Answer:
A compound subject is a subject that consists of two or more subjects joined by a coordination conjunction.
Explanation :
you welcome.
Please help me fasttttt
Answer: just read the questions carefully. it tells you in the question.
Explanation:
Sometimes writers imply ideas in their writing instead of stating them directly.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Writers can imply ideas using figurative language.
What is the farmer unsure about hurry
Answer:
it is how people in the next town will treat the traveler
Explanation:
i got it correct
Answer:
it is how people in the next town will treat the traveler
Explanation:
Explanation:
Janice got a call from her dad . After she came back from the call , she had tears in her eyes . Her dad must have told her some bad news
Hi, you've asked an incomplete question. I answered from a logical perspective.
Answer:
Maybe
Explanation:
It is still uncertain to conclude that Janice got bad news from her father because we must remember that at times a person may be very much overwhelmed with positive emotions causing tears to fall from their eyes.
For example, her dad may have told her given her an unexpected surprise. But it may also be that she received some bad news.
n the sentence olive to eat offers private in-home cooking demonstrations, the simple predicate is (a) olive to eat, (b) offers, (c) private, (d) demonstrations.
The simple predicate in the given sentence is "offers." The simple predicate, also known as the verb phrase, is the main verb or action that describes what the subject is doing or experiencing.
In this sentence, "offers" is the verb that indicates the action being performed by the subject, which is "olive to eat." The phrase "olive to eat" functions as the subject of the sentence, but it does not represent the complete action. Instead, it provides additional information about the subject.
Therefore, "offers" is the simple predicate because it is the main verb that conveys the action of offering private in-home cooking demonstrations.
To learn more about verb, visit here
https://brainly.com/question/19101867
#SPJ4
From who’s point of view is this?
Answer:
outside the story
Explanation:
why did Christie’s novel 1926 The murder of roger Ackroyd receive so much criticism
Considered by many to be Christie’s masterpiece, the novel is nonetheless controversial for it’s stunning ending. Christie admitted she got the idea for the ending from her brother-in-law, James Watts, who mused on a detective novel in which the criminal turns out to be the “Dr. Watson” character, referring to Watson’s position in Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s Sherlock Holmes series as the companion and chronicler of the brilliant detective.
Agatha Christie's novel "The Murder of Roger Ackroyd," published in 1926, received a lot of criticism because of its controversial ending. The novel is a classic example of the "whodunit" mystery genre, which typically features a crime and a series of suspects, with the reader trying to solve the mystery along with the detective.
Who is Agatha Christie?Agatha Christie (1890-1976) was a British author and playwright, best known for her detective novels and short stories. She is considered one of the most popular and successful authors of the 20th century, and her works have been translated into more than 100 languages.
Christie began writing while working as a nurse during World War I and published her first novel, "The Mysterious Affair at Styles," in 1920. She went on to write more than 80 novels, as well as numerous short stories, plays, and non-fiction works. Her most famous characters include the detectives Hercule Poirot and Miss Marple, who have become iconic figures in the genre of detective fiction.
Throughout her career, Christie was widely acclaimed for her skill in crafting intricate plots and unexpected twists, and for her ability to create memorable characters. Many of her novels have been adapted for stage, screen, and television, and she remains a beloved and influential figure in the world of crime fiction.
Here in the question,
In this novel, the narrator is Dr. James Sheppard, a village doctor who is also a close friend of the victim, Roger Ackroyd. When Ackroyd is found murdered, Sheppard becomes involved in the investigation, and eventually becomes the novel's detective. However, the novel's twist ending reveals that Sheppard is actually the murderer, and has been narrating the story in an attempt to cover up his own crime.
This ending was controversial because it broke with the traditional conventions of the mystery genre, in which the detective is usually a trustworthy and reliable figure. Many readers felt that the ending was a betrayal of the reader's trust, and that it undermined the entire premise of the novel.
Therefore, despite the controversy, the novel was also praised for its innovative narrative technique and for the strength of its characterization. It remains one of Christie's most famous and influential works.
To learn more about Investiture Controversy click:
https://brainly.com/question/14837486
#SPJ2
Research question – Why do people who go to college
get better jobs than those who don't attend any school at
all?
Why is this example considered to be a weak research question?
0
A. The answer can easily be found by checking the facts.
B. The answer is controversial and not assumed to be true.
C. The answer is based on a subjective or personal opinion.
D. The answer is obvious and requires little research to find
PREVIOUS
MI
Finally, I did get across. Late one night me and my wife went. I had gone back to the plantation to get her. Mr. Rankins had him a bell by this time, along with the light. We were rowin and rowin. We could see the light and hear that bell, but it seemed we weren't getting any closer. It took forever, it seemed. That was because we were so scared and it was so dark and we knew we could get caught and never get gone.
Which statement best describes the speaker’s viewpoint of his escape?
He is nervous that Mr. Rankins will make him go back.
He is terrified that he will get caught crossing the river.
He is worried that he will have to leave without his wife.
He is doubtful that he will be free after he crosses the river.
Answer:
B.) He is terrified that he will get caught crossing the river.
Explanation:
Based on context clues, this answer seems to fit best.
How does Jonas respond to the rules and expectations of the community? What conclusions can we draw about what kind of person he is based on his behavior ?
Answer:
Jonas obeys all the rules, but does not agree with any of them. This shows that Jonas has a very respectful and peaceful behavior.
Explanation:
The question above is about "The Giver", a book written by Louis Lowry, where we are introduced to a society that wants to provide equality for all citizens, allowing everyone to act in the same way and have all the same resources. Although it seems like a utopia, this book presents a dystopia, since this attempt is corrupted and has bad results.
The protagonist of this book is called Jonas, a boy who was chosen to be, the giver, a person who must store the memory of the whole society. It is because of this duty that Jonas begins to realize that he lives in a society, that instead of providing equality and freedom, it provides for imprisonment, sadness and limitations. Jonas finds himself in a society full of rules, where it is forbidden to question, forbidden to lie and forbidden to reflect. He disagrees with all of this, but obeys all the rules, as he is an obedient, respectful and peaceful boy.
Gabriela says she does not know if she likes Vietnamese food. What is the most likely reason she doesn't know the answer to this question? What clues in the text suggest the reason?
Answer:
The reason might be so because she has never tasted Vietnamese food?
Explanation:
DIRECTIONS
Use complete sentences to respond to each question about your novel or short story.
Title of short story or novel __________________________________________________
Author ___________________________________________________________________
Rising Action
Think about the protagonist of your novel or short story. List two actions the protagonist takes that increase the conflict. Describe the results of each action.
Protagonist’s Action #1
Result of Protagonist’s Action #1
Protagonist’s Action #2
Result of Protagonist’s Action #2
Think about the antagonist of your novel or short story. List two actions the antagonist takes that increase the conflict. Describe the results of each action.
Antagonist’s Action #1
Result of Antagonist’s Action #1
Antagonist’s Action #2
Result of Antagonist’s Action #2
Climax
Think about the climax of your story. Describe the choice the protagonist makes to change the course of the conflict.
Falling Action
Think about the falling action of your story. Describe one event of falling action that directly follows your protagonist’s choice. for freak the mighty
Answer:
ok here very story takes on a plot, and every piece of writing has a structure. ... novels—that will help frame any current story you're working on, and give you ... events that complicates matters for your characters, and results in increased drama or suspense. ... Rather than calling these plot points, I find it helpful to think of these two ...
Explanation:
Answer:
Choose a clear central message. A great story usually progresses towards a central moral or message. ...
Embrace conflict. As a storyteller, you can't shy away from conflict
Have a clear structure
Mine your personal experiences
Engage your audience
Observe good storytellers
Narrow the scope of your story
Explanation:
HELP!! TIMED!!!
The character of Laertes is an example of a(n)
1-Aside
2-Soliloquy
3-Foil
4-Monologue
Answer: Aside
Explanation:
Answer:Foil
Explanation:he parallels hamlet.
the breedloves' reasons for remaining in the storefront provide what insight?
The Breedloves' decision to remain in the storefront provides insight into their resilience, determination, and the complex dynamics of their lives.
By choosing to stay, they demonstrate their refusal to be defeated by their circumstances by inequalities. It reveals their unwavering hope for a better future and their commitment to making the best of their current situation. Their decision also highlights the limitations and barriers they face, as they lack the means or opportunities to improve their circumstances.
It sheds light on the systemic inequalities and social barriers that marginalize and trap them in their current environment. Overall, their choice to remain in the storefront reflects their resilience in the face of adversity and their enduring desire for change and upward mobility.
To learn more about inequalities, visit here
https://brainly.com/question/30447229
#SPJ4
I need help please I will give brainleist loves.
Answer:
The answer is B
Explanation:
Ur welcome :) (t would be kind to make me brian list)
When you write a compare-and-contrast
O avoid explaining how both works develop the theme.
compare and contrast how the themes are developed.
Obe sure to use transitions and avoid literary devices.
O explain why the author chose a particular theme.
essay about a common theme, you must
When writing a compare-and-contrast essay about a common theme, it is important to compare and contrast how the themes are developed in both works.
The correct answer to the given question is option 2.
When writing a compare-and-contrast essay about a common theme, it is important to analyze how the themes are developed in both works. Rather than simply explaining how each work individually develops the theme, focus on examining the similarities and differences in their approaches.
To effectively compare and contrast the development of the theme, use transitions to guide the reader through your analysis. Transitions such as "Similarly," "In contrast," "Likewise," and "On the other hand" can help signal the shift between discussing each work's development of the theme.
Avoid relying heavily on literary devices in your essay. Instead, focus on analyzing the techniques and strategies used by the authors to develop the theme. Look for similarities and differences in their use of characterization, plot structure, symbols, imagery, or narrative style.
Lastly, instead of explaining why the author chose a particular theme, center your analysis on how the theme is developed in each work. Analyze the choices made by the authors in terms of plot events, character motivations, or thematic elements to highlight the similarities and differences in the development of the theme.
By following these guidelines, you can create a strong compare-and-contrast essay that explores the development of a common theme in multiple works, providing insightful analysis while avoiding literary devices and explaining the author's choice of theme.
For more such questions on theme, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/30094980
#SPJ8
The author claims, "However, there is no research to support the idea that teens share too much personal information online."
Which sentence would be best to add after the second sentence in paragraph 2, to support the claim?
A.
There is a lot of research to support the idea that teens are, in fact, better at monitoring what they post than most of the adults in their lives.
B. Dely, a local university professor, believes teens should be able to keep their social media private because they have grown up learning how to use this kind of technology.
C.
A recent study, conducted by leading child psychologist A. Dalry, found that teens have a more acute sense of privacy than adults realize.
D.
In fact, one can find numerous blog posts on the Internet that argue teens have a greater sense of privacy than adults do.
Answer:
I think the answer is A
Explanation:
write the sentence in indirect speech: Mbali asks,"do i go to church?"
Answer:
To change this sentence into indirect speech, it would become "Mbali asked if she should go to church."
Hope this helps!
P.S. There are many different ways to change this sentence into indirect speech. My answer may not be word-for-word correct, but if you change i tup a little bit I'm sure it will work! :D
Explanation:
When Benvolio sees the servants of both families fighting, he yells "Part, fools! Put up your swords." What is he trying to do?
Join in on the fight
Help the others hang up their swords
Make fun of everyone for being immature
Stop the fighting and keep the peace
Answer:
Stop fighting and keep the peace.
Explanation:
Benvolio is not very interested in fighting (at least in this scene.) He’s a foil to Tybalt, who then comes in and tries to start a fight. I hope this is accurate & helpful!
ead the excerpt from Queen Elizabeth's Response to Parliament's Request That She Marry. The realm shall not remain destitute of any heir that may be a fit governour, and peradventure more beneficial to the realm, than such offspring as may come of me: For though I be never so careful of your well-doing, and mind ever so to be, yet may my issue grow out of kind, and become perhaps ungracious. What is Queen Elizabeth's purpose in this excerpt
Answer:
to persuade Parliament that simply because she has a child does not guarantee that the child will be a competent ruler
Explanation:
THESE ARE THE OPTIONS FOR THE QUESTION
to persuade Parliament that the method of choosing successors to the throne based simply on birthright needs to be revised
to persuade Parliament that her child should not be considered a possible choice for successor to the English throne
to persuade Parliament that simply because she has a child does not guarantee that the child will be a competent ruler
to persuade Parliament how catastrophic it could be if they acted ungraciously toward her or her child
Queen Elizabeth's purpose as regards to the excerpt is that she was persuasive towards the Parliament, and this because she knows that having a child is not a yardstick that the particular child will grown to become a
competent ruler.
Answer:
What is Queen Elizabeth's purpose in this excerpt?
to persuade Parliament that the method of choosing successors to the throne based simply on birthright needs to be revised
to persuade Parliament that her child should not be considered a possible choice for successor to the English throne
to persuade Parliament that simply because she has a child does not guarantee that the child will be a competent ruler------>>>correct
to persuade Parliament how catastrophic it could be if they acted ungraciously toward her or her child
Explanation:
100% on Edge 2021
Can someone please describe what this means. Please help me
Answer: I believe it means that Anne frank was used as a symbol of the children's promise or their potential because of her death while knowing that she was very bright herself.
Explanation:
Is anyone on here a veterinarian or going to college too be one?
Answer:
no but ik ppl are
Explanation:
In paragraph 9, the author uses the simile "mad as a hornet" because it -
A. O helps create the image that Mrs. Cross was speaking kindly to the narrator
B. O helps the reader visualize how angry Mrs. Cross was
C.
is a vivid image, and it helps the reader imagine the narrator's mood
D. O makes it easier to follow the plot of the story
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Answer:
B
Explanation:
The reason why B is because they are describing how mad she is.
Convert this simple sentence into compound and complex by expand it and using conjunctions.
"I finished my homework"
Answer:
I finished my homework, and I think I will go play with Lucy, my dog!
Explanation:
Hope this helps...:)
read the sentence from paragraph 8. What can the reader infer from this sentence?
Answer:
B
Explanation:
they are not sure if that's what they really want & they don't trust the government either.
What does this ironic twist at the end tell us about the author's attitude toward status? Use evidence from the story to support your answer.
I have looked this question up. It is about the short story "The Diamond Necklace," by Guy de Maupassant.
Answer and Explanation:
The main character, Madame Loisel, is a woman who dreams of being rich. She resents her social status, especially the lack of money to buy the fancy things she has a taste for. One day, as she and her husband are invited to a ball, Madame Loisel borrows a necklace from a friend whose social status is superior to her own. She loses the necklace and, to replace it, spends ten years of her life working herself old and "ugly" (to her standards).
At the end, the ironic twist lies in the fact the the necklace she lost was a fake one. There is a lot to be interpreted here, especially the fact that Madame Loisel never even thought to ask if the necklace she was borrowing was made of real diamonds or not. She just assumed it was because that is how she views rich people. She thinks of them as having money to spare, so they would have no reason to buy a fake necklace.
The ending also reveals Maupassant's own attitude toward status. Unlike his character, he is not fooled by a person's appearance of wealth. It is all appearance after all, a façade. There is no reason to marvel at the life of a wealthy person. They are not happier or better than anyone else.
From BBC ShakespeaRe-Told Macbeth:
1, What do the garbage collectors predict in their second visit that convinces Joe he will get to keep the restaurant?
2, What happens to fulfill their prediction?
Answer:
82
Explanation:
99 + 53
1
if there any links u will get banned
Answer:
bro this is the answer ☝️☝️☝️☝️☝️☝️☝️
Answer:
false.
Explanation:
if u turn it once the top will no longer have that tip at the top, it will be flat at the top.
How did Percy get away from Grover at the bus station?
Answer:
Percy got away from Grover when Grover had to go to the bathroom.
Explanation:
In the book it says,
"Confession time: I ditched Grover as soon as we got to the bus terminal.
I know, I know. It was rude. But Grover was freaking me out, looking at me like I was a dead man, muttering "Why does this always happen?" and "Why does it always have to he sixth grade?"
Whenever he got upset, Grover's bladder acted up, so I wasn't surprised when, as soon as we got off the bus, he made me promise to wait for him, then made a beeline for the restroom. Instead of waiting, I got my suitcase, slipped outside, and caught the first taxi uptown."
Hope this helped!
Stay safe! <3
Part A
How does Agamemnon attempt to get Achilles to fight in "Agamemnon's Appeal to Achilles" and "The Arming of Patroclus"?
Agamemnon offers him great gifts.
Agamemnon promises to win the war.
Agamemnon make sacrifices to the gods.
Agamemnon sends Achilles' friends to him.
Question 2
Which evidence from the text best supports the answer in Part A?
Select the two correct answers.
"'And now, as I did him wrong, so I will make amends. I will send back the maiden Briseis, and give him much more besides.'"
"'The king has sent us to offer you gifts, great and many, for the wrong that he did to you.'"
"'You are welcome, my friends,' cried Achilles, 'for though I am angry with the king, you are not the less my friends.'"
"'And if you have no thought for Agamemnon, yet have thought for the people who perish because you stand aside from the battle
Answer: this is what i got answers are PART A IS D: Agamemnon offers him great gifts.
PART B IS A:'And now, as I did him wrong, so I will make amends. I will send back the maiden Briseis, and give him much more besides.'"
AND C:The king has sent us to offer you gifts, great and many, for the wrong that he did to you.'"
Explanation:
Answer:
The answer to part A is D) "Agamemnon offers him great gifts"! The answer for part B is A) & B) "'And now, as I did him wrong, so I will make amends. I will send back the maiden Briseis, and give him much more besides.'" and "'The king has sent us to offer you gifts, great and many, for the wrong that he did to you.'"
Explanation: I took the test and these were the answers! I got 100% These are correct!