Answer: Full version Editorial 1: Why the United States Should Have Invaded Iraq
The United States made the right decision to invade Iraq. Saddam Hussein had a history of aggression towards neighboring countries and had shown a willingness to use chemical weapons against his own people. The United States had reason to believe that he was developing weapons of mass destruction, which posed a threat not only to the Middle East but to the entire world. The preemptive strike was necessary to prevent a potential attack on the United States or its allies.
In addition, the United States had exhausted all other options, including diplomatic efforts and economic sanctions. The invasion was a last resort to protect American interests and ensure global security. The U.S. military was well-equipped to defeat the Iraqi military, and the strategy for rebuilding the Iraqi government and economy was well thought out.
The American public was asked to support the war effort by making sacrifices, including paying higher taxes and accepting increased security measures. The human and economic costs of the war were significant, but they were necessary to ensure global security and prevent the development and use of weapons of mass destruction.
Editorial 2: Why the United States Should Not Have Invaded Iraq
The United States should not have invaded Iraq. The stated purpose of the invasion, to find and destroy weapons of mass destruction, was not supported by the available evidence. The United States initiated a preemptive war without clear evidence of an imminent threat, which violated international law and damaged the reputation of the United States.
The United States had engaged in preemptive wars in the past, but those were different circumstances. In the case of Iraq, there were viable alternatives to invasion, including continued diplomatic efforts and economic sanctions.
The assumption that the U.S. military could easily defeat the Iraqi military was misguided. The strategy for rebuilding the Iraqi government and economy was poorly planned, and the United States struggled to stabilize the country after the fall of Saddam Hussein.
The human cost of the war was significant, with many Iraqi civilians and American soldiers losing their lives or being injured. The economic impact of the war was also substantial, with billions of dollars spent on the war effort. The invasion damaged relations between the United States and its traditional allies and strained relations with other nations in the Middle East.
In conclusion, the United States should not have invaded Iraq. The stated purpose of the invasion was not supported by the evidence, and there were viable alternatives to invasion. The human and economic costs of the war were significant, and the invasion damaged global security and relations between nations.
Explanation:
Shorter version of Editorial 1: Why the United States Should Have Invaded Iraq
The United States had good reasons to invade Iraq. Saddam Hussein had a history of aggression and was believed to be developing weapons of mass destruction. The U.S. had tried other options and believed the preemptive strike was necessary for global security. The American public was asked to support the war effort, and the human and economic costs were necessary to prevent potential threats.
Shorter version of Editorial 2: Why the United States Should Not Have Invaded Iraq
The United States should not have invaded Iraq because the stated purpose of finding weapons of mass destruction was not supported by evidence, and there were viable alternatives to invasion. The assumption that the U.S. military could easily defeat the Iraqi military was misguided, and the strategy for rebuilding Iraq was poorly planned. The human and economic costs of the war were significant, and it damaged global security and relations between nations.
From Truman’s perspective, why might the events in Korea have consequences elsewhere in the Pacific region?
who was the founder of the ottoman empier
Answer:
The founder was Osman Gazi
hope this helps
Question 1 of 19
By the end of 1863, the Union wanted to:
A. capture the Confederate president Jefferson Davis.
B. capture all Confederate troops in the North.
C. capture all Confederate spies in the North.
D. capture the Confederate capital of Richmond.
SUBMIT
Option (d), The Union sought to take control of Richmond, the Confederate capital, by the end of 1863.
Richmond was on the radar of the Union, but why?Regardless of its political stance, the Confederate States Army would have protected it at all costs since it was a vital supply and armament source for the war effort as well as the terminus of five railways.
What did the Confederates manage to do in 1863?Fighting broke out between Union and Confederate forces in Chancellorsville, Virginia, south of Fredericksburg, in late April and early May 1863. The Rebel fighters were attacked by an army of more than 60,000 warriors from the Rebels. Confederate troops lost a lot of men but nevertheless prevailed in the conflict.
By prolonging the Civil War until 1863, what goal was achieved by the Union?The Union's military plan extended beyond simple reunification and included the abolition of slavery as a component. The South had to be invaded by the Union, who had to subsequently defeat the Confederate armies and seize control of the region to bring about emancipation. Early in the Civil War, the conflict's political goals were mostly constrained to military ones.
Learn more about abolition of slavery: https://brainly.com/question/30675047
#SPJ1
The complete question is:
By the end of 1863, the Union wanted to:
A. capture the Confederate president Jefferson Davis.
B. capture all Confederate troops in the North.
C. capture all Confederate spies in the North.
D. capture the Confederate capital of Richmond.
What are the ramifications of Pakistan's support of the Taliban during the cold War?
Pakistan did not support the Taliban during the Cold War, but it did provide support to mujahideen groups that were fighting against the Soviet Union in Afghanistan during the 1980s. The support provided by Pakistan and other countries to the mujahideen had both short-term and long-term ramifications.
In the short term, the support provided by Pakistan and other countries helped the mujahideen to inflict significant losses on the Soviet Union and its Afghan allies, ultimately leading to the withdrawal of Soviet forces from Afghanistan in 1989.
However, in the long term, the support for the mujahideen had unintended consequences, including the rise of extremist groups like the Taliban and Al-Qaeda. The Taliban emerged in the 1990s as a powerful force that was able to take control of Afghanistan and establish a repressive regime. Al-Qaeda, which had originally been formed to fight the Soviet Union in Afghanistan, later became a global terrorist organization that carried out attacks against the United States and other countries.
Pakistan's support for the mujahideen also had domestic ramifications. The influx of weapons and fighters into Pakistan helped to fuel sectarian and ethnic conflicts within the country, and some of the mujahideen fighters who had received training and support from Pakistan went on to become leaders of extremist groups that continue to pose a threat to Pakistan today.
Please help it’s due today!!!
America has used different foreign policies throughout its history, including isolationism, imperialism, internationalism, containment, and interventionism.
What is the Foreign Policy about?According to a report by the Council on Foreign Relations, "U.S. Foreign Policy: Back to Basics," American foreign policy has evolved over time in response to domestic and international factors, such as the country's geographic position, economic interests, and ideological beliefs. For instance, after World War II, the U.S. adopted a policy of containment to counter Soviet expansionism, which led to the Cold War. In contrast, during the 1990s, the U.S. pursued a policy of engagement and enlargement, seeking to promote democracy and human rights worldwide.
However, some critics argue that American foreign policy has been inconsistent and sometimes ineffective, as illustrated by the Vietnam War and the Iraq War.
Regarding what kind of foreign policy America should use, this is a matter of debate and depends on various factors, such as national security, economic interests, and moral values. A report by the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, "American Foreign Policy for the 21st Century," argues that the U.S. should pursue a strategy of "responsible sovereignty," which emphasizes cooperation with other nations, respect for international law, and promotion of global public goods, such as climate change mitigation and pandemic response.
The report suggests that this approach would advance American interests while also contributing to global stability and prosperity. Other scholars argue for different approaches, such as a return to isolationism or a more assertive posture towards rivals like China and Russia. Ultimately, the choice of foreign policy depends on the political and social context of the U.S. and the world, as well as on the values and priorities of American citizens and policymakers.
Read more about Foreign Policy here:
https://brainly.com/question/2196996
#SPJ1
See text below
VOCABULARY: Foreign Policy, Isolationism, Neutrality, Imperialism, Containment, Internationalism, Expansionism, Interventionism, Spanish- American War, Savage, Partisan, Self-Government, Policy, Truman Doctrine, Communism, Cold War, Berlin Airlift, Berlin Wall, Vietnam War, Vietcong, Kuwait, Saddam Hussein
1. What kind of foreign policy has America used? To what extent was this correct? Reference at least two sources and clearly explain how American foreign policy has changed over time.
Evidence
(4/4 Scale)
1 appropriately and consistently cited evidence from 3 or more of the most relevant provided sources that synthesize learning
(3/4 Scale)
I appropriately and consistency te evidence from at least of the most relevant provided sources.
(2/4 Scale)
I cite three or less of the provided sources, or I am inconsillant or incorrect (some textual evidence, some of which may be less relevant)
(1/4 Scale)
1 use evidence from one or less sources to support my dad 27 the evidence doesn't support the clam (minimal, occasional evidence which is generally invalid or irrelevant).
2. What kind of foreign policy do you believe America should use? Why should others agree with you? Reference at least one source and clearly explain how the source agrees with your claim.
CAS-SS20-GR.HS-S.
1-GLE.2 Key concepts of continuity and change, cause and effect, complexity, unity and diversity, and significant ideas in the United States from Reconstruction to the present.
(4/4 Scale)I state a claim that focuses on an accurate and relevant understanding of which foreign policy ideology (neutrality, imperialism, containment, and internationalism) would be best for Moderni American society.
I made interesting and original connections to current events that support my thesis
(3/4 Scale)
I state a claim that accurately focuses on which foreign policy ideology (neutrality, imperialism, containment, and internationalism) would be best for Modern American society.
I make connections to various current events that support my thesis.
(2/4 Scale)
I state a claim that focuses on which foreign policy ideology (neutrality, imperialism, containment, and internationalism) would be best
for Modem American society, but it may not show clear understanding.
I craft a stance that is somewhat reasonable about which type of foreign policy would be best for modern America but there may be some inaccuracies or inconsistencies in my reasoning.
(1/4 Scale)
I do not yet state a clear claim or my understanding of the different ideologies related to foreign policy (neutrality, imperialism,
containment, and internationalism) is incorrect
I do not yet craft a stance about which policy would be best for modern America and/or my information is not correct.
Which society experienced unique challenges with labor during the transition from slavery to freedom, in contrast to other major societies?
Answer:
African American Society
Explanation:
The society that experienced unique challenges with labor during the transition from slavery to freedom was the African American society in the United States.
help me please i need your help please
This fill in the gap prompt about history of Europe is given as follows.
What is the completed Sentence?02. For centuries mst people in Europe had lived in the COUNTRYSIDE.
By the 1800s, more and more people lived in CITIES where they had come to find jobs.
03. Areas of poverty and poor housing in European cities are called SLUMS. a person in a city could expect to live FEWER years. In the countryside, a person could expect to live LONGER years.
04. Working conditions were also bad. The average worker spent LONG hours a day on the job, days a week. Many workers were killed or seriously injured in accidents.
05. What social class of people did skilled workers, professionals, business people, and wealthy farmers make up the UPPER CLASS.
Learn more about Europe at:
https://brainly.com/question/1068709
#SPJ1
based on this telegraph, how were relations between Austria Hungary and Romania during this time
Explanation:
based on this telegraph, how were relations between Austria Hungary and Romania during this time
Compare the treatment of slaves before European involvement and after European involvement.
Answer:
The treatment of slaves varied depending on the period and the region in question, so it is difficult to provide a comprehensive answer. However, in general, slavery existed in many societies throughout history, including in Africa, Europe, Asia, and the Americas, before the arrival of Europeans in the Americas.
Explanation:
The treatment of slaves varied depending on the period and the region in question, so it is difficult to provide a comprehensive answer. However, in general, slavery existed in many societies throughout history, including in Africa, Europe, Asia, and the Americas, before the arrival of Europeans in the Americas.
Before European involvement in the African slave trade, slavery in Africa was a complex institution with various forms and purposes. In some societies, slaves were treated as members of the family and could even rise to positions of power and influence. In other societies, slaves were used for manual labor and treated harshly. In many cases, slaves were acquired through warfare, debt, or as punishment for crimes.
European involvement in the African slave trade began in the 15th century, and over the following centuries, millions of Africans were forcibly taken from their homes and transported across the Atlantic to the Americas to work as slaves on plantations. The transatlantic slave trade was characterized by extreme brutality, as slaves were treated as property and subjected to inhumane conditions, forced labor, and physical and sexual abuse. Slaves were often forced to work on sugar, tobacco, and cotton plantations, and many died from overwork, disease, or mistreatment.
In short, while slavery existed in many societies throughout history, the European involvement in the African slave trade led to a particularly brutal form of slavery that treated human beings as property and subjected them to extreme cruelty and exploitation.
What did Prohibition Accomplish? check all that apply.
Prohibition Accomplish made the sale of alcohol illegal in the United States.
The option (A) is correct.
With the eighteenth amendment done to the Constitution in 1917, the assembling, dealing, and transportation inside and from the US were precluded by regulation. This correction became effective in 1919. The US Congress accepted that the disallowance of liquor would get an adjustment of the general way of behaving of the multitude of Americans and the wrongdoing and debasement rates would descend.
As an impact, the public authority use on the support of detainment facilities, and the detainees would likewise descend. This restriction must be reclaimed as it acquired famous objection against its execution.
Learn more about Prohibition Accomplish:
https://brainly.com/question/20374739
#SPJ1
This question is not complete, Here I am attaching the complete question:
What did Prohibition accomplish? Check all that apply.
(A) It made the sale of alcohol illegal in the United States.
(B) It directly promoted women’s rights and equality.
(C) It brought about the repeal of the 18th Amendment.
(D) It helped bring about the end of the temperance movement.
(E) It led to an increase in crime and corruption across the country.
(F) It resulted in the establishment of speakeasies and bootlegging.
What was the Union's (North) war plan to beat the Confederate States
(South)?
Answer:
Fully blockade all Southern coasts. This strategy, known as the Anaconda Plan, would eliminate the possibility of Confederate help from abroad. Control the Mississippi River.
How does federalism limit the power of the national, or federal, government in the United States?
Answer:
Federalism limits government by creating two sovereign powers—the national government and state governments—thereby restraining the influence of both. Separation of powers imposes internal limits by dividing government against itself, giving different branches separate functions and forcing them to share power.
Many of Georgia's courts are known as Trial Courts. Which trial court is the court where judges can only be appointed?
Answer: Superior
Explanation:
As known as 3 branches help each other they mention the superior.
please write a minimum of 8 sentences explaining why the source shown in the image goes against the new deal.
Answer: Brainliest?
Explanation:
The source shown in the image goes against the New Deal for several reasons:
The source depicts a man labeled as "big business" standing over a small man labeled as "taxpayer." This image implies that big business has more power and influence than the common taxpayer, which goes against the New Deal's efforts to redistribute power and wealth more evenly throughout society.
The caption "Can you spare a dime?" implies that the small taxpayer is asking for a handout from big business, which goes against the New Deal's emphasis on providing social welfare programs such as Social Security, unemployment insurance, and minimum wage laws to protect workers and ensure they receive fair pay.
The image's use of the word "dole" also implies that the small taxpayer is asking for a handout, which goes against the New Deal's goal of providing a safety net for those who are struggling and need assistance.
The image's depiction of big business as a large, menacing figure and the small taxpayer as a weak and powerless figure reinforces the idea that the wealthy and powerful are the only ones who can provide assistance, which goes against the New Deal's emphasis on government intervention and public programs to address social and economic issues.
The image also implies that the government is not capable of providing assistance to the small taxpayer, which goes against the New Deal's efforts to expand the role of government in providing social welfare programs and regulating the economy.
The use of the term "cure-all" suggests that the New Deal's programs were seen as a panacea that could solve all social and economic problems, which is a misrepresentation of the New Deal's goals and achievements.
The image implies that the New Deal's programs were ineffective and a waste of taxpayer money, which is a misrepresentation of the New Deal's successes in providing relief, recovery, and reform during the Great Depression.
Overall, the image reinforces negative stereotypes about government intervention and social welfare programs, which goes against the New Deal's efforts to promote social and economic justice for all Americans.
How do the different climates influence land us in India
India is suffering from some of the most severe effects of the climate catastrophe, from heat waves decimating crop output to torrential rains producing flooding that submerges entire communities. India only contributes about 7% of global emissions while making up little more than 17% of the world's population.
What about climate?India can be broken down into many climate-related regions. The majority of the interior of the country experiences a tropical climate that is a mix of wet and dry conditions. A humid tropical climate prevails in the northern regions, whereas wet tropical regions can be found on the western coast. India has four different climatic categories. These include the winter season (cold weather season), the summer season (hot weather season), the rainy season (southwest monsoon season), and the retreating monsoon season. This category includes the tropical monsoon climate and the tropical wet and dry climate, both of which are found in India.To learn more about climate, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/7160472
How might Kennedy and Khrushchev's different objectives help explain how both men could look at the same historical event (the Bay of Pigs invasion) and yet come to such opposite conclusions about it?
Answer:
President John F. Kennedy and Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev had vastly different objectives and priorities, which influenced their interpretations of the Bay of Pigs invasion.
Kennedy's primary objective was to prevent the spread of communism and to establish the United States as the world leader in the fight against it. He believed that the Bay of Pigs invasion would help achieve this objective by overthrowing the communist regime of Fidel Castro in Cuba. However, the invasion failed, and Kennedy's administration was widely criticized for its role in the operation.
Khrushchev, on the other hand, saw the Bay of Pigs invasion as an opportunity to strengthen Soviet influence in Cuba and undermine American attempts to remove Castro from power. The Soviet Union had been providing military and economic assistance to Cuba, and Khrushchev saw the failed invasion as evidence that the United States was unable to carry out its objectives in the region.
As a result of their different objectives, Kennedy and Khrushchev had very different interpretations of the Bay of Pigs invasion. Kennedy viewed it as a setback in the fight against communism, while Khrushchev saw it as a victory for the Soviet Union and a sign of American weakness. This demonstrates how different perspectives and objectives can lead to vastly different interpretations of the same historical event.
Why would a wealthy business owner oppose socialism?
A wealthy business owner may oppose socialism because socialism is a political and economic system that aims to redistribute wealth and resources more equally among all members of society.
This means that under a socialist system, individuals or businesses that have accumulated significant wealth and resources may be required to share or give up some of their wealth to support the needs of the broader community. As a result, a wealthy business owner who has worked hard to accumulate their wealth may feel that socialism undermines their efforts and diminishes the incentive to work hard and innovate. Additionally, some business owners may believe that socialism leads to inefficiencies, stifles innovation and creativity, and ultimately harms economic growth.
Furthermore, some wealthy business owners may view socialism as a threat to their individual freedoms and property rights, as it often involves increased government intervention in the economy and greater regulation of private enterprise. They may argue that a free market system with minimal government intervention is a better approach to promoting economic growth and individual liberty.
Learn more about resources here:
https://brainly.com/question/28605667
#SPJ11
Which difference do you notice between the territory under the tang dynasty and the later song dynasty
There are several differences between the territories under the Tang and Song dynasties in China:
Size and Boundaries: The Tang dynasty controlled a much larger territory than the Song dynasty. At its height, the Tang empire included not only China but also parts of Central Asia, Korea, and Vietnam. In contrast, the Song dynasty was limited to China proper and did not extend beyond its current boundaries.
Capital City: The Tang dynasty had its capital in Chang'an, which was one of the largest cities in the world at the time. The Song dynasty, on the other hand, had its capital in Kaifeng, which was a smaller city and located further to the east.
Economy: The Song dynasty had a more prosperous economy compared to the Tang dynasty. During the Song dynasty, there was a significant growth in commerce, trade, and agriculture. This was facilitated by the development of the Grand Canal, which connected the Yellow River to the Yangtze River, making transportation of goods easier.
Military Power: The Tang dynasty had a stronger military than the Song dynasty. During the Tang dynasty, the empire had a powerful army that was instrumental in expanding its territories. In contrast, the Song dynasty faced significant military threats from the Khitan and Jurchen tribes, which led to the loss of some territories.
Cultural and Intellectual Achievements: Both dynasties made significant contributions to Chinese culture and intellectual development. However, the Tang dynasty is often regarded as a "Golden Age" of Chinese literature, poetry, and art. In contrast, the Song dynasty is known for its contributions to science and technology, including the development of movable type printing, gunpowder, and the compass.
Overall, the Tang and Song dynasties had significant differences in terms of territory, capital city, economy, military power, and cultural achievements.
In a wealthy ________ family in ________, the body of a deceased relative stays at the family home until it is time for cremation. Before cremation, the body will be washed by family members.A.) Jewish; IsraelB.) Catholic; RomaniaC.) Lutheran; AustriaD.) Hindu; India
Answer:
D- Hindu; India
Explanation:
What was Winston Churchill describing as an “iron curtain” falling across Europe?
A. the establishment of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO)
B. the industrialization of Western Europe under the Marshall Plan
C. the creation of the Declaration of Liberated Europe
D. the establishment of pro-Soviet governments in Eastern Europe
Answer: The answer is D, the establishment of pro-Soviet governments in Eastern Europe.
Explanation: Winston Churchill was describing the establishment of pro-Soviet governments in Eastern Europe as an "iron curtain" falling across Europe. This term was used in a speech delivered by Churchill in Fulton, Missouri, on March 5, 1946, in which he warned of the dangers posed by Soviet expansionism and the need for a strong Western response to this threat. Churchill's speech marked the beginning of the Cold War and became a famous and influential call to arms against Soviet aggression.
what is a salon in history
A salon is a gathering of people held by a host. These gatherings often consciously followed Horace's definition of the aims of poetry, "either to please or to educate" (Latin: aut delectare aut prodesse).
Why were the Elections of 2000 and 2008 significant?
Answer:
What is the historical significance of the 2008 presidential election?Obama became the first African American to be elected to the presidency, as well as being only the third sitting United States senator elected president, joining Warren G. Harding and John F. Kennedy.
What is the historical significance of the 2000 presidential election?It was the fourth of five American presidential elections, and the first since 1888, in which the winning candidate lost the popular vote, and is considered one of the closest U.S. presidential elections, with long-standing controversy about the result.
sister exchange, where the sister of the groom married the brother of the bride in a double ceremony, was the ideal marriage arrangement for owens valley paiute (True or False)
False.sister exchange, where the sister of the groom married the brother of the bride in a double ceremony, was the not the ideal marriage arrangement for owens valley paiute
Sister exchange was a traditional marriage arrangement among some Native American groups, but it was not specific to the Owens Valley Paiute. Additionally, the practice varied widely among different tribes and was not universally accepted or practiced. In sister exchange, two men would marry two women who were sisters, and the two women would move into the households of their respective husbands. This practice helped to establish and reinforce social ties between families and communities, and it also helped to ensure that women were provided for in the event that their husbands died or were unable to provide for them. However, as with any cultural practice, it is important to recognize that sister exchange was not universally practiced or viewed as ideal by all members of the Owens Valley Paiute or any other group that may have engaged in the practice.
Learn more about Sister exchange here:
https://brainly.com/question/10438779
#SPJ11
ailure to report background changes within 30 days as required under section 1729.2 of the California insurance code could subject a license or applicant to
could subject a licensee or applicant to formal disciplinary action, including a fine, suspension, denial, restriction, or revocation of the license.
Failure to report background changes within 30 days, as required by section 1729.2 of the California Insurance Code, may lead to disciplinary actions, such as fines or license suspension.
Not reporting significant background changes within the stipulated 30 days may result in formal disciplinary action against the licensee or applicant.
This is mandated by section 1729.2 of the California Insurance Code to ensure transparency and compliance with regulations.
Potential consequences of non-compliance include fines, suspension of the license, denial of a license application, restrictions on the license, or even revocation of the license. It is crucial for individuals to adhere to this requirement to maintain their licensure in good standing.
For more such questions on disciplinary actions, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/28818118
#SPJ11
Evaluate the extent to which the outcome of the Second World War changed United States foreign policy between 1945 and 1965.
The outcome of the Second World War had a profound impact on United States foreign policy between 1945 and 1965. The war marked the emergence of the United States as a global superpower, and the nation's role in the postwar world would be shaped by a series of key events and decisions.
One of the most significant changes in U.S. foreign policy was the shift toward a policy of containment. This policy, articulated by George F. Kennan in 1947, called for the United States to prevent the spread of communism around the world. The policy led to a series of interventions in countries such as Korea and Vietnam, as the United States sought to contain the influence of communist regimes.
Another major shift in U.S. foreign policy was the development of a system of alliances and treaties designed to promote stability and security in the postwar world. The United States played a leading role in the formation of NATO, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, which served as a bulwark against Soviet expansion in Europe. The United States also entered into a series of alliances and agreements in Asia, including the Southeast Asia Treaty Organization (SEATO) and the Manila Pact.
The outcome of the Second World War also had a significant impact on U.S. economic policy. The United States emerged from the war as the world's dominant economic power, and the nation's leaders sought to promote economic growth and prosperity both at home and abroad. The Marshall Plan, which provided economic aid to Europe in the aftermath of the war, was a key element of this policy, as was the creation of institutions such as the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank.
In conclusion, the outcome of the Second World War had a profound impact on U.S. foreign policy between 1945 and 1965. The emergence of the United States as a global superpower led to a shift toward a policy of containment, the development of a system of alliances and treaties, and a focus on promoting economic growth and prosperity both at home and abroad. These changes would shape U.S. foreign policy for decades to come, as the nation continued to play a leading role in world affairs.
Why are there still fortune hunters in New Mexico looking for lost gold mines? a. The Catholic church still offers a reward for finding old mines. B. The fortune hunters are descendents of the original holders of the treasure. C. Many gold legends have been proven true over the years. D. Legends have been changed over time, making them more believable.
The correct option is option D: Legends have been changed over time, making them more believable.
Several gold tales have been handed down over time, generating a sense of excitement and adventure among treasure hunters, and there are still fortune hunters in New Mexico hunting for hidden gold mines. While some of these stories may be based on historical occurrences, many are certainly exaggerated or made up entirely.
Furthermore, the prospect of discovering lost riches may be quite alluring to certain people, regardless of whether they have any ties to the original owners of the wealth. The Catholic Church does not pay a reward for discovering old mines, and while some treasures may have descendants, this is not a key element in the ongoing interest in discovering lost gold mines.
To learn more about fortune hunters
https://brainly.com/question/22393760
Which of these statements is true regarding the Preamble to the Constitution of the United States?
A.
It establishes the three branches of government.
B.
It sets up the power of the states over the people.
C.
It explains the purposes of the constitution.
D.
It defines the role of the states to the federal government.
Some opponents of President Roosevelt's New Deal programs raised concerns that the programs:
A. Didn't do enough to help people living in poverty.
B. Were not working quickly enough to be effective.
C. Singled out certain segments of the population.
D. Were not administered fairly by the government.
Answer:
Its A
Explanation:
just did the test
What year did the Czech Republic secede?
the rallying cry ""fifty-four forty or fight"" referred to which desired territory?
Answer:
Explanation:
the northern boundary of Oregon was the latitude line of 54 degrees, 40 minutes. "Fifty-four forty or fight!" was the popular slogan that led Polk to victory against all odds. Oregon City, along the banks of the Willamette River, the final stop along the Oregon Trail as it appeared in 1848.