A ball is rolled with a speed u along the floor. The speed remains constant from point A to point B, after which the speed changes as the ball rolls along the curved surface from B to C, finally becoming a projectile at point C.
(a) Determine the required speed u as a function of g, R, and x so that the ball will land at point A.
(b) Determine the required speed u in ft/s if the curved surface has a radius of R= 3 ft and x= 8 ft.
(c) For R= 3 ft, what is the minimum horizontal distance, xmin, for which a person can play this game if the ball must remain in contact with the curved surface until reaching point C?

a) It takes light approximately 4.33 ns to travel 1.30 mm in vacuum.
b) Light travels approximately 0.965 m in water during the time it travels 1.30 m in vacuum.
c) Light travels approximately 0.838 m in glass during the time it travels 1.30 m in vacuum.
d) Light travels approximately 0.663 m in cubic zirconia during the time it travels 1.30 m in vacuum.


a) To calculate the time, use the formula: time = distance / speed of light. In vacuum, the speed of light is approximately 299,792,458 m/s. So, time = (1.30 x 10^-3 m) / (299,792,458 m/s) ≈ 4.33 x 10^-9 s = 4.33 ns.

b) The refractive index of water is about 1.333. Speed of light in water = (speed of light in vacuum) / refractive index. Then, calculate the distance using the same formula as in (a).

c) The refractive index of glass is about 1.5. Repeat the same process as in (b) using the refractive index of glass.
d) The refractive index of cubic zirconia is about 2.15. Repeat the same process as in (b) using the refractive index of cubic zirconia.

To know more about speed of light click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/1555553#

#SPJ11

a.) The minimum kinetic energy needed for a 4.6×10^4-kg rocket to escape the Moon is 7.7×10^10 J.

The escape velocity of the Moon is approximately 2.4 km/s. Using the formula for kinetic energy (KE = 1/2 mv^2), where m is the mass of the rocket and v is the velocity needed to escape, we can calculate the kinetic energy required. Plugging in the given values, we get KE = 1/2 × 4.6×10^4 × (2.4×10^3)^2 = 7.7×10^10 J.

b.) The minimum kinetic energy needed for a 4.6×10^4-kg rocket to escape the Earth is 3.3×10^11 J.

The escape velocity of the Earth is approximately 11.2 km/s. Using the formula for kinetic energy (KE = 1/2 mv^2), where m is the mass of the rocket and v is the velocity needed to escape, we can calculate the kinetic energy required. Plugging in the given values, we get KE = 1/2 × 4.6×10^4 × (11.2×10^3)^2 = 3.3×10^11 J.

For more questions like Earth click the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/7981782

#SPJ11

Despite contacting the glacier sample boundary at an angle larger than the critical angle, the first incident laser beam is still refracted as the  Total internal refraction condition is not met.

Critical angle:  it is the angle of incidence where the angle of refraction becomes 90 degrees.

The Total internal reflection (TIR) is a phenomenon that takes place when the two conditions are fulfilled.

First: a light ray is traveling in the more dense medium and approaching the less-dense medium.

Second: the angle of incidence for the light ray is greater than the critical angle.

Here, the second condition is met, but the first condition is not met.

Hence, the first incident laser beam is still refracted as the Total internal refraction condition is not met.

To learn more about Total internal reflection :

https://brainly.com/question/13088998

#SPJ12

i) These equations yield the real and imaginary parts components of the n = 2, l = 1, m = -1, 0, and 1 orbitals: Zero imaginary parts.

Real part is proportional to cos(phi) for m = -1.

Part in the imagination: proportional to sin(phi)

m = 0:

Real part: z/r * sin(theta) proportional to

Zero imaginary parts

Real component is proportional to -sin(phi) when m = 1.

Part in the imagination: proportional to cos(phi)

Theta is the polar angle in this case, while phi is the azimuthal angle.

ii) The m = -1, 0, and 1 orbitals may be combined to create the more well-known 2p orbitals.

The m = -1 and m = 1 orbitals are linearly combined to form the 2p_x orbital, whereas the real portions of the m = 0 orbitals for positive and negative values of phi are linearly combined to form the 2p_z orbital. By extracting the hypothetical portion of the 2p_x orbital, the 2p_y orbital is obtained.

iii) The more well-known 2p orbitals will still be eigenvectors of the L_x, L_y, and L_z angular momentum operators.

Learn more about imaginary parts visit: brainly.com/question/5564133

#SPJ4

A surface integral is a powerful tool for computing the flux of a vector field.  In this case, the vector field is F = ˆr/|r|2 and the surface is a unit sphere centered at the origin.

To compute the flux of this vector field, we need to take the surface integral of the dot product of F and the normal vector of the surface. This can be expressed mathematically as the integral over the surface of F · n da.

Since the normal vector of a unit sphere is always the position vector, then the surface integral can be expressed as the integral over the surface of ˆr/|r|2 · ˆr da. This integral can be solved to yield the result that the flux of F leaving the unit sphere is 4π.

Know more about flux here

https://brainly.com/question/30858765#

#SPJ11

The magnetic flux through the coil is 0.5 Weber when the coil is perpendicular to the magnetic field and 0 Weber when parallel.

Magnetic flux is the product of the magnetic field and the area perpendicular to it. When the coil is perpendicular to the magnetic field, the maximum amount of magnetic flux passes through it, which is equal to the product of the magnetic field and the area of the face of the coil:

[tex]Φ = B x A = 2.0 T x 0.25 m² = 0.5[/tex]  Weber.

When the coil is parallel to the magnetic field, the magnetic flux passing through it is zero because the area of the face of the coil is parallel to the magnetic field, and hence, the component of the magnetic field perpendicular to the coil is zero.

Learn more about magnetic field here:

https://brainly.com/question/20431008

#SPJ11

The comfort-related properties of indoor air that climate sensors measure are III. Humidity, IV. Temperature, and V. Ventilation.

Climate sensors in indoor spaces measure various comfort-related properties to ensure a healthy and comfortable environment. These properties include:

Learn more about indoor air at

https://brainly.com/question/17137739

#SPJ11

Answer:150g

Explanation:

a) you can use formula: m=D.V

with: D= 1000kg/m³ and V=0,15m³

Okay, here are the steps to solve this problem:

(a) To accelerate the car from rest to v0/2, the required work is proportional to the square of the final velocity.

So W = k*v^2  (where k is some constant)

Setting v = v0/2, the work required is:

W = k*(v0/2)^2 = k*v0^2 / 4

Therefore, the work required is W0/4

(b) To accelerate the car from v0/2 to v0, the required work is:

W = k*v^2 (where v starts at v0/2)

Setting v = v0, the work required is:

W = k*(v0/2)^2 * 2 = k*v0^2 / 2  = W0/2

Therefore,

(a) W0/4

(b) W0/2

Does this make sense? Let me know if you have any other questions!

The capacitance of the capacitor is approximately 4.27 μF (microfarads).

Hi! To find the capacitance of a capacitor with a reactance of 65 ohms at a frequency of 57 Hz, you can use the formula for capacitive reactance:

Xc = 1 / (2 * π * f * C)

Where Xc is the capacitive reactance (65 ohms), f is the frequency (57 Hz), and C is the capacitance we want to find. Rearranging the formula to solve for capacitance:

C = 1 / (2 * π * f * Xc)

Now, plug in the given values:

C = 1 / (2 * π * 57 Hz * 65 ohms)

Calculate the result:

C ≈ 4.27 × 10^-6 F

So, the capacitance of the capacitor is approximately 4.27 μF (microfarads).

To know more about capacitance refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/28445252

#SPJ11

Speed is a measurement of how quickly an object's distance travelled changes. Speed is a scalar, which implies it has magnitude but no direction as a unit of measurement.

Thus, 1 / f =1 / s + 1 / s' -1 / 0.75 m

= 1 / 2 m + 1 / s' s'

= -0.54 m t

= -0.54 m / -1.9 m /s [ (V - 25) m / s ] t

= 2 m

The item was moving, changing speed as it went. This indicates that the object's speed is constantly changing rather than remaining constant throughout the entire journey.

When a moving object's speed changes over time, the average speed is computed as the total of all instantaneous speeds divided by the total number of different speeds.

Thus, Speed is a measurement of how quickly an object's distance travelled changes. Speed is a scalar, which implies it has magnitude but no direction as a unit of measurement.

Learn more about Speed, refer to the link:

https://brainly.com/question/17661499

#SPJ12

True. Over the past several years and until recently, the United States has indeed had lower unemployment rates than most European countries.

According to data from the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), the United States had an unemployment rate of 3.7% in 2019, while the average unemployment rate for OECD countries was 5.7%. This trend has remained consistent over the past several years, with the US unemployment rate consistently lower than the average for OECD countries since the early 2000s. In 2020, the US unemployment rate increased to 14.7%, but even this rate is still lower than the OECD average of 7.9%.

To learn more about unemployment rate click here https://brainly.com/question/30115084

#SPJ11

The power from the sun reaching Earth's upper atmosphere is 1.42 x 10³ kW/m².

To calculate the power per square meter reaching Earth's upper atmosphere from the Sun, we need to use the inverse square law.

The power output of the Sun is given as 4.00 x 10²⁶ W.

The distance between the Sun and the Earth varies throughout the year, but on average, it is about 149.6 million kilometers (9.3 x 10⁷ miles).

Using the formula for the surface area of a sphere, we can find the total surface area of the imaginary sphere with a radius equal to the distance between the Sun and the Earth.

The surface area of a sphere = 4πr²

The surface area of the sphere with a radius of 149.6 million km:

A = 4 x 3.1416 x (149.6 x 10⁹)²

A = 2.827 x 10²³ m²

Now, we can calculate the power per square meter reaching Earth's upper atmosphere by dividing the total power output of the Sun by the total surface area of the sphere.

Power per square meter = Power output of the Sun / Total surface area of the sphere

= (4.00 x 10²⁶ W) / (2.827 x 10²³ m²)

= 1.42 x 10³ kW/m²

Therefore, the power per square meter reaching Earth's upper atmosphere from the Sun is 1.42 x 10³ kW/m².

Learn more about inverse square law:

https://brainly.com/question/30404562

#SPJ11

When the rotation rate of a generator coil is doubled, the peak emf (electromotive force) will also double. This is due to the fact that the emf produced by the coil is directly proportional to the rate of change of magnetic flux through the coil.

When the coil rotates faster, the rate of change of magnetic flux through the coil also increases. This in turn leads to a higher emf being produced. The peak emf refers to the maximum voltage that is generated by the coil during one cycle. Doubling the rotation rate of the coil will therefore result in a corresponding increase in the peak emf.

It is important to note that the peak emf is not the same as the average emf, which is the total emf produced over one complete cycle divided by the time taken for that cycle. The peak emf is a measure of the maximum voltage generated by the coil, while the average emf is a measure of the overall voltage produced.

In summary, doubling the rotation rate of a generator coil will result in a doubling of the peak emf produced by the coil. This is due to the direct relationship between the rate of change of magnetic flux and the emf generated.

For more such questions on Peak EMF.

https://brainly.com/question/15175713#

#SPJ11

When the rotation rate of a generator coil is doubled, the peak emf (electromotive force) will also double. This is due to the fact that the emf produced by the coil is directly proportional to the rate of change of magnetic flux through the coil.

When the coil rotates faster, the rate of change of magnetic flux through the coil also increases. This in turn leads to a higher emf being produced. The peak emf refers to the maximum voltage that is generated by the coil during one cycle. Doubling the rotation rate of the coil will therefore result in a corresponding increase in the peak emf.

It is important to note that the peak emf is not the same as the average emf, which is the total emf produced over one complete cycle divided by the time taken for that cycle. The peak emf is a measure of the maximum voltage generated by the coil, while the average emf is a measure of the overall voltage produced.

In summary, doubling the rotation rate of a generator coil will result in a doubling of the peak emf produced by the coil. This is due to the direct relationship between the rate of change of magnetic flux and the emf generated.

For more such questions on Peak EMF.

https://brainly.com/question/15175713#

#SPJ11

The slope of the plot of spring potential energy versus the square of the displacement would be equal to the spring constant divided by 2 x (k/2).

The theoretical form for the spring potential energy is given by:

[tex]U = 1/2 * k * x^2[/tex]

Here U is the spring potential energy, k is the spring constant, and x is the displacement from the equilibrium position.

To plot the spring potential energy as a function of position, we would need to first calculate the spring constant k and then plug in values of x to the above equation to get the corresponding values of U. The plot of spring potential energy versus position would not be linear. It would be a parabolic curve, because the spring potential energy depends on the square of the displacement.

To make the plot linear, we could plot the spring potential energy versus the square of the displacement (i.e., U versus x^2). This would give us a straight line with slope equal to k/2. The y-intercept would be zero because U is zero at the equilibrium position.

To adjust position or spring potential energy to make this plot linear, we would need to take measurements of displacement and corresponding spring potential energy and then plot U versus x^2. We could then use a linear regression analysis to determine the slope of the line.

Learn more about potential energy visit: brainly.com/question/21175118

#SPJ4

Correct Question:

Finally, write down the theoretical form for the spring potential energy. How could we plot the spring potential energy (as determined from the answer to problem 2) as a function of position to easily show that this theoretical form holds? Will a plot of spring potential energy versus position be linear? How could we adjust position or spring potential energy to make this plot linear? What would be the slope of this plot? (The section "Using Linear Relationships to Make Graphs Clear" in the appendix "A Review of Graphs" will help you answer this question.)

When a light beam travels through a material with a refractive index different from that of vacuum or air, its wavelength and speed are altered. The refractive index of a material is the ratio of the speed of light in vacuum or air to the speed of light in that material.

In this case, the light beam has a wavelength of 340 nm in a material with a refractive index of 2.00. This means that the speed of light in the material is 1/2.00 = 0.5 times the speed of light in vacuum or air.

The relationship between the wavelength of light, its speed, and its frequency is given by the equation: c = λf where c is the speed of light, λ is the wavelength, and f is the frequency.

Since the speed of light in the material is 0.5 times the speed of light in air or vacuum, the frequency of the light remains the same, while its wavelength is reduced by a factor of 2.00: λ_material = λ_air/v_material = λ_air/2.00 Substituting the given value of λ_air = 340 nm, we get: λ_material = 170 nm

Therefore, the wavelength of the light beam in the material with a refractive index of 2.00 is 170 nm. This means that the light beam is strongly refracted when it enters the material, as it is bent towards the normal to the surface of the material due to the increase in its refractive index.

Know more about refractive index here:

https://brainly.com/question/29858469

#SPJ11

The number to be placed in the blank is 1/4.

No. of cups of soda, s = 4

No. of cups of fruit juices, j = 16

So,

The ratio of soda and juice can be given as,

s/j = 4/16

s/j = 1/4

Therefore,

s = j/4

s = (1/4)j

To learn more about proportions, click:

https://brainly.com/question/31548894

#SPJ1

The number to be placed in the blank is 1/4.

No. of cups of soda, s = 4

No. of cups of fruit juices, j = 16

So,

The ratio of soda and juice can be given as,

s/j = 4/16

s/j = 1/4

Therefore,

s = j/4

s = (1/4)j

To learn more about proportions, click:

https://brainly.com/question/31548894

#SPJ1

In 10 seconds, the wheel turns through an angle of approximately 2094.4 radians or 120000 degrees.

(a) To find the angular velocity in radians per second, first convert the given rate from revolutions per minute to radians per second. Recall that there are 2π radians in one revolution and 60 seconds in one minute.

Angular velocity (ω) = (2.0 × 10^3 rev/min) × (2π radians/rev) × (1 min/60 s)

Now, perform the calculations:

ω = (2.0 × 10^3) × (2π) × (1/60)
ω ≈ 209.44 radians/s

So, the angular velocity of the wheel is approximately 209.44 radians per second.

(b) To find the angle through which the wheel turns in 10 seconds, multiply the angular velocity by the time interval:

Angle (θ) = Angular velocity (ω) × Time (t)

θ = 209.44 radians/s × 10 s
θ ≈ 2094.4 radians

Now, to express this angle in degrees, recall that there are 180 degrees in π radians:

θ (degrees) = 2094.4 radians × (180°/π)

θ (degrees) ≈ 120000°

Therefore, the wheel rotates across an angle of around 2094.4 radians, or 120000 degrees, in 10 seconds.

Learn more about "angular velocity": https://brainly.com/question/20432894

#SPJ11

The velocity as a function of time is v(t) = 3t² - 30t + 72 ft/s

The velocity at time t, v(t), is the first derivative of the position function s(t) = t³ - 15t² + 72t.

To find v(t), differentiate s(t) with respect to t:

v(t) = ds/dt = 3t² - 30t + 72 ft/s

The velocity of the particle at time t is v(t) = 3t² - 30t + 72 ft/s.

To explain further, the position function s(t) represents the position of the particle at any given time t.

To find the velocity, we need to determine the rate of change of position with respect to time, which is given by the derivative of the position function.

By applying the power rule for differentiation, we find the derivative, which represents the velocity of the particle as a function of time. The velocity function v(t) is thus 3t² - 30t + 72 ft/s.

To know more about derivative click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/25324584#

#SPJ11

The requried, regardless of their individual properties or distances from Earth, all three stars have the same luminosity. Option D. is correct.

Luminosity refers to the total amount of energy emitted by a star per unit of time. It is a measure of the intrinsic brightness of a star, independent of its distance from us.

In the given scenario, we have three stars: tau cet, hip 87937, and hip 108870. The information states that these three stars have the same luminosity. This means that all three stars emit the same amount of energy per unit of time, making them equally bright.

Therefore, regardless of their individual properties or distances from Earth, all three stars have the same luminosity. This suggests that, in terms of brightness, there is no distinction among tau cet, hip 87937, and hip 108870.

Learn more about luminosity here:

https://brainly.com/question/13945214

#SPJ12

As a result, the individual is subject to the friction force for 0.765 seconds. Utilizing the work-energy concept and the conservation of momentum, we can find a solution to this issue.

First, we may calculate the total ultimate velocity of the passenger and the cart using the conservation of momentum. The overall momentum is preserved since there are no outside forces operating horizontally on the person-cart system.

[tex]m_p* v_p,i + m_c * v_c,i = (m_p + m_c) * v_f\\(60.0 kg)(4.00 m/s) + (120 kg)(0) = (60.0 kg + 120 kg) * v_f\\v_f = 2.00 m/s[/tex]

Next, we can use the work-energy principle to find the distance that the person slides on the cart before coming to rest. The work done by the friction force is equal to the change in kinetic energy of the person-cart system:

[tex]W_friction = \alpha (K)[/tex]

where W_friction is the work done by the friction force and ΔK is the change in kinetic energy of the person-cart system. The change in kinetic energy is:

[tex]K = (1/2) (m_p+ m_c) - (1/2) m_p * v_p*i^2[/tex]

Substituting the given values, we get:

[tex]K = (1/2) (60.0 kg + 120 kg) (2.00 m/s)^2 - (1/2) (60.0 kg) (4.00 m/s)^2\\K = -720 J[/tex]

The negative sign indicates that the kinetic energy of the person-cart system decreases as a result of the friction force.

The work done by the friction force is:

[tex]W_friction = f_k * d[/tex]

where f_k is the kinetic friction force and d is the distance that the person slides on the cart. The kinetic friction force is:

[tex]f_k = u_k * m_p * g[/tex]

where μ_k is the coefficient of kinetic friction, m_person is the mass of the person, and g is the acceleration due to gravity. Substituting the given values, we get:

[tex]f_k = (0.400) (60.0 kg) (9.81 m/s^2) =[/tex] 235.4 N

Substituting the values of ΔK and f_k, we get:

235.4 N * d = -720 J

d = -720 J / (235.4 N) = -3.06 m

The negative sign indicates that the displacement of the person is in the opposite direction of the friction force, which is expected since the person slides backward relative to the cart.

Finally, we can find the time that the friction force acts on the person by dividing the distance by the initial velocity of the person:

t = d / [tex]v_p,[/tex]

i = -3.06 m / 4.00 m/s = -0.765 s

t = 0.765 s

Learn more about friction force visit: brainly.com/question/23161460

#SPJ4

The worker must apply a horizontal force of approximately 19.78 N to maintain the motion of the box of mass 11.2 kg.

To find the horizontal force the worker must apply to maintain the motion of a box with a mass of 11.2 kg at a constant speed of 3.10 m/s, we need to consider the frictional force acting on the box.

Here are the steps to calculate the required force:

1. Calculate the gravitational force acting on the box: F_gravity = mass * g, where g = 9.81 m/s² (gravitational acceleration).

F_gravity = 11.2 kg * 9.81 m/s² = 109.872 N

2. Calculate the frictional force: F_friction = coefficient of kinetic friction * F_gravity

F_friction = 0.18 * 109.872 N = 19.77696 N

3. Since the box is moving at a constant speed, the applied force must be equal to the frictional force to maintain the motion.

F_applied = F_friction = 19.77696 N

So, the worker must apply a horizontal force of approximately 19.78 N to maintain the motion of the box.

For more information on mass, speed and force refer to https://brainly.in/question/23858054

#SPJ11

The pendulum would need to be approximately 18.964 meters long to double its period.

To find the period of a pendulum, we can use the formula:

T = 2π√(L/g)

where T is the period, L is the length of the pendulum, and g is the acceleration due to gravity.

Given that L = 4.74 m and g = 9.8 m/s², let's find the period T:

T = 2π√(4.74/9.8)
T ≈ 2π√(0.4837)
T ≈ 2π(0.6955)
T ≈ 4.372 s

So the period of the pendulum is approximately 4.372 seconds.

Now, to double the period, we have to find the new length L'. We can use the same formula but with the new period T':

T' = 2T
T' ≈ 2(4.372)
T' ≈ 8.744 s

Now, let's solve for L':

8.744 = 2π√(L'/9.8)
(8.744/2π)² = L'/9.8
1.932² = L'/9.8
L' ≈ 1.932² * 9.8
L' ≈ 18.964 m

To double the period, the pendulum would have to be approximately 18.964 meters long.

For more about pendulum:

https://brainly.com/question/29702798

#SPJ11

(A) 3600 rad/s^2 B) 42 revolutions.

(A) To find the angular acceleration of the crankshaft, we can use the formula:

angular acceleration = (final angular velocity - initial angular velocity) / time

Converting the final angular velocity to radians per second:

[tex]3600 rpm = 3600/60 = 60[/tex] revolutions per second

2π radians = 1 revolution

So, [tex]3600 rpm = (3600/60) x 2π = 120π[/tex] radians per second

Initial angular velocity is 0, and time is 2.1 seconds, so:

angular acceleration = [tex](120π - 0) / 2.1 = 57.14π rad/s^2[/tex]

(B) To find the number of revolutions made by the crankshaft, we can use the formula:

number of revolutions = final angular velocity x time / 2π

Substituting the values we have:

final angular velocity = 120π radians per second

time = 2.1 seconds

number of revolutions = [tex](120π x 2.1) / 2π = 120[/tex] revolutions

Learn more about crankshaft rpm here:

https://brainly.com/question/8424566

#SPJ11

The angle of reflection for the given scenario would be 72.0 degrees.

According to the law of reflection, the angle of incidence is equal to the angle of reflection. Therefore, the angle of reflection for the given scenario would also be 72.0 degrees. It is important to note that the angle of incidence is the angle between the incident beam of light and the normal to the surface, while the angle of reflection is the angle between the reflected beam of light and the normal to the surface. Additionally, the index of refraction of water affects the speed of light in water, but does not have a direct impact on the angles of incidence and reflection.

Overall, in this scenario, the angle of reflection would be the same as the angle of incidence, which is 72.0 degrees.

Learn more about reflection here:

https://brainly.com/question/30270479

#SPJ11

The correct answer is the wavelength of light falling on the double slits is approximately 1160 nm.

To find the wavelength of light in nm, we can use the formula for double-slit interference:

d * sin(θ) = m * λ

where:

- d is the distance between the slits (2.15 µm or 2.15 * 10^(-6) m)

- θ is the angle of the maximum (61.0°)

- m is the order of the maximum (3 for third-order)

- λ is the wavelength of light

Rearranging the formula to find λ:

λ = (d * sin(θ)) / m

Converting the angle to radians:

θ = 61.0° * (π / 180) ≈ 1.064 radians

Now, plug in the values:

λ = (2.15 * 10^(-6) m * sin(1.064)) / 3

Calculating the wavelength:

λ ≈ 1.16 * 10^(-6) m

Converting the wavelength to nm:

λ ≈ 1160 nm

To know more about wavelength here

https://brainly.com/question/31143857

#SPJ11

The speed with which a wave travels on the piano string is 153.4 m/s.

To find the speed of a wave on a string, we can use the formula v = √(T/μ), where v is the wave speed, T is the tension in the string, and μ is the mass per unit length. Given that the mass per unit length (μ) is 5.20 x 10^-3 kg/m and the tension (T) is 1200 N, we can plug these values into the formula:
1. Calculate the square root of the tension (T) divided by the mass per unit length (μ): √(1200 N / 5.20 x 10^-3 kg/m)
2. Solve the equation: √(1200 / 5.20 x 10^-3) ≈ √(230769.23) ≈ 153.4

Therefore, the speed with which a wave travels on the piano string is approximately 153.4 m/s.

Learn more about wave here:

https://brainly.com/question/25954805

#SPJ11

When the magnetic field weakens to 0.840 of its original value, a current of approximately 44.5 μA is needed to give full-scale deflection in the galvanometer.

To answer this question, we need to use the formula for the current (I) that produces a deflection in a galvanometer, which is given by:
I = kθ/B

Where k is sensitivity of the galvanometer, θ is deflection angle, and B is magnetic field strength.

In this case, we are given that the galvanometer needle deflects full scale for a 53.0-μA current, which means that:
[tex]I1 = 53.0 μA[/tex]

We are also told that the magnetic field weakens to 0.840 of its original value, which means that:
B2 = 0.840B1

To find the current that will give full-scale deflection with this weaker magnetic field, we can rearrange the formula as follows:
I2 = (B2/B1) (I1)

Substitute:
[tex]I2 = (0.840B1/B1) (53.0 μA)\\I2 = 44.5 μA[/tex]

Therefore, the current that will give full-scale deflection with the weaker magnetic field is 44.5 μA.

Learn more about galvanometer here:

https://brainly.com/question/17247518

#SPJ11

When the magnetic field weakens to 0.840 of its original value, a current of approximately 44.5 μA is needed to give full-scale deflection in the galvanometer.

To answer this question, we need to use the formula for the current (I) that produces a deflection in a galvanometer, which is given by:
I = kθ/B

Where k is sensitivity of the galvanometer, θ is deflection angle, and B is magnetic field strength.

In this case, we are given that the galvanometer needle deflects full scale for a 53.0-μA current, which means that:
[tex]I1 = 53.0 μA[/tex]

We are also told that the magnetic field weakens to 0.840 of its original value, which means that:
B2 = 0.840B1

To find the current that will give full-scale deflection with this weaker magnetic field, we can rearrange the formula as follows:
I2 = (B2/B1) (I1)

Substitute:
[tex]I2 = (0.840B1/B1) (53.0 μA)\\I2 = 44.5 μA[/tex]

Therefore, the current that will give full-scale deflection with the weaker magnetic field is 44.5 μA.

Learn more about galvanometer here:

https://brainly.com/question/17247518

#SPJ11

The ratio of the skater's final moment of inertia to his initial moment of inertia after pulling in his arms is 0.614.

To find the ratio of the skater's final moment of inertia to his initial moment of inertia after pulling in his arms, we can use the conservation of angular momentum principle. The formula is:

Initial angular momentum (L1) = Final angular momentum (L2)

where L1 = I1 × ω1 and L2 = I2 × ω2 (I is the moment of inertia and ω is the angular speed).

Given that the initial angular speed (ω1) is 3.34 rad/s and the final angular speed (ω2) is 5.44 rad/s, we can set up the equation:

I1 × ω1 = I2 × ω2

To find the ratio I2/I1, divide both sides by I1 × ω2:

I2/I1 = ω1/ω2 = 3.34 rad/s / 5.44 rad/s

I2/I1 ≈ 0.614

So the ratio of the skater's final moment of inertia to his initial moment of inertia is approximately 0.614.

Learn more about moment of inertia: https://brainly.com/question/15246709

#SPJ11

you have a 9.00-V battery, a 2.6-μF capacitor, and a 7.85-μF capacitor. In series, A) Total charge stored = 1.76 * 10⁻⁵ C; B) Energy stored=  7.9 * 10⁻⁵ J; In parallel, C) Total charge stored= 94.05 * 10⁻⁶ C; D) Energy stored= 4.23 * 10⁻⁴ J

Given V= 9V

C1 = 2.6 μF

C2 = 7.85 μF

If capacitors are connected in series:

then, Ceq = (C1 * C2)/ C1+ C2 = (2.6 * 7.85)/ (2.6 + 7.85) = 1.953  μF

A) Q = CV = 1.953  μF * 9V = 17.578  μC = 1.76 * 10⁻⁵ C

B)  Energy stored = U = 1/2 CV²

or, U= 1/2 (1.953 * 10⁻⁶ F) * (9V)² = 7.9 * 10⁻⁵ J

If capacitors are conncted in parallel,

Ceq = C1+ C2 = (2.6 + 7.85) μF = 10.45 μF

C) Here, Q= CV = 10.45 μF * 9V = 94.05 * 10⁻⁶ C

D) Energy stored = U = 1/2 CV²

or, U= 1/2 (10.45* 10⁻⁶ ) (9)² = 4.23 * 10⁻⁴ J

To know more about capacitors here:

https://brainly.com/question/17176550#

#SPJ11