characteristics of the numerous colours he employs in his paintings by dissecting the bigger image into its smaller constituent elements.
To know more about Painted visit:
https://brainly.com/question/13429695
#SPJ1
2.4.1 Properties of the gradient (i) Experiment with the the desmos link given in section 2.3 above, trying out a variety of functions. For each function you choose, move the gradient along one or more of the level sets. What relationship do you observe between the gradient and the level sets of the function? (ii) Now, using any example you chose or the one provided, drag the gradient to a point on some level set, and zoom in to that point until the level set looks straight. What happens if we move slightly in the direction perpendicular to the gradient? (iii) Using the explanation you gave in the previous step, explain why the gradient points in the direction in which f(x, y) increases the fastest.
After experimenting with various functions on the Desmos platform and moving the gradient along level sets, you'll observe that the gradient is always perpendicular to the level sets of the function. This means that the gradient indicates the direction in which the function's value changes most rapidly.
When you zoom in on a point on a level set and the level set appears straight, if you move slightly in the direction perpendicular to the gradient, you'll notice that the function value changes the most compared to other directions. This demonstrates that the gradient direction indeed corresponds to the maximum rate of change of the function. Based on the previous observations, we can conclude that the gradient points in the direction in which f(x, y) increases the fastest because it is perpendicular to the level sets, and moving in this direction results in the maximum change in the function's value.
The gradient essentially captures the steepest slope of the function at a given point, and following this direction leads to the quickest increase in the function's value.
To know more about gradient, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/7193955
#SPJ11
T or F. A persuasive speech on banning the death penalty is an example of a question of policy.
Correct the faulty parallelism in these sentences.
1. To lick one's fingers and picking one's teeth in a restaurant are one way to get attention.
2. Our CEO claims his most valuable business assets are hitting a good backhand and membership at an exclusive golf club.
3. After an enjoyable dinner, I like to drink a cappuccino, a dark chocolate mint, and, occasionally, a good cigar.
4. Business travellers complain of long delays at airports, they are paying higher cost for services, and tighter restrictions on their freedom of movement.
To lick one's fingers and to pick one's teeth in a restaurant are one way to get attention. When the sentences in a series do not share the same grammatical structure, the parallelism is flawed.
Our CEO claims his most valuable business assets are his ability to hit a good backhand and his membership at an exclusive golf club.
Faulty parallelism is correct in the sentence after an enjoyable dinner, I like to drink a cappuccino, a dark chocolate mint, and occasionally, smoke a good cigar.
Business travelers complain of long delays at airports, high costs for services, and tighter restrictions on their freedom of movement.
Learn more about parallelism, here:
https://brainly.com/question/13857666
#SPJ1
Read the excerpt from The Red Badge of Courage. In the excerpt, Henry Fleming and the soldiers in his regiment are marching after performing poorly in a battle. Henry is expressing discontent about his commanding officers’ leadership and the lieutenant of Henry’s regiment expresses his feelings toward his men.
"Good Gawd,” the youth grumbled, "we’re always being chased around like rats! It makes me sick. Nobody seems to know where we go or why we go. We just get fired around from pillar to post and get licked here and get licked there, and nobody knows what it’s done for. . . . Now, I’d like to know what the eternal thunders we was marched into this woods for anyhow, unless it was to give the rebs a regular pot shot at us. We came in here and got our legs all tangled up in these cussed briars, and then we begin to fight and the rebs had an easy time of it. Don’t tell me it’s just like! I know better. It’s this derned old—”
The friend seemed jaded, but he interrupted his comrade with a voice of calm confidence. "It’ll turn out all right in th’ end,” he said.
"Oh, the devil it will! You always talk like a dog-hanged parson. Don’t tell me! I know--”
At this time there was an interposition by the savage-minded lieutenant, who was obliged to vent some of his inward dissatisfaction upon his men. "You boys shut right up! There no need ’a your wastin’ your breath in long-winded arguments about this an’ that an’ th’ other. You’ve been jawin’ like a lot ’a old hens. All you’ve got t’ do is to fight, an’ you’ll get plenty ’a that t’ do in about ten minutes. Less talkin’ an’ more fightin’ is what’s best for you boys. I never saw sech gabbling . . .”
He paused, ready to pounce upon any man who might have the temerity to reply. No words being said, he resumed his dignified pacing.
According to this excerpt, what is the outcome of Henry and his lieutenant’s differing perspectives?
The lieutenant gets into a physical altercation with the soldiers.
Henry and the other soldiers go silent.
Henry suddenly decides to join the rebels.
The lieutenant provides evidence that his strategy was correct.
Answer:
According to the excerpt, the outcome of Henry and his lieutenant’s differing perspectives is that the lieutenant intervenes and scolds the soldiers, telling them to stop arguing and focus on fighting. The soldiers, including Henry, go silent in response. Therefore, the correct answer is "Henry and the other soldiers go silent."
Explanation:
hope this helps:)
I think you -------(will/are going to this movie. (choose the correct answer)
"I think you are going to this movie" is the correct answer.
When we are making a prediction, we use 'going to'. If we have to use 'will', the question will be framed as "I think you __will_ go to this movie".
What does the root infer mean in the word inferior?
After the change of management, the store began to offer inferior products. Best answer to this sentence
fresh
better
small
below
Answer:
i think the word infer in the inferior is below
small have negativd mining too but infer refers quality of the product not quantity so it is below.
you learned that the author's message in "The Battle of Greasy Grass" is that the battle "was a watershed moment in the history of Indigenous-U.S. relations." You also learned that the message in "The Little Horn Massacre" is that the battle was a disaster for the United States. Since the two accounts have the same general purpose, explain how the perspective of the accounts helps communicate the different messages.
The difference in perspective in the two accounts helps to communicate the different messages. "The Battle of Greasy Grass" focuses on the significance of the battle for Indigenous-U.S. relations, and as such, emphasizes the impact of the battle on the Indigenous community. On the other hand, "The Little Horn Massacre" focuses on the United States' defeat and the negative consequences for the U.S. military. The two accounts have the same general purpose of discussing the battle, but the different perspectives highlight different aspects of the event and lead to different conclusions. The author's perspective influences the way in which they present the events and interpret their significance, which in turn helps communicate the different messages.
From the book "Neptune Project" chapters 1-6, find pieces of evidence that support the following statements:
1. Citizens have a fear of the outside world.
2. Citizens live in a dehumanized state.
3. Individuality and dissent are forbidden.
4. The natural world is banished and distrusted.
In order to raise awareness of current marine research and the value of protecting our ocean's resources and processes, Project NEPTUNE combines a long-term study of the physiological and psychological consequences of compression on the human body.
Nere has never understood why she feels so much more at ease and confident in the water than on land, but all makes sense when she finds out that she is one of a group of children who has been genetically modified to survive in the ocean without their knowledge.
Learn more about the Neptune Project here:
https://brainly.com/question/28422859
#SPJ1
Explain another way that the author could have resolved the conflict in this play. Describe whether or not it would be a good resolution based on the play’s plot events. Use at least two specific examples to support your response.
There are different ways authors can resolve conflicts in a play.
What were the ways?Compromise: The characters involved in the conflict may come to a compromise, where both parties give a little in order to resolve the issue.
Intervention: An external party, such as a mediator or a wise character, may intervene and help the conflicting parties to understand each other's perspective and come to a resolution.
Forgiveness: One or both parties may forgive each other for their actions, leading to the resolution of the conflict.
Confrontation: In some cases, a confrontation may be necessary for the conflict to be resolved. This could involve characters confronting each other directly or indirectly, leading to a better understanding of each other's perspectives.
Tragic ending: In some plays, conflicts may not be resolved, and the story ends tragically, leaving the audience to ponder the consequences of the conflict and the actions of the characters involved.
Ultimately, the approach an author takes to resolve a conflict in a play will depend on the context, characters, and themes of the story.
Learn more about conflicts on;
https://brainly.com/question/846617
#SPJ1
There are different ways authors can resolve conflicts in a play.
What were the ways?Compromise: The characters involved in the conflict may come to a compromise, where both parties give a little in order to resolve the issue.
Intervention: An external party, such as a mediator or a wise character, may intervene and help the conflicting parties to understand each other's perspective and come to a resolution.
Forgiveness: One or both parties may forgive each other for their actions, leading to the resolution of the conflict.
Confrontation: In some cases, a confrontation may be necessary for the conflict to be resolved. This could involve characters confronting each other directly or indirectly, leading to a better understanding of each other's perspectives.
Tragic ending: In some plays, conflicts may not be resolved, and the story ends tragically, leaving the audience to ponder the consequences of the conflict and the actions of the characters involved.
Ultimately, the approach an author takes to resolve a conflict in a play will depend on the context, characters, and themes of the story.
Learn more about conflicts on;
https://brainly.com/question/846617
#SPJ1
Select the correct answer.
Which detail best supports the idea that Walero may develop new products to sell in other markets?
A.
"James says Walero's products have been adopted by drivers in all levels of racing since they hit the market in 2015, including IndyCar and the European Rally Championship." (paragraph 12)
B.
"With the designs completed, the company wanted to ensure its product would work in a real-life situation. 'To do that, we had to run simulations,' said James." (paragraph 10)
C.
"Fiona James thought there might be some way to make the experience a bit more bearable. She believed the key might be in the specialized clothing worn by all race drivers: full-body undergarments." (paragraph 8)
D.
"'I've sold it to hikers who wanted to keep warm on a walk.' James said. 'I also sold Walero once to someone who was going through menopause to stabilize her temperature.'" (paragraph 14)
The detail that demonstrates Walero may branch out to other markets is experience of selling the product to hikers and someone going through menopause. This indicates market expansion potential and validates possibility of developing new products.
Explanation:The detail that best supports the idea that Walero may develop new products to sell in other markets is: 'I've sold it to hikers who wanted to keep warm on a walk.' James said. 'I also sold Walero once to someone who was going through menopause to stabilize her temperature.' (D) (paragraph 14).
This information shows James, the representative of Walero, is already exploring different markets by selling the product to hikers and a person dealing with menopause which suggests potential market expansion for Walero's products. In other words, this detail clearly indicates the feasibility of Walero developing new products to sell in various markets based on the diverse needs of its customers.
Learn more about Market Expansion here:https://brainly.com/question/33405609
#SPJ2
According to the passage, why did the
Columbian Exposition planners not want to
build a tower 500 feet taller than the Eiffel
Tower?
The planners of the Columbian Exposition did not intend to erect a skyscraper 500 feet taller than the Eiffel skyscraper.
Because they feared they would be obliged to utilise the idea that someone else had already used and they wanted to avoid utilising other people's ideas.
The Columbians intended to demonstrate that they were more evolved in architecture and technology than the Eiffel Tower, hence they did not want to construct a tower like the Eiffel Tower.
The Columbians also sought to demonstrate the excellence of their engineers and their innovation in coming up with new inventions, so they invented the Ferris wheel.
The World's Columbian Exposition (also known as the Chicago World's Fair) was a world's fair held in Chicago in 1893 to commemorate 400 years since Christopher Columbus' arrival in the New World in 1492.
To know more about Columbian exposition:
https://brainly.com/question/8202482
#SPJ4
A sentence with the word antagonist
This is writing btw
Answer: The antagonist of the play was a jealous and manipulative character who tried to sabotage the hero's plans.
-
What makes Torvald speed up the firing process of Krogstad?
In Henrik Ibsen's play, A Doll's House, Torvald Helmer is the husband of the play's protagonist, Nora. Krogstad is a man whom Nora borrowed money from in order to help her husband recover from an illness.
Krogstad works in Torvald's bank and is in danger of being fired due to some past wrongdoings. Torvald decides to fire Krogstad and replace him with Nora's friend, Mrs. Linde, who is in need of a job. There are several reasons why Torvald decides to speed up the firing process of Krogstad. Firstly, he is convinced that Krogstad is a dishonest man and that he cannot be trusted. Secondly, Torvald believes that he is acting in the best interests of the bank and his family by getting rid of Krogstad. Lastly, he is trying to assert his authority and demonstrate his power as the head of the household and the bank. Torvald's decision to fire Krogstad ultimately leads to a series of events that exposes the flaws in his character and the hypocrisy of his values. It is revealed that Torvald is not the virtuous and honorable man that he claims to be, and that his treatment of Krogstad is unjust and cruel. The play is a commentary on the societal expectations placed on men and women in the 19th century and the consequences of living a life based on appearances rather than truth.
Learn more about Torvald's character here:
https://brainly.com/question/30909043
#SPJ11
In a paragraph explain one reason why Okonkwo from the book “Things Fall Apart” is or is not a good person.
how does malala yousafzai speak on behalf of god
For the first time since the Taliban attempted to assassinate her in October, Malala Yousafzai, a Pakistani teenager who was wounded, has talked publicly about her rehabilitation in Britain. She claims that God has given her "a second life" because of the prayers of those who have supported her all around the world.
Before her most recent surgeries on Saturday, Malala spoke in a brief video, saying: "Today you can see that I am alive. I can see you, everyone else, and I can speak. Every day I'm getting better. Just as a result of people's prayers. Because everyone has prayed for me, including men, women, and children. And God has given me this new life as a result of these prayers, also a second life, this. I also wish to help. I desire to help the populace. I want every girl and child to have access to education.
Malala expressed her happiness that both of her operations had been successful in a different video she shot on Sunday, the day after them. It had been five hours since she had been asleep. I am feeling better, I can talk, I can walk a little bit, and it didn't seem like I had a large operation. She mentioned her "mission" to assist people once more.
Learn more about Malala Yousafzai here:
https://brainly.com/question/30585742
#SPJ1
“China’s Cultural Revolution” What does the phrase “work on the land” mean? Use two details from the article to support your response
Its claimed objective was to maintain Chinese communism by eradicating traditional and capitalist components from Chinese society.
What is China’s Cultural Revolution?The Cultural Revolution in China in the 1960s and 1970s brought about numerous significant developments. Mao Zedong, the powerful man who led the Chinese Communist Party, thought that the peasantry exemplified the best aspects of Chinese society. China had embraced communism in 1949 after the Soviet Union. This political system was designed to make life better for the proletariat—the working class. A number of Five-Year Plans were implemented by Mao in an effort to change the country.
A wide range of visual resources in many media were produced during the ten-year Cultural Revolution in China, from 1967 to 1977. These artworks, which were frequently characterised by straightforward, heroic images that catered to the masses, were effective political propaganda weapons.
To know more about Cultural Revolution, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/15267189
#SPJ1